[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 11 KB, 279x200, Gilles_Deleuze.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16529125 No.16529125 [Reply] [Original]

>Beneath the scintillating stylistic facade of a "rhizomatic" prose, Deleuze tirelessly and monotonously underscores the same essential point again and again: Everything exists on one ontological level alone; everything is to be situated on a single "plane of immanence": therefore, the temptation to posit split tiers of existence (such as Plato's division between the visible and intelligible realms and Kant's noumenal-phenomenal opposition) must be resisted.

>> No.16529156

>>16529125
>Kant's noumenal-phenomenal opposition
and how does he avoid Hume's scepticism then?

>> No.16529188
File: 253 KB, 648x720, 1601468510282.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16529188

>>16529125
Must difference be mediated by Identity, Analogy, Opposition, and resemblance inorder to be livable and thinkable? What is the nature of the propitious moment?

>> No.16529249

>>16529156
>how does he avoid Hume's scepticism then?
He doesn't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilles_Deleuze#Epistemology

>> No.16529254

>>16529188
Deleuze, easy on the rhizomes...

>> No.16529744

>>16529254
kek

>> No.16529746
File: 117 KB, 279x401, rhizome.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16529746

Deleuze is Catholic creationist actually, as this book explains http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=35F18F9D14D99AFAB5FFF7EADF6DCA06

>> No.16530755

>>16529746

Could this be... a Based Deleuze?

>> No.16530776

>>16529125
Basically. And he has no good reason for underscoring that point.