[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 51 KB, 655x527, pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16480508 No.16480508[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

The idea that God is everything renders the concept of God useless

>> No.16480513

>>16480508
How so?

>> No.16480516

>>16480508
>frogposter
>being retard
every time

>> No.16480532

>>16480513
if it is everything then may as well be nothing

>> No.16480542

>>16480513
If everything is God... then nothing is ;)

>> No.16480570

>>16480532
>>16480532
God cannot be contained within any kind of parameters. If you are imagining something which can be contained then that thing is not God.

>> No.16480598

>>16480508
I think most of the time when people say "God is everything" there's an implied "and more!" tacked on

>> No.16480599

>>16480570
you can't even imagine god but know his existence?

>> No.16480618

>>16480508
Yes.

>> No.16480648

>>16480599
I said this
>imagining something which can be contained
I can imagine, or a better word is conceptualise, something which cannot be contained.

>> No.16480707

>>16480532
>>16480542
Conceptualizing God this way with finite thought is one thing; directly experiencing God as everything is something else altogether and beyond finite thought.

>> No.16480724

>>16480707
In the 'direct experiences' I've had with God I was in a state of mind in which it wouldn't even be meaningful to ask things like 'is God everything' because you are aware of a kind of radically different ontological structure than what we normally perceive to be reality. I am obviously mentally ill though and cannot separate my illness from my religious feelings very well.

>> No.16480734

>>16480508
If god knows everything then god knows what if feels like to fuck a baby? So god is a babyfucker?

>> No.16480739

>>16480734
God also knows what it is like to be the baby, the baby's family, and the nurse that watched the whole thing

>> No.16480746

>>16480734
logical fallacies are not comedic if they are pertaining to marriage or religion or both, this nugget will help you in your life anon. In short: never make jokes about marriage or religion

>> No.16480752

>>16480532
Yes, now you grasp the Ayin of Ein Sof.

>> No.16480753

>>16480739
Not only is god the cucker but also the cucked. Interesting, how may I go about worshipping this god?

>> No.16480759

>>16480532
>>16480542
How about everything and nothing being just modes of the Substance, which has unlimited perfection in its own genre

>> No.16480794

>>16480746
Get that bbc out yo ass faggot and stop being so serious.

>> No.16480799
File: 5 KB, 156x160, th (7).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16480799

>>16480508
God's a higher aleph number

>> No.16480808

>>16480759
Any logically consistent absolutism has to admit of no real modification of the Absolute, which disqualifies it from being a substance which makes up everything including the changing world, the Absolute can be both transcendent and immanent and preserve Its unconditioned nature in Its higher transcendent form, but to make the Absolute only immanent as the world, the physical universe and its laws is to land oneself in too many contradictions and unresolved problems.

>> No.16480814
File: 197 KB, 1377x960, spinoza.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16480814

>>16480508
Got is an infinite substance containing infinite attributes each of which expresses an infinite essence.

>> No.16480819

>>16480794
Comedy is serious. You need to relax mate, are you constipated what's going on?

>> No.16480827

>>16480814
*subverts your path*

>> No.16480841

>>16480753
Idk everyone has different ways. Personally, I dont worship God as much as I seek to understand him

>> No.16480846

>>16480819
Proof?

>> No.16480849

>>16480846
Axioms and inquiries do not require such things.

>> No.16480866

>>16480841
How could you a mortal ever come close to understanding a god?

>> No.16480869

>>16480849
That's what I thought bitch.

>> No.16480899

>>16480866
I won't, but I plan on being closer to God when I go to bed than I was when I woke up

>> No.16480924

>>16480516
lol

>> No.16482616

>>16480532
why
>>16480542
why

>> No.16482710

>>16480570
>using a word you admit is undefinable
cease doing this

>> No.16482759

The one becomes all. All beings are aspects of the universal being. That's the profundity of monotheism.

2 = 1 + 1
3 = 1 + 1 + 1
4 = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1
...

You could say every number is just a bunch of ones, but that doesn't render the concept of one useless. When we look at 4, we know it to be a type of oneness, i.e., a group of four ones. I would say that everything in existence, every being that is a type of number, or a true number as some think, and one is God.

>> No.16482816

>>16480508
By that logic every metaphysical opinion renders itself useless. "if everything is material then the concept of material is useless"?

>> No.16482836

>>16482710
>>using a word you admit is undefinable
>cease doing this
You first. Most words are not precisely defineable and only used for their pragmatic value.

>> No.16482884

>>16482836
Every word I use has a specific definition. Stop being dishonest.

>> No.16482895

>>16482884
A specific definition? Every word you use has DOZENS. That's what I'm getting at. You can pretend like you can define things well, but it's pretty much level 1 of Socratic skepticism to point out that you can't even define a table, because at what point does it become a stand or a counter etc. Stop being anal.

>> No.16482898

>>16482895
You literally used a word you defined as undefinable. Don't act like thats the same way people normally use words.

>> No.16482908

>>16482898
It can have dozens of definitions as well but none will be accurate. As is the case with literally every word:
>it's pretty much level 1 of Socratic skepticism to point out that you can't even define a table, because at what point does it become a stand or a counter etc.

>> No.16482915

>>16480508
If everyone is human then no one is human

>> No.16482921

>>16482816
It renders 'everything' useless, which it is - a devalued word

>> No.16482946

>>16482908
multiple definitions are better than zero you absolute pseud

>> No.16482953

>>16482946
So then you must be glad that I said it can have dozens of definitions as well. Yet you are seething...

>> No.16482962

More so it reveals the profundity of the emptiness, the womb of all

>> No.16482973

>>16482953
But if it has dozens of definitions, then it can't also be undefinable. Definitions provide perimeters, which you said god can't be confined in. You contradict yourself

>> No.16482992

>>16482973
>if it has dozens of definitions, then it can't also be undefinable
You said it was undefinable. >>16480570 said merely that it cannot be contained
>Definitions provide perimeters
Not parameters that can contain the whole thing. I can define you as the person that responded to me. That doesn't exhaust you or define you well, but it's all I can work with at this point.
And I can defined God as the source of being, as the liberator of Israel from Egypt, as the Father of Christ, but all those are as exhaustive as my definition of you. Which is not exhaustive at all, not even a fraction of who it really is, is contained in the definition.

>> No.16483421

If God was a loving God he would have got ma a Goddes by now. He hasn't, so I render God useless.

>> No.16483794

>>16482992
based and monad-pilled

>> No.16484271

>>16483421
>who is Sophia

>> No.16484469

Universe is everything, but we can distinguish different entities inside it at different levels of concretion.

>> No.16484583
File: 1.81 MB, 1400x5426, Catholic - God's Existence.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16484583

>>16480508
>The idea that God is everything

That's pantheism. You're right to reject it.

>> No.16484590
File: 121 KB, 647x338, Edouard Phillipe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16484590

>>16480508
No, it changes how you think of everything. By attributing to everything properties you previously were attributing only to God. Say I realize everything, looked really closely, is actually made of cheese ; am I not learning something new about the world? I used to think cheese was a very specific, separate thing from your mom, but now I discover I've been putting my dick in cheese.
Is that hard for your little brain? This whole board is for pseuds.

>> No.16485684

>>16484583
>applying causation to the beginning of time itself
only a retard would do this

>> No.16485739

No.. God is Infinite Existence-Awareness-Bliss.
Due to the virtue of existing, everything that exists is God.
From one angle God is a separate thing, but from another all is God.