Why are leftists so dumb

[Anonymous No.16479640]

[Anonymous No.16479648]

>>16479640
>t. incel

[Anonymous No.16479662]

>>16479648
t. incel-turned-tranny

[Anonymous No.16479673]

[Anonymous No.16479679]

>>16479673

[Anonymous No.16479685]

>>16479640
Get out

[Anonymous No.16479686]

>>16479679
that’s you after you take the /pol/ to tranny pipeline

[Anonymous No.16479692]

>>16479640
Based

[Anonymous No.16479711]

Cultural hegemony makes them forget you can be wrong sometimes

[Anonymous No.16479721]

Go back to /pol/

[Anonymous No.16479742]

leftism is for dumb people. It's not a coincidence the nazis read philosophy and history while the left reads star wars fantasies

[Anonymous No.16479795]

>>16479686
>that’s you after you take the /pol/ to tranny pipeline

[Anonymous No.16479828]

>>16479640
name a smart "conservative" under 40 years old

[Anonymous No.16479848]

>>16479640
I would have told you to fuck off yesterday but that spam today is a new low from leftypol.

[Anonymous No.16479862]

Why is /lit/ called a literature board?

[Anonymous No.16479863]

>>16479828
Imagine thinking anyone here is a neocon

[Anonymous No.16479890]

>>16479648
Incels briefly occupying the interest of mainstream journalists and academics was a good litmus test of whether the supposedly revolutionary '68 episteme actually exists, i.e., whether several generations of "postmodern thinking" and non-stop deconstruction of all traditional norms, hierarchies, and "power-knowledge" actually made human beings fundamentally more compassionate, understanding, or adept at identifying systemic oppression and subaltern voices at the everyday level.

What happens when a completely monstrous person “of color” tortures and murders some white child or shoots a cop in the face in cold blood? The institutionalized postmodernists rush in to remind everyone that institutions are structurally and systemically oppressive, and that this unfortunate individual incident shouldn't blind us to the structural factors that gradually and systemically caused the young person to lash out.

We shouldn't simply follow our gut and say "Pull yourself up by your bootstraps! Murder and violence are never justified, and no matter how oppressed you are, you aren't entitled to cruelty, hatred, spite, or resentment!" We should constantly remind ourselves against all our instincts that we're occupying the uphill, superior position, the easier position to hold, and we're shouting down at someone who is barely surviving, using this tragedy to justify keeping the structures of oppression in place because "it's fundamentally the individual's responsibility and the individual's guilt." We're supposed to resist the urge to shoot from the hip, and use abstruse Marxian analysis to figure out that resentment-fueled violence really isn't the perpetrator's "fault," but the fault of complex social structures and language-embedded injustices.

[Anonymous No.16479898]

>>16479890
But then when a white guy starts expressing some ennui and sense of alienation, by doing anything less than outright grovelling and cringing and apologizing for feeling this ennui in the first place, at a time when being a "default" young-white-working-class-male means being the most atomized and pointless and taken-for-granted drone in an already atomized and pointless society, every single one of these ultra-subtle critical theorists says the same shit: "LOL what are you a fucking virgin? Man up! Buck up! You don't deserve any sympathy! You aren't guaranteed anything! It's YOUR responsibility to EARN the things you want from life! Just because you're miserable, doesn't mean you have the right to lash out, ever!"

It's a one-to-one analogous case, in the abstract. But there's no analogous consideration of structural or systemic factors, no interest in "seeing the perpetrator as himself a victim," no interest in subtly examining how social isolation almost always leads to short-sighted lashing-out that just leads to worse isolation in a vicious cycle, nothing.

DECADES of postmodern wanking about sympathy for the downtrodden hasn't managed to make that sympathy reflexive. It was all one big role-playing game.

[Anonymous No.16479900]

>>16479862
burgers gonna burger

[Anonymous No.16479909]

>>16479640
>>16479890
>>16479898
post chin

[Anonymous No.16479912]

>>16479909
not an argument, leftoid

[Anonymous No.16479923]

>>16479640
retardation is a universal ailment and affects righties as much as it does leftists, and sparks of genius have emerged within and/or endorsed each side in turn

[Anonymous No.16479928]

>>16479890
You're unironically not a smart person. The issue is that of legalism vs natural law, and secondarily the responsibility of action with intent.

I'm almost certain that you will not understand what I'm telling you because you are a fiend.

[Anonymous No.16479932]

>>16479909
post chin and physique
Also nose while you're at it

[Anonymous No.16479936]

>>16479928
>I'm almost certain that you will not understand what I'm telling you because you are a fiend.

[Anonymous No.16479937]

>>16479928
you're unironically responding to /pol/ copypasta. imagine thinking you have the upper ground while baited. run back to your maoist hellhole

[Anonymous No.16479961]

>>16479928
Doesn't surprise me in the slightest that a faggot like you would redirect people to dated Chinese philosophies. I'm sure you clutch your little red book tightly each night

[Anonymous No.16479968]

>>16479936
Wojak and Greentext response just shows how braindead someone really is

[Anonymous No.16479996]

>>16479968
>Wojak and Greentext response just shows how braindead someone really is