Conservative /lit/

[Anonymous No.16473648]

What are the best Conservative /lit/ websites/magazines?

https://theimaginativeconservative.org/category/books
https://theimaginativeconservative.org/category/literature

[Anonymous No.16473657]

>>16473648
the American conservative

[Anonymous No.16473684]

>>16473648
Steve Sailer, that's pretty much it. Ross Douthat at the NYT just steals Sailer's ideas & makes them somewhat more PC.

[Anonymous No.16474163]

>>16473648
Pat Buchanan's columns

[Anonymous No.16474198]

The American Spectator
https://spectator.org/evelyn-waugh-catholic/

[Anonymous No.16474210]

Sometimes you can find good stuff on:

city-journal.org
quillette.com

[Anonymous No.16475539]

>>16474163
Buchanan's been great recently on Chronicles

[Anonymous No.16475560]

>>16473648
Animal Farm

[Anonymous No.16476302]

>>16473657
This right here. The comment sections however are filled with reddit tier "I fucking Love Science" people, polyamorists who think that the only Christians with substantive faith are those who tolerate his sinful relationships and retards who think Conservatism is a monolith and have never heard of paleo conservatism despite reading a paleocon mag because they're only there to write snarky comments.

[Anonymous No.16476313]

>>16473648
a black gent with the surname Longenecker wrote an article about lynching? interesting

[Anonymous No.16476329]

>>16473648
The right can't write

[Anonymous No.16476332]

>>16473648
>2020
>being a conservative

[Anonymous No.16476351]

>an ideology that has almost politburo levels of focus on producing agitprop
>writing anything worth reading

[Anonymous No.16476440]

The Claremont Review of Books.

[Anonymous No.16476507]

>>16476329
rowling is not right wing lmao that woman is super lefty
lived off govt welfare for a period of months to years, donates vast monetary amounts to LGBT charities, regularly talks about her characters being black or gay or whatnot
Rowling is what americans call a 'terf' because she's been physically and sexually abused in the past and because of that doesn't believe that we should remove sex-segregation in public spaces
Men, males, are the vast majority of rapists, murderers, physical abusers; so why would we allow them into womens spaces?

[Anonymous No.16476567]

>>16476507
you really fell for the shittiest bait on this board

[Anonymous No.16476587]

>>16476567
fuck me, I had a thought it was bait but I'm a new /lit/ pseud so I guess I just bit anyways

[Anonymous No.16476629]

>>16476507
New?

[Anonymous No.16476655]

>>16476629
>>16476587

[Anonymous No.16476868]

>>16473648

The National Review hosts the Great Books podcast. It's pretty good.

[Anonymous No.16476892]

>>16476329
the only leftist their Is Marx as Wilde
hahaahah

[Anonymous No.16476997]

>>16476892
Smith was leftist: he hated corporations, landlords, and believed in self employment
Orwell: obviously leftist
DFW: hated capitalism, leftist
Dumas: hated racism as a black man, leftist
Tolstoy: anarchist, hates capitalism and hierarchies
Marx: duh
Darwin: was pro science, leftist
Wilde: duh
Camus: left anarchist
Nietzsche : thought fundamental to left wing social movements and critical theory, and the right resisted association with him
Rousseau : huge egalitarian, leftist
Goethe: called himself a liberal

[Anonymous No.16477019]

>>16473648
First Things and The Josias.

>>16476302
I like Dreher, but the comment section of American Conservative really is terrible.

[Anonymous No.16477040]

>>16473648
I like The Orthosphere

[Anonymous No.16477046]

You'll run into a lot of good thinkers here.

https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/

[Anonymous No.16477049]

>>16476868
It's simply "National Review." Adding an extra "the" is a widely mocked error

just telling you now before you make a fool of yourself at your next political function

[Anonymous No.16477055]

>>16476332
I wonder why anyone in 2020 would not be a progressive.
Does anyone know why? Let's take a look here

https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2020/09/29/author-apologizes-inside-higher-ed-article-he-recently-wrote-opinion

This kind of thing looks pretty comfy. Dunno why conservatives can't see this.

[Anonymous No.16477056]

>>16473648
>America must return to the noble traditions of her founders
So it's a website for liberals.

[Anonymous No.16477149]

>>16477055
That was one of the most disturbing and pathetic articles I have ever read. I am physically revolted that supercuck is the same race as me.

Pic is what a male with non functional testicles looks like.

[Anonymous No.16477186]

>>16477056
for grumpy liberals

[Anonymous No.16477349]

>>16476868
>>16477049
National Review's actual articles are crap though.
They unironically host neoliberal jews whining about "dose darn evil redneck whiteys who should just go die if they can't outcompete government incentivized immigrants (who should be brought in even if they're economically unviable)". It's like a parody of Bush-era GOP faggotry half the time. Even blatant populist rightwing papers manage better.

[Anonymous No.16477378]

>>16476997
Not that I give a shit about the bait image but:
>Darwin: was pro science, leftist
Pure bait.
>Nietzsche : thought fundamental to left wing social movements
They were calling him evil for ages right up until flanderized versions were popularized in english.
>Rousseau : huge egalitarian, leftist
An avid nationalist who thought people who obsessed about aiding foreigners were only doing it to avoid their actual responsibilities to their own people.
>Goethe: called himself a liberal
As did half the non-monarchist conservatives in Europe before the term got associated with open borders faggotry.

[Anonymous No.16477417]

>>16473648
I like unconstrainedanalytics.org

[Anonymous No.16477428]

>>16476507
>lived off govt welfare for a period of months to years

So is national socialism a left wing ideology?