next /lit/ trend?

[Anonymous No.16450928]

We've had a Guenon meme, a deleuze meme, a whitehead meme, an aquinas meme, a land/acc meme, and probably a million other stupid memes I'm forgetting.

What will be the next philosophical meme-trend on lit? I vote for wittgenstein.

[Anonymous No.16450948]

Wittgenstein can't really be a trend since most on /lit/ have read him.

[Anonymous No.16450949]

>>16450928
Wittgenstein is literally autistic. Like he literally jerked off ti numbers. Fucking mentally ill kikes.

[Anonymous No.16450960]

>>16450928

Andrei Bely

[Anonymous No.16450962]

retvrn to tradition

[Anonymous No.16450970]

>>16450928
Wagnerian shit, it's already happening.

[Anonymous No.16450973]

The guenon poster was a meme or a serious idiot? We'll never know

[Anonymous No.16451206]

>>16450928
We need to make Gustavo Bueno and the School of Oviedo the new trend.

[Anonymous No.16451213]

>>16450973
He was a schizo so he was more or less serious

[Anonymous No.16451283]

>>16450948
I highly doubt anyone beyond a select few have actually delved into Wittgenstein, most comments concerning him on this board are trite simplifications and misunderstandings

[Anonymous No.16451315]

probably an object oriented ontology meme

[Anonymous No.16451323]

>>16450970
Seconded.
Wagner is not as easy to get into as Ludwig "I dont read any philosophy texts" Wittgenstein.

[Anonymous No.16451344]

>>16450928
>a whitehead meme
Link?

[Anonymous No.16451349]

Spinoza

[Anonymous No.16451396]

>>16451344
between 2-1 year ago we had an anon making frequent 'read whitehead' threads

[Anonymous No.16451402]

>>16450928
Analytic philosophy I don't think stands up to critical scrutiny. It's pretty obvious that Frege was wrong that language can be generalized from mathematics. There is no necessary connection between general propositions and tautological ones. It might have made sense to Frege, who was a Platonist, to say that language (general propositions) are a more general form of math (which is tautological in form), but anyone who has operated a computer would find no evidence that Frege was right.

Also, if analytic philosophy really were so powerful as people thought it was in the 1920's, how come we still have a full plate of philosophical questions that Wittgenstein thought we could only be silent about? Obviously the reason why is because Tractatus proposition 6.54 is where the book should have ended, and proposition 7 is empty verbiage.

[Anonymous No.16452001]

>>16450928
Judaism is the next trend, in already getting ahead of the trend.

[Anonymous No.16452041]

>>16452001
I've been waiting for Confucianism to come around. It's everything LARPers want from "Traditional Catholicism", and more.

[Anonymous No.16452106]

>>16450928
My bet goes on Henri Bergson. Once anon gets a hold of the Creative Mind he will won't put it away. Bergson is the philosopher for the pseud.

[Anonymous No.16452131]

>Yes, I do start Wittgenstein threads, how did you know?

[Anonymous No.16452134]

it needs to be such that you nor anybody else EVER reads them

so not wittgenstein

maybe some gnostic shit

[Anonymous No.16452141]

>>16450928
Pyrrho
>can't know nuffing
>circles bro
>suspension

pyrrhonian skepticism very vogue in analytic philosophy atleast

[Anonymous No.16452195]

It was hilarious watching the Whitehead memers getting stopped in their tracks by the "retroactive refutation" posters

[Anonymous No.16452232]

>>16450928
People try to force analytics into memes, but it never works. You need some esoteric depth so that people feel more invested in the joke.

[Anonymous No.16452246]

>We've had a Guenon meme, a deleuze meme, a whitehead meme, an aquinas meme, a land/acc meme, and probably a million other stupid memes I'm forgetting.

[Anonymous No.16452486]

>>16451206
This

[Anonymous No.16452493]

>>16451396
>between 2-1 year ago
Time flies wow

[Anonymous No.16452506]

>>16452493
Fruit flies like a banana

[Anonymous No.16452607]

>>16450928
Consider Weininger:
>kantian
>goethe wagner and ibsen shill
>genius discourse, great man theory
>thinly veiled hatred for immanentists in the vein of Hume and Spinoza
>would probably have despised the post-structuralists
>peak incelcore literature, literally metaphysical incelism
>wrote about the moral inferiority of women and judaism, the moral superiority of christianity and the "aryans"
>killed himself at 23
Sex & Character is seriously THE 4cheng book. Unironically go read it, Weininger sounds like an autist ripped straight off of r9k or pol, it's not even funny how well he fits the trope. He even has the fucking lore to go with it. It's also got some subtle radical interpretations of Kant hidden between all the muck which you might find interesting philosophically, but who am I kidding; Nobody on here reads out of genuine curiosity.

[Anonymous No.16452636]

>>16450928
are there any philosophers who talk about gene splicing?

[Anonymous No.16452641]

>>16450928
dont forget the brief esoteric Bentham posting

[Anonymous No.16452843]

>>16450948
kek

[Anonymous No.16452865]

A brilliant and underrated thinker, inspired by Toynbee and Spengler, who personally altered the course of history, who still makes left wingers and third worlders seethe with impotence, who once used an entourage of whores to smuggle himself into Paris so he would not be convicted for crimes against humanity by the Hague? A lover? A warrior? A scholar? A statesman? A metaphysician perhaps?

[Anonymous No.16452879]

>>16451206
>>16452486
>hates anglos
>catholic atheist
>platonist
>thomist
>nationalist
>marxist yet supports capitalism
Based af

[Anonymous No.16452909]

>>16451396
>2-1

[Anonymous No.16452922]

>goodbye faggot post-ironist Quentin
>hello fenian twink duginist Keith

[Anonymous No.16452966]

>>16452607
>>peak incelcore literature, literally metaphysical incelism
What on earth does this mean?

[Anonymous No.16453003]

>>16452865
>used an entourage of whores to smuggle himself into Paris so he would not be convicted for crimes against humanity by the Hague?
Did he really?

[Anonymous No.16453145]

>>16450928
Wittgenstein was a meme back in 2014.
>>16451402
Frege's project wasn't that language can be generalized from mathematics, it was that logic grounded both mathematics and language.

[Anonymous No.16453271]

>>16453145
>Logic grounds both math and language
Sure, but they are still apples and oranges. Either way it's a convenient Platonism; the statement "2+2 = 4" is self-referential and right by definition while the statement "any 2 things are different in at least 30 ways" is not self-referential or definitionally true, but rather it is a fact we have to get by observation.

Also, it doesn't help with the original metaphysical question which was whether math is realist or positivist. (which remains unknowable)

[Anonymous No.16453279]

>>16452041
would be fine with this

[Anonymous No.16453337]

Miguel Serrano

[Anonymous No.16453346]

>>16452246

[Anonymous No.16453398]

>>16450928
>What will be the next philosophical meme-trend on lit?
Ironic psyop charts and Darger posting

[Anonymous No.16453403]

>>16453337
Basado

[Anonymous No.16453438]

>>16450928
Artaud, Mark Fisher, Spinoza

[Anonymous No.16453450]

My bet is on Cassirer and Sorel?

[Anonymous No.16453461]

>>16451206
>>16452486
>>16452879
Based, but Bueno (pbuh) is not as memesy as Maestro

[Anonymous No.16453470]

>>16453461
Veo que eres un hombre de cultura.

[Anonymous No.16453495]

Again: Zurück zu Kant!

[Anonymous No.16453734]

>>16452865
Based Kissinger poster

[Anonymous No.16454154]

>>16453271
how is 2+2=4 self referential?

[Anonymous No.16454219]

>>16451396
time..... time never changes

[Anonymous No.16454686]

>>16452879
>>catholic atheist
???

[Anonymous No.16454712]

>>16450928
We can have Buckley/Vidal again

[Anonymous No.16454999]

>>16450928
Giovanni Gentile, which will lead to the rehabilitation of (italian) fascism

[Anonymous No.16455017]

>>16453271
>the statement "2+2 = 4" is self-referential and right by definition
What definition?

[Anonymous No.16455161]

>>16454154
Not him but the guy he's replying to. 2+2=4 is referencing the same "thing" (referent) as just saying 2+2 or 4 and so on just like saying "the morning star is the evening star" is in both cases referring to Venus.
>>16453271
Agree on the Platonism being Frege's problematic aspect, but it was reasonable enough of him to assume that he could revamp logic so as to be able to account for both language and mathematics. That he was ultimately unsuccessful and dogmatic does not invalidate his achievements (articulating the context principle among other things)

[Anonymous No.16455283]

I wonder how many /lit/fags have engaged in seriously reading philosophical investigations and on certainty. Not many given the meme-tier discussions one often finds here.

[Anonymous No.16455519]

I recommend whippets

[Anonymous No.16455640]

>>16452246
of course, i was mainly referencing philosophy memes