[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 69 KB, 666x707, 1551051470100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16343005 No.16343005[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Can we talk for a second about how much of a total faggot sophist this guy is? I unironically want to break his nerd glasses. Contrarian retard, living proof of too much literature rotting the brain of the midwit
He recently got 0hp Lovecraft, an actually intelligent and genuine account to block him and i know hes seething over it. I think he's really jostled that 0hp's short stories are a million times more clever and interesting and successful than his faggy little book that I can't even repeat the name of because its so cringe. So he's been passive aggressively harrassing 0hp for the past days and finally got what he deserved

>> No.16343019

>>16343005
this is so embarrassing but i actually rewrote the whole first chapter of logo's book
it's so perfectly wrong i couldn't resist

>> No.16343018

How is this literature? What are you on youtube or tweetch or something? Make a thread about a book you read not some faggot making videos about putting dildos in his ass

>> No.16343025

>>16343005
who?

>> No.16343028

>>16343005
I don't know who that is but I wonder why it matters so much to you what some random faglord on the internet does. Just live your life anon, live your life and read slme good books. I recommend Spenser's the faerie queene.

>> No.16343033

>>16343005
am I supposed to know who this is?

>> No.16343037

>>16343028
No, I can do that later. This is fun
>>16343025
>>16343033
Logo Daedalus, an obnoxious pseud from twitter

>> No.16343041

>>16343018
Its literally about literature you fucking faggot, maybe try reading the post. Go look up 0hp lovecraft and read his stories

>> No.16343051

>>16343041
also like all of his threads unrolled are extremely good

>> No.16343056

e-celeb faggotry
sage

>> No.16343062
File: 279 KB, 586x497, 0hp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16343062

>>16343005
>0hp Lovecraft
this is the first thing i saw on his tl
literally no one on twitter has ever read anything, holy FUCK they're retarded

>> No.16343077

>>16343051
>>16343062
this, who even gives a shit

>> No.16343086

>>16343062
>thinks you need to literal irish faggot to make a good point, whether it misunderstands the text or not

>> No.16343088

Yikes. How far we've come to end up exactly nowhere.

>> No.16343091

>>16343005
I don't mind this guy, he seems reasonable at least. 0hp also sometimes says interesting stuff

most of those twitter accounts seem positively deranged, and not in a self-aware way

>> No.16343094

>>16343037
He looks jewish. Is he jewish?

>> No.16343114

>>16343005
k y s

>> No.16343125

>>16343005
Maybe you should debate him OP. Settle this one for /lit/ and achieve victory. Some of us are too old to quibble.

>> No.16343129

>>16343091
I used to like Logo, because he had an interesting perspective on things and led me to look into Pyncheon. But something happened to him, hes recently taken a turn towards suddenly thinking having any opinion whatsoever on current events means you are being psyopped and pretends it makes you part of a rare minority to know what dialectics are. he still occasionally says something good but he clearly jealously harasses people that get more interaction than him. hes also a giant nerd bitch and has way too high of an opinion of himself
>>16343094
claims not to be

>> No.16343134

>>16343129
>claims not to be
Somehow I don't believe him.

>> No.16343137
File: 886 KB, 1199x647, 1551051933534.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16343137

>>16343134

>> No.16343160
File: 70 KB, 594x720, 444.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16343160

logo and kantbot's pivot away from any rightist critique of contemporary politics is a smart one, all the guys still openly aligned right are gonna get their accounts and payment processors nuked on nov 4th.

in terms of quality discussion, twitter was a lot better before all these people tried to make a career out of it

>> No.16343171

>>16343137
That's a pretty impressive nose he has.

>> No.16343176

Why do you people go on Twitter

>> No.16343177

>>16343160
Ah yes, better to compromise your ideas and standpoints to appease the corporate overlords than to find alternative platforms.

>> No.16343178

I'm so confused.

>> No.16343181

>>16343062
Shit like this makes my blood boil; literature is infinitely more important than this

>> No.16343182
File: 128 KB, 1280x720, 1594718952032.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16343182

>>16343177
what is an "idea"? can you define that for me?

>> No.16343184

>>16343005
>when there is one rose amongst an overgrowth of weeds one has a hard time of percieving the rose amongst the weeds and when one finally sees the rose he is either confused or ecstatic, the ugly soul is confused, "why is there a rose amonst these weeds?" but the beautiful soul is ecstatic " there is a rose amongst the weeds!" the sad and ugly man responds to the rose with a question but the happy and beautiful man responds to the rose with an exclaimation for he and the rose speak the same metaphysical language and he need not be confused why the rose is there , therefore ask it no question, for he knows already of the rose

Whoever posted this in a previous logo thread, please provide a source

>> No.16343185

>>16343182
Grab a dictionary, genius.

>> No.16343190

>>16343177
exactly, they are spineless losers. The same reason all of their takes are clouded in obscurity and refusal to take an actual position is the reason they are now going dirtbag left. They have no convictions nor anything original or interesting to say

>> No.16343195

I'm still confused. Also, there are no roses here.

>> No.16343202

>>16343062
>>16343181
Can you tell me what exactly is wrong with this? Do you guys know what Lacanian Psychoanalysis and Girardian analysis mean?

>> No.16343210

Is it that hard to just not check an account you dislike or am I missing something here

>> No.16343219

>>16343210
my personality is such that I cannot resist bashing things I dislike. Its actually one of my most liked things to do

>> No.16343249

>>16343219
This kid is just some inoffensive quipster though. You're all worked up into a lather about diddly squat.