[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 1.21 MB, 1647x2240, freud.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16339381 No.16339381 [Reply] [Original]

>you're just projecting
>you hate others for what you hate in yourself
>have you ever considered that you might be gay because you think that [insert political stance here]?
>the term "pathological" and its abuse
>everything can be traced back to sexuality
>you think "x" because you have mommy/daddy issues/subconscious bias

How do we combat the vulgar freudism that our culture has been steeped in for decades now?

>> No.16339447
File: 25 KB, 512x387, 20200812_115005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16339447

Only talking with those above the age of 18 has done me wonders

>> No.16339460

>>16339447
Midwits love this lukewarm armchair psychologizing sort of shit, though.

>> No.16339473

>>16339381
>>you hate others for what you hate in yourself
This one is absolutely true, not just about hate, but about contempt and in general what people choose to criticize. And it's specifically things about yourself that you hate but that you have buried and refuse to look at. It's also sometimes subtle, in that the thing in yourself is only analogous to something you hate in others, so the resemblance is not immediately obvious.

Freud didn't come up with this though, people have been saying it for centuries at least, Id bet there is a mention of it somewhere in classical texts too.

>> No.16339505

>>16339473
It's by far the most retarded one out of all of them.

>> No.16339527

>>16339473
So I hate murderers and rapists because i'm supposedly a murderer or a rapist? Whoa, such an applicable logic that surely hadn't come from a flawed and fallible perspective.

>> No.16339596
File: 107 KB, 1044x488, 1589661895198.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16339596

>>16339381
>tfw mommy was a cringe Fruedian Steven Pinker pleb instead of a based Deleuzian

>> No.16339602

>>16339527
No, but there may be something in the fact that you felt the need to signal to people that you really "hate murderers and rapists" (how heroic). Wow oh gee I also hate [moral taboo in general]

>> No.16339646

All true

>> No.16339650

>>16339602
>No
Says it all right there. Anything past that point is hypocrisy

>> No.16340178
File: 871 KB, 640x360, based peterson quotes.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16340178

what is hate?

>> No.16340210

>>16339527
There exists in you the same impulse to rape and murder as exists in the rapist, yes. By rejecting him, you reject those parts of yourself.

>> No.16340211

>>16339381
>>16339505
>>16339527
>>16339650
this is a high iq thread

>> No.16340382

>>16339596
Poor dude but I'm keking hard

>> No.16340535

Read Freud before critiquing him.

>> No.16340660

>>16340535
He isnt. He said vulgar freudism, meaning common, lowly and tantamount to calling something "pop" sci.

>> No.16340766

>>16339381
break their jaws so they can't fucking talk, and if they try to type, break their fingers too

>> No.16340819

>>16339381
Name and shame it as the cultural marxism that it is.

>> No.16340836

>>16339473
imo 'let he without sin cast the first stone' is sort of similar if you really grasp

>> No.16340870

>>16339381

he isn’t wrong when it comes to projection. you can’t separate your prior experiences and thought processes from any observations that you make. anybody who sees experiences the world creates it, just as much as it already exists. the trick to winning is not to give a shit if you’re projecting or not

>> No.16340877

>>16340836
Those two are completely unrelated. Casting the first stone is about questioning whether you're in the moral place to begin with to make such judgments; you don't want to cast a stone because you hate people who cast stones.

>> No.16340880

>>16340535
Freudism is not Freud. The Oedipus complex isn't even a sexual idea, using the modern understanding of sexual. But that doesn't stop midwits from name-dropping it as if it were an important insightful idea

>> No.16340941

>>16339381
Why combat it when everything you posted is profoundly based?

>> No.16340948

>>16339381
First step would be to have them read his actual works instead of getting it second hand but who are we kidding

>> No.16341059

>>16339381
His best thesis was that religion is a comforting lie and the only reason man refuses to dispense with it is the fear of facing reality as it is without a celestial parental guardian to shepherd them through danger. Our culture needs more scrutiny of illusions, starting with the most ridiculous, religion.

>> No.16341114

>>16341059
I can think of some rather more obvious illusions in our culture than religion, which talks after all about completely unverifiable metaphysical claims.

>> No.16341137

>>16341059
Ludwig Feuerbach said exactly that like 60 years before Freud.

>> No.16341163

>>16341137
The Enlightenment said that 200 years before Freud

>> No.16341220

>>16341059
That and Jews are somehow people worth keeping around

>> No.16341252

>>16339381
You forgot:
>i have a lot of trauma

>> No.16341301

>>16341114
Expound

>> No.16341309

>>16341301
Six million

>> No.16341571

>>16339473
no its not psued

>> No.16341606

>>16341571
Yes it is

>> No.16342587

>>16339473
I think other people are pretty cool, but I hate myself. How many years of psychoanalysis do I need?