/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16331878]

>He's an Aristotelian
>In 2020
Have you retards heard of Hume? Locke? Science?

[Anonymous No.16331886]

>>16331878
Why are you so obsessed with what posters on this board believe/think? Gotta crush on anon, do we?

[Anonymous No.16331888]

>>16331878
I'm an unrepenting platonist. I've seen shit.

[Anonymous No.16331894]

>>16331888
>tfw anon has glimpsed the realm of the forms

[Anonymous No.16331897]

Aristotle's political analysis was far superior to Locke's gibberish

[Anonymous No.16331899]

someone please post a novel basedjak as I'm on my phone

[Anonymous No.16331910]

>>16331886
>Gotta crush on anon, do we?
Wouldn't that qualify as pederasty, given the median age here is around 12?

[Anonymous No.16331912]

>>16331878
>He's a Humean and a Lockean
>In 2020
Have you retard ever heard of Kant? Hegel?

[Anonymous No.16331916]

>>16331910
Projection or wishful thinking?

[Anonymous No.16331929]

>>16331878
no i'm a whiteheadean rhizomatic nomad neo-china fascist stalinist accelerationist guenonian

[Anonymous No.16331933]

>>16331912
Have you ever heard of Evola? Guénon? You chucklefuck?

[Anonymous No.16331967]

>>16331916
Educated inference based on the content of the board.

[Anonymous No.16331999]

>>16331933
>Guénon?
Based...

[Anonymous No.16332073]

>>16331967
you seem dedicated

[Anonymous No.16332518]

>>16331888
Just listening to an biography of the strong wrestler Plato. His Utopia is hilarious and would never work but it's surprising how much you see later moments try and copy it. Nazis, Communists, movies/television.

[Anonymous No.16332538]

>>16331878
>>He's an [follower of a famous early scientist, both a physicist and zoologist]
>>In 2020
>have you heard of science

[Anonymous No.16332620]

What's wrong with Aristotle?

[Anonymous No.16332629]

>>16331878
this is like saying
>hes a maxwellian in 2020
>haven't you guys heard of quantum electromagnetism?
science doesn't smugly regard everyone in the past as wrong, because it doesn't regard anyone in the present as necessarily correct either, because even technically they weren't. einstein discovered special relativity through newtonian mechanics' incompatibility with maxwell's eqs, even though both of those theories don't explain behaviors we know exist today (wave-particle duality, etc). similarly it would be ridiculous to totally disregard aristotle and his theories and debunks of plato just because much of what he says isn't any longer considered the whole picture (especially when we use a lot of his terminology and insights on a day-to-day basis today)

[Anonymous No.16332631]

>he’s a platonist
Have you ever heard of Aristotle?

[Anonymous No.16332667]

>>16331878
I agree MacIntyre has a major problem in dismissing Aristotle's metaphysics as the ground for his ethics, as if you can do without that foundation. But what is to be done?

[Anonymous No.16332935]

Why do y’all bitches have to hate on anything and deem it inferior just because you think you’re way more intelligent? Goddamn I hope you /lit/ faggots get raped by a gang of niggers on a cold winter night.
You guys act like bunch of cheerleaders talking about how many guys they’ve fucked. Goddamn all of you are pussies.
This is why people hate us, because retards like you have to be gatekeepers.
None of you have come up with anything original, so you faggots need to stop acting like you have the moral high ground just because you thought you were special because you read books as a kid, you dense motherfuckers.

[Anonymous No.16332948]

>>16332935
B8ed hard

[Anonymous No.16332954]

>>16332935
Gatekeeping is good. Gatekeeping is why literature is even held on a high standard in the first place, unlike other art forms like comics.

[Anonymous No.16332973]

>>16331933
Literally who?

[Anonymous No.16332980]

>>16331878
>science
Lmao

[Anonymous No.16332982]

>>16332538
>le aristotle was an early scientist meme
Stop. "Science" in the modern and proper sense of the word starts with the invention of the scientific method.

[Anonymous No.16333267]

>>16332954
Literature does not need gatekeepers the same way religion doesn’t have any, unless yourself are religious.
My point being, Schopenhauer, Adorno, and Locke didn’t have to be gatekeepers.
These writers don’t need gatekeepers.
If you’re into it, you’re into it, but at least they finished writing a draft, you anxiety ridden, stripped of any type of originality, dense motherfucker.

[Anonymous No.16333274]

>science

[Anonymous No.16333278]

>>16332982
Science got kiked a while ago. Kikes have destroyed everything so far. All these bergs and steins have promoted degeneracy. Fuck niggers and Kikes.

[Anonymous No.16333283]

>>16333278
Based

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.16333296]

>>16332935
Sarkeesian isn’t Jewish

[Anonymous No.16333355]

>In the experiments about atomic events we have to do with things and facts, with phenomena that are just as real as any phenomena in daily life. But atoms and the elementary particles themselves are not as real; they form a world of potentialities or possibilities rather than one of things or facts ... The probability wave ... mean[s] tendency for something. It's a quantitative version of the old concept of potentia from Aristotle's philosophy. It introduces something standing in the middle between the idea of an event and the actual event, a strange kind of physical reality just in the middle between possibility and reality.
Heisenberg

[Anonymous No.16333358]

>>16332935
I was about to type an effortpost, but then I realised you don't enjoy the thoughts of those more intelligent.

[Anonymous No.16335156]

>>16333296
armenians are honorary jews

[Anonymous No.16335170]

>>16331878
>he's not a neo-aristotelian
Enjoy your insuperable philosophical difficulties. Tell me again how consciousness suddenly arises when you put enough neurons together.

[Anonymous No.16335186]

>He has an opinion
>In 2020
Have you retards heard of Pyrrho? Nagarjuna?

[Anonymous No.16335197]

>2020
>not a hedonistic high financeer

[Anonymous No.16335215]

>2020
>doing any philosophizing at all, or thinking for that matter
Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got much more important matters to attend to

BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP

[Anonymous No.16335244]

>>16331929
>rhizomatic
Have you even read Deleuze’s book on Hume

[Anonymous No.16335312]

>>16331933
Have you heard of Christopher Langan and his CTMU theory?

[Anonymous No.16335324]

>>16335312
Yes I have. He is a con artist and his ‘theory’ is untestable gobbledygook