/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16331434]

>environmentalist
>anti-corporate
>right wing
>populist

[Anonymous No.16331438]

>big tent

[Anonymous No.16331439]

>>16331434
>Literature

[Anonymous No.16331442]

shut up directionbrain

[Anonymous No.16331449]

>>16331434
can you prove those or are you just jerking off?

[Anonymous No.16331460]

>>16331449
What do I need to prove? I’m sorry I don’t understand your question.

[Anonymous No.16331463]

>>16331434
>populist
automatically non-chad. True chads are elitist.

[Anonymous No.16331622]

>>16331463
Nonsense. The true chads are völkisch.

[Anonymous No.16331633]

>>16331434
>anti-corporate
>right wing
>populist
you can't be anti-corporate and right wing retard

[Anonymous No.16331646]

>>16331633
>hurr durr right wing means laissez faire
Historically illiterate amerifat

[Anonymous No.16331649]

>>16331633
implying corporations aren't a leftist scheme against the monarchy alongside their perfidious banker friends

[Anonymous No.16331660]

>all ethics must be grounded in virtues
>all power must be in the hands of a warrior-nobility that is kept in check by a priest class
>"Good" and "Evil" are ontologically empty terms, "sublime" and "ugly" are the tools of proper reasonable judgement
>rape is a political tool like any other
>the sovereign must draw his legitimacy through the tracing of his bloodline to demigods and heroes of the past golden age

[Anonymous No.16331683]

>>16331633
Duuurrrrrr

[Anonymous No.16331735]

>>16331463
BASED. Fuck the retarded masses

[Anonymous No.16331749]

Just say fascist.

[Anonymous No.16331761]

>>16331434
>environmentalist, anti-corporate, populist
>right wing
Pick one.

[Anonymous No.16331771]

>>16331633
Quite the opposite. You can't be corporate and right wing.

[Anonymous No.16331789]

>>16331761
Cope

[Anonymous No.16331818]

>>16331771
>I have my own special definitions of common words

[Anonymous No.16331833]

>>16331818
Corporate strives for the highest level of profit. That means catering to faggots, niggers, and all those things. Just look at any corporate now. Totally anti-rightwing in every way.

[Anonymous No.16331834]

>>16331818
>how dare you not indulge in the american liberal political dialectic

[Anonymous No.16331869]

>>16331833
That's standard corporate capitalism, hence rightwing. Conservatism versus liberalism has nothing to do with left versus right. The global ruling class are rightwing liberals.

[Anonymous No.16331877]

>>16331834
The "american liberal political dialectic" is what conflates conservatives and rightwingers, dumbass.

[Anonymous No.16331887]

>>16331633
Do people really believe this? Look around right now and you will see the most anti-corporation and dare I say even the full ACAB-pilled are the extreme right wing.

[Anonymous No.16331895]

>>16331887
Are you high?

[Anonymous No.16331923]

>>16331895
If the antifa and blm are fighting against the system why does literally all the corporations as well as universities and a good number of local government and federal bureaucrats support them?

[Anonymous No.16331926]

>>16331633
In that case blm are right wing since corportions are backing them up right?
Corporations are neutral they dont care about ideas they want profit.

[Anonymous No.16331934]

>>16331926
Why do corporations push ideology beyond what makes sense for their bottom line then?

[Anonymous No.16331938]

>>16331660
>>all power must be in the hands of a warrior-nobility that is kept in check by a priest class

>handing the keys to the kingdom to effete bureaucrats with no centrality
>implying the warrior-noble doesn't imply a higher attainment than the priest, who closes himself off from the world, while the warrior tames chaos in both the inner and outer worlds

[Anonymous No.16331940]

>Politics are
>for no-life
>losers

[Anonymous No.16331956]

>>16331895
Is that all you can say? The left is entirely propped up, advertised and funded by the most monopolized corporations in not only America but the entire world while being protected by the police and excused by the establishment. That's why the right says Antifa and pigs deserve eachother. You need to wake up.

[Anonymous No.16331968]

>>16331660
>wanting to be ruled over
What a fag

[Anonymous No.16331971]

>Hohenstaufen loyalist
>Committed to the Reichsgedanke
>Drawing from Germanic tribe soul, Greek philosophy, Roman imperialism and Christian humility

[Anonymous No.16331977]

>>16331923
IdPol is the opposite of leftism.

>>16331956
Lmao. Nice bait, retard.

[Anonymous No.16331998]

>>16331977
Marx was literally about class based IdPol retard.

[Anonymous No.16332010]

>>16331998
Lol, no.

[Anonymous No.16332012]

>>16331818
>I have my own special definitions of common words

[Anonymous No.16332016]

>>16332010
Read

[Anonymous No.16332019]

>>16332016
Read Marx, moron.

[Anonymous No.16332022]

>>16331434
cringe
eh...
eh...
cringe

[Anonymous No.16332035]

>why of course I believe in Christ, if he did not die for our sins how do you explain that every year after winter comes spring and summer again?

[Anonymous No.16332037]

>>16332019
Read das kapital and the communist manifesto retard

[Anonymous No.16332041]

>>16332037
Already have. Clearly you haven't.

[Anonymous No.16332048]

>>16331649
This is absolutely correct. The REAL definition of the left/right spectrum is liberals/socialists vs aristocrats/monarchists

[Anonymous No.16332050]

>Frisian supremacist
>Hyperborean bloodline preserver
>Grutte Pier as patron saint

[Anonymous No.16332053]

>>16331934
becuase they know it's easy to co-opted modern leftoids movements.

[Anonymous No.16332054]

>>16332035
Based

[Anonymous No.16332057]

>>16331660
>>the sovereign must draw his legitimacy through the tracing of his bloodline to demigods and heroes of the past golden age

>tracing mere genealogy as if the sovereign is some performance animal
>not setting up trials and the performance of miracles to prove his attainment and therefore right to rule

[Anonymous No.16332059]

>>16331463
This. True chads are aristocratic and superior hierarchical caste systems

[Anonymous No.16332065]

>>16332041
You clearly haven’t m8.

[Anonymous No.16332066]

>>16331633
read a history book

[Anonymous No.16332071]

>>16332065
You wish, libfag.

[Anonymous No.16332078]

>>16332053
Or you know the leftoid movements were already coopted back in the 70s.

[Anonymous No.16332087]

>>16332071
I’m not lib I’m a national socialist. Explain Marx then fag.

[Anonymous No.16332089]

>>16332041
is-isnt class conciousness literally the self identity creation (ie idpol) of the working class? thats kinda what i got from making of the english working class. NOT THAT IDPOL IN NECESSARILY AND BY DEFINITION WRONG.

[Anonymous No.16332107]

>>16332087
Marx's materialism is the rejection of identity politics.

>>16332089
>isnt class conciousness literally the self identity creation (ie idpol) of the working class?
No. If you work for a living, you are working class regardless of your "self-identity". "Class consciousness" means become aware of the reality of your external material circumstances.

[Anonymous No.16332123]

>>16332107
How is wanting to overthrow the bourgeois in violent revolution not IdPol? Do you have any quotes?

[Anonymous No.16332128]

>>16331977
And you still can't even defend whatever it is you believe that makes you opposed to what I stated above. Quite typical.

[Anonymous No.16332129]

>>16332107
Anon are you not literally assigning identities to different groups of people?

[Anonymous No.16332130]

>>16332123
>How is wanting to overthrow the bourgeois
That's not the end game. The end game is the abolition of private capital.

[Anonymous No.16332149]

>>16332130
But you have to do that to get there don’t you lol?

[Anonymous No.16332172]

>>16331660
This.

[Anonymous No.16332197]

>>16332129
"Identity politics" is based on the social identities that individuals assign to themselves and each other. IdPol proponents define their politics around self-identities like "Latina" or "gay" or what have you. In contrast, the material facts about you -- viz., facts about your economic relation to production -- are true regardless of how you conceive of yourself.

>>16332149
Merely swapping out the particular people in the ruling class changes nothing.

[Anonymous No.16332244]

>>16332197
Everything you just said is a massive cope lol

[Anonymous No.16332254]

>>16332244
>t. seething libfag

[Anonymous No.16332260]

>>16332035
Blessed post.

[Anonymous No.16332330]

>>16332254
Not a lib, not even anti IdPol
>actually this identity isn’t actually an identity because bullshit

[Anonymous No.16332342]

>>16331434
>t.

[Anonymous No.16332344]

>>16332330
Sorry, but you're not making a lick of sense. Use your words, libfag.

[Anonymous No.16332365]

>>16332330
>not even anti IdPol
Of course not. You are pro-IdPol like all libfags. Now go dilate.

[Anonymous No.16332374]

What's the type of government called where every teacher and civil worker checkbox clipboard faggot is killed while roaming Soul Squads go around asking a series of questions and trials to random citizens to make sure they have a soul with any soulless people being sent to trial to make their case they have a soul?
Fail both your trial and your soul test and you're melted down into protein paste because its not really murder.

[Anonymous No.16332444]

>>16331463
based

[Anonymous No.16332448]

>>16331434
>eco-fascism

[Anonymous No.16332890]

>>16332374
Sounds based desu, I’d vote for it.

[Anonymous No.16332916]

This is my politics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJog7PfkNRY&ab_channel=%E0%A5%90LucasLima%E0%A5%90

[Anonymous No.16332928]

>>16331633
Oh fuck off.

[Anonymous No.16332937]

>>16332035
Bless this post.

[Anonymous No.16332972]

>We need to go back.
Okkk. how far? Like the 1950s?
>No.
uhh the 1800s?
>No.
Before the French revolution?
>No. Back to 62.
Uhh, 1762?

>No. 962 AD

[Anonymous No.16332975]

>>16332365
At least he has the decentcy to admit it instead of diluading himself into thinking he is not doing idpol.

Iy you believe something is true, like your class and then you indentify with it, its veracity is besides the point as you still Identify with it.

[Anonymous No.16332977]

>>16331463
The true redpill is to synthesize the two into Caesarianism

[Anonymous No.16332990]

>>16332342
The Liberal stare
vs
The Third Positionist Gaze

[Anonymous No.16332992]

>>16332977
Yes.

>The party ascended the winding way that leads from the Forum to the Piazza of the Campidoglio on the summit of the Capitoline Hill. They stood awhile to contemplate the bronze equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius. The moonlight glistened upon traces of the gilding which had once covered both rider and steed; these were almost gone, but the aspect of dignity was still perfect, clothing the figure as it were with an imperial robe of light. It is the most majestic representation of the kingly character that ever the world has seen. A sight of the old heathen emperor is enough to create an evanescent sentiment of loyalty even in a democratic bosom, so august does he look, so fit to rule, so worthy of man’s profoundest homage and obedience, so inevitably attractive of his love. He stretches forth his hand with an air of grand beneficence and unlimited authority, as if uttering a decree from which no appeal was permissible, but in which the obedient subject would find his highest interests consulted; a command that was in itself a benediction.

“The sculptor of this statue knew what a king should be,” observed Kenyon, “and knew, likewise, the heart of mankind, and how it craves a true ruler, under whatever title, as a child its father.”

[Anonymous No.16333069]

>>16332975
Nope, not even close.

[Anonymous No.16333746]

>>16332035
amen

[Anonymous No.16333945]

>>16331761
might want to look into what country first implemented environmentalist policies there big guy protip it's one you don't like