[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 249 KB, 540x540, Thomas-Sowell-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16330983 No.16330983 [Reply] [Original]

Read all these, where do I go next?

>> No.16331015

>>16330983
Thomas Sowell man among my mentor

>> No.16331111

>>16330983
Kys rightoid chud

>> No.16331120
File: 668 KB, 939x949, 1559647332553.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16331120

The plantation.

>> No.16331207

>>16331015
>Thoms Sowell my Tor

>> No.16331297

>>16330983
He is a useful idiot

https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2016/10/28/sowell-choose-trump-hes-much-easier-to-impeach/

>> No.16331350

>>16331297
Thanks for this. This proves once and for all that le based black economist is nothing but a midwit.

>> No.16331395

Industrial Society and its Future.

>> No.16331401
File: 12 KB, 249x202, LitChart238.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16331401

Read this

>> No.16331426

>>16330983
Marx

>> No.16331490

>>16330983
Are you looking for books on economics or race relations?

>> No.16331558

>>16331401
dial 8

>> No.16331567

>>16331350
>>16331297
>makes an argument for picking one out 2 equally awful options for president.

How does this make him an idiot?

>> No.16331614

>>16331401
Very good book list

>> No.16331692

uncle tom

>> No.16331694

>>16330983
Talib (pbuh)

>> No.16332547

>>16330983
to the nearest cliff so that you may jump off it

>> No.16332557

>>16331567
because trump is the great litmus test as to whether a public figure has principles or is just a mouthpiece for the deep state

>> No.16332625

>>16331401
these are some good books

>> No.16332665

>>16331111
waste of digits

>> No.16334313

>>16330983
Cool chart OP.

>> No.16334565

>>16330983
You skipped Intellectuals and Society?

>> No.16334701
File: 193 KB, 1024x917, dangerdog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16334701

>>16331401

>> No.16334715

>>16331401
Did not expand the picture because I absolutely do not want to read some Ŕéńé Ǵúéńóń

>> No.16334901

>>16331401
Fuck this

>> No.16334928

>>16331401
Very good chart

>> No.16334942

>>16330983
fox news
>>16331401
rofl

>> No.16335033

>>16331401
Fuck

>> No.16335045

>>16331401
Great list.

>> No.16336369

>>16331401
U r cock

>> No.16336444

>>16331401
This

>> No.16336551
File: 169 KB, 480x600, 1599563187896.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16336551

>>16331111

>> No.16337320

>>16331401
nono

>> No.16337333

Something that disagrees with your world view.
>he doesn't alternate reading far right and far left books to get the broadest perspective possible
NGMI

>> No.16337360

>>16330983
Das Kapital

>> No.16337388

>>16331401
Ok

>> No.16337429

>>16330983
>Read all these
What a painfully dull way to spend your time.

>> No.16337887

>>16331401
why?

>> No.16337906

>>16337429
Classic leftist. "It doesn't matter if I'm wrong, it only matters that I'm interesting!"

>> No.16337921

>>16336551
is this achievable natty?

>> No.16337925

>>16330983
>Thom, as Sowell, a man among my mentor.

>> No.16338521

>>16331401
Monkey

>> No.16338529

>>16331401
foock

>> No.16338565

>>16331401
vgitg this is the second time i fell for this today

>> No.16338570

>>16331111
Based

>> No.16338590

>>16331401
.

>> No.16338608
File: 468 KB, 1200x1252, theory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16338608

>>16330983
now read these

>> No.16338648

>>16331401
OH FUCK OH FUCK

>> No.16338654

>>16337906
Leftist? I'm to the right of Sowell. His economic liberalism is a threat to all traditional modes of living.

>> No.16338708
File: 45 KB, 313x475, 154242.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16338708

>>16330983
Ludwig Von Mises and some Rand. Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal specifically.

>> No.16338715

>>16331401
what a chart

>> No.16338716

>>16331401

>> No.16338716,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>16331401
replying on this archive because i'm banned from 4chan but i need my mommy :(

>> No.16338729

>>16332557
If in any capacity you need to redound your argument to Trump you're a brainlet.

>> No.16338822

>>16331401
based

>> No.16338826

>>16331401

>> No.16339043

>>16331401
more rightoid bait

>> No.16339079

>>16331401
Bait

>> No.16339136

:(

>> No.16339152

>>16331401
based

>> No.16339183

>>16331401
damn

>> No.16340429

>>16331401
got me dud

>> No.16340471

>>16330983
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fJZ9eUQNB4

>> No.16340586

>>16331401
here is your (you)

>> No.16340742

>>16331401
darnit

>> No.16340748

>>16331401
is there an extended version of this chart? lots of gems here.

>> No.16341151

>>16330983
Read Smith, then Ricardo, then Marx, then Hayek, then Keynes, then all the other major economists of the modern era. Take the time to read actual economics so you can get that neocon pseudo-economics out of your head. Chicago economics along the lines of what Sowell, Friedman, and their buddies advocated have proven to be total failures. Thatcher's UK and Pinochet's Chile utterly shit the bed economically, and only recovered once neoliberals and succdems took the reigns. Even Reagan realized how idiotic those policies are, and immediately abandoned them in favor of ballooning federal spending. There's a reason why the 21st-century has generally reached a consensus of neoliberalism, social democracy, and Deng-esque scientific socialism. All these other ideologies, from Austrian thought-experiments to Chicago pseudoscience to ultra-left tomfoolery have proven to be both historically irrelevant and economically incompetent. If you're interested in economics, actually read basic economics, not "Basic Economics" which is nothing more than neocon ideology.

>> No.16341169

>>16331401
yeo

>> No.16341179

>>16338654
As a Marxist, I can actually agree with this. If you do happen to be a reactionary, you shouldn't ally yourself with capitalism, considering that capitalism has basically obliterated any semblance of tradition or idealist values. All the "right-libertarians" in this thread should read Adorno. Granted, I'd prefer people gain Marxist conclusions from Adorno, but I'd still prefer philosophically-consistent reactionaries over braindead neocons anyday.

>> No.16341198

>>16338608
Somehow these are all the absolute worst leftist books. Nice chart

>> No.16341433

>>16331401
damn

>> No.16341550

>>16331111
how do u say 'chud' without cringing

>> No.16341563

>>16331401
fuck you.

>> No.16341825

>>16331401
ahh

>> No.16342719

>>16341198
as opposed to?

>> No.16342805

>>16331401
wow thanks for sharing.

>> No.16342816

>>16331401
Why did you do that

>> No.16342832

>>16331426
This. You like economics so much. Read the most influential economist in history

>>16338608
>Still censoring Trotsky
Haha. Replace it with Spain Betrayed

>> No.16343271

>>16334701
thank you powerful dog

>> No.16343521

>>16331401
fuck you

>> No.16343760

>>16331401
thanks for sharing

>> No.16343778

>>16331401
AHHHHHHH

>> No.16343781

>>16338729
you have failed the test

>> No.16343799

>>16331401
(You)
I've been on 4chan for a decade and I'm still falling for these at least once a week...

>> No.16343819
File: 24 KB, 453x334, commonpepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16343819

>>16331401

>> No.16343925
File: 51 KB, 500x576, 1550602719477.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16343925

>>16331401
Pretty gay

>> No.16344014

>>16331401
many great reads, truly recommendable

>> No.16345303

>>16331426
>still believes in the objective value of work
retard

>> No.16345712

>>16331401
imbecile

>> No.16345712,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>16331401
Oh damn, guess I need to reply now.