[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 100 KB, 853x802, bloomak.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16324017 No.16324017 [Reply] [Original]

>INTERVIEWER
>You’ve written that the Christian Bible is, on the whole, a disappointment.

>BLOOM
>The aesthetic achievement is so much less than that of the Old—or original—Testament. The New Testament is a very curious work from a literary point of view. So much of it is written by writers who are thinking in Aramaic and writing in demotic Greek. And that curious blend of Aramatic syntax with a Greek vocabulary is a very dubious medium. It’s particularly egregious in the Revelation of St. John the Divine, the Apocalypse, which is a very bad and hysterical and nasty piece of writing. Even the most powerful parts of the New Testament from a literary point of view—certain epistles of Paul and the Gospel of John—are not works that can sustain a close aesthetic comparison with the stronger parts of the Hebrew Bible. It is striking how the Apocalypse of John has had an influence out of all proportion to its aesthetic, or for that matter, I would think, its spiritual value. It is not only an hysterical piece of work, but a work lacking love or compassion. In fact, it is the archetypal text of resentment, and it is the proper foundation for every school of resentment ever since.

What did /ourguy/ mean by this?

>> No.16324031

>>16324017
It means he is a seething Jew

>> No.16324034

>>16324017
He was Jewish

>> No.16324041

>>16324017
I'm surprised he didn't dwell on the relationship between Apocalypse and earlier books of the Bible, especially Ezekiel (perhaps he did somewhere else).

His linguistic observation strikes me as valid, this is probably what Nietzsche meant when he said that God spoke bad Greek. I'm not sure I would follow him on his aesthetic conclusions however.

>> No.16324042

>>16324017
Basically he means:
>Around Jews, resentfuls lose.

>> No.16324047

>>16324017
adorno wrote that the secret of aesthetic sublimation is the presentation of fulfillment in its brokenness. this is not to be found in the new testament, which is fulfillment. it's near blasphemous to speak of Scripture in this way though, it's not a work of art it's God's way of instructing man and leading men to Him

>> No.16324059

>>16324047
Brainlet here please translate

>> No.16324057

>>16324017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2QGwuuQqgA

>> No.16324065

>Jew
Aiiiight that explains it

>> No.16324067

>>16324047
I wrote that Adornos gay

>> No.16324104

>>16324059
it's just a passage from his screed on pop culture in dialectic of enlightenment. he's saying, as i understand it, that art derives its emotional/spiritual power the way it demonstrates that even when we get what we want, it fails to suffice, the general tragedy of the human race. consider eroica's transition from the triumph of the first act to the funeral march of the second. you can find this same pattern of the tension between achievement
and falling in short in virtually every great work of art. this can then be tied in with Adorno's focus on how the barter principle (that we view everything as exchange) has come to dominate society, and the results of our bartering with nature in a doomed attempt to attain mastery over it.

>> No.16324151

>>16324059
He's critiquing the color of a nuclear reactor.

>> No.16324158

>>16324047
If you believe the New Testament is divine scripture then it's entirely blasphemous to speak this way, but Bloom doesn't, he doesn't believe the Old Testament is divine either.

>> No.16324192

>>16324017
Jesus is the best we have, the best we’ll ever have
Can’t expect (((Buh Loom))) to care to admit that

>> No.16324345

Doesn't he also think that the Pentateuch was written by a woman in "Solomon's court" or some horseshit

>> No.16324351

>>16324345

He thinks the J writer is a woman.

>> No.16324377

>>16324017
>So much of it is written by writers who are thinking in Aramaic and writing in demotic Greek.
This isn't even true. Pretty embarrassing claim to make. All of this reads like Hebrew cope. Of course he wouldn't like the NT.

>> No.16324411

>>16324017
>the Revelation of St. John the Divine, the Apocalypse, which is a very bad and hysterical and nasty piece of writing
did donald trump write this?

>> No.16324485

>>16324411
Trump is actually a good writer

>> No.16325482

>>16324017
Did bloom really say this? I always thought he spoke highly of both the old and new testament?

>> No.16325497

>>16324017
>jew likes the OT better than the NT
I'm shocked

>> No.16325512

>>16324017
The New Testament is the greatest piece of non-fiction ever written. Keep seething circle man

>> No.16325526

>>16325482
Apparently it's from this interview

https://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/2225/the-art-of-criticism-no-1-harold-bloom

>> No.16325568

>>16324017
Delete. It.

>> No.16326129

>>16324104
The Eroica ends in a triumph, there are two other movements after the funeral march

>> No.16326136

Reminder this dude also LARPs as a Gnostic.

>> No.16326163

>>16324017
>and nasty piece of writing
This is where he revealed himself.

>> No.16326178

>man spends whole career defending the canon from those awful "leftists"
/lit/: "based and redpilled XD"
>man says something slightly jewish
*/lit/ throws him under the bus*

The right eats their own.