[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 119 KB, 640x785, e4330592ac0dc64772087358880fc229.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16320104 No.16320104[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Literary redflags?

>he only reads classics
>he reads obvious facists
>he refuses to read books by women
>he only reads non-fiction
>he doesn't read books newer than 1950's

>> No.16320122

>>16320104
>Hasn't started with the Greeks

>> No.16320126

>>16320104
Pretty solid list.

>> No.16320139

>>16320104
That haircut is a pretty big one

>> No.16320171

>he reads

>> No.16320299

here comes the wall

>> No.16320389

just post the nudes already I can't stand this anymore I just want to coom

>> No.16320393

>>16320104
I want to tie her up and throw her down a rooftop of a 6-story building.

>> No.16320398

>>16320299
)du-da-de-du)

>> No.16320403

>>16320104
Those eyes NGHHHHHHHHHH

>> No.16320506

>>16320139
Her hair is so disgusting and brittle from all the chemicals she bathes it in that it looks like a wig. If you touched that hair it would be really coars and overall feel disgusting. Run your fingers through your hair. It feels smooth and light. Now if you ran your fingers through her hair it would feel awful, like sandpaper.

>> No.16320611

>>16320104
>she only reads contemporaneous
>she reads marxist trash
>she reads authors ending with berg or stein
>she reads anything from the last two centuries at all

>> No.16320624
File: 1.61 MB, 280x296, 1043.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16320624

>>16320104
>he doesn't read books newer than 1950's
The only good ones that came out after the 50's were Snow Crash and Unintended Consequences.
>>16320139
>>16320506
problem glasses and the shitty bull ring that every basic bitch has

>> No.16320625

>>16320104
But, the classics are fiction.

>>16320299
>Uh oh! I’m about to find you unattractive!! Nyahahahha

>> No.16320642
File: 200 KB, 900x678, 1586706736607.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16320642

>>16320625
>fake me keeps posting
Amazing how your identity is based around the misrecognition of your self.

>> No.16320654

>>16320642
^Fake cracked trip

>>16320625
The real me with new trip.
Buzz off, kid

>> No.16320656

>>16320104
If you read only books before 1950 your vocabulary would probably be better than most people.

>> No.16320658

NIGGERS TONGUE MY ANUS

>> No.16320671

>>16320654
Still waiting on that timestamped pic with the new trip code...
Except you're just another lonely man pretending to be something he's not for attention

>> No.16320733

>>16320104
“She only reads Harr Potter, Gone Girl and believes its feminist, spends most of her time reading recommended books from lonely 40 year old spinsters but all meaning goes over her head.”

>> No.16321006

>>16320104
More like based flags

>> No.16321032

>she can read

>> No.16321154

>>16320104
>he only reads non-fiction
Tbh this is a red flag because it means he’s a soulless autist with no artistic spirit.

>> No.16321336

>>16320624
>not Neuromancer
ok buddy

>> No.16321358

This thread again?

>> No.16321376

>he doesn't read books newer than 1950's
I read Infinite Jest!

>> No.16321631

>>16320104
Did /lit/ always have such terrible posts? I remember it being smarter

>> No.16321632

>>16321358
>>16321631
summerfags have extended their stay

>> No.16321638

>>16320104
>>he doesn't read books newer than 1950's

When you refer to a given decade, you don't need to put the apostrophe before the "s." There's no reason for it to be there.

>> No.16321647

>>16321336
As much as I like Neuromancer I feel like SnowCrash was still better.

>> No.16322383
File: 275 KB, 700x800, 1598159067260.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16322383

>he likes the religions of other lands but his own

>> No.16322432

>>16322383
What if my land has no gods?

>> No.16322529

>>16320611

>could I make it aaaany more obvioouuuss

>> No.16322652

>>16322432
What land is that?

>> No.16322658

>>16320104
>thinking I give a shit about what some 6/10 """"alternative"""" art femcel feels
heh thanks for the chuckle

>> No.16323937

get this disgusting bait off the board ffs

>> No.16324101

>>16320104
All seems pretty based to me

>> No.16324108

>>16320624
>Not even infinite jest

sure buddy

>> No.16324887

>>16322383
>TFW no Asuka GF

>> No.16324952

>>16320104
Tell one book that is worth it since the 50s. Also, what's the problem with only reading non-fiction, and what's the problem with the classics? those are the red flags for a well-read man even if an unpleasant one.

>> No.16324978

>>16322652
America

>> No.16325012

Anything "socially conscious"
Any "theory"
Any psychoanalysis

>> No.16325057

>>16320104
relationship red flags should not consist of any media unless its something completely unacceptable to appreciate beyond a artistic craft level and they do. to some people that could mean infinite jest and Lolita and those people are retarded, but things like Birth of a Nation or Mein Kampf where they are generally unacceptable by all modern standards and not just by some faggots sensibilities should be where the line is drawn

>> No.16325062

>>16324978
Mormonism

>> No.16325117

>>16325057
nigger cuck

>> No.16325126

>>16320104
>she almost exclusively reads books written by women
>"the alchemist is one of my favourite books"
>she says manga is literature
>she doesn't buy second hand books
>she only reads books new than the 1950s

>> No.16325131

>Why do women not make use of their intellectual potential? For the simple reason that they do not need to. It is not essential for their survival. Theoretically it is possible for a beautiful woman to have less intelligence than a chimpanzee and still be considered an acceptable member of society.

>> No.16325211

>>16325057
God you're a faggot.

>> No.16325231

>>16320104
wots redflag, precious?

>> No.16325441

>>16325062
Reasonable, or native animism, something like that.

>> No.16325449

>>16320122
>Didn't study Loomis

>> No.16325455

>>16320104
>classics are based
>fascism is based
>women can't write and shouldn't read
>non fiction for non hedonists that want to gain wordly and spiritual knowledge
>only good book after 1950s is White Power by George Lincoln Rockwell

>> No.16325476

>>16320104
Redflags?

>> No.16325494
File: 141 KB, 1080x1080, 9B94213C-8EE7-436C-A32A-35A01700BCB5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16325494

>>16325476
>>16325231
Like red pills

>> No.16325514

>>16320104
Dated a chick with those plucked eyebrows. I thought they looked kinda cute at first but some subconscious part of my brain interpreted her expression as if she was angry or constantly disapproving of me. Started second guessing everything I did and I couldn't really trust anything she said, always trying to figure out if she was being ironic or something.
I mean, her thousand yard stare and bitchy face probably had something to do with how I felt, but still, being around her felt really oppresive, like I was in some Kafka story. Those 35 months we dated sure were fun.

>> No.16325519

>>16320104
Non-fiction red flags
>author 'poetically' asserts his field / study as superior to others
>arguments are presented in candor but doesn't smear the opposing thinkers / group
>inspection of references shows work is a restatement of prior works with little to no actual analysis
>Forward is 70% of the content, maybe an attempt to sell a book where the initial piece would have been too slim
>paper is unified only by a large umbrella subject but co-authors write unconnected and overly niche subsections
>Work is clearly a reflection on a past landmark piece but has no reference to developments in the field since