/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16278370]

>Origin of Species
>dude bird beaks lmao
>therefore we ape
The nerve of this guy.

[Anonymous No.16278389]

>>16278370
anon there's already a thread where morons bitch about darwin
keep your nonsense in one place eh

[Anonymous No.16278405]

>he’s too proud to embrace monky
Very cringe, I bet you believe in tabula rasa and the possibility of racial harmony as well.

[Anonymous No.16278431]

Is he wrong?

[Anonymous No.16278460]

>>16278431
Darwin actually used pigeons a lot more than finches to demonstrate the theory

[Anonymous No.16278746]

>>16278370
Reading the Origin of Species right now, the book was last updated 150 years ago, so anyone using Darwin to attack the theory of evolution is literally insane.

[Anonymous No.16278757]

>>16278460
What I found fascinating is that apparently many scientist at the time believed that the many varities of for example sheep or pigeon, originated not from a single stock, but from dozens of local breeds that where all independently domesticated!

[Anonymous No.16279863]

>Mankind has bred dogs, cows, horses and chickens by manipulating evolution to suit their needs for thousands of years
>But no Darwin was the one who figured it out

[Anonymous No.16279892]

>>16278370
>the virgin *ngloid evolutionist materialist proto-bugboi consoomer cope
>the CHAD Muslim MIT-graduate physicist Sophia Perennis Sufi: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mpMbnyRtHgA

[Anonymous No.16279908]

>>16278370
Why is /lit/ so dumb about science? Not accepting evolution is as pseud as it gets.

[Anonymous No.16279922]

>>16279908
What does evolution explain?

[Anonymous No.16279924]

>>16279908
Theory of evolution lacks empiricism, so it is just a belief, not a fact.

[Anonymous No.16279931]

[Anonymous No.16279970]

>>16279922
Evolution explains racially intrinsic behaviours, as shown here...
>>16279931

[Anonymous No.16280066]

>>16278370
irreducible complexity debunks evolution alone
not to mention the problem of increasing information in DNA with random mutations
just a THEORY and nothing else

[Anonymous No.16280075]

>>16280066
Do you know what THEORY in a scientific context means?

[Anonymous No.16280276]

>>16280066
>irreducible complexity debunks evolution alone
give an example of a part of the body that is "irreducibly complex"

[Anonymous No.16280278]

>>16280075
Probably not, he's returning to monke

[Anonymous No.16280355]

>>16280276
bacterial flagellum

[Anonymous No.16280404]

>>16280355
>google "bacterial flagellum irreducible complexity"
>get dozens of results refuting the concept of irreducible complexity
kek
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13663-evolution-myths-the-bacterial-flagellum-is-irreducibly-complex/

[Anonymous No.16280457]

>>16280404
>refuting
basically scientists """refute""" it by saying that evolution works in mysterious ways not well known
big shit of a refutation

[Anonymous No.16280492]

>>16280457
>

[Anonymous No.16280506]

>>16280492
t.

[Anonymous No.16280543]

>>16278370
He took Plato's argument about man being a featherless biped and added extra steps so that it was easier to follow for the average person.
Diogenes was a brainlet, and likely a cr*ationist too.

[Anonymous No.16280552]

>>16280506
>t.

[Anonymous No.16280555]

>>16280543
Ridiculous. Diogenes would have jizzed into any creationist's face right alongside the faces of dualist dipshits like you

[Anonymous No.16281364]

>>16280555
I can't argue with trips. Where do I have to go to get jizzed by Diogenes?

[Anonymous No.16281415]

Evolution works perfectly for 99.9% of life on earth. It falls apart when applied to humans, viruses, bacteria, parasites, octopus, cuttlefish, squid, jellyfish, and a couple others I can't recall right now.

[Anonymous No.16281513]

>>16281415
>humans, viruses, bacteria, parasites, octopus, cuttlefish, squid, jellyfish,
Explain what you mean. How does on species of great apes, with many extinct relatives, not make evolutionary sense? What do you mean by parasites, which can range from a woodpecker to single celled eukaryote? How does it work for 99.9% of life but not bacteria, are you implying that bacteria doesn't make up most life on Earth?

[Anonymous No.16281525]

>>16281364
unironically reddit. he is their patron saint.

[Anonymous No.16281578]

>>16279908
>he believes in the shoddy theory that every redditor gushes over
Who's the real pseud here?

[Anonymous No.16281773]

>>16279892
OLD THING = GOOD, IT OLD TEXT AND KNEELING. I AM SUPER DEEP I PROMISE AND NOT SHALLOW AND DEFINITELY NOT JUST FOLLOWING THIS FOR THE AESTHETIC

NEW THINGS = BAD ALL THEY GRILS KNO IS SOCIAL MEDIA NETFLIX PLAY ON THEIR POHNE

kys

[Anonymous No.16281788]

>>16281513
Instead of trying to answer your obvious attempt at gish gallop... Just prove with scientific studies how viruses evolved. It's just one question for you, it shouldn't be different, and I want peer reviewed studies.

If you cannot answer this single question, then the theory of evolution is incorrect.

[Anonymous No.16281840]

>>16281364
Become an astral whore in the fields of elysium of course.

[Anonymous No.16281906]

>>16281578
Imagine determining the truth or falsity of a theory based on your perception of social media.

You're the real pseud.

[Anonymous No.16282108]

>>16281415
>It falls apart when applied to humans
This is what egalitarians actually believe

[Anonymous No.16282624]

Fucking hell, /pol/ really did a number on this board. So this is what post-Trump /lit/ looks like, an anti-intellectual right-wing creationist shithole.

[Anonymous No.16282657]

>>16278370
He also had to rely on Engles to keep him funded too

[Anonymous No.16283874]

>>16281788
>If you cannot answer this single question, then the theory of evolution is incorrect.
wew, lad. even if you're correct, and evolutionary biologists haven't got an answer for ths question today, that is in no way shape or form a proof that the theory of evolution is incorrect. what kind of brainlet tier reasoning is that? jesus, this board is shit

[Anonymous No.16283941]

>>16281415
>It falls apart when applied to humans
No it doesn’t, this is a cope for retards who want to believe all humans are created equally, in fact evolution is especially interesting when applied to humans, and the people that don’t want it applied are Jewish shills (Culture of Critique)
>>16280066
Redpilled, egalitarian creatiocucks seething


>>16279892
That video proves that even independent of what is true, Darwin was the Chad.” (Pic related).
>proving that anti-evolutionists are all sandnigger cultists
Lmao
>>16280457
>demonstrates how it’s not irreducible complex by showing how the flagellum’s component proteins serve other functions that could have evolved into flagella
>shows that variation in the flagella and changes in structure proves that it is not irreducibly complex
>NOOO that doesn’t count
Absolute state
>>16281788
>If you cannot answer this single question, then the theory of evolution is incorrect.
This is not how natural philosophy works, this is how sophistry works. “We don’t know yet” is an acceptable answer for someone who seeks truth until the answer is located. Besides there are good ideas of how viruses came to be via gene displacement of replicatory genes.
>>16282624
Evolution is in fact more right wing than creationism, ideas of human universalism and true commonality between all races is a very Christian ideal, because Christianity is the foundation of humanism.

[Anonymous No.16283969]

>>16282657
I’ve not heard about this, most of his funding as I knew it was from being rich.
It’s ironic if true considering that natural selection totally refutes Marxist egalitarianism. Marxists may say otherwise, but Darwin himself told Marx that they weren’t compatible; Marx accused Darwin of applying a “socially Victorian” model to nature, seemingly forgetting that competition between superior and inferior forms for a niche is the cornerstone of Darwinism. Marx was so desperate for more materialistic forms of naturalism that he didn’t bother understanding how the theory worked.