/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16272837]

How disconnected from reality do you have to be to write bollocks like this?

[Anonymous No.16272862]

I looked up the author. I'm surprised how unsurprised I am.

[Anonymous No.16272892]

There is no legit defense of looting, they can defending looting, I defend shooting looters.

[Anonymous No.16272920]

>>16272837
by being your average middle class american urbanite

[Anonymous No.16272935]

what parts did you disagree with?

[Anonymous No.16272944]

>>16272837
Enough to become a tranny

[Anonymous No.16272951]

>>16272935
The core concept obviously.

[Anonymous No.16272956]

>>16272837
No one on this board has read it, including you OP.

[Anonymous No.16272957]

This thread is about a cover, not about literature.

[Anonymous No.16272960]

/lit/ told me these people didnt exist

[Anonymous No.16272975]

>>16272892
So you defend armed robbers?

[Anonymous No.16272976]

>>16272837
Lumpenprole apologetics is end-stage liberalism.

[Anonymous No.16272978]

>>16272951
>>16272837
>>16272862
How about you actually read it and explain why you think the author is wrong instead of making a low effort /pol/thread in the search of (you) 's?

[Anonymous No.16272989]

>>16272978
/pol/ tourists can't process anything longer than a tweet

[Anonymous No.16273001]

>>16272978
someone needs to upload a looted copy

[Anonymous No.16273013]

>>16272892
>I defend shooting looters.

I saw some looters get shot at as they tried to break into a pawn & jewelry shop across. They scattered like roaches. Ask me what the looters looked like.

[Anonymous No.16273017]

>>16272989
how many pages have you read today?

[Anonymous No.16273027]

Holy based

[Anonymous No.16273030]

>>16272837
>How disconnected from reality do you have to be to write bollocks like this?
They never had anything stolen from them

[Anonymous No.16273036]

>>16272837
I'm surprised by how much press this book is getting (in both liberal and conservative media), especially considering just how flimsy the arguments presented in the book (and by the author in interviews) are:

https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2020/08/27/906642178/one-authors-argument-in-defense-of-looting

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/in-defense-of-looting-vicky-osterweil_n_5f43eb88c5b6c00d03b24525

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/09/there-no-defense-looting/615925/

https://time.com/5851111/protests-looting/

https://spectator.us/defense-looting-vicky-osterweil/

https://fee.org/articles/debunking-npr-s-bizarre-in-defense-of-looting-interview/

https://thefederalist.com/2020/08/31/amid-riots-ripping-the-country-npr-promotes-book-in-defense-of-looting/

https://pjmedia.com/columns/tyler-o-neil/2020/08/29/new-book-provides-a-terrifying-glimpse-into-how-antifa-justifies-looting-and-rioting-n864754

[Anonymous No.16273039]

>>16273017
Only about 20 so far. Why?

[Anonymous No.16273049]

>>16272837
Holy shit, I think the previous thread is still alive.

[Anonymous No.16273074]

>>16273027
>violence is femme
They're joking. It's a jest. It has to be

[Anonymous No.16273141]

there really isnt anything wrong with looting, its just doing what makes sense. much worse crimes are perpetrated daily in the name of financial gain.
it's a double standard to ask that people consider the wellbeing of their community over their own wellbeing when there isnt a business entity on the planet, or at the least in this country, that values a community over its own wellbeing

its a situation where you can take something for free, with no consequences. if the shopkeeper or police cant stop you, thats their problem. the people looting did not create the system that puts them in direct competition with their neighbors, theyre just behaving within it the only reasonable way they can. they dont have the resources to engage in financial crime or real estate speculation, so they take a pair of nikes when they get the chance. its just the way things work

[Anonymous No.16273203]

>>16273141
>muh big financial oligarchs
>muh systemic racism in mortgages
you left moralist twats are a literal cancer upon the world. keep whining about big corporations fucking workers and lower middle class in the ass (which they do) while stroking the collective cock of your dear lumenproletariat (said big corporations' foot soldiers) and romanticizing riots and senseless burning done by borderline retarded masses of idiots without even the basic understanding of philosophy, economics, geopolitics or what have you as an act of brave "class warfare" against the evil patriarchal white male bouregoise class. Meanwhile the ones getting torched are the small businesses that get by month-to-month (and are especially frail during lockdown times) and the ones cheering for it are the wealthiest, most priviliged sacks of shit you can ever imagine
your ideology is outdated and you need a new brain, see if you can loot one from someone smarter than you are

[Anonymous No.16273280]

>>16273203
im not romanticizing riots any more than im romanticizing slumlords or sub prime mortgage scams. im stating the fact that engaging with a capitalist system means acting in your own self interest above the interest of anyone else.

pretending that there's malice involved when there isnt is just fairy tale bullshit.
there isnt any malice when the richest people on the planet break the law to make money, so assigning malice to poor people who do is just brainless moralizing. a tiger doesnt hate deer, it just eats them. you dont have to like it, but thats the way it is. if you can get away with a crime that will improve your life, it's stupid to commit it. that's how capitalism works fundamentally.
it doesnt matter who theyre looting from, because consideration of the wellbeing of others does not factor in. you could say the store owners would be justified in protecting their own material interests, and id be inclined to agree, but fundamentally it is capitalism that is putting the interests of these groups opposite each other

also try to calm down man, its just a forum

[Anonymous No.16273281]

>>16272837
It really doesn't reflect well on transwomen, who already have a reputation for mental illness and a loose grip on reality. Certifiably insane viewpoints abound with that demographic, they seem to distill and exemplify the general psychotic break with reality that is contemporary progressivism.

[Anonymous No.16273286]

>>16273280
stupid not to commit it*

[Anonymous No.16273320]

>>16273013
What did the looters look like anon?

[Anonymous No.16273345]

>>16273027
the modern leftist, everybody.

[Anonymous No.16273364]

Every time these people encounter resistance they hide behind the institutions they ridicule. Paper tigers. Benefactors of a system they want to burn down.

[Anonymous No.16273400]

>>16273001
It's on LibGen

[Anonymous No.16273402]

>>16273364
I'm fond of "champagne socialist."

[Anonymous No.16273416]

>>16273280
Imagine coming so close to a neoreactionary hot take which touches on a profound naturalistic truth only to fall flat and spew out a load of selfish, nihilistic apologia for violent thugs. Sad

[Anonymous No.16273418]

>>16273027
the tacit acceptance of misogynist claims about women as destructive, hysterical, illogical, overly emotional, and obsessed with vaginas.
Only a tranny would claim to be a woman and see no issue in writing this garbage.

[Anonymous No.16273427]

I wish I knew people like this in real life so I could put them in their place.

[Anonymous No.16273454]

>>16273320
They were all b- ... b- buh ba....

[Anonymous No.16273470]

>>16273416
c'mon man let me in on the secret. what's the profound truth? spell it out for me

[Anonymous No.16273489]

>>16273320

[Anonymous No.16273503]

>>16273418
I do love the fact that the left is little more than a fashion statement nowadays.

[Anonymous No.16273552]

>>16273027
2020 amerimutt leftism consists of parodies of women playing out miniaturized parodies of revolutions

[Anonymous No.16273557]

muh heckin shopkeeperinos

[Anonymous No.16273564]

This is a fairly good takedown of the book. Not as if it needs one.
https://spectator.us/defense-looting-vicky-osterweil/

[Anonymous No.16273702]

>>16273552
That's not a woman, that's just a dude in a dress. Also

>Osterweil

I guess noticing patterns is bigotry right?

[Anonymous No.16273720]

>>16273503
>he says that like it hasnt been a fashion statementfor the past 60 years

[Anonymous No.16273957]

>>16273027

[Anonymous No.16273988]

>>16272837
You just need to live an area that doesn't actually have any looting.

[Anonymous No.16274147]

>>16273141
I like your line of thinking, anon. Society has kept good-looking women away from me, therefore rape is justified. If you don't agree with me you are sexist.

[Anonymous No.16274469]

>>16274147
looting doesn't violate a person's bodily autonomy. rape violates a person's bodily autonomy.

[Anonymous No.16274477]

>>16272837
Literally judging a book by its cover

[Anonymous No.16274489]

>>16274469
Neither does taking a huge dump in the middle of your living room, now will you give me your address?

[Anonymous No.16274502]

>>16273027
My critique is the text itself.

[Anonymous No.16274516]

>>16273141
>if the shopkeeper or police cant stop you
In this case they can, but the government has chosen to have the police NOT stop the looting, and to prosecute shopkeeper's that do stand up to it.

[Anonymous No.16274735]

>>16273418
>Gramsci
>Not Euro-centric
What do they mean by that?

[Donald "Mini Strokes for My Mi(...) No.16274825]

>>16272892
same shit bitch

[Donald "Mini Strokes for My Mi(...) No.16274832]

>>16272976
WWJD?

[Anonymous No.16274839]

>>16274469
most people who get raped aren't really "people" in the conventional sense though

[Anonymous No.16274900]

>OP obviously hasn't read the book
heh breddy ebin thread ;):))::))

[Anonymous No.16274937]

>>16272978
>not bashing innocent people's heads in with heavy blunt objects and stealing shit and burning buildings to the ground is /pol/
I genuinely hope this is bait.

[Anonymous No.16274938]

>>16274469
yeah but why is bodily autonomy important

[Anonymous No.16274947]

>>16273027
Parody. Right? Then again...

[Anonymous No.16274955]

>>16274900
this book is a rushed, disposable, polemical pamphlet. it is not meant to be read but to turn a profit off clicks and curiosity.

[Anonymous No.16274960]

>>16274955
So you admit you didn't actually read it? I've never heard of the book and it doesn't look very interesting, but this thread just seems to be low-quality polbait. Why not go and shit up another board?

[Anonymous No.16274964]

>>16274960
I'm not OP. I'm just pointing out that reading the book is, from the perspective of the writer and publisher, beside the point for a book like this. it exists to rile people up on social media through marketing material. it is polemic, not research or literature.

[Anonymous No.16275041]

>>16274960
why are you obsessed with pol? do you think if people disagree with you then they must be pol? Are you mentally deranged from cutting your cock off or did you cut your cock off because you're mentally deranged

[Anonymous No.16275053]

>>16272837
or maybe just desperate. question: could this just be a calculated ploy for controversy and $$ ??

Fuck who knows what to believe and who is authentic anymore.

[Anonymous No.16275065]

>>16275053
I'm starting to think this 100%. The system just needs another "controversy" to keep people entertained and distracted. You fools have obviously fallen for the system's trick.

[Anonymous No.16275379]

>>16272837
Reminder that the author of this book, which was shilled on NPR, describes itself as "a queer Jewish anarchist". Yikes. I think anyone who is hip to these issues would guess that the author was a Person of Schnoz given the last name and topic, though.

Also, some choice quotes from this book:
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/09/there-no-defense-looting/615925/
> Looting is good, she says, because it exposes a deep truth about the great American confidence game, which is that “without police and without state oppression, we can have things for free.” She came to this conclusion six years ago, and in her book, which is written “in love and solidarity with looters the world over,” she defends this view as ably as anyone could.

>The “so-called” United States was founded in “cisheteropatriarchal racial capitalist” violence. That violence produced our current system, particularly its property relations, and looting is a remedy for that sickness. “Looting rejects the legitimacy of ownership rights and property, the moral injunction to work for a living, and the ‘justice’ of law and order,” she writes. Ownership of things—not just people—is “innately, structurally white supremacist.”

>The rest of the remedy is more violence, which she celebrates as an underrated engine for social justice. The destruction of businesses is an “experience of pleasure, joy, and freedom,” Osterweil writes. It is also a form of “queer birth.” “Riots are violent, extreme, and femme as fuck,” according to Osterweil. “They rip, tear, burn, and destroy to give birth to a new world.” She reserves her most pungent criticism for advocates of nonviolence, a “bankrupt concept” primarily valuable for enlisting “northern liberals.”

>But Osterweil’s great class war has only two sides, so a working-class Korean woman is effortlessly enlisted on the side of the white-supremacist cisheteropatriarchs. Osterweil quotes a communist magazine: “Just as Jews were in 1965, Koreans in 1992 were ‘on the front-line of the confrontation between capital and the residents of central LA—they are the face of capital for these communities.’” As explanations of communal violence go, this is contemptibly inane.

[Anonymous No.16275538]

>>16275379
Glad to see the roof Koreans getting their fair due here.

[Anonymous No.16275557]

>>16275379
You know actually this person's life actually contradicts a central claim of anti-Semitism, namely that Jews preach degeneracy to their racial enemies while maintaining traditional attitudes in their in-group. I first came to this line of thinking as I observed a bunch of affluent educated Jewish boys getting high and listening to basketball American music at a festival. I also knew an affluent leftist Jew from the suburbs that went to an Ivy that now identifies as a woman and only exists on facebook. It seems that diaspora Jews partake in all the same anti-social activities that they seek to inflict on white goyims, so at least they're consistent. This Vicky Osterweil is just a particularly extreme example. So /lit/ how should I feel about this

[Anonymous No.16275563]

>>16272837
>disconnected from reality
disconnected from spooks?

[Anonymous No.16275569]

>>16275538
What's funny about that is that one could have lifted the bit about "racial capitalism" out of Nazi propaganda and just changed a few names around. The same copes against white (Anglo-American) society have been repeated for about a century now.

[Anonymous No.16275576]

>>16275557
Acknowledge that there's no monolithic cabal, wealthy people just produce retarded kids and there are a lot of wealthy Jewish people

[Anonymous No.16275583]

>>16275557
>Jews preach degeneracy to their racial enemies while maintaining traditional attitudes in their in-group.
That only really applies to issues related to the existence/legitimacy of Israel. I don't think you could accuse Jews of being "trad" in practice, they just have a tendency to engage in anti-white activism out of resentment or fear of future persecution (I think Gilad Atzmon called this "pre-traumatic stress disorder"), or because they think it's good for the Jews.

[Anonymous No.16275597]

>>16275576
I too think there is an essential connection between wealth/luxury and "degeneracy" in the broadest sense. Whatever is going on here is probably what the sages of the past condemned as "decadence", though it's hard to prove that a universal is participating so directly in the period you inhabit

[Anonymous No.16275615]

>>16273027
>if it achieves nothing it is femme
>but also if it achieves something
Compelling argument.

[Anonymous No.16275634]

>violence is good when it benefits you

What insight.

[Anonymous No.16275639]

>>16275583
Yeah, that's why I think radical anti-Semitism is only justified if the political progressivism of Jews is actually cynical and a part of racial power politics. That is what /pol/ thinks; the Jews are secretly eugenicist right-wing racial supremacists and use progressivism as a weapon against their enemies. There are actually a few examples of Jews that are definitively like this (a liberal Epstein girl said she was referred to as a "white slave" in their presence, this has mostly been censored) but most of them seem to be genuine in their egalitarian activism

[Anonymous No.16275645]

>>16273027
This poor person is going to join the 41% if an ape doesn’t kill it when he traps it.

[Anonymous No.16275669]

>>16275639
It's not that different to anyone else who engages in egalitarian activism - they just view themselves as more equal than others and will be the ones in charge of the administration of equality. Jews just do this disproportionately out of resentment and a sense of victimization.

[Anonymous No.16275684]

>>16275379
>> Looting is good, she says, because it exposes a deep truth about the great American confidence game, which is that “without police and without state oppression, we can have things for free.”
It also shows how without police and state protection violent and callous criminals can take everything from you.

[Anonymous No.16275700]

>>16275576
There doesn't have to be a monolithic cabal explictly conspiring at all, just group tendencies. Stereotypes are usually accurate.
>>16275639
They may not be secretly "redpilled" but there's plenty of hypocrisy and double standards for example the overwhelming support for Israel despite its anti black racism and treatment of Palestinians, and also that they'll say their success is purely due to IQ and/or culture whereas disadvantage is always the product of white oppression.

[Anonymous No.16275702]

>>16275684
Although I appreciate the sentiment of people who fly their "thin blue line" flags or post "back the blue!", as it's basically a coded rejection of anti-white rhetoric, the reality is, in America, outside of black ghettos, one hardly needs more than a skeleton crew of a police department. The American police are far more likely to arrest someone for playing video games too loudly and then blow them away than actually protect them from anything. Indeed, they actually protect rioters as we have seen the past three months. Most of us would be better off pooling resources with our neighbors to hire private security.

With that said, I can understand how American police get to be the way they are if they have to deal with the violence of American blacks all day. It's funny to see how relaxed Scandinavian cops used to be, where no crime happened pre-Enrichment, compared to American ones. Or take the Japanese police who coordinate fake gun busts with the Yakuza because they have nothing better to do.

[Anonymous No.16275708]

>>16275702
I forgot to add that at least you can fire a private security officer if they do a poor job. Police officers are basically un-fireable no matter how bad they are at their job and are only out for their pension.

[Anonymous No.16275748]

>>16274735
It could be an American who thinks things don't happen in the rest of the world. I've met Americans who
>didn't believe other countries had television
>were surprised other countries had bus services, and horrified any local bus service that runs past 6pm
>did not believe Europe had black people (I don't know if they knew where Africa is located)
>were surprised other countries had credit cards (and even more surprised many don't accept American express)
>were surprised other countries had police
>were surprised other countries had voting
>were surprised other countries had supermarkets
>were surprised other countries had different languages
>were surprised other countries had capital cities at both state and national levels
>were surprised other countries had computers and CD players
>were surprised other countries had elevators
>were surprised other countries had pop music
>were surprised other countries have doctors who were not American Red Cross flown in for emergencies
>were surprised other countries have smoking laws

[Anonymous No.16275756]

>>16275702
That's what they're there for, to be a sword against evil and to act as pest control.

If the community is strong, armed and care for eachother as they should there shouldn't be any need for private security though but it would certainly be cheaper to hire a few good lads to clean the streets and haul corpses to landfills in pickup trucks.

[Anonymous No.16276169]

>>16272837
Considering that this is a book written as justification for a 3 month old American political topic Id imagine its absolute shit

[Anonymous No.16276187]

>>16273017
More than you.

[Anonymous No.16276199]

>>16275379
what did the koreans do to get singled out? theyre even less of the population percentage wise

[Anonymous No.16276447]

>>16272837
Looting is idiotic in general. People are using looting as a synonym for violence. And I do think it is possible to justify violence. You look at the american revolution and you can see violence was justified. If we all became slaves to a communist state, I am sure you would all see violence as justifiable. The problem here is that the violence isn't really justifiable because their perception of reality is distorted. America isn't some 1930s Germany trying to keep POC down. If it were, maybe they would have a point. But that is so clearly not the case they just look delusional.

[Anonymous No.16276493]

>>16275379

And jackasses in this thread expect us to read an entire book of this drivel before we can refute "all we have to do to have free stuff forever is just keep stealing shit and waiting for the capitalists to put out more shit to steal."

[Anonymous No.16278060]

>>16272862
why that man dress like lady ??

[Anonymous No.16278139]

I said this before in the last thread on this book. Looting and rioting isn't a sign that a movement is "pregnant" or whatever gay metaphor the author uses. It's a sign of failure, of lashing out aimlessly.
Looting is not some epic rebellion against the evils of capitalism. It has absolutely no potential to affect change of the system. It's a nihilistic and selfish explosion of uncontrolled rage.

[Anonymous No.16278149]

>>16278139
>Looting is not some epic rebellion against the evils of capitalism
Most of these looters have probably never even heard the word capitalism and couldn't tell you what it means.

[Anonymous No.16278172]

>>16273030
>They never had anything stolen from them
/thread

[Anonymous No.16278211]

>>16272837
Have you noticed that protesters in Belarus and Balkans didn't loot a single store?
I wonder why.

[Anonymous No.16278242]

>>16272862
You make the same post over and over you stupid faggot. Say something new (or meaningful) or kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.16278248]

>>16278211
It's due to systemic anti-black racism in America - the Balkan peoples are black and didn't loot any stores because there's no systemic racism against them that forces them to act out in such a way.

[mr zebra !ciW4S7Cnuk No.16278254]

>>16273280

brilliant response.

[Anonymous No.16278260]

>>16273416
I thought >>16273280 was a pretty good take frankly.

[Anonymous No.16278270]

>>16275748
You’ve met the literal lowest of the low tier.

[Anonymous No.16278333]

>>16278248
lmao
imagine thinking that by destroying small businesses you are fighting racism

[Anonymous No.16278643]

>>16272978
>only /pol/ doesn't like wanton theft, arson, burglary, rape and murder
wtf I love /pol/ now

[Anonymous No.16278662]

>implying anyone is even able to give a coherent defense of private property
The one who got the closest was Locke, and his was bad.

[Anonymous No.16278673]

>>16278242
Not much needs to be said.

[Anonymous No.16278680]

>>16278643
No no no anon
>only /pol/ wants to circlejerk about a political book no one has read on the internet
That's how it goes.

[Anonymous No.16278712]

>>16273203
Based

[Anonymous No.16278789]

I could defend looting in a sociopolitical system which denies people representation. If the state denies you a legitimate path to pursue your political views, then violent opposition becomes a legitimate form of political expression. But the American system does not unduly deny anyone influence in their political institutions. Looting is therefore an illegitimate form of expression and should be condemned without qualification.

[Anonymous No.16278808]

I really fucking hate trannies.

[Anonymous No.16278810]

>>16273074
Chaos is feminine. Look at Tiamat, at witches, at female monsters. They are obsessed with birth and can only react with total acceptance or violent rejection. Male violence is a structured conflict, there are winners and losers, terms and courtesies. The feminine could kill you and fuck your corpse to birth horrid abominations from your essence, it is a tale as old as mankind.

[Anonymous No.16278820]

>>16273203
When you're living in a project because your grandma got a reverse mortgage and lost the family home why give a shit about the community.

[Anonymous No.16278872]

>>16273027
>It's real

[Anonymous No.16278877]

>>16274825
[citation needed]

[Anonymous No.16278882]

>>16278270
Not him you you'd be surprised the number of fully-grown adults with careers I've met who have never left the state they were born in. Their only knowledge of the world outside America comes from what they see on TV.

[Anonymous No.16278895]

>>16272978
>How about you actually read it and explain why you think the author is wrong

Trannyism retroactively refutes any future "arguments" you might make.

[Anonymous No.16278907]

>>16278270
They're more common among Americans though. It really is bizarre meeting them, because it's common enough among Americans to think of the world the same way people in NK do. Anon posts extreme examples, but #1 for people who make weird ignorant assumptions about the rest of the world are Americans. I'm sure if more people escaped from North Korea they'd edge the Americans out, but so far Americans lead the charts.

[Anonymous No.16278909]

>>16278882
Why is that surprising? I don't think the vast majority of people really move away from the area they are born -- and a state is especially large.

[Anonymous No.16278934]

>>16278139
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24XgpGryWQA

[Anonymous No.16278937]

>>16273027
Yass queen slay!! (I'm a man btw)

[Anonymous No.16278952]

>>16278909
I'm >>16278907 but that is only normal in America. Most people would go on holidays to places that are further away than twice the size of Texas. Along with visiting other countries more regularly which are closer but have a language difference.

[Anonymous No.16278963]

>>16272978
It reads like a collection of tweets from woketard#34351 (because it is), it deserves nothing but derision

[Anonymous No.16278966]

>>16278673
listen mate
>>16278139 made a point regarding the book succinctly, how meaningless and weak these people are.

>>16273280 points out the ways in which it is to be expected.

[Anonymous No.16278988]

>>16273203
Why should I give a shit about small businesses? I thought the iron law of capitalism was that the weak should fail and the strong should survive. If your business can't compete with Amazon then capitalism says you're inferior and you deserve to fail. Why should we make an exception for petty booj shopkeepers who pay their employees just as badly as the big companies?

[Anonymous No.16279006]

>>16272837
I would support looting if it was me doing the looting on companies that I hate and if I could get away with it. Literally the only good political ideology is anything that results in more free shit for me.

[Anonymous No.16279032]

>>16272978
this is what atheism makes to your brain

[Anonymous No.16279263]

>>16273281
>>16273702
>>16278060
>>16278808
>>16278895
Why is 4chan so mean to trans women? Most of us are highly intelligent (Nick Land called us "the jews of gender" for a reason) and tend to be extremely considerate and submissive partners and our autism should theoretically make us more relatable to the average poster. I just want a nice bf who likes pomo meme lit as much as I do ;_;

[Anonymous No.16279308]

>>16279263
Because you never post your feet.

[Anonymous No.16279389]

>>16279308
but that's against the rules of this big beautiful blue board, anon

[Anonymous No.16279403]

>>16279263
Because you're not women

[Anonymous No.16279411]

https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/vicky-osterweils-case-for-looting

She gets demolished. I don't even like Chotiner that much and I think he did a good job.

[Anonymous No.16279656]

>>16273027
VGH... THE BLACK TRANS WOMXN OF STONEVVALL...

[Anonymous No.16279747]

>>16273027
Lmao, remember when one of the actual people in the Stonewall riots wrote a piece for the spectator on how there were no black trans people there and transgenders were trying to rewrite history so that Stonewall was about LBGT plus, when it was about G. Good times

[Anonymous No.16279753]

>>16279263
High IQ people tend to be more neurotic so no big surprises there
Nick Land is a retard

[Anonymous No.16279757]

>>16279747
>even gays live to see themselves become insufficiently left-wing
Kek.

[Anonymous No.16279760]

>>16279389
See?

[Anonymous No.16279764]

>>16272837
Is there an "essential woke literature for HR managers" chart somewhere?

[Anonymous No.16279816]

>>16279764
Give me half an hour.

[Anonymous No.16279823]

>>16278211
Belarus and the Balkans have more community

[Anonymous No.16279826]

>>16279411
That whole thing is so hard to read. The interviewer isnt even jumping on her and it still sounds like she is fumbling all of her beliefs.
"Lets say a middle class or lower middle class white man in the protests helps loot a black owned business, is that good"
"Hypotheticals are really unhelpful"
What a fucking dumbass. This is the kind of person who would say that all rioting and revolution is ok and then if you pointed out the Beer Hall Push they would say that doesn't count

[Anonymous No.16279832]

>>16279764
White Fragility

[Anonymous No.16279882]

>>16279832
I was so happy that The New Criterion tackled it in their latest issue. Just gutted the whole book

[Anonymous No.16280009]

>>16272862
>I'm surprised how unsurprised I am.
Thank you, that response was perfect.

[Anonymous No.16280037]

>>16275379
>>16276199
is interesting that a lot of comments in reddit against blacks are from asians because they get a lot of racism from blacks.

another interesting thing about whats happening is that all this leftist are pushing for blacks to be "themself" this means to be looters and criminals and members of gangs because this is their "culture" ...
this is something very interesting in the sense that is very machiavellian, they are trying to do the same with hispanics/latinos (we HAVE to reject this, even outside the US this is happening), re-inforce and perpetuate a culture of mediocrity looting and violence... rap/hiphop is a big part of this too

[Anonymous No.16280081]

>>16275639
>Epstein girl said she was referred to as a "white slave" in their presence
Proofs?

[Anonymous No.16280083]

>>16279832
>>16279764
Let me know if you want anything changed.

[Anonymous No.16280092]

>>16272978
The Atlantic reviewed it (unfavourably, obviously):
>Osterweil’s argument is simple. The “so-called” United States was founded in “cisheteropatriarchal racial capitalist” violence. That violence produced our current system, particularly its property relations, and looting is a remedy for that sickness. “Looting rejects the legitimacy of ownership rights and property, the moral injunction to work for a living, and the ‘justice’ of law and order,” she writes. Ownership of things—not just people—is “innately, structurally white supremacist.”

THIS GUY IS A JOKE.

[Anonymous No.16280096]

>>16272978
>"Actually the looters are right, here's why..."
>gets robbed
>"LAW AND ORDER"

Prove me wrong you faggot, no one here is Jesus.

[Anonymous No.16280101]

>>16280083
based, but take off The Nickel Boys and add Americanah

[Anonymous No.16280104]

>>16279747
What's funnier is that it was a mafia bar. The mob would make money out of overpriced drinks with no real overhead except keeping the lights on because captive market.

[Anonymous No.16280110]

>>16280083
maybe replace dubois with the caged bird sings or something. Solid chart though

[Anonymous No.16280113]

>>16278680
>>16273036
Areyou going to plug your ears forever?

[Anonymous No.16280127]

>>16278895
>retroactively refutes any future "arguments"
/pol/acks should be expelled from literature forums, they can't even use words correctly

[Anonymous No.16280136]

>>16279411
It's a reassuring sign that every lefty mag I come across is critical of it.

[Anonymous No.16280140]

>>16279389
Just post them

[Anonymous No.16280148]

>>16279263
I don't have an issue with transwomen personally, I generally dislike their politics and their tendency to want to socially engineer society and language to accomodate them.

[Anonymous No.16280151]

>>16280101
The excerpt I read from The Nickel Boys read like it was designed to pander to these people.
>>16280110
These people reference things like "double consciousness" and the "wages of whiteness" all them time. His work is an integral component of what can be called HR ideology.

Both of your recommendations are good. I was considering adding an extra row, so I guess I'll just go for it.

[Anonymous No.16280154]

>>16273027
This reads like part of a Contrapoints script

[Anonymous No.16280177]

>>16278934
I'm not disagreeing with Zizek here. Rioting and looting is symptomatic of festering socioeconomic problems. But it's no solution.

[Anonymous No.16280185]

>>16273027
When a 95er tries to write using French philosophy patter.

[Anonymous No.16280260]

>>16280083
Oh man thank you for that, I was looking for content for my meme story

[Anonymous No.16280338]

>>16279760
>>16280140
well, if classically abby says it's okay... have this extremely old pic

[Anonymous No.16280339]

>>16280127

Piss up a rope, r*tard. I read non-fiction history.

[Anonymous No.16280363]

>>16280260
Here's a little more for you.

[Anonymous No.16280382]

>>16280363
Thanks a lot