[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 29 KB, 396x600, pop mp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16251589 No.16251589 [Reply] [Original]

This is the only French philosophy worth reading. The rest of them are pseud hacks.

>> No.16251609

>>16251589
qualia are not phenomena, sorry my guy, but you just filtered yourself

>> No.16251610

I plan on reading it in the future but busy with Husserl at the moment.

>> No.16251621
File: 14 KB, 250x396, 7F47BD25-B507-4939-87E6-51AEA0A41939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16251621

>>16251589
>the rest are pseuds
OK then

>> No.16251636

>>16251589
God he’s so good man. IMO it wasn’t until when he talked through sexuality and language/expressivity that things began to click for me. His later manuscript The visible and invisible was an easier read for someone to jump straight into compared to TPOP
>>16251621
Another great, his application of the dialectic of recognition was an eye opener for me

>> No.16251726

explain it to me

>> No.16251766

>>16251726
Have your bf explain it to you

>> No.16251794

>>16251766
explain it to me bro
husserl... explain that shit!

>> No.16252102

>>16251589
Blaise Pascal

>> No.16252173

>>16251636
Which Althusser book includes the dialectics of recognition?
I am not familiar with his works yet, so any recommendation would be much appreciated

>> No.16252398

Bump

>> No.16252410

>>16252173
Hey sorry anon I was cooking dinner
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08935696.2019.1629198?scroll=top&needAccess=true&journalCode=rrmx20

>> No.16252414

Henri Bergson

>> No.16252430

The only good French author was Diderot, and Rabelais before he started the third act of Pantagruel

>> No.16252521

I dunno, I like Marquis De Sade, Maurice Blanchot, Blaise Pascal, Henri Poincare, and Frederic Bastiat just to name a few.

>> No.16252624
File: 21 KB, 346x350, Rene-guenon-1925.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16252624

>>16252414
refuted by pic related

>It should be noted too that under the influence of the very recent idea of ‘progress’, ‘philosophies of becoming’ have, in modern times, taken on a special form that theories of the same type never had among the ancients: this form, although it may have multiple varieties, can be covered in general by the name ‘evolutionism’. We need not repeat here what we have already said elsewhere on this subject; we will merely recall the point that any conception allowing for nothing other than ‘becoming’ is thereby necessarily a ‘naturalistic’ conception, and, as such, implies a formal denial of whatever lies beyond nature, in other words the realm of metaphysics— which is the realm of immutable and eternal principles. We may point out also, in speaking of these anti-metaphysical theories, that the Bergonian idea of pure duration’ corresponds exactly with that dispersion in instantaneity to which we alluded above; a pretended intuition modeled on the ceaseless flux of the things of the senses, far from being able to serve as an instrument for obtaining true knowledge, represents in reality the dissolution of all possible knowledge.

>> No.16253092
File: 22 KB, 342x476, Bataille.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16253092

>>16251589
>The rest of them are pseud hacks.

>> No.16253127

>>16251589
paul virilio's writing grows more and more prescient each year

>> No.16253161

Ricoeur, Lavelle, Wahl, Bachelard are all good too

>> No.16253414

>>16251589
Remember that only midwits make grand dismissals like “all French philosophers except X are pseud hacks”. There are no “hacks” in the philosophical canon — if you find any philosopher from it uninteresting, it is because you are an uninteresting reader.

>> No.16253422

>>16253414
This applies to everyone from the Pre-Socratics to the likes of Deleuze and Derrida