/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16247504]

what does /lit/ think about existential comics?

[Anonymous No.16247541]

>>16247504
Jeez, is Hegel really this based? What works of his should I read?

[Anonymous No.16247543]

>>16247504
I don't

[Anonymous No.16247545]

>>16247504
Great takes, even the boomer ones

[Anonymous No.16247553]

>>16247504
Based Hegel. Except MedChads are the Superior ones. The rest of Euros are just Honourary Meds, but they shouldn't push it. Everyone else must be purged.

[Anonymous No.16247582]

>>16247504
liberals are truly awful people
no wonder they love garbage like existential comics

[Anonymous No.16247601]

>>16247582
imagine opening the nytimes op-ed pages and thinking "yeah! yeahhh! that's so insightful, man, what a great idea!"

[Anonymous No.16247604]

>>16247582
To be very fair to them

[Anonymous No.16247617]

>>16247604
Why is he attacking his fanbase?

[Anonymous No.16247627]

>>16247617
It's hilarious

[Anonymous No.16247640]

>>16247504
Engels had the best threesomes.

[Anonymous No.16247643]

>>16247617
I am not completely convinced that the comic is attacking the guy.

[Anonymous No.16247652]

>>16247643
don't politicize your head it's clearly being very condescending

[Anonymous No.16247654]

He's a commie retard who doesn't even understand Foucault. Also
>mixing philosophy with entertainment
Fuck you, OP.

[Anonymous No.16247660]

>>16247617
His fan base are post-Feyerabendian marxists.

Jesus fuck, that's undergraduate shit. Are you even a party member?

[Anonymous No.16247662]

>>16247604
>Friends and family of Immanuel Kant concerned after he was found outside having fun.
That gave me a good chuckle. The rest of both of these are kind of lame.

[Anonymous No.16247670]

>>16247662
I was reading this it's stupid lol https://existentialcomics.com/comic/355

[Anonymous No.16247676]

>>16247617
That guy is actually right about literally everything though.

[Anonymous No.16247677]

>>16247601
i had an existential crisis when i dated a rich girl and found out her parents were huge obama supporters because i 100% honestly thought that rich people are evil, not midwits, they support astroturf candidates like obama because they know the rubes will vote for them and they know politics has been simplified down to "Black mean mean u fightin' racism, that good and nice"

but then i found out the NYT readers are high on their own supply and have been for years, and i freaked out. it was like i had the lowest possible expectations of what rich well educated people must be like and it turned out it was way worse than that. i had to take a few minutes while my whole worldview shifted and realigned

[Anonymous No.16247691]

>>16247677
That's funny they're not responsible by being extremely evil just terribly incompetent and there's nothing anyone can do

[Anonymous No.16247697]

>>16247691
>there's nothing anyone can do
Sure there is, we can take a cue from Kant and go outside and have fun.

[Anonymous No.16247709]

>>16247670
>penis
ok that is pretty funny though

[Anonymous No.16247710]

>>16247697
Yeah I meant the epiphany

[Anonymous No.16247720]

>>16247676
"Morality is relative" contradicts "We should do whatever makes everyone most happy".

[Anonymous No.16247731]

I think that physiognomy is real.

[今晚打老虎 No.16247742]

>>16247504
hegel sounds based

[Anonymous No.16247746]

>>16247504
>whines on twitter all day about american politics
uh huh

[Anonymous No.16247749]

>>16247710
So did I.

[Anonymous No.16247753]

>>16247731
>Why yes, of course I'm a women respecter, how did you know?

[Anonymous No.16247762]

>>16247504
Find a flaw in anything he said op, I'll wait

[Anonymous No.16247768]

>>16247762
You mean in what Hegel said? I can't find any flaw in what Hegel said, he seems based