[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 72 KB, 464x700, 74f225736ed3c5e878824e0a8f49c6ac.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16235915 No.16235915 [Reply] [Original]

What are some good books about the purest form of love?

>> No.16235923

>>16235915
c-cute!

>> No.16235924

>>16235915
female invasion of /lit/?

>> No.16235928

>>16235915
Death in Venice

>> No.16235964

>>16235915
120 days of saddam

>> No.16235972

>>16235915
dISGUSTING HOMO's, when you're aware of the content in which homosexuality involves, no one could like it.

>> No.16235982

>>16235972
ever wanted to fuck a women in the ass?

>> No.16235992

I'll never experience this.

>> No.16236001
File: 49 KB, 718x267, guppy1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16236001

>>16235915

>> No.16236004

>>16235972
dare i say... Based

>> No.16236008
File: 1.95 MB, 245x310, 1597063533101.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16236008

>>16235972
what's wrong with you

>> No.16236019

>>16235982
Sure.

>> No.16236027

>>16236019
then you're gay

>> No.16236029

>>16236008
>is unironically a homosexual
Get your childhood problems over with already.

>> No.16236039

>>16236029
You first, bud.

>> No.16236043

>>16236029
It‘s all so tiresome with the faggot cope.

>> No.16236046

>>16236008
seems like attractive ppl are more likely to be ... gay... and bi... and have a lot of sex.

>> No.16236058
File: 55 KB, 500x750, c1e85b2492b5fca2a40235fe04698ab9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16236058

>>16236029
what problems? Why are you so angry?

>> No.16236068

>>16236046
Seems like people who‘s biggest achievement in their life is their clear skin and low body fat percentage also objectify themselves in their sexuality. Imagine my surprise.

>> No.16236085

>>16235915
I'm NB. what do I do now?

>> No.16236108

>>16236085
Kill yourself obviously.

>> No.16236109

>>16236043
What the fuck do you think can happen? Do you expect gays to somehow wipe all memory of their childhoods and install a new one? You're also overlooking the fact that plenty of gay people come from traditional backgrounds. You're overlooking the massive Catholic pedophile rings. Rings started by "oddball" men of "good" families. It's a clean little theory you got, and if you ignore a lot of problems, it works perfectly.

>> No.16236129

>>16236108
Ah. Obviously.

>> No.16236172

>>16236027
I thought you meant have sex, I didn't realise you meant insinuating anal sex. No that's disgusting but understandable in the case of a woman, and I don't think it's gay.

>> No.16236181

>>16236109
>What the fuck do you think can happen?Do you expect gays to somehow wipe all memory of their childhoods and install a new one?
No, that is repression, not overcoming it. I wish they would acknowledge the damage that was done instead of strutting it in parades and by ruining their own life. Imagine people doing parades for being depressed. You do not get to make your trauma your personality and expect people to act as if it isn’t a trauma.

>You're also overlooking the fact that plenty of gay people come from traditional backgrounds.
No i don’t. That is actually a huge source of childhood trauma.

>You're overlooking the massive Catholic pedophile rings. Rings started by "oddball" men of "good" families.
Again, no i don’t. What is socially seen as „good background/childhood“ is usually all but beneficial and more often than not leads to deep trauma.

>It's a clean little theory you got, and if you ignore a lot of problems, it works perfectly.
I do not ignore even one problem. There is not a single argument that can hold against it.

>> No.16236191

>>16236039
Are you retarded? I'm saying bad relationship with either parents, and that usually means both if it is one, is what at least plays a major role in the development of many homosexuals.

>>16236046
Yes, just like all the attractive lesbians means that it's not as if them being the exception and an attractive one are being filmed.

>> No.16236202

>>16235915
the purest form of love is indeed two teenage twinks kissing. and then committing a lovers' suicide as the end of their twinkdom approaches.

>> No.16236210

>>16236202
That's about the aesthetic peak of selfish self-deception at the sound of the word love, liking it more than the act, or in this case liking it so much, the sound of yourself, to die for it.

>> No.16236216

>>16236202
Your life must be very lonely and sad.

>> No.16236221
File: 1.95 MB, 540x960, 1582511863383.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16236221

>makes you straight

>> No.16236225

>>16236172
I personally don't see a difference in fucking a woman in the ass, and fucking a man in the ass. I think making a distinction is disingenuous and unfair.

>> No.16236235

>>16236216
No, no, he's right

>> No.16236238

Hi fellow book lovers!

Recently, I've been speaking to a lot of friends and they all share the same sentiment.
The process of selling or giving away books online is not as simple and straightforward as it should be.
As a result, I created a questionnaire to help us readers and I was wondering if you could spare 2 minutes of your time to fill it.
The purpose of this questionnaire is to evaluate how easy and convenient it is for other book readers to sell/give away books.
The questionnaire is completely anonymous and also covers those not looking to sell books.

Please share and leave feedback if you can.
Thank you in advance.
Natasha, a fellow book lover

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdsXW-JszybJzSEteuoTpt2x-e8WggZ1arWBil1do66DSns-w/viewform?usp=sf_link

>> No.16236239

>>16236108
>>16236129
Snippy cunts.

>>16236181
There's more to homosexuality than childhood trauma. Plenty of straight people have been sexually abused as kids.

>> No.16236250

>>16236210
>>16236216
take it up with mishima if you don't like it.

>> No.16236256

>>16236225
Ugh maybe because it's with a FEMALE???? I mean you could make a hypothetical that it has some connection to homosexuality like EMJ but it's not the worst thing to do it with a woman that's your partner, it's just an act of pleasure as a fetish for a some, I'm not saying it isn't wrong or disgusting but it's not "that" much more extreme than normal sex.

>> No.16236262

>>16236250
That's not what Mishima did you retard and you're FUNDAMENTALLY misunderstanding the artistic ideal and achievement of his suicide if you think it any way is a good comparison, though undoubtedly Mishima had an ego.

>> No.16236275

>>16236239
>There's more to homosexuality than childhood trauma. Plenty of straight people have been sexually abused as kids.
Yes, so? Not everyone copes the same way. Some become fat, some alcoholics, others kill themselves, some become homosexuals. The same trauma mustn‘t lead to the same cope, which doesn‘t mean one is less of a cope.

>> No.16236283

>>16236256
But would you make a distinction between a female and a trap? if you only saw them from behind, and they both were "female" enough, how would you feel?

I just have never understood. I asked my brother once, and he said something similar "he's just a guy", right? but if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, is it really such an important distinction? what is it, exactly, that makes "gay" so much worse than the alternative?

>> No.16236299

>>16236283
Anon, I miss the part where sex is merely about pleasure, or where pleasure trumps thou shalt not of sin.

>The essence of the Scandinavian, as indeed of all Pagan Mythologies, we found to be recognition of the divineness of Nature; sincere communion of man with the mysterious invisible Powers visibly seen at work in the world round him. This, I should say, is more sincerely done in the Scandinavian than in any Mythology I know. Sincerity is the great characteristic of it. Superior sincerity (far superior) consoles us for the total want of old Grecian grace. Sincerity, I think, is better than grace. I feel that these old Northmen wore looking into Nature with open eye and soul: most earnest, honest; childlike, and yet manlike; with a great-hearted simplicity and depth and freshness, in a true, loving, admiring, unfearing way. A right valiant, true old race of men. Such recognition of Nature one finds to be the chief element of Paganism; recognition of Man, and his Moral Duty, though this too is not wanting, comes to be the chief element only in purer forms of religion. Here, indeed, is a great distinction and epoch in Human Beliefs; a great landmark in the religious development of Mankind. Man first puts himself in relation with Nature and her Powers, wonders and worships over those; not till a later epoch does he discern that all Power is Moral, that the grand point is the distinction for him of Good and Evil, of Thou shalt and Thou shalt not.

You can disagree with this spiritually, but no one can deny in action that it remains true.

>> No.16236309

>>16236283
It‘s unnatural and undignified. But it is notmal for gays to not understand dignity at all. If they could, they wouldn‘t have become gay in the first place. Talking to a faggot about how gay sex is undignified is simply a waste of time since the concept is so foreign to him.

>> No.16236320

>>16236309
This, the homosexuals who engage in frequent sex or sex at all have no concept of dignity.

>> No.16236337

>>16236299
>>16236309
guys, I'm too drunk.
listen, I'm gonna be honest. I'm asexual. I have no interest in sex, and as such I like to think I'm impartial.
And as someone who is impartial, I don't see the difference. What if a twink wore briefs, and you never knew at all that he was a dude? What if a girl had no tits, and you thought she was a dude?
Sticking your dick in a hole shouldn't have that much religious, or any other kind of meaning. You're sticking your dick in a hole. What about if you stick your dick in a fleshlight? A watermelon? If you fuck your hand? Be completely honest with yourself. What makes it "okay" and what makes it "sin"?

>> No.16236356

>>16236337
>You're sticking your dick in a hole.
This concept of sex is why you think you‘re asexual. If i thought like that about it i wouldn‘t want to ever have sex either. It‘s a perfect example of how homosexuality and asexuality are simply twisted ideas about humans and sexuality and not valid alternatives in any way.

>> No.16236379

>>16236356
>why you think you‘re asexual
Mm. No.

>> No.16236392

>>16236337
Yeah dude what this guy says>>16236356

You have a highly, to put it comically autistic understanding of what sex is, like Da Vinci said it was one of the most disgusting acts or something along those lines. Obviously sex is not just merely "load code, put leaver in slot, and slide!", you're two people--; But to put it greatly, life is but an array, truly is not everything symbol and sign for another? But in the end, in Eternity, before God or not, these things amount up speaking only practically but morally too, these things have value, and it is only the man to lie about it.

>> No.16236403

>>16236337
The actual divine reasoning is that your penis is the sign of the power of creation granted to you, the highest divinity in you. That's why masturbating is bad - you are wasting new life, spilling the most divine thing you can do on the ground. Same for anal, fellatio, and gay sex.

The actual reason most people have against it is an ingrown 'ew' reaction. It's just morals that are so enforced they become part of the ego. Gay sex - ew!, You fuck a guy? But what if I have the same attraction to men as you do to women? - well stop doing that. Its not logical because it's not, same reason that if you ask most people why thieving is bad they won't give you a real reason, just 'it's wrong', only that in gay stuff it's really extreme so you get to rather random reasons like 'it's unnatural' (why is being natural good? What about gay animals, they exist) 'undignified' (try getting an actual explanation of what dignity is).
There are people with thought out reasons, but for the most it's just base reaction.

>> No.16236433

>>16236379
Then tell me why.

>> No.16236527

>>16236403
No anon you missed the point, to put it crudely, sex defines character. If you're getting fucked up that ass that says more and something different than just another anon jerking himself off.

>> No.16236601

>>16236527
Alright, so the problem is receiving and thus making you have the wrong character. Obvious next questions are:
A. So being a top is ok?
B. What do you mean, wrong character? Is it a sin to have the wrong character? What if you're a total cowardly wimp who never takes it up the ass?

>> No.16236890

>>16235915
>depraved faggotry
>purest form of love

>> No.16236923

>>16236890
What's depraved about two guys being in love with each other?

>> No.16236952

>>16235915
Lolita

>> No.16236957

>>16236923
Please go easy on the mentally disabled

>> No.16236986

>>16236601
>Alright, so the problem is receiving
No, *sigh*, anon that was an example. The point is sex is not just pleasure, and even if it is just pleasure that does not mean you look for pleasure at any cost, that is is beyond sin. In this case homosexuality is the wrong, and to give an example of one argument against it(which is a thinking of an already natural and universally common reason), that you're changing your orientation to man in your life in such a fundamental way, a degeneration, and the Romans obviously considered a bottom wrong, so why would you cast such shame on anyone? And it only casts back on yourself. As another example.

>> No.16237032

>>16236986
So two reasons you just said are: changes the way you view men in your daily life, and brings shame. Obvious questions incoming:
A. A man is born with attraction to other men. He already views all men as sexual beings, what's going to change?
B. Why is viewing men as sexual things to have a degeneration? Trick question - to be degenerate is to lose moral qualities. Whose morals? Yours, of course. So why should a gay man but into your morals?
C. Large swaths of today's society do not consider homosexuality as shameful. Why are the Romans better?
D. Do you have any inherent reason that is not societal? I already gave a divine reason that holds water better than all of yours and I'm playing the gay side.

>> No.16237081

LIL GAY TWINK NIGGAS GETTIN GAPED BY BIG FAT BBC DRIPPIN WIT CUMMIES

>> No.16237210

>>16236275
And some people become pretentious asshats who constantly make sanctimonious posts on Namibian badger-keeping forums about how hard everyone else is coping. At the end of the day, everyone is coping with something. You're just claiming (based on absolutely nothing) that your flavor of cope is better than everyone else's.