[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 36 KB, 410x473, deleuze.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16231629 No.16231629 [Reply] [Original]

Is there a bigger cope than french philosophy?

>> No.16231638

Yea life; life itself

>> No.16231643

>>16231638
Deep

>> No.16231912

>>16231629
lmao a good pic

>> No.16231983

>>16231629
Nazism

>> No.16232002

>>16231629
did anyone ever explain Deleuze without dumbing it down into some vague shit? what is a body without organs? rhizomes?

>> No.16232003

>>16232002
It's these nuts

>> No.16232012

>>16232002
Your brain

>> No.16232015
File: 24 KB, 600x398, 6292C115-50EC-4E55-9609-FF0C4238B012.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16232015

>falling for the Deleuze meme

>> No.16232019
File: 47 KB, 460x307, 6000199844346.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16232019

>>16232012
The brain is an organ.

>> No.16232027
File: 82 KB, 1080x720, 1597457712300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16232027

>>16232015
They put the "lose" in Deleuse

>> No.16232031

>>16231638
This but unironically

>> No.16233158

>>16232002
The body without organs is how you look at a body and rather than seeing it as containing multiple organ systems, to you as the person with the body, it is a single object. Rather than having a respiratory system, which deleuze calls a breathing machine, you can see the lungs as part of what's in your body, the BwO is when you deterritorialise or oedipalise- meaning that you see things as a rhizome, something with no beginning or end.
So consider whether you have a penis or a neovagina, the content doesn't matter as it has a purpose and is part of your body. I know it's quite hard but it all fots into place when you see the rhizome.
-headspinning.

>> No.16233162

French philosophy =/= retards liked by Americans.

>> No.16233219

>>16232002
No but it was referred to in a review of the latest Deleuze book translation, and they linked to reddit...

>> No.16233262

>>16232002

>make a unique concept seem intelligible without falling into trappings of old dogma

Plebs, pseuds, and platitudes

>> No.16233269

>>16233219

>reddit

Why can't they come here? Too barbaric. Is reddit ancient Greece and 4chan Rome?

>> No.16233305

>>16231638
life himself*. life is a male, you feminist dyke.

>> No.16233335

>>16233269

What makes you think Greek society was any less unmerciful than the Roman? Ancient Rome probably offered the best life one could have even before the Industrial Revolution which made production output more accessible, even for plebs as long as they were citizens.

>> No.16233344

>>16231629
Cope with what?

>> No.16233346

>>16233158
But that doesn't change anything ))))))))):

He's just rejecting definition for a different one.

>> No.16233417

>>16233346
what are you a rightard? get lost on your way to the construction site?

>> No.16233984

>>16232002
It's nonsense. It wasn't meant to be understood because deleuze was a professional charlatan. His books are designed to waste your time for his benefit not yours.

>> No.16234287

>>16233262
>Unique concept
The reason the BwO is never explained clearly is because the concept is wholly unoriginal
The idea itself is present in Plato and the Upanishads

>> No.16234294

>>16232027
Isn't it pronounced Delezh?

>> No.16234680

>>16232019
I miss playing on these