/Nietzsche General/

[Anonymous No.16227763]

Let's have a discussion about Nietzsche. What would he think of modern life, what can we do to replace the void left by the death of Christianity and all the rest!

This is slowly becoming my favourite general and as always newcomers are welcome.

[Anonymous No.16227772]

>>16227763
Reminder

[Anonymous No.16227773]

>>16227763
he'd despire you for opening this thread

[Anonymous No.16227796]

> Let's have a discussion about the guy who didn’t read Hegel

[Anonymous No.16227800]

>>16227773
As Nietzsche said "Do not follow me". I don't care I like his philosophy if he doesn't like people discussing his philosophy in a Nietzsche general then that's fine. Though I think he would appreciate people talking about his philosophy.

[Anonymous No.16227808]

>>16227800
Fack off blady tosser

[Anonymous No.16227813]

>>16227772
He was a Chad before he grew his moustache

[Anonymous No.16227817]

>>16227808
Yawn

[Anonymous No.16227822]

THIS PATHETIC PIECE OF SHIT PLAGIARIZED STIRNER, SCHOPENHAUER AND MAINLÄNDER
ABSOLUTELY FUCKING DISGUSTING

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK N*ETZSCHE

[Anonymous No.16227824]

>>16227813
Chad

[Anonymous No.16227836]

>>16227763
A small question:
Is it just me or has anyone else got more traditionalist after (mis)reading Nietzsche?

[Anonymous No.16227843]

>>16227824
Ngl he looks pretty bad ass in that pic
Should have played sports

[Anonymous No.16227892]

>>16227836
Yes despite what he had to say about organised religion he wasn't as much of a fedora tipper as I thought he would be.

There's just a feel about Nietzsche that's different. Maybe it had something to do with the parody parable style of writing he used in Thus Spoke Zarathustra?

[Anonymous No.16227898]

>>16227763
Give it up, lowercase pedants. The Fempire is inevitable.

[Anonymous No.16227907]

>>16227898
Not many people know this but NIETZSCHE was a BLACK man.

[Anonymous No.16227941]

Where do I start with him?

[Anonymous No.16227956]

>>16227941
Greeks

[Anonymous No.16227969]

>>16227907
All whiteness is a struggle to rediscover the pure Black forms of the truly lost epochs of pre-history.

[Anonymous No.16227974]

>>16227941
Thus Spoke Zarathustra is fantastic. On the genealogy of morality is really great as well.

[Anonymous No.16227988]

>>16227843
He couldn't have played sports as he was an invalid.

[Anonymous No.16228000]

>>16227969
stop posting this thot and also kill yourself please

[Anonymous No.16228012]

>>16227988
He was a military man though

[Anonymous No.16228026]

>>16227898
The Future is GAY

[Anonymous No.16228083]

>>16227898
Nietzsche didn't like socialists he called them flatheads

[Anonymous No.16228106]

>>16227974
Are they accessible enough for someone that isn't autistically knowledgeable about the western canon?

[Anonymous No.16228298]

>>16228106
Yes. Nietzsche himself said that he felt he made his philosophy too easy to read because any old average Joe could read it and understand it

[Anonymous No.16228344]

>>16228298
Great, gonna check them out then.

[Anonymous No.16228365]

>>16227772
That the mustache man? He is looking cool. Crazy eyes but he could of held it together. If only he would of gotten some pussy, he wouldn't have gone insane.

[Anonymous No.16228366]

>A person can perish from nothing other than a lack of religion. The genius shows this most horribly, for the man of genius is the most devoted man, and when *devotion* leaves him, his genius has left him. It was not without deep reason that the "unscrupulousness of the mind" became a problem for Nietzsche; the "unscrupulousness of the mind" is the "clever" man, and the "clever" man was the fate that menaced Nietzsche, and the abyss that finally dragged him down. Would he otherwise have considered it necessary to stress explicitly when he meant something seriously, and really wanted to be taken seriously? What Nietzsche lacked was *mercy*, but without mercy, loneliness, even Zarathustra's, is not bearable. Thus logic was not a uniquely valuable good for him, but an external constraint (for he felt too weak not to scent danger everywhere). However, he who negates logic has already been abandoned by it, he is on the road to insanity.

-Weininger

[Anonymous No.16228378]

>>16227824
give him a military hair cut cut and this man is a Chad

[Anonymous No.16228532]

>>16227763
Okay, where to start with Nietzsche for newcomers? I have pretty pleb-level philosophical background/

[Anonymous No.16228549]

>>16228000
ok

[Anonymous No.16228997]

>>16228532
The Birth of Tragedy and Twilight of the Idols
Then move onto Ecce Homo, Genealogy of Morals, Beyond Good and Evil, Thus Spoke Z and Joyous Science. Add Will to Power at the end if you want.

[Anonymous No.16229463]

>>16228366
Could god make a rock so heavy that even he could not lift it?

[Anonymous No.16230242]

Nietzsche would have liked Hitler but disliked national-socialism.

[Anonymous No.16230307]

>>16230242
did the moustache man make a stance on race relations? Was he redpilled?

[Anonymous No.16230953]

>>16230307
He called Jews "born to slavery", or "born as slaves"

[Anonymous No.16230957]

>>16227898
tax my privilege, queen!!

[Anonymous No.16231007]

>>16228366
>A person can perish from nothing other than a lack of religion.
I don't see how not absorbing values from outside yourself would cause one to perish, seeing as though the creators of such values did not do so first.
> The genius shows this most horribly, for the man of genius is the most devoted man, and when *devotion* leaves him, his genius has left him.
You obviously become devoted to yourself, for yourself. A man does not die when he loses devotion to external idols not set by himself. The birth of each religion necessitates this principle to be true, for if it was false, there would be no such first valuation on which to found that religion.
>It was not without deep reason that the "unscrupulousness of the mind" became a problem for Nietzsche; the "unscrupulousness of the mind" is the "clever" man, and the "clever" man was the fate that menaced Nietzsche, and the abyss that finally dragged him down
The dishonesty of man did not destroy Nietzsche. "We will no longer take things to heart, we're choosing the mask as our
supreme divinity and redeemer". He called deception divine.
>However, he who negates logic has already been abandoned by it, he is on the road to insanity.
To negate the truth of logic is not the same as to be unable to utilize it.