[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 21 KB, 232x312, 321714e862b5db9e8bf641fc1f879a56_thumb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16144771 No.16144771 [Reply] [Original]

>the only person who got Nietzsche right

>> No.16144786

The dude who runs academy of ideas seems to have a solid grasp

>> No.16144795
File: 31 KB, 780x438, tj39bhew77q11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16144795

>>16144786

>> No.16144796

>>16144771
That's like bragging about getting Terrence Howard right.

>> No.16144811

>>16144796
>Terrence Howard
Who?

>> No.16144871

>>16144796
That's like bragging about getting Blimpbleborf Smorflestophh IV right.

>> No.16144883

>>16144796
Thats like bragging about getting John Johnson Michael John right

>> No.16144908

>>16144795
What? It's true

>> No.16145011

In what way?
I've read Spheres among other works of him but I can't say I have encountered a clear critique or in-depth engagement with Nietzsche.
Is your argument in "Nietzsche Apostle" or another work.

He has written so much insightful stuff I find it hard to choose what to read next from him.

>> No.16145060

>>16144771
Nice advertisement.

>> No.16145127

>>16145011
Du musst denier Leben ändern is the best Nietzsche explanation I've seen desu

>> No.16145639

>>16144771
based

>> No.16145707

>>16144771
Alongside Deleuze, Foucault, Baudrillard,etc.

>> No.16145849

>>16145707
>Foucault

Go back

>> No.16145854

>>16145849
kek
this

>> No.16145856

>>16145707
Foucault gets Nietzsche more than Deleuze, that's for damn sure.

>> No.16145858

>Slaughter Dick

>> No.16145877
File: 50 KB, 736x492, Pierre-Klossowski.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16145877

>>16144771
Excuse me?

>> No.16146045
File: 15 KB, 220x220, precht.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16146045

*blocks your way*

>> No.16146159

>>16146045
Who?

>> No.16146239

>>16146045
Kek
I wonder if this clown is respected by even a single actual Philosopher in Germany or if they all just cringe just by hearing the name.
>>16146159
German "philosopher" who is the go-to guy if they need to have some seemingly "deep" take on state funded TV.

>>16145127
I see that one mentioned all the time. I guess I'll go with it.
Any pages that stand out or caught your special interest?

>> No.16146252

>>16146239
>I see that one mentioned all the time. I guess I'll go with it.
>Any pages that stand out or caught your special interest

Its a big book, I dont think there is a specific page but he talks the most about Nietzsche in the first 100 pages, the rest is mostly Foucault and Wittgenstein

>> No.16146303

>>16144771
The best philosopher in the world. The only bad thing is that he doesn't state his arguments about praxis clear enough in modern form so it is almost impossible to argue with analytical philosophers. Such a pitty.

>> No.16146372

>>16146239
Sloherdijk thinks there was no such think as slave revolt. That's the best thing about his perspective. I think it makes sense

>> No.16146593

>>16145849
>>16145854
t. Mindless Foucault hating newfags who haven't read him.

>> No.16146650

>>16146303
this

>> No.16146657

>>16144771
That’s not Evola

>> No.16146667

>>16144771
>not a single quote or anything
Fuck off with your shitty spam threads.

>> No.16146673

>>16146657
Evola got the spiritual part right, but it is sloterdijk who gives you the full picture

>> No.16146800

>>16146667
Not him but, yes, I would literally suck sloterdijks dick even though none of us is gay

>> No.16147112

>>16144771
True

>> No.16147517

>>16146800
same bro

>> No.16147735

Crying in front of cameras when getting grilled by left liberal journalists is getting Nietzsche right.

Bravo.

>> No.16147741

>>16147735
Where do I find this?

>> No.16147757

>>16147735
>>16147741
Unironically yes, it reminds me of my childhood purity in simply crying because of something that has made me sad.

>> No.16147786

>>16146372
>Sloherdijk thinks there was no such think as slave revolt. That's the best thing about his perspective. I think it makes sense
what, seriously explain

>> No.16147791

>>16144771
If only one person "got Nietzsche right" then that means Nietzsche is a dogshit philosopher.

>> No.16147850

>>16147791
Why do anons speak and think like this? I don’t understand. You trivilize the tradition and activity of thought by treating it like a sports match between footy clubs or whatever. You’re all quick to criticize how illogical and emotive “normies” are yet here you are, dismissing a thinker with what’s essentially a tweet like some blue checkmark.

>> No.16148435

>>16147735
>neetch cried his whole life because of one rejection
Sounds about right.

>> No.16148448

>>16147850
Neet's philosophy was the first tweet.