[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 384 KB, 1298x1040, retards.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16139114 No.16139114[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

One must be retarded to think this represents /lit/ culture.
Neither anime nor frogs belong to this literature forum.
There are fully grown men in their 20's thinking that they are some stupid frog and that's not ok, they only damage themselves.
But this board could be so much better without them.

>> No.16139118

Do you think you'll be alright?

>> No.16139119

>>16139114
>/lit/ culture
Kek

>> No.16139124
File: 32 KB, 516x424, eok.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16139124

>>16139114
>One must be retarded to think this represents /lit/ culture.
>Neither anime nor frogs belong to this literature forum.
>There are fully grown men in their 20's thinking that they are some stupid frog and that's not ok, they only damage themselves.
>But this board could be so much better without them.

>> No.16139128

>>16139114
This man needs a fren.

>> No.16139137

Just posted an off topic frog thread bc of this post. Rock rock on.

>> No.16139139

>>16139128
>>16139124
This limited level of mental activity does not belong here.

>> No.16139155

>OP confirmed for taking himself way too serious

>> No.16139169
File: 15 KB, 882x758, wwww.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16139169

>>16139139
>This limited level of mental activity does not belong here.

>> No.16139167

>>16139155
Shitposting doesn't bother me. The predominance of it, on a board not made for shitposting, does.

>> No.16139170
File: 62 KB, 577x700, swedish-fucked-up-joker_4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16139170

>>16139114
We need to first ban the tranny and coomer spammers of /fit/

That board is genuinely under attack to the point where a good half of us had to leave

>> No.16139193

>>16139167
This whole site is a hole for shitposting. /lit/ included. If you can not deal with the lightheartedness and lack of pretentious seriousness that is 4chan then maybe you should pay a visit to reddit or some other place that has no humor.

>> No.16139199

Hello frens

>> No.16139203

>>16139170
Good riddance. Pretending to be interested in philosophy and art but only if it fits your personal and narrow niche is not a sign of a great mind.

>> No.16139207

>>16139193
reddit seems tailor-made for your type of humor, "fren".

>> No.16139208
File: 250 KB, 800x1024, 1596772713202.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16139208

>>16139199
Hi fren

>> No.16139216

>>16139207
I wouldn‘t know i don‘t go there. Then maybe give instagram a try. Or twitter. Wtf do i know, just go where all pretentious pseuds meet up.

>> No.16139219
File: 44 KB, 657x527, external-content.duckduckgo.com.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16139219

>>16139139
I think you just need a little fun in your life!

>> No.16139226
File: 40 KB, 1024x964, 82CB24B8-E522-46D3-95D8-47DB9A6879D2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16139226

>>16139199
Sup fren

>> No.16139227

>>16139203
This is a literature board, not a philosophy board, the philosophical discussions should follow the rules. Most of they don't, that's why they devolve into a political discussion with a level of coherence more appropiate to either /pol/, /his/ or /x/ in the worst case.

>> No.16139229
File: 127 KB, 439x363, 1549645582879.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16139229

This is now a fren thread

>> No.16139233

>>16139208
>>16139219
>>16139226
>>>/r9k/

>> No.16139242

>>16139114
Petition to ban non-oobing posters

>> No.16139252

>>16139227
I never said it is. Besides, it‘s not the users fault that mods are too lazy to make a dedicated philosophy board. There is no room for those thread on any other board either.

>> No.16139260
File: 178 KB, 1242x1769, A12F6481-0F23-475B-A2FE-3D6939EBB9A5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16139260

>>16139229

>> No.16139271

>>16139216
frogposters are not interested in literature.
Most of them are "feels" threads for people to get dopamine from replies and "cute" images of drawn frogs posted by people as self indulgent as themselves.
The intersection between a) frogposters, b) religion threads and c) philosophy posters is alarming because none of them follow the basic rules and their thinking usually revolves between a philosophy to "cope" or a tradition to adhere themselves to.

>> No.16139282

>>16139252
>those discussions of philosophy that take place on /lit/ should be based around specific philosophical works to which posters can refer.
you haven't even bothered to read the sticky.

>> No.16139285

>>16139271
All philosophy, literature, entertainment and art is a means to cope. So what if a feels thread gives some lonely anon a short dopamine kick? Let him have it. Why are you so selfish?

>> No.16139300

>>16139285
There are boards for that
>>>/r9k/
>>>/b/
>>>/tv/

>> No.16139304

>>16139282
Ofc i have. But there are discussions that aren‘t meant to be about a specific work or author. What do you suggest where they go?
His? No they are not about history, they are about humanity.
Pol? What if someone *gasp* doesn‘t want the discussion to be political?
Adv? What if the discussion is strictly theoretical? One would just get shit on with „hurr durr what‘s your question? Do you even want help or just have fruitless discussion?“

>> No.16139308

>>16139300
Maybe someone wants to talk to people who know how something feels and sometimes that takes a certain level of intelligence not found on those boards.

>> No.16139321

>>16139304
Then they must make it clear, otherwise they discussion will ALWAYS devolve into something undesired.
Those posters fail to filter uninformed opinions because most of the time they don't want to do it and because they put no thought in their wording of the post and it shows most of the time.

>> No.16139332

>>16139321
Emotional pain isn‘t conductive to coherent thought.

>> No.16139334

>>16139114
Stop being so concerned with the appearance of "intellectual discussion" and start posting something of actual quality, you miserable shithead. It's pretty obvious at this point that most of the posters in this dump are more interested in looking smart for hanging out on the "intellectual board" of four chan than they are in actually talking about literature.
I don't give a good goddamn about anime or frogs, all I want is an anonymous message board to talk about books in, and every time I visit this festering shitheap I leave disappointed.

>> No.16139347

>>16139308
That reasoning sickens me.
Those people should either get help or get the rope.
You are not helping them or healing their wounds for being failures. You are only extending the part of themselves that should be cut so they can finally grow up.

>> No.16139348

>>16139334
This. People like op just want to keep lit as pseud as possible so they can keep feeling superior to be a /lit/izen.

>> No.16139354

>>16139347
It‘s not on you to decide when someone is ready to get actual help or commit suicide. So why not make this world a slightly less shitty place for someone who‘s hurting even just for a moment?

>> No.16139398

>>16139354
I don't care if the goal of your life is to be an online therapist or if your altruism is pathological. But there are places for that and this is not one of them.

>> No.16139409
File: 1.25 MB, 1484x994, 1594139070430.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16139409

>>16139199
Fren.

>> No.16139411

>>16139398
Maybe you are mistaking and this isn‘t the place for your edgy superiority.

>> No.16139412

>>16139348
None of that. If the rules were enforced none of this would be a problem to begin with and anons like you would not have been mislead to think this board is their safe space.

>> No.16139417

>>16139114
you have to go back

>> No.16139422

>>16139411
I don't pretend to be superior but be careful, you may have an inferiority complex.