/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16135282]

>12
Humbert was right.

[Anonymous No.16135295]

>>16135282
Age of consent in civilized countries is already 14, and plastics are causing unnatural early puberty
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5615581/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rises-in-early-puberty-may-have-environmental-roots/

Now please, fuck off

[Anonymous No.16135298]

>>16135282
Humbert?

[Anonymous No.16135303]

>>16135282
Angelfu a cute. A cute!

[Anonymous No.16135314]

Will trannies lead the way to legalized pedophilia? They can inter-sectionally align with mulsim men

[Anonymous No.16135319]

Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins!

[Anonymous No.16135327]

non-literature

[Anonymous No.16135332]

[Anonymous No.16135333]

Were you the one who sent me an email with a protonmail account? If so check your inbox/spam.

[Anonymous No.16135337]

>>16135327
>humbert isn‘t a figure from literature
You slow or what?

[Anonymous No.16135339]

>

[Anonymous No.16135345]

>>16135327
>discussion on the validity of the motives of the main character of one of the greatest literary works of the 20th century
>non-literature

[Anonymous No.16135374]

>NOOOOOOOO MY WIFE NEEDS TO BE FAT, HAIRY, WRINKLED AND NEEDS TO HAVE HAD *AT LEAST* TEN OTHER MEN INSIDE OF HER SO THAT SHE "KNOWS WHAT SHE'S DOING" WHEN SHE HAS STARFISH SEX WITH ME!!!!

[Anonymous No.16135376]

wow

[Anonymous No.16135390]

>>16135337
>>16135345
That was quick.
Have a look:
>>16135295
>>16135298
>>16135303
>>16135314
>>16135319
>>16135332
>>16135333
>>16135339
>>16135374
I am amazed at the discussion, who knew there'd be ten people in just half an hour who have read Nabokov and were ready and willing to discuss this issues at hand?

[Anonymous No.16135391]

>>16135282
>12
Brehs.....that's not the body I expected a twelve year old to have.....

[Anonymous No.16135392]

>>16135345
>greatest literary works of the 20th century
>Wow he used complex works, this literature is soo great

[Anonymous No.16135399]

>>16135390
>replying to every post

[Anonymous No.16135402]

[Anonymous No.16135403]

>>16135399
I'm not you stupid nigger I'm showing you the shit this thread was not meant to discuss literature but to push your pedophilia further onto this board like many of you have been doing for a long time

[Anonymous No.16135404]

>>16135392
>uh no bro steven king is the real goat he uses laymans terms

[Anonymous No.16135407]

>>16135391
Your perception is warped. That is a very normally developed body for a 12yo.

[Anonymous No.16135408]

>>16135403
Excuse me, to push our *what*?

[Anonymous No.16135428]

>>16135403
>clearly post-pubescent girl
>pedophilia

[Anonymous No.16135440]

>>16135390

[Anonymous No.16135459]

>>16135282
>>16135295
>>16135298
>>16135303
>>16135314
>>16135319
>>16135327
>>16135332
>>16135333
>>16135337
>>16135339
>>16135345
>>16135374
>>16135376
>>16135390
>>16135391
>>16135392
>>16135399
>>16135402
>>16135403
>>16135404
>>16135407
>>16135408
>>16135428
>>16135440
at what age women peak

[Anonymous No.16135464]

>>16135459
Go back to your other thread or better yet fuck off to /pol/, holy shit this board is becoming garbage

[Anonymous No.16135469]

>>16135459
That one peaked at 12.

[Anonymous No.16135472]

>Go back to your other thread or better yet fuck off to /pol/, holy shit this board is becoming garbage

[Anonymous No.16135473]

>>16135459
12-14

[Anonymous No.16135477]

>>16135459
God damn it, stop this

[Anonymous No.16135492]

>>16135459
12-14

[Anonymous No.16135506]

>>16135282
This thread and all others like it feel like a glowie honey trap

[Anonymous No.16135507]

>>16135407
>That is a very normally developed body for a 12yo.
So the cunnybros were right all along?

[Anonymous No.16135515]

>>16135440
>Sexual attraction to children occurs in roughly 3 to 9 percent of the population. However, most knowledge about such desires comes from forensic samples, and most studies fail to assess preferred sexual activity and sexual partner. A new multimodal assessment of sexual desire was used to investigate interest in consensual and nonconsensual sex with adults and children in an online sample of men sexually attracted to children (n = 101). Desires were compared across history of sex offending behavior and preferred gender of child victim. Men who have and have not acted on their sexual attractions to children reported similar levels of sexual desire. Men primarily attracted to girls reported greater desire for sex with adults than did men primarily attracted to boys.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10538712.2017.1328476?af=R&journalCode=wcsa20

>The hypothesis that arousal to pedophilic stimuli is a function of general sexual arousability factors was supported in that pedophilic and adult heterosexual arousal were positively correlated, particularly in the physiological data. Subjects who were highly arousable, insofar as they were unable to voluntarily and completely inhibit their sexual arousal, were more sexually aroused by all stimuli than were subjects who were able to inhibit their sexual arousal. Thus, arousal to pedophilic stimuli does not necessarily correspond with pedophilic behavior.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0005789405800395?via%3Dihub

>The current study is the largest to date to employ pedophilic stimuli and genital measures with men drawn from a community sample of volunteers. The current results suggest that sexual arousal to pedophilic stimuli occurs among a sizable minority of normal men who report no pedophilic behavior and is not necessarily associated with pedophilic behavior.
https://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library/97-048_article.html

You should read your own studies, that graphs makes no sense

[Anonymous No.16135523]

>>16135282
shes not 12 shes 15 and she wouldnt fuck any of you fatfuck autistic book readers

[Anonymous No.16135529]

>>16135523
That's Angelina Polikarpova. She's 14 now and was 12 when that image was taken.

[Anonymous No.16135533]

>>16135507
It's not a normally developed body for a 12yo. Furthermore, anti-pedophilia moral arguments should are pretty much never based on appearances alone (it would be fucking stupid after all, since you can always find outliers, like OP did).

Basicslly: OP is trying to legitimize pedophilia by attacking the most retarded strawman that can be concieved.

[Anonymous No.16135534]

>>16135529
doesn't matter she looks 15 and she def wouldn't fuck you

[Anonymous No.16135546]

>>16135534
>it doesn't matter that i am totally wrong
lol ok bro

[Anonymous No.16135547]

>>16135506
It's the same one or two pedoposters making all of them

[Anonymous No.16135553]

>>16135533
Ops
*moral arguments are pretty much never....

[Anonymous No.16135554]

>>16135533
>moral arguments
Spooks?

[Anonymous No.16135561]

>>16135546
it doesn't i'd ask for her id before we fucked and if she was 12 i'd say give me your number i'll talk to you in 4 years, you'd ask for her id and she'd tell you to fuck off pedo

[Anonymous No.16135562]

>>16135554
>tfw to defend pedophilia you have to deny the validity of moral reasoning, making therefore literally everything permissible
lmao

[Anonymous No.16135565]

Bruh why are young girls developing like this and gen z boys are all twigs. Has it always been like this?

[Anonymous No.16135567]

>>16135561
post a timestamp of your flexed bicep so i can laugh my ass off

[Anonymous No.16135575]

>>16135533
>It's not a normally developed body for a 12yo
It is. I had very similar proportions at that age and so did the other girls i knew.
And i also know very well that girls are sexual beings at that age. The issue is that society sees sexuality as something inherently degenerate and filthy when it is n‘t at all. It‘s only that way because of what we have made out of it. If we could go back to seeing the purity and beauty in sexuality we could also stop trying to deny that 12yo‘s are sexual beings because we‘re so afraid to prematurely destroy their innocence with sex. The key is that sex doesn‘t have to destroy someone‘s innocence and purity. If we could stop being coomers and porn addict perverts with degenerated fetishes, we could go back to not see sex as something that destroys the beauty of a 12yo girls who is very much adequately developed to be sexually active.

[Anonymous No.16135576]

>>16135565
No, see >>16135295

[Anonymous No.16135579]

>>16135562
>moral reasoning
Unless you are a devout believer in certain religions you don't have a leg to stand on.

[Anonymous No.16135584]

>>16135554
Tell me what a spook is

[Anonymous No.16135586]

>>16135282
She is an outlier though, most girls dont have a body like that until 14-15. So you should just say you are attracted to 15 year olds, which is normal

[Anonymous No.16135588]

>>16135565
Yes it has always been like this. It‘s why all girls/boys schools are a thing. Girls develop sooner than boys. Just look at any 5. grade class. The boys are children still, the girls are becoming women.

[Anonymous No.16135593]

>>16135579
>duuuude I swear, torturing infants is not more immoral than eating a candy bar!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.16135596]

>>16135584
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/max-stirner/

[Anonymous No.16135602]

>>16135593
You can't justify why that statement is wrong unless you are religious.

[Anonymous No.16135603]

>>16135515
And how are "children" defined? If it's by the law (age of consent, which can be as high as 18), then the findings of the studies can be disregarded as utter bullshit, and if it's by puberty (below 10-11 or so), then the studies are right.

[Anonymous No.16135604]

>>16135596
There is no mention of the word "spook"

[Anonymous No.16135605]

>>16135567
i've been lifting, not gay though stay safe pedo boy

[Anonymous No.16135616]

>>16135575
No one is basing their arguments on the notions of innocence and purity either. Most reasonable anti-pedophilia arguments are mostly based on notions such as consent, cognitive differences between children and adults, and empirical findings related to the traumstic effect that pedophilic sexual relations have on children's developement.
The idea that people says that pedophilia is wrong because "eww it's gross/impure!!!" is laughable.

[Anonymous No.16135619]

>>16135605
>no timestamp
as expected. 1/10 effort nerd

[Anonymous No.16135621]

>>16135602
Good way of ignoring the totality of secular moral philosophy of the last 300 years.
Inb4 you have your own definition of religion

[Anonymous No.16135630]

>>16135616
>empirical findings related to the traumstic effect that pedophilic sexual relations have on children's developement.
Most studies done on this find the sex itself has little to no impact and people constantly telling them they are fucked up for life now is far more damaging.

[Anonymous No.16135636]

>>16135621
>secular
>morals
lmao i can fuck a toddler if i feel like it under """"""""""secular morals"""""""""

[Anonymous No.16135645]

>>16135616
> traumstic effect that pedophilic sexual relations have on children's developement.
Sex is traumatic when it is a dignity violation. This doesn‘t stop when one becomes an adult. It‘s just easier to grasp how some perverted old fart raping a little child will cause trauma. It‘s not actually an argument against pedophilia, it is an argument against sex that has been robbed of it‘s innocence. I completely agree with that, it should be banned and punished by death.

>consent, cognitive differences
I dare to assume that there are a lot of „adults“ who shouldn‘t be allowed to make their own decisions about consent based on their cognitive abilities either. If the prerequisite for sex should be consent from a cognitively developed person then a lot of adults wouldn‘t be allowed to have sex either. But yes, this is a grey area since kids aren‘t able to see the bigger picture yet. However, if sex wasn‘t traumatic due to perversion, seeing the bigger picture might not even be necessary.

[Anonymous No.16135649]

>>16135636
I guess yiu have your own retarded definition of secularism too, then. Please, tell me how Kant's philosophy (to pick one among the many) is religious. If it's not, tell me how it justifies the rape of toddlers.

[Anonymous No.16135655]

>>16135649
Tell me why I have to follow Kant's philosophy when he is just a man like me brainlet.

[Anonymous No.16135656]

>>16135619
i know people like you.
i won't even abuse you so bad that you go and lift ahahahhahaha

[Anonymous No.16135660]

>>16135630
Prove it. Post some reputable studies with a relevant citation count. Since MOST studies agree with your stance, as you claim, this request should be very easy to satisfy.

[Anonymous No.16135667]

>>16135655
Am I arguing with a 13 years old? lmao

[Anonymous No.16135669]

>>16135660
Studies on this are obviously biased since the people involved can not fathom the idea of sexuality being capable of purity.

[Anonymous No.16135686]

>>16135282
I just read this book for the first time a few days ago. It was really good, and I was surprised how emotionally affected I was. I felt a profound sadness for a full day afterwards. When Humbert begs Lolita to come live with him at the end and she just smiles and says "no", that moment is so perfect. A lesser author would have had Lolita and Humbert's final meeting be some melodramatic confrontation where Lolita screams about how Humbert ruined her life. But shes so worn down and just doesn't care. I loved the book but I don't know if I ever want to read it again.

[Anonymous No.16135694]

This whole thread bullshit, thoughts do not justifiy action. An extremely large majority of the population have homocidal fantasies, but this does not in the slightest justify carrying them out

Yes a 1/4 of men are sexually aroused by pedophilic stimulii, but lets be real here, by what can't we be aroused
https://www.ipce.info/sites/ipce.info/files/biblio_attachments/every_fifth.pdf

This does not justify any action being carried by an individual

[Anonymous No.16135699]

>>16135645
>Sex is traumatic when it is a dignity violation. This doesn‘t stop when one becomes an adult. It‘s just easier to grasp how some perverted old fart raping a little child will cause trauma. It‘s not actually an argument against pedophilia
The difference would be that we can concieve of adult sexual relations that are not touched by this argument, while the same cannot be said about pedophilic ones. In this sense, it is also an argument against pedophilia, since it entails a negative for every possible pedophilic intercourse.
I also disagree with your use of the concept of "innocence" here, but I think it's beyond the point (since I agree with your use of the notion of "dignity"). We seem to agree on what's important

[Anonymous No.16135704]

>>16135669
Dude wtf. You just said
>Most studies done on this find the sex itself has little to no impact and people constantly telling them they are fucked up for life now is far more damaging.
Were you just lying?