John von Neumann

[Pessoa No.16135216]

What would the scientist and philosopher John von Neumann think of GPT-3 self-learning AI right now? Would he think that we're on our path towards achieving Strong General Intelligence?

[Anonymous No.16135228]

>>16135216
I bet he'd be a tad skeptical, OP

[Pessoa No.16135250]

>>16135228
>I bet he'd be a tad skeptical, OP
I don't think so; I think he'd be actually quite sure we would have started reaching a breaking point in AI technology right now.

You might say that we've reached a limit of what computers can achieve at this point; but honestly saying this makes us look very stupid in 5 years or so.

[Pessoa No.16135261]

>>16135228
Who is the "girl" on the pic? She looks like the kind of tranny that would be into My Little Pony and be an agreeable sort-of-tranny that likes videogames. Back then I didn't like them all too much; but now I'm starting to think they're usually quite agreeable to be around with.

[Anonymous No.16135263]

>>16135216
>>16135250
Fuck off shill.

[Pessoa No.16135286]

>>16135263
Seems like you are frustrated. You should read some books and some philosophy, friend. I'd recommend you begin with Nick Bostrom's SuperIntelligence: Dangers, Paths and Strategies in order to chill a little bit.

[Anonymous No.16135292]

I'm reading the AI generated article and it's pretty convincing
It really does read like something written by a mindless liberal NPC bugman.

[Anonymous No.16135310]

>>16135250
>Read Ray Kurzweilly once

[Pessoa No.16135493]

>>16135292
>It really does read like something written by a mindless liberal NPC bugman.
Wait 12 months and it'll be as good as any writer you can think of - be it James Joyce or Nabokov.

[Anonymous No.16135502]

>>16135493
both are hacks