[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 62 KB, 540x540, 1512633491216.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16132278 No.16132278 [Reply] [Original]

>read the first chapter of a book
>decide it's shit and stop reading
How do I get over this hurdle of having impossible standards

>> No.16132316

>>16132278
Because you will enjoy it by the end. However some books are great from the start such as Notes from the Underground.

>> No.16132332
File: 100 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16132332

>finish a chapter or two of book
>hate it
>finish it anyway because I am not a quitter
>book doesn't improve

How do I start valuing my time over my pride

>> No.16132377

>>16132316
I read Notes From Underground and was disappointed by the first few chapters of Crime and Punishment

>> No.16132409

>>16132278
Pock it back up a little later and reassess. Every time I do this I check back in, and it turns out its a good or great.

>> No.16133472

lmao the problem isn't your impossible standard; the problem is your poor taste.

>> No.16133985

>>16132377
Did you at least make it to Part 2 of C&P? Otherwise you may have ADD

>> No.16134005

>>16133985
I can't decide on which translation to read

>> No.16134028

>>16134005
Garnett. Now get to it shitfuck

>> No.16134032

>>16132278
You should decide whether the book is good or not *before* starting to read. Do your research then read with confidence.

>> No.16134062

>>16132278
Try to set some benchmark for yourself. If, after having read one hundred pages, the book is still not interesting, you might be justified in setting it aside.
t. Considering dropping Kafka on the Shore

>> No.16135285

Read the adult adhd toolkit

>> No.16136457

>>16134028
Based

>> No.16136466

Just read the second chapter

>> No.16136785

>>16132278
Realize you don’t have impossible standards and are just stupid and getting filtered over and over again

>> No.16137366

>>16132278
Author got filtered by you. Based.