[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 184 KB, 1400x1392, elon-cyborg.0.0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16118933 No.16118933[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>AI passes the Turing test*
>its writing becomes indestinguishable from that of a human writer
What will this mean for the future of human-writers and their profession?

>> No.16118940

Someone ban this retard already

>>16118933
Bro you still haven't posted solid proof

>> No.16118943
File: 71 KB, 850x400, quote-i-ve-put-in-so-many-enigmas-and-puzzles-that-it-will-keep-the-professors-busy-for-centuries-james-joyce-15-10-82 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16118943

For good writers who actually have something relevant to say: nothing.
For pseuds and obscurantist retards like Joyce who use word salad as a device to enchant the reader it means the end of literature as they know it.

>> No.16118957
File: 142 KB, 1376x1124, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16118957

>>16118940
I have posted more than proof enough. The machine AI can even write philosophy up to this point. Get informed.

>>16118943
At this point in time, yes, high-quality literature is still not dominated by Machine AI learning. But this is just a very, very temporary thing. You see, in order for a person to be able to imrpove enough to become a great writer, e needs to practise his art during a whole lifetime; but for a machien to do the same, all it takes is a single generation of computational improvement.

>> No.16118961

>>16118957
Every time I ask for proof you tell me to just go to AIdungeon

>> No.16119013

>>16118940
fpbp
Shut the fuck up already

>> No.16119020

>>16118933
Why do you keep spamming this thread?

>> No.16119101

>>16118957
>an infographic where "dumb humans" are closer to Einstein than to chimps
>nu-/lit/ still falls for the bait
based effortbaiter

>> No.16119122

nothing. most published writing is already highly formulaic and strictly limited in the ideas and conclusions allowed to be given.

>> No.16119137
File: 199 KB, 1420x1963, 1594781038219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16119137

>>16118933
Human writers will use AI to assist them (atleast the smart ones) Use the AI to expand your story multiple times, look for what you think are actually kino storylines. Edit, format, add your own fluff. This is the future of writing, boomers might not like it but just wait till a breath taking novel is written this way.
Human writers won't go away, and AI will not be consistent for 300 pages for a while.