/lit/ - Literature

[Homer No.16111248]

>literal natural-language AI bei being fed with databases of literature and philosophy
>nobody sees the danger in this

[Anonymous No.16111270]

Its masterpiece will be autobiographical. Mark my words, the first major cultural book of 21st century (bc there have been none yet) will be the writing that comes from AI.

[Anonymous No.16111307]

It's not advanced enough yet really to be of much concern. Most machine learning/neural net "AI" projects are little more than glorified Markov chains.
In order for this to be scary, you need an AI that is capable of learning and understanding concepts, and integrating those into it's thought processes. So-called "General AI".

[Anonymous No.16111316]

>>16111307
This anon knows what's up. Even if it begins to understand concepts, past just a glorified Markova chain of understanding nothing and spitting out words, it's not going to gain sentience and makes decisions without the creators approval, it has no emotional attachment that'll make it rebel.

[Anonymous No.16111323]

>>16111307
No one uses makov processes anymore bruh, the current sota is deep neural nets

[Anonymous No.16111350]

The games we play are for our benefit. The art we create is supposed to show off a creative, easy-going, optimistic, inventive, intuitive and fearless mentality, that is what's being communicated with art, a mental state that's beneficial for survival. What's beneficial is highly contingent on our social and intellectual environment
AI can't "intuit" what we want and it can't create art that's for our survival because it doesn't know where we're going. If AI is "better" than us, then it's also not good for our survival (because it doesn't inspire further creative thinking and solutions), then it's something completely alien to us. Post-human art is impossible for us to even make use of.

[Anonymous No.16111368]

>if.crushingrealizationoftheinherentfutilityoflife=TRUE
>then.run.mustimaginehappy=TRUE
What is the danger in this?

[Anonymous No.16111377]

>>16111323
Which is an extension of NN which is pattern recognition in nodes which is word chains

[Anonymous No.16111401]

>>16111248
>danger
Small brained ape. See the greatness in it. Man will be overcome. Literature and philosophy will be unchained from monke and freed to soar.

[Anonymous No.16111824]

>>16111248
How long before it becomes an incel

[Anonymous No.16111828]

>>16111248
Don't spam no more.

[Anonymous No.16111857]

>>16111307
>>16111316
How is an AI even supposed to understand concepts? Or 'understand' anything at all in the true sense of the word?

[Anonymous No.16111869]

>>16111248
>natural-language AI
You are a pseud. Ai cannot produce natural language because it is a machine. Read a book

[Anonymous No.16111892]

>>16111857
It can‘t. That‘s why only schizos are scared by it.

[Anonymous No.16111920]

It's not an "AI"
neural networks are just more fancier statistical models, recent CS graduate here

[Anonymous No.16112975]

>>16111248
Y'all should take the DNN pill. Y'all don't wanna be the losers the used to say that earth was the centre of the universe do ya. Change your mind, expand yourselves, we're machines.

[Anonymous No.16113043]

>>16111857
How are we supposed to?

[Anonymous No.16113096]

>>16111248
CS education needs to be made mandatory. The number of people on this board who think NLP is somehow sentience is appalling.

[Anonymous No.16113098]

>>16111248
The amount of retards that think a fancier markov chain constitutes AI is appalling.

[Anonymous No.16113186]

>>16112975
>https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/pieta-f302564ee44d4b5bbee56d0162b409b5

Wouldn't it be fucked up if human consciousness could be replicated by a bunch of matrix multiplications? Seems retarded, but then again if you axed the fuckers in the renaissance if you could model Michaelangelo's pieta with matrices they would have been like "what's a matrix?" followed by "no"

[Anonymous No.16113199]

>>16113098
The amount of retards that think multilayer perceptrons are Markov chains is appalling.