[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 19 KB, 350x499, 41zP7EIMzsL._SX348_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103685 No.16103685 [Reply] [Original]

Ah PFFFFFFFT, whatever

>> No.16103693

I agree, it just reads like an account of human conscious living in his own jargon.

Doesn't really answer what being is, or time.

>> No.16103695
File: 730 KB, 2000x1890, peggy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103695

Hm.

>> No.16103718

He makes a big deal about not presupposing what being is, like referring to other thinkers on the matter. The best he could do is like, being, is. Then he makes a distinction in Being. Like, is he talking about God? Then he introduces Dasein, or just people, and describes every day living. I don't get why he's so acclaimed. Is it the way he formatted daily experience? Also, his attempt to generalize being feels misguided to me. We're all different.

>> No.16103748
File: 241 KB, 1280x800, 1595242010261.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103748

>>16103693
>>16103718
I'd like to give Sloterdijk a try. Will I *get* spheres if I have only a cursory understanding of Heidi's thought?

>> No.16103763

>>16103685
>>16103693
>>16103718
Imagine such filtering
ngmi

>> No.16103782

Being and Time is great, but I honestly prefer late Heidegger. His essays are a much better place to start for a new reader and his lectures are incredible.

>> No.16103910

>>16103748
>Will I *get* spheres if I have only a cursory understanding of Heidi's thought?
Yes.
He lays out his ideas very carefully and with a lot of explanation. If you feel like you should read up on some of Heideggers terms when they come up, then a quick refresh with wiki or another dictionary should do the trick easily.

>> No.16103976

>>16103910
You have read them then? Could you tell me how it enriched your perspective on existence, if at all? Sloterdijk's 'Spheres' purports to be a continuation of Heidegger's project. How do you feel about these two authors?

>> No.16104002

>>16103748
>Never has an author so insisted on distinction and yet attracted such vulgarity

what tf does this even mean?

>> No.16104015

>>16103685
I see this board remains a cesspool.
Bye see you later in a year or so.

>> No.16104058

>>16103718
>being is

Hahahaha no... There is being.

>> No.16104084

>>16103748
Currently reading yoh must change your life and its pretty kino. Not his ideas particularly but his takes on various philosophers

>> No.16104096

>>16104015
Come on anon, there is an excellent thread up discussing logical positivism.

>> No.16104097

>>16103782

Which do you recommend?

>> No.16104304

>>16103685
My problem with it is just that it's all. so. obvious.

>> No.16104327

>>16104015
See you tomorrow

>> No.16104337

>>16104058
>There is being.
deep

>> No.16104737

>>16104337
Filtered

>> No.16104985

>>16104097
Get the Harper Perennial Basic Writings collection for like 10 bucks, its a great intro to his thought. After that obviously you should give Being and Time a read, but I'd really recommend exploring the following lectures/essays:
>Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics
>What is called Thinking
>The Turning
>Identity and Difference
>Poetry, Language, Thought
>Heraclitus Seminar
>Plato's Parmenides and Sophist
>Lectures on Aristotle
>History of the Concept of Time
>Works on Holderlin
>Nietzsche Lectures
>Phenomenology of Religious Life
>Lectures on Schelling
>Off the Beaten Track
>Early Greek Thought
imo the works I listed are just as good as BnT, if not better in many aspects.

>> No.16105345

>>16103693
>or time
Temporality

>> No.16105352

>>16104985
I'd add Introduction to Metaphysics

>> No.16105361

>>16104015
you just said this yesterday. i remember.