[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 28 KB, 452x678, images (23).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16103007 No.16103007[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Why aren't more people talking about AI? THIS WILL LITERALLTLY CAUSE A DISRUPTION OF HUMANITY. THIS IS NOT A JOKE; IT IS NOT A PREDICTION; AND IT IS NOT A WARNING. IT IS A FACT. YOU CANNOT CONTROL THE EXPONENTIAL RATE OF GROWTH OF THIS THING.

>> No.16103028

It's one of those things that I will believe it when I see it, just like the Corona virus

>> No.16103055

>>16103007
>YOU CANNOT CONTROL THE EXPONENTIAL RATE OF GROWTH OF THIS THING.
We actually can, current AI cannot reproduce and improve without human beings.

>> No.16103061

>>16103007
>A programme will be able to write superior versions of itself
You people really are gullible, aren't you?

>> No.16103073

>>16103061
"The AI Singularity" is the 21st century Philosopher's Stone

>> No.16103074

>>16103007
I'm totally open to your thesis, but I've never seen a chatbot that was worth even half a shit. Where are all these AI programs that have the language-comprehension skills of a human? They don't exist.

>> No.16103109

>>16103007
AI is the ultimate pleb filter. I am talking abotu afilter way greater than filtering the retards who care about society, like the female teachers taught them in public school to be a good boy for liking the Humanist dogmas.

Nonononono. Way bigger filter than this. Ai is the filter for ALL rationalists. Literally all the subhumans can be pegged as utter retards. This is because rationalists think that the execution of a bunch of rules by an engine is intelligence.
THis is what a postmodernist society does on your cumbrain. You literally believe that intelligence is facade. You like a monkey in front of a Coca-Cola Coke dispenser who sees it as being served by living thing.
You are one cunt hair way to be a woman who thinks that machines should have rights in the democracy.

>> No.16103125

>>16103007
AI hype is wildly overblown by parties with a financial stake in its success, or people who plan to monetize it down the road. Similar to electric cars though, the promises are far ahead of the technology itself & the real results are generally underwhelming (remember Tay?). Silicon valley loves promising the Next Big Thing then underdelivering because the Thing is just some shit a wealthy executive cooked up out of the blue, with only enough detailed planning to convince investors to throw money at them (which isn't hard).

I remember being in awe of the idea of natural language processing but after working with various NLP modules/libraries I'm disappointed. It's not what the public thinks it is in its mind's eye

>> No.16103136

>>16103007
>>>/sci/

>> No.16103141

/sci/ here, OP you're retarded.
>>16103073
Completely correct.
There is absolutely 0 evidence that we're any closer to achieving general AI than we were 100 years ago.

>> No.16103143

>>16103109
>rationalists think that the execution of a bunch of rules by an engine is intelligence
What else can intelligence be?

>> No.16103144

>>16103074
unironically there are quite good linguistic models but AI doesn't tend to make use of them presumably because it's too complicated or there's not enough of a disciplinary crossover.

machine translation could be a lot better for instance but the available translators are outdated and poorly designed from the beginning. tech companies suck at making things.

>> No.16103149

>>16103143
idk what about your brain you retard? it's not a computer nor is it a bunch of rules executed.

>> No.16103151

>>16103149
What does that brain do that results in intelligence, if not follow rules?

>> No.16103153

>>16103151
Brain magic.

>> No.16103156

>>16103149
>nor is it a bunch of rules executed.
what else can it realistically be, it's just a machine made by DNA

>> No.16103163

>>16103144
We don't seem any closer to robust general AI than we were 50 years ago, despite all the hype.

>> No.16103174

>>16103156
>it's just a machine made by DNA
How do you know?

>> No.16103185

>>16103174
well we evolved didn't we? Unless God came down and did something sneaky we are just bits of DNA making copies of itself in more complicated ways.

>> No.16103188

>>16103185
So essentially we're just big arrays of numbers?

>> No.16103198

>>16103007
Gentlemen. Imagine a cluster of points in n dimensions. The n dimensions are the aspects or, technical term, features, of your dataset. An AI is nothing more than an algorithm that clusters those points based on certain criteria, determined by the programmer, and then drawing decision buondaries between those clusters of points. Thus, we have our model. Then the model merely takes in data, the aforementioned features, and compares them against the model to determine how to calssify any given new point. That's it. That;s the entire basis of AI. It's an algorithm for drawing lines in between clusters of points.

>> No.16103271

>>16103151
It could question those rules, I suppose. That's where self-awareness comes from.

>> No.16103665

>>16103007
Reminder that this guy keeps spamming threads under various names. Fuck off schizo namefag, get a life.