[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 28 KB, 388x333, Stirner.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075797 No.16075797[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>> No.16075804

he would've be dead from AIDS by now

>> No.16075818

>>16075797
If we're dealing in memes, he literally embodies the 30 y/o boomer. Doesn't care about ideas any more, embraces physical pleasure.

>> No.16075829

>>16075804
tops don't get aids

>> No.16075971
File: 42 KB, 564x448, 26e4618ce2546bfab54bf80ecd8c5435.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075971

>>16075797
Why?
>>16075818
I really hope that isn't what you got out of reading his works anon.

>> No.16075987

>>16075797
Nah, he’d have made a milk empire

>> No.16076008
File: 322 KB, 750x936, ms.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076008

>>16075797
>Why yes, I think gender is a spook, how could you tell?

>> No.16076010

>>16075971
becoming a femboy is the ultimate expression of the ego taking its own

>> No.16076022
File: 27 KB, 480x480, 1596562033609.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076022

>>16076008
femboys and trannies are very different, Anon

>> No.16076041

>>16076010
Incorrect. A transexual makes the feminine their property, while a femboy stops halfway.

>> No.16077010

>>16076041
A femboy makes both the masculine and the feminine their property

>> No.16077033

max stirner made some great literature and he'd be a king of shitposting and a massive femboy.
>>16076008
gender is a spook, more spooky then your dick when you see a femboy yourself

>> No.16077222

>>16077033
>>16076008
Gender isn't a spook. It doesn't refer to some platonic, hidden essence, it refers to a set of empirical aspects.

>> No.16077275

>>16077222
irremediably spooked trips poster

>> No.16077298

>>16077275
Again, you have no idea what that word means because you've never read Stirner. Lazy people like you are what lead people into believing they have refuted Stirner by saying "well, why not call everything a spook!", or "Isn't the idea of spook itself a spook?", which is completely fair as a criticism when your only relationship with his work is through people that don't know what it means and therefore use it everywhere.

>> No.16077349

>>16077298
Reading is a spook. Reality is a cope people use for not attempting things they really want to do.

>> No.16077353

>>16077298
can't meme either
fag

>> No.16077362

>>16077349
>>16077353
you guys are retards

>> No.16077377

>>16077362
retardation
is
etc

>> No.16077440

>>16077349
No, since you can use literature to increase your power in gaining property. Reading is a means.

>> No.16077457

>>16077362
what did stirner mean by 'property'?
have i made you my property?

>> No.16077471

>>16077457
He was horny

>> No.16077595
File: 36 KB, 384x500, 1596270869096.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077595

>>16077362
>you guys are retards
You're the one that thinks gender isn't a spook

>> No.16077650

>>16075818
>embraces physical pleasure
tell me where in any of stirner works he says this

>> No.16077901

>>16075797
He would be AnCap.

>> No.16077923

>>16077901
No, he wouldn't. Stirner is not an anarchist. To call Stirner an anarchist would be as dumb a mistake as to call Nietzsche an anarchist. Stirner wants to appropriate civilization for his own ends, and is thus the complete opposite of an anarchist.

>> No.16077925

>>16077595
You have no idea what that word means. It is just a floating signifier to you.

>> No.16078003

>>16077925
It's just referring to a concept, that's why he has to specify that the unique is just a way to gesture at the whole of you that is not a concept.

>> No.16078133

>>16077298
>relationship with his work
I doubt you are capable of understanding a single complex thought. Reading the words is not the same as knowing them.

>> No.16078149

>>16077925
Your thought are floating signifiers, like the turds I just squeezed out of my butt into a toilet niqqa

>> No.16078210

>>16077923
And how does One appropriate civilization all Oneself?

The answer confirms that he is the anarchist suprême

>> No.16078221
File: 34 KB, 363x523, 75D21AEC-5457-4AEC-A8CA-20AB74D2CE15.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16078221

>>16075797

>> No.16078225
File: 92 KB, 565x873, E773AD6D-2E82-4609-9529-CF9EB6576EFE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16078225

>>16078221
The sensible World is the only theater of pain

>> No.16078231
File: 8 KB, 211x238, D4E9B8A1-B486-4621-A245-24D218DD5510.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16078231

>>16078225
Would Max approve of Rozz?

>> No.16078239

>>16078210
>And how does One appropriate civilization all Oneself?
Absolute monarchy--the logical end of anarchist society.

>> No.16078388
File: 89 KB, 411x411, DE18CD7D-3A18-4A88-98D2-5F1FD7862F16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16078388

>>16078239
You haven’t read it, I see.

>>16075797
Of Max Stirner was born 20 years ago, he’d have been a cat

>> No.16078599

>>16078388
>he said it in the book, it must be right!
Bootlicker

>> No.16078646

>>16076041
That's retarded. Trannies are gross, femboys are hot.

>> No.16078797

>>16075797
He already was one:
>Outwardly of middle height, Max Stimer was a slim, almost lean man, inconspicuous in every way. Simply dressed, but always with great care and cleanliness, his compact appearance was thoroughly that of a man without any outward pretension. If here and there he was declared to be a dandy, then it may be recalled that many already held every orderly, however simply dressed man to be a fop, which Stimer quite certainly was not. Rather, he had something of the upper school teacher about him, "a teacher of the best kind for upper school girls," and this impression was further strengthened by his silvery glasses. As a teacher at Mme. Gropius's he is said to have worn "thin steel glasses with small lenses" that, when he took them off something he often did-showed the strong indentation they made over his nose.

>He never appeared neglected, even if in later years, when need and loneliness beset him, he may not have given his outward appear ance its old exactness. He wore short blond sideburns and mustache, while his chin was always clean-shaven, and his blond, reddish, lightly curled and short cut, soft hair left completely free his massive, domed, quite strikingly high and conspicuous forehead. Behind the glasses his clear, blue eyes looked at people and things calmly and gently, neither dreamily nor staring. Around the fine, small-lipped mouth often played a friendly smile, which with the years sharpened and which betrayed an inner irony, just as many no ticed in Stirner a "quiet inclination to ridicule." This trait, attributed by others to bitterness, had certainly not yet gripped him in the years in which he appears to us here, nor had ever been used to wound any one. His nose was moderately large, strong, ending in a point; his chin was bold. Stirner's hands were especially handsome: white, well cared for, slim, "aristocratic" hands. In short he gave a thoroughly pleasant impression. He appeared self-confident and calm, without hasty and jerky movements-with a light trace of pedantry.

>> No.16080350

>>16078646
Based

>> No.16080372

>>16078599
>He coined the term Union of Egoists
>he must have meant monarchy
>The book is mine now!

>> No.16080373

I just saw this in the bookstore today, it’s one of 300, should I buy it?

>> No.16080377

>>16080373
What translation?

>> No.16080379
File: 23 KB, 333x400, 4527E028-5EA2-48D0-B904-6E6411D457C4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16080379

>>16080373
Forgot picture

>> No.16080389

>>16080379
>dat meme pic
GO BACK NOW

>> No.16080394

>>16080389
I’ll get on it tomorrow

>> No.16080395

>>16080379
Weird. Is this in German than?

>> No.16080399

>>16080394
desu most of the stuff is probably online, did you happen to check the content?

>> No.16080409

>>16080395
Yes, that’s why I didn’t get it, because I don’t speak German, but I might get it and give it away on /lit/ or something, dunno

>> No.16080425
File: 726 KB, 1280x3600, 4A3FCFE2-91D3-434D-94E5-5B35B1F18A8A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16080425

>>16080409
Well don’t get it if you can’t read it.
I was gonna make a joke and say all you have to do it take it and it’s yours

>> No.16080524

>>16080425
u haven't posted substance about a single book since feminister trciked u

>> No.16080815

>>16078388
Kill yourself trann

>> No.16081194

>>16078797
>clean and cute
>fem
low bar

>> No.16081207

>Implying the satirical alter ego pseudonym known as "Max Stirner" was ever born

>> No.16081439

If he was born today he wouldn't have written a word because the modern world is tailored exactly to him and he wouldn't have a single critique to make.