This is a book

[Anonymous No.16065314]

This book exposes the left as a braindead cult serving jewish power by destroying western civilization.

It contains literature.
In this literature there are arguments.
Among these arguments there is not one the left has refuted.
Discuss.

[Anonymous No.16065322]

>>16065314
Chapter 7: Jewish Involvement in Shaping U.S. Immigration Policy

pp. 241-42: Jews support liberal immigration because it means a pluralistic society, not a homogeneous one. Hence there is little chance of a unified opposition to Judaism.

p. 242: “Ethnic and religious pluralism . . . serves Jewish interests because Jews become just one of many ethnic groups. . . . Jewish activism on immigration is merely one strand of a multipronged movement directed at preventing the development of a mass movement of anti-Semitism in Western societies.”

p. 249: “In The Passing of the Great Race (1921) [Madison] Grant argued that the American colonial stock was derived from superior Nordic racial elements and that immigration of other races would lower the competence level of the society as a whole as well as threaten democratic and republican institutions.”

p. 251: “. . . It is probable that the decline in evolutionary and biological theories of race and ethnicity facilitated the sea change in immigration policy brought about by the 1965 [Immigration and Nationality Act].”

pp. 254-55: “Jews played a very prominent role in organizing blacks beginning with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. . . . Jews organized African Americans for their own interests rather than in the best interests of African Americans.”

Jewish Anti-Restrictionist Political Activity

p. 259: “Making the United States into a multicultural society has been a major Jewish goal beginning in the nineteenth century.”

pp. 281-82: “Restrictionists [regarding US immigration in the 1920s and 1930s] often pointed to evidence that over 90 percent of American Communists had backgrounds linking them to Eastern Europe.”

p. 288: “Richard Avens noted, ‘One of the curious things about those who most loudly claim that the [restrictionist McCarran-Walter] act is “discriminatory” . . . is that they oppose admission of the approximately one million Arab refugees in camps where they are living in pitiful circumstances after having been driven out of . . . Israel.’”

p. 293: “Particularly important is the provision in the Immigration Act of 1965 that expanded the number of immigrants. . . . Jewish spokespersons had been in the forefront in attempts to admit family members on a nonquota basis.”

p. 294: “The family-based emphasis of the quota regulations . . . has resulted in a multiplier effect that ultimately subverted the quota system entirely by allowing for a “chaining” phenomenon in which endless chains of the close relations of close relations are admitted outside of the quota system . . . .”

p. 296: “. . . The Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of the United States. . . .”

[Anonymous No.16065331]

does reading this get me deeper in depression? honest answers pls

[Anonymous No.16065333]

>>16065322
Appendix: Jewish Pro-Immigration Efforts in Other Western Countries

p. 301: “It is remarkable that the sea change in immigration policy in the Western world occurred at approximately the same time (1962-1973), and in all countries the changes reflected the attitudes of the elites rather than the great mass of citizens. . . . In neither Australia nor Canada was there ever any popular sentiment to end the older European bias of immigration policy. . . .”

p. 302: “Only after the 1978 [Canadian] law was in effect did the government embark on a public information campaign to inform Canadians of their new immigration policy. . . .”

[Anonymous No.16065334]

Pinker BTFO this book so hard:
>The suggestion that scholars "can't ignore bad ideas" is a nonstarter. In science there are a thousand bad ideas for every good one. "Doing battle" against all of them is not an option for mere mortals, and doing battle against some of them is a tacit acknowledgment that those have enough merit to exceed the onerous threshold of attention-worthiness. MacDonald's ideas, as presented in summaries that would serve as a basis for further examination, do not pass that threshold, for many reasons:

>1. By stating that Jews promulgate scientific hypotheses because they are Jewish, he is engaging in ad hominem argumentation that is outside the bounds of normal scientific discourse and an obvious waste of time to engage. MacDonald has already announced that I will reject his ideas because I am Jewish, so what's the point of replying to them?

>2. MacDonald's main axioms – group selection of behavioral adaptations, and behaviorally relevant genetic cohesiveness of ethnic groups – are opposed by powerful bodies of data and theory, which Tooby, Cosmides, and many other evolutionary psychologists have written about in detail. Of course any assumption can be questioned, but there are no signs that MacDonald has taken on the burden of proof of showing that the majority view is wrong.

>3. MacDonald's various theses, even if worthy of scientific debate individually, collectively add up to a consistently invidious portrayal of Jews, couched in value-laden, disparaging language. It is impossible to avoid the impression that this is not an ordinary scientific hypothesis.

>4. The argument, as presented in the summaries, fails two basic tests of scientific credibility: a control group (in this case, other minority ethnic groups), and a comparison with alternative hypotheses (such as Thomas Sowell's convincing analysis of "middlemen minorities" such as the Jews, presented in his magisterial study of migration, race, conquest, and culture).

[Anonymous No.16065344]

>>16065331
the only thing that won't make your depression worse is attaining a level of physical prowess that lets you obtain a mate (not a temporary whore)

[Anonymous No.16065350]

>>16065334
also friends with dershowitz and epstein

[Anonymous No.16065371]

>>16065334
MacDonald BTFO pinker so much softer than he could have:
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Pinker.htm

>1
This is ridiculous. In Culture of Critique I make it clear that in order to be considered as a Jew who is participating in a Jewish intellectual movement, the person must have a Jewish identification and must regard their involvement in the movement as advancing specific Jewish interests. More specifically, my procedure is as follows:

1.) Find influential movements dominated by Jews, with no implication that all or most Jews are involved in these movements and no restrictions on what the movements are. For example, I touch on Jewish neo-conservatism which is a departure in some ways from the other movements I discuss. In general, relatively few Jews were involved in most of these movements and significant numbers of Jews may have been unaware of their existence. Even Jewish leftist radicalism — surely the most widespread and influential Jewish subculture of the 20th century — may have been a minority movement within Jewish communities in the United States and other Western societies for most periods. As a result, when I criticize these movements I am not necessarily criticizing most Jews. Nevertheless, these movements were influential and they were Jewishly motivated.

(2.) Determine whether the Jewish participants in those movements identified as Jews AND thought of their involvement in the movement as advancing specific Jewish interests. Involvement may be unconscious or involve self-deception, but for the most part it was quite easy and straightforward to find evidence for these propositions. If I thought that self-deception was important (as in the case of many Jewish radicals), I provided evidence that in fact they did identify as Jews and were deeply concerned about Jewish issues despite surface appearances to the contrary. (See also Ch. 1 of CofC.)

(3.) Try to gauge the influence of these movements on non-Jewish society. Keep in mind that the influence of an intellectual or political movement dominated by Jews is independent of the percentage of the Jewish community that is involved in the movement or supports the movement.

(4.) Try to show how non-Jews responded to these movements — for example, were they a source of anti-Semitism?

Obviously, it's not enough to simply be a Jew, and in Chapter 2 of The Culture of Critique, I list a number of Jews who have contributed to evolutionary/genetic perspectives on human behavior. There is no evidence that they were involved in a Jewish intellectual movement as I have defined this. However, no evolutionist should be shocked at the possibility that scientists pursue their ethnic interests via their research. Indeed, this should be the default assumption. But it must be proved, not assumed.

see link for more. But obviously pinker is nothing but lying propaganda mouthpiece for the jewish conspiracy, everything he says is wrong in all his work.

[Anonymous No.16065465]

>>16065350
Not an argument
>>16065371
Not a btfo

[Anonymous No.16065503]

>>16065465
Not an argument

[Anonymous No.16065542]

>>16065465
It literally is an argument.

[Anonymous No.16066193]

[Anonymous No.16066313]

[Anonymous No.16066321]

Nigga this is the third fucking time you made this thread get a grip.

[Anonymous No.16066442]

[Anonymous No.16066728]

[Anonymous No.16067035]

[Anonymous No.16067112]

Dropped like a bag of hot potatoes. Its sad that this crackpot is the only source neo-nazis have to support their ideology

[Anonymous No.16067125]

[Anonymous No.16067138]

>>16065314
This is a jew boy.
He makes the same thread over and over.
you can find more info on him here: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/smiley-fringe-wizard-kenneth-schueler-and-fringechan.4428/

[Anonymous No.16067153]

>>16067112
>appeal to authority

[Anonymous No.16067158]

>>16067153
le npc le meme
gtfo jewboy

[Anonymous No.16067162]

>>16065334
What a dishonest puke. The funny thing is that the only people who will be swayed by this lazy rebuke would have been swayed by anything, because they're the stupid majority only looking for which figure is the mainstream one they're 'supposed' to believe, while the real smart people who are curious to read Pinker's justification for dismissing a controversial book outright will be disgusted by his slimy rhetoric.

>>16065350
Big surprise. It can't even be called irony anymore, because irony requires that you didn't expect it.

Reminder not to respond to low effort trolls. The more they troll, the madder they really are.

[Anonymous No.16067175]

>>16065314
Kill le jews!

[Anonymous No.16067228]

[Anonymous No.16067285]

>>16067158
sad living joke

[Anonymous No.16067314]

>>16065465
>NOOOOO WHAT DO YOU MEAN PEOPLE TEND TO BE TRIBALISTIC AND PROTECT THEIR GROUP

[Anonymous No.16067372]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Genetic_Diversity:_Lewontin%27s_Fallacy
>common genetic variation varies more between individuals than between races, race/ethnicitiy doesn't really mean anything biologically
>all genes are equal in effect
fucking kikes

[Anonymous No.16067441]

Western Civilization isn't being destroyed, it's just adapting and changing. Unless you're a traditional Catholic you have no stakes in muh western civilization

[Anonymous No.16067449]

>>16065334
Word salad

[Anonymous No.16067477]

>>16067175
This is too classy to be a suburban mall ninjas house

[Anonymous No.16067584]

>>16065314
Antisemitism is just mystifying class-strugle, even if you remove the Jews, you still have European billionaires. And their interests go against the interests of the working class.
This is why fascism is essentially is just a protection for capitalism in decay. The cause of class-strugle is projected onto the external intruder. Go back to /pol/.

[Anonymous No.16068823]

>>16067584
I agree that the problem is billionaires who care only about profit and that many of the people responsible for the current decline of our civilizations and destruction of our planet are not Jewish BUT there is a Jewish element that cannot be ignored. Look, man. I used to be a communist. I understand how stupid all of this can look, especially when you have idiots from /pol/ throwing around slurs and advocating genocide. There is a problem with elite Jews working in the interest of their people to the detriment of the west though. People who only focus on the JQ are missing the bigger picture and often descend into actual bigotry but if you're ignoring it, you aren't fully understanding the picture you're looking at.

[Anonymous No.16068845]

Holy moses when did /lit/ become so obsessively based?

[Anonymous No.16068861]

>>16068823
>>16067584
le rhyme with ventral tanks phrase

[Anonymous No.16068866]

>>16065314
This shit's an endless cycle "->Goy insanely cruel to Jew because of their self-pity, tribal bullshit, and scheming-> Jew engages in self-pity, tribalism, and scheming to fuck over Got who fucked hin-> (return to beginning)". How do we get out of this shit? The simplest route is not caring, but you get in trouble for not caring in America.

[Anonymous No.16068868]

>>16068823
>Jewish element
What? And how can it not be solved for striving for socialism thus removing Jewish porkies from positions of power and usurping surplus wealth from the exploited working class?

[Anonymous No.16068911]

>>16065314
Honestly, I read the book ~2 years ago but eventually you realise that the jews are the not the be all and end all, and that people who fixate over them and mention them in every passing sentence come off like distasteful retards (like TRS).
At some point you have to realise that what Codreanu said that "a country only has the jews that it deserves" is true.
Anglo liberalism and internationalism (yes liberalism began with WHITES) is the root of this, its ideology merely allowed Jews to take root and gain immense power, and in the end, Jewish power works in cooperation with the Anglo elite in America who are wholeheartedly devoted to liberalism.
Whites are the most fervent supporters of liberalism, they are promoting it and pushing it to absurd lengths.
At what point are TRS retards going to keep crying about jews while ignoring the fact that liberalism began with Anglos and is perpetuated by them.
Read Spengler.

[Anonymous No.16068916]

>>16065314
Imagine being this delusional.

[Anonymous No.16068954]

>>16067441
At what point is there a difference between "adapting and changing" and being destroyed?
Would you say that the barbarians invading the Roman empire is just the empire "adapting and changing"?
But then the empire collapsed, so where do you draw the line?
Also
>Unless you're a traditional Catholic you have no stakes in muh western civilization
Catholics in Southern Europe really played no role in Western civilisation.
It was created by largely Northern European Germanic peoples

[Anonymous No.16068957]

>>16068868
Because there are a lot of Jews involved in radical leftist movements both historically and currently who are in favor of destroying many good and healthy aspects of western culture. It's something to keep in mind when you look at who is leading your glorious revolution. Does it look like the German revolution? The Hungarian one? I also don't really think the revolution will ever come and at this point radical leftists are useful idiots for capital. The short term goals of anarchists and Marxists are often the same as those of progressive capitalists. Get rid of distinctions, break down borders, flood the country with cheaper labor, erode traditional sources of meaning and identity so they may be replaced with more consumerism.

It's also important to understand the JQ to understand the motivations of the Jewish bourgeoisie, which are sometimes motivated by their ethnic interests (or the cultural legacy of their heritage, which encourages universalism and pluralism) rather than their class interests, though those may intersect.

>>16068861
Central banks?

[Anonymous No.16068965]

>>16068911
Could not have said it better myself.

[Anonymous No.16069199]

>>16065322
>The Passing of the Great Race
I've known about this book for like a decade now but haven't read it. Has anyone here read it? Is it worth reading? I feel like most of the racial theories in it would be outdated by now.

[Anonymous No.16069213]

>>16068911
>a country only has the jews that it deserves" is true.
>Anglo liberalism and internationalism (yes liberalism began with WHITES) is the root of this,
chicken and egg. who funded Cromwell...
i do agree that myopia about Jews is stupid though.
>>16068957
that's the one. mental shanks