How does one avoid writing something like this?

[Anonymous No.16017212]

Do you think he only wrote one draft of this and published it immediately? Did he not ask for critiques?

[Anonymous No.16017283]

>>16017212
Reverse psychology isn’t gonna work, Horia

[Anonymous No.16017290]

>>16017283
SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP

[Anonymous No.16017298]

>>16017212
Not sure but it was perfect and 100x better than anything anyone on /lit/ has ever written

[Anonymous No.16017381]

>>16017283
kek based

[Anonymous No.16017416]

>>16017298
That's because it is literally the only book written by someone from /lit/

[Anonymous No.16017469]

It's good enough that my local Barnes and Noble has copies of it in their display window. Seethe more pseuds

[Anonymous No.16017491]

>>16017469
Stop breaking into bookstores to drop your trash on the displays, Horia.

[Anonymous No.16017519]

>>16017212
>>16017298
>>16017469
Cool it with the samefagging there

[Anonymous No.16017529]

>>16017519
Cope more pseud trash. You will never (NEVER) be as influential a thinker as Belcea

[Anonymous No.16017534]

>>16017529
>bb..ut im changing ip on every reply
it's time to stop belcea

[Anonymous No.16017567]

>>16017534
SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP!!!! YOU WILL NEVER BE AS INFLUENTIAL A THINKER AS BELCEA, YOU ARE A WORM - A POISONOUS FLY INFESTING THE MARKETPLACE!! YOU ARE WICKED AND HOLLOW, HOLLOW AND WICKED! HOW WICKED AND HOLLOW YOU ARE!!!!

[Anonymous No.16017585]

The many faces of schizophrenia

[Anonymous No.16017653]

>>16017529
>Edited screenshot
Nice

[Anonymous No.16017672]

>>16017585
>>16017653
>>16017534
Horia, why are you accusing yourself of faking screenshots? Is this all to drum up hype for your book?

[Anonymous No.16017855]

>>16017672
This tactic of trying to make fun of yourself to get attention on your shit book won’t work Horia. Time to move on

[Anonymous No.16017881]

>>16017529
Do you know what the word "influential" means? It means it has influenced many people. Now how many people have read your book, let alone mention it to others? Probably not more than 10. It cannot be called influential by any standard.

[Anonymous No.16017908]

First draft, best draft

[Anonymous No.16017950]

>>16017908
This is incredibly based.

[Anonymous No.16018025]

>>16017881
Actually, strictly speaking, for something to be influential it only has to have influenced someone or something. If you read The Synthesis you would be aware of this basic fact

[Anonymous No.16018266]

>>16018025
If this is representational of the kind of thinking contained in that book then I'm glad nobody is reading it, myself included

[Anonymous No.16018293]

did horia ever come back after that thread? i miss him bros

[Anonymous No.16018301]

>>16017212
You have to go to school and learn how smart people talk

[Anonymous No.16018323]

ITT: one (1) insanely ambitious samefag

[Anonymous No.16018324]

>>16018301
This. Or read 19th and 20th century philosophy till you adopt their style and then you can write anything and 99% of people won't be able to call you out because they're not qualified to penetrate modernist obscurity

[Anonymous No.16018332]

>go see a doctor XDD
These are the people that get filtered by Mr. Belcea

[Anonymous No.16018342]

>>16018332

[Anonymous No.16018412]

>>16018342
Basado.

[Anonymous No.16018528]

>>16017416
I read it. He's not from /lit/. Maybe /pol/. But he only mentions books and authors in the context of not having read them. Except Bronze Age Pervert, which is what inspired this disaster.

>>16017881
I wish I could say it was influential in the sense of OP's post, but it really—really—is My Twisted World bad. Except less fun. It won't influence 10 people. Pic related.

>>16018266
It's peak midwit. Reading Tila Tequila tweets about flat earth is more interesting.

>>16018323
The book is far from ambitious.

>>16018332
>>16018342
Kek. That Schopenhauer quote is real btw.

[Anonymous No.16018579]

>>16017212
>>16017283
>>16017290
>>16017298
>>16017381
>>16017416
>>16017469
>>16017491
>>16017519
>>16017529
>>16017534
>>16017567
>>16017585
>>16017653
>>16017672
>>16017855
>>16017881
>>16017908
>>16017950
>>16018025
>>16018266
>>16018293
>>16018301
>>16018323
>>16018324
>>16018332
>>16018342
>>16018412
>>16018528
The best part about all of this is no amount of fake drama that he creates himself will make anyone want to read his book. Did he seriously think he could self publish and shill on lit into being successful and influential? Do you think he has daydreams of being the most celebrated thinker of the 21st century? Of all of Philosophy perhaps?

[Anonymous No.16018601]

>>16017212
It is not the first draft. It's fair to give him that. As for publishing, I haven't seen anyone post a physical copy, not even the author LARPing as a fan. Vanity publishing is never acceptable.

As for asking for critiques, obviously not. See:

>>/lit/thread/S15824974

One of the strange, under the surface aspects of this memoir is that there are no people, friends or family. Quite eerie. 500 page memoir. No people. Memoir. Alone. In his boring, stupid head.

1,885 semicolons. 500 pages. Infinite Jest has 1,249.

[Anonymous No.16018602]

>>16018528
>the book is far from ambitious
The samefagging isn't

[Anonymous No.16018634]

>>16018579
>Did he seriously think he could self publish and shill on lit into being successful and influential?

I'm not convinced it isn't a long form shitpost.

>Do you think he has daydreams of being the most celebrated thinker of the 21st century?

I think it's possible he fell into a power fantasy where we'd all finally see that HE proved that the world is all masculine/feminine and that humans operate, like wolves, in hierarchies. He neglected to prove the former or see if anyone before him ever noticed the latter.

>Of all of Philosophy perhaps?

Pic related.

[Anonymous No.16018641]

>>16018602
Can't you hire people? If not, I have a business idea.

[Anonymous No.16018643]

>>16018634
>>16018528
fuck off retad you're an even bigger pseud

[Anonymous No.16018668]

>>16018641
I don't have the capital to hire anyone. What's your idea?

[Anonymous No.16018674]

>>16018643
Seethe harder Horia.

[Anonymous No.16018702]

>>16018579
Reminded bitch janny Horia will ban his critics but allow his spam to proliferate, and then posts suspiciously defending him (totally not him himself...) start appearing. Do NOT trust jannies on this website they are corrupt.

[Anonymous No.16018715]

>>16018702
Wtf was up with the multiple bannings?

Wonder if this thread will stay up =)

[Anonymous No.16018722]

>>16018579
You are on the same level as him, in that you also lack self awareness and look incredibly stupid.
I actually bought the book and was the first to upload it to libgen. I am gonna be honest I read a large part of his book just to try to psychoanalyze this dude. Stuff like this has me in tears. It's like one of those 4chan screencaps were someone totally embarrassed himself, but the embarrassment is the thread that he made and the reality of his book (or actually it's more like a diary)
But you're a retard for mass replying, and I bet if you would write a book it wouldn't be much better

[Anonymous No.16018731]

>>16018722
I'm pretty sure anyone else's diary would be better.

[Anonymous No.16018740]

sneed

[Anonymous No.16018742]

>>16018715
Basically: When the book first came out, threads spamming it were made en masse. Posts memeing it up and being obnoxious began flooding in after people reading it saw how fucking bad the book was and began tearing it apart. After a while, the memeing switched to actual suspiciously sycophantic defense posts. In the following stage, there was massive bump spam on the then-four or so threads still active. Jannies never did anything. Someone decided to make a new thread to CONTAIN the Horia Belcea content to one place, with the proposal that jannies delete the rest. The meme spam and suspicious defense posts invaded said thread and then that thread, but not the other four, was deleted. By that point everyone began to realize Horia was actually a janny. A new thread was made by the old OP, this time pointing out that the past deletion while the other spam threads remained untouched was indicative that Horia was a janny. Everybody started piling on Horia and his shitty book, the shitty defending continued, then said thread was deleted and OP was banned. Eventually an explicit meta thread was made collecting the evidence of thread deletion and abuse, and that thread was also deleted and many people were banned. The four spam threads never got deleted. Horia spam suspiciously cooled down to tenable levels since but it still happens on and off, as you see here.

[Anonymous No.16018771]

>>16018742
How do we get Horia banned?

[Anonymous No.16018774]

>>16018722
No need to get worked up about it :)

[Anonymous No.16018782]

>>16018742
Oh wow. What a sad individual he must be

[Anonymous No.16018783]

>>16018771
Reporting a janny to Hiro is probably the most one can try do, but I'm not convinced that will really do anything. Still, you can try sending 4chan feedback or something.

[Anonymous No.16018790]

>>16018742
Thanks anon, I actually feel kinda bad for him but at the same time never want to see this book mentioned anywhere ever again

[Anonymous No.16018796]

>>16018782
He’s a fucking Romanian, what did you expect?

[Anonymous No.16018802]

>>16018782
>>16018742
>>16018771
stop samefagging retard none of these happened

[Anonymous No.16018815]

>>16018332
Fedoras should be eliminated. Yes...you can prove God

[Anonymous No.16018818]

>>16018790
>feel bad for him

All I’m experiencing is schadenfreude. Those threads where he was getting his ass torn apart were absolute gold.

[Anonymous No.16018822]

>>16018802
t. Whore's Belch

>>16018796
I know some fun romanians

[Anonymous No.16018825]

>>16018802
Fuck off Horia, there's literally no reason to lie about shit that can be proven to have happened with warosu.

[Anonymous No.16018826]

>>16018742
Are jannies assigned to one board only? Horia is not a litfag. Even on his first book post on /lit/ he says 4chan community. That sounds like /r9k/, which would explain his book and attitude and tinge of mental illness. Though he is a 32 year old wizard with no friends....

[Anonymous No.16018832]

>>16018826
>32 years old
Oh god oh fuck. Books to save me from that? I have 10 years left.

[Anonymous No.16018845]

>>16018826
Nothing really changes whether the janny doing the bullshit thread deletion and banning is or isn't Horia, it's just that it makes most sense if it is given the amount of suspicious defending Horia gets when the theory that he is a janny is floated around.

[Anonymous No.16018846]

>>16018790
If you read the book you won't feel bad. Only anger.

>>16018796
He is larping as Romanian to associate with BAP.

>>16018802
Idk man, I've been banned over this shit 2x. And I just want to discuss the dumb book and how dumb idiot Horia is...

[Anonymous No.16018849]

>>16018818
He needs a hug and to be told he doesn't have to be the greatest philosopher in the history of the world to be happy or loved

[Anonymous No.16018850]

>>16017212
this book saved my marriage, ama

[Anonymous No.16018855]

>>16018832
Stop coming to imageboards is a pretty good start, I would say

[Anonymous No.16018863]

>>16018845
Also at this point, the shilling is overwhelmed with making fun of the book. And people post the pdf so no one has to buy it... Doesn't 4ch have a board for torrent requests? But discussing a garbage book isn't allowed?

[Anonymous No.16018868]

>>16018846
This is how some people on here see themselves with philosophy

[Anonymous No.16018874]

Every month spend about and hour interrogating what you believe, and what your beliefs are grounded in. If you are a serious thinker you will quickly find that you have certain ungrounded assumptions about things i.e, what matter is, what being is, what intentionality is, what mind is, what objects are, and so on. Yiu follow the chain of questioning down to the assertion, and then you read, study, and research the debates around that assumption.

Midwits like this guy don't question themselves or ground their thinking. They are pseuds because they have built an entire philosophical project on ungrounded opinions. He begins from a theory about 'masculine and feminine', then going about applying it to society, never once challenging or interrogating what these terms mean, or what they are grounded in. To avoid mitwittery, you must read more than you theorise.

If you spend more time crafting the phrasing of your beliefs than interrogating them, then you are a pseud and a fraud. Every great philosopher has devoted their lives to interrogating their beliefs, since knowledge can only come from doubt. Kant awoke from his 'dogmatic slumber', and his interrogation of the basic assumptions of philosophy lead him to his copernican revolution. Descartes' radical doubt was the means to achieve a certainty. Heidegger interrogated the 'forgotten question' of being that grounded all philosophy. These great thinkers devoted their lives to doubting, questioning, and interrogating. Serious thinkers willingly debride their worldview in a painful procedure to cut away all the ungrounded nonsense and opinions in their minds. If you do not regularly do this you become a dogmatic. Once your dogma has ossified, you write it as a deranged manifesto, or pseudo-intellectual tome.

Socrates was right that the path to wisdom begins with accepting that you know nothing. Doubt leads to certainty, and scepticism leads to knowledge.

Read, read, read, read, my unlearned reader!

[Anonymous No.16018875]

>>16018849
He is a thoroughly unlovable bore.

>>16018832
Actually read books. Just never let a woman catch you with one.

[Anonymous No.16018879]

>>16018832
Read this
>>16018874

[Anonymous No.16018883]

>>16018874
>Read, read, read, read, my unlearned reader!
cringe

but nice effort post

[Anonymous No.16018890]

[Anonymous No.16018893]

>>16017212
why does this collection of schizoid ramblings keep getting shilled here?

[Anonymous No.16018901]

>>16018893
It's not schizoid. Besides the semicolon abuse, it's a diary of the normie quiet guy who sits in the middle of the middle row in a macroeconomics class.

Talking about liking Christopher Nolan and League of Legends isn't schizoid.

[Anonymous No.16018904]

>>16018890
>I got criticised and never touched it again
Wish the same would apply to his book

[Anonymous No.16018910]

>>16018904
kek

[Anonymous No.16018915]

>>16018904
LOL come to think of it, this will probably be the case. Fucking FIVE HUNDRED PAGES ahahahahaha imagine??

[Anonymous No.16018922]

[Anonymous No.16018929]

>>16018901
no, it's incel rantings about how society is so evil etc etc. there is no way you could read this self published garbage and think it's normal

[Anonymous No.16018934]

>>16018922
What is his proof of G-d?

[Anonymous No.16018942]

>>16018901
>a diary of the normie quiet guy
it's a diary of a narcissistic basement dweller

[Anonymous No.16018953]

>>16018929
You're witnessing just another one of those really awkward and suspicious defense posts that always pop up in Horia threads.

[Anonymous No.16018954]

>>16018922
Based, I love how casual it is

[Anonymous No.16018961]

>>16018883
It's a quote from Laurence Sterne

[Anonymous No.16018963]

>>16018929
I don't think this is a fair characterization. He is a confirmed wizard and ironically the vibe of the book is asexual.

There is zero anger or passion in the book, so there is a distinct lack of ranting.

Not sure what you're talking about...

[Anonymous No.16018971]

>>16018961
Even more cringe, Lucretius. =)

[Anonymous No.16018974]

At least this was fun to read.

[Anonymous No.16018982]

>>16018942
Yeah def narcissistic. But is League of Legends a basement dweller game? The distinct lack of in-the-world experience in a 500 page memoir almost definitely means he lives at home.

[Anonymous No.16018985]

>>16018963
>zero passion
The man is enamored with himself. It's one of the most self-fellating pieces of text ever written.

[Anonymous No.16019002]

>>16018954
>>16018934
Pic related. Yes, that's the whole proof.

[Anonymous No.16019015]

>>16018985
Nah. Read Or*y of the Will or Nietzsche... those have passionate self praise. Horia has only warm milk in his veins.

[Anonymous No.16019045]

>>16019002
>I think, therefore God is real

This could have been a compelling argument if he had spent his time developing it rather than talking about how he believes literal thought processes are far beyond conventional standards.

[Anonymous No.16019047]

>>16019002
beautiful

[Anonymous No.16019051]

>>16019045
*HIS literal thought processes

[Anonymous No.16019053]

>>16019045
>This could have been a compelling argument
No

[Anonymous No.16019056]

>>16019002
Damn, how will atheists ever recover

[Anonymous No.16019314]

>>16018846
The text in this pic is something I actually came to realize myself, and I have a blog where I post about the process of how I came to this level of understanding in detail, from initially having no comprehension of it. Now, unlike Horia, I can read sheet music, but I understand that this level of musical comprehension is essentially independent of whether or not you can actually read notes in staff notation or play an instrument, and for the sake of this being somewhat ignorant of music theory is somewhat of a blessing, because it allows you to realize that coming to this understanding of classical music is a 'natural' process that isn't dependent on being taught that music should be structured in a particular way or anything like that.

[Anonymous No.16019359]

>>16019002
im convinced

[Anonymous No.16019369]

>>16019314
You have no understanding of music. I bet you think it's subjective, don't you?

[Anonymous No.16019377]

>>16019369
Yes I do think it's subjective, faggot. Now go and read horia

[Anonymous No.16019391]

>>16019377
Dropped. You are as dumb as Horia.

[Anonymous No.16019553]

>>16019369
>I bet you think it's subjective, don't you?

The fuck are you on about? Of course it's 'subjective' in the sense that experiencing it in any particular way depends on your own ability to hear and interpret sound, which there is no specifically objective way of doing. We have specific tendencies as humans to hear and expereince things in certain ways as opposed to others, and musicians naturally take advantage of those they personally understand, but I can assure you that the way people personally experience music can differ immensely, and this I understand both through personal experience and research.

If you disagree pleas explain why.

>>16019377
This dude isn't me.

[Anonymous No.16019598]

>>16019553
You understand the musician has specific intentions when it comes to writing music?
Death of the Author doesn't apply to just books.

[Anonymous No.16019614]

>>16019553
>which there is no specifically objective way of doing
LOL ok Horia

>>16019598
It applies more to music

This guy really thinks the key to music is a musicians relationship with his instrument. Holy hell.

[Anonymous No.16019648]

>Let me preface this review by pointing out that I have given a 5 star review not becuase I think the contents of the book are revolutionary or artfully written; but for other reasons, which I will explain later.
>I found out about this book through a discussion on a literature forum, and I was shocked by how negatively it and it's author were recieved. While I don't think this book is the greatest philosophical work ever written, it certainly did not warrant the level of criticism it recieved. It's true that this book isn't written to the standards of an academic work of philosophy, and while the ideas presented are for the most part solid they do need to be refined and further developed. In addition to the ideas the writing itself also needs work; it can drone on at times and the ideas are not expressed very well. However, despite these valid criticisms, I still think this book has literary merit.
>While this book markets itself as a book on philosophy, it functions much better as a combination of personal narrative and social science. An ordinary man's attempt to make sense of the world, covering many far ranging yet interconnected topics. This point of view is enormously important, yet not one we see expressed often in literature. Current events combined with sincere personal reflection, on pretty much every topic imaginable. Many original and interesting ideas as well. This is what I think makes this book worth reading.
>As for the author, if he wants to write a more academically acceptable philosophical work, he has a lot of studying to do. He needs to gain a deeper understanding of past philosophers and their ideas, which is not present in this book. He also needs to develop and contextualise his ideas with more depth and nuance than he has done so far. This will be a lot of work but then again so is writing an entire book, and he has already accomplished that. I wish him the best of luck.

[Anonymous No.16019664]

>>16019648
horia really is an /r9k/ lolcow

[Anonymous No.16019695]

>>16019598
>You understand the musician has specific intentions when it comes to writing music?

Is this a question? I mean, at this point I'm assuming that you're interpreting Horia as saying something naive and equivalent to "classical music is about telling [some specific] story" like each piece of music contains some set narrative or something like that, and assuming I also mean something similar. But no I don't feel that and I don't believe Horia does either, it's just that this is a completely reasonable way of describing the 'abstract' story-like nature of a musical movement when interpreted by someone capable of perceiving music in terms of functional harmony and its progression.

But otherwise I can't tell what the fuck point you are trying to make.

>>16019614
>LOL ok Horia

I just think that this is an otherwise reasonable description of coming to a particular form of 'musical maturity', in contrast with the absolutely insane babble that is the rest of the book. I don't think this in particular is all that unreasonable, though "the key to music is a musicians relationship with his instrument" is badly worded nonsense that says nothing.

[Anonymous No.16019703]

>>16018528
kek did he actually read BAP?

[Anonymous No.16019717]

>>16018634
lmao Kant btfo

[Anonymous No.16019729]

>>16019695
>though "the key to music is a musicians relationship with his instrument" is badly worded nonsense that says nothing.
So what are you agreeing with?

>But no I don't feel that and I don't believe Horia does either
So you are Horia? No one besides him and I have read his diary. In fact I think Horia only wrote the diary and put it in front of everyone.

> it's just that this is a completely reasonable way of describing the 'abstract' story-like nature of a musical movement
No it isn't. I doubt you know anything about music m9

[Anonymous No.16019735]

>>16019703
I think so. It's the only book he mentions reading in 500 pages.

[Anonymous No.16019745]

>>16018742
lol that shit was obviously just someone forcing the meme. fucking newfag.

[Anonymous No.16019762]

>>16019729
>So what are you agreeing with?

The paragraph posted above that, which matches up with a particular way of interpreting music which I know is possible from experience and which others have also described.

>No one besides him and I have read his diary.

I've only read the excerpts posted in this thread and presumed that the bulk of it would be as silly.

>No it isn't.

Please explain why. What is your understanding of music like such that you just flatly disagree with this? Can you at least describe how you feel about this yourself and what your experience and background is?

[Anonymous No.16019794]

>>16019762
You agree with how Horia *feels* about music? And how he *feels* it's the musician and his instrument that is what makes music work? You are a retard, Horia. Also: I know you're not Romanian.

[Anonymous No.16019820]

>>16017212
Humility, and a agent/editor that will say "No."

[Anonymous No.16020035]

>>16017469
=^(

[Anonymous No.16020331]

>>16019717
He puts himself on equal footing. Amazin.

[Anonymous No.16020447]

>>16017212
This is one of those great occurrences in /lit/. The only problem with this great work of shit is the whole mod janny shilling of it.

[Anonymous No.16020565]

>>16020447
The bizarre modding just makes it better. Imagine pouring your heart out over 6 years onto a .docx, reading Bronze Age Mindset, having an emotional revelation that you're the next Kant (whatever Kant did, never read him), then tagging onto your .docx diary a summary of your trailblazing and lightninglike ideas, forever to guide humanity, subtitle: "Writing the future of modern philosophy", then using a vanity press and being laughed at every time your name or book comes up.

[Anonymous No.16020745]

>>16017212
>I suddenly realized that there was just a masculine force and feminine force to explain all of society - Horia Belcea

[Anonymous No.16020761]

>>16020565
Good point. The best part of it is that no matter how much it's shilled, the text speaks for itself.

[Anonymous No.16020797]

>>16020745
Except that even in his own words, the theory doesn't work:

>>16018528

Really have to wonder if it's a joke...

[Anonymous No.16020819]

>>16018342
It's so refreshing to read a philosophical text written with the common man in mind.

[Anonymous No.16020833]

>>16020819
based

[Anonymous No.16020901]

>>16020819
Hey man, could you answer some questions on, errr, behalf of Horia?

1. Did Horia think people would believe he was Romanian?

2. Is the book a parody or is it serious? To have this be unclear is an achievement.

3. Does Horia own any guns?

4. How much has this cost him so far? His time is worth nothing, obviously.

5. Could it be that his time has negative value? What are the implications of this?

6. What are his investing tips, since he was able to handily beat the stock market?

7. When will we see the next book in the series? I'm interested in Belcean film theory, Belcean video game criticism, Belcean recipes, Belcean PUA tips, and Belcean crisis management.

8. Why didn't Horia have anyone read his first draft?

9. I read his book in GOOD FAITH—when will he apologize for unleashing this garbage?

10. Does he realize his diary is a long list of why no one wants to be friends with him?

[Anonymous No.16021028]

>>16020901
>1. Did Horia think people would believe he was Romanian?
The concept of Romanianism is actually a subjective-peripheral ideal spun from an objective-center of racial categorization, which in turn serves as an objective-center for many different traits (stealing, lying, cheating, colorful tunics), which, when adopted by feminine-form male, become a new objective-center in and of itself. If, for instance, a caucasian man born in England were to be raised in an savage African tribe, could he not claim to be an African? But then again, the concept of Africanism is derived entirely by outsiders to the land known as Africa. To Africans, being African is just existing. Attempting to apply the concept of Africanism to any person or thing is a Caucasian trait. Your question is unanswerable.
>2. Is the book a parody or is it serious? To have this be unclear is an achievement.
Why do these concepts have to be mutually exclusive? Austin Powers clearly intends to mock certain aspects of the James Bond films, but does so with competent (therefore serious) cinematography, writing, casting etc. Therefore it is both a parody and a serious film. It would be better to categorize traits as being "feminine" or "masculine" as opposed to "parody" or "serious".
>3. Does Horia own any guns?
I would have to guess that Horia is a classic intellectual, and therefore subscribes to the notion of self-defense as an inherent right. How far he is willing to take this idea is anyone's guess.
>4. How much has this cost him so far? His time is worth nothing, obviously.
Publishing on Amazon is not expensive.
>5. Could it be that his time has negative value? What are the implications of this?
Time is an objective-center system. Horia Belcea exists as a subjective-peripheral. "Negative" is not the right word. Horia Belcea's time is masculine-feminine, as it is used to create things (feminine) of a spiritual nature (masculine).
>6. What are his investing tips, since he was able to handily beat the stock market?
The key is to be able to synthesize concepts and news from a variety of sources.

It occurs to me that your questions are not asked in good faith. I will not continue to indulge this mockery.

[Anonymous No.16021055]

>>16021028
What a little bitch.

[Anonymous No.16021190]

>>16021028
kek

[Anonymous No.16021298]

>>16019053
Why no? Thinking is DIVINE

[Anonymous No.16021342]

>>16021028
Good lord, your posts are just as miserable as your book. They’re goddamn hilarious though, and just as serious as Austin Powers evidently.

[Anonymous No.16021472]

>>16021028
Imagine writing this shit and not commiting suicide

[Anonymous No.16021477]

>>16018893
I'm pretty sure the author of this book wrote it just to troll us. There's no way someone could write something this bad and actually believe it. Although I have been getting a good laugh out of this thread.

[Anonymous No.16021502]

>>16021477
Then whose diary is it? It would be p great to stumble on a goldmine like this a shove it out into the light under a fake name.

[Anonymous No.16021556]

>>16018722
Based

[Anonymous No.16021596]

>>16021477
It ain't true, look at the archives. This nigga serious.

[Anonymous No.16021679]

>>16017212
Can anyone who has read it confirm or deny pic related?

[Anonymous No.16021945]

>>16021679
The post fits but it's fake

[Anonymous No.16022235]

>>16021679

[Anonymous No.16022244]

>>16018528

[Anonymous No.16022249]

>writing the future of modern philosophy

Does he not know that "modern philosophy" refers to ~1500-1800

[Anonymous No.16022253]

>>16022249
Go back to your containment thread guenonfag

[Anonymous No.16022313]

FUCK YOU HORIA BELCEA

[Anonymous No.16022339]

>>16021028
Holy kek, this guy it's taking its larp too far

[Anonymous No.16022361]

Whoever wrote this book is actually pretty brilliant in terms of marketing his self-published book, you should all take notes.

[Anonymous No.16022371]

>>16022361
How does shilling on 4chan equals marketing

[Anonymous No.16022377]

He's actually a decent writer, he just needs to read more philosophy or maybe even pursue formal education in it

[Anonymous No.16022390]

>>16022377
>this is decent writing by /lit/ standards

[Anonymous No.16022391]

>>16022371
I've seen this book all over 4chan, I know it by name and cover by the amount of times random people have been posting it around, this author is a WHO, and has gotten a whole lot of attention. Marketing is anything that gets your product into minds of others.

[Anonymous No.16022396]

>>16022391
Yeah, but I don't think it helps when a even a bunch of faggots can see through the charade and recognize is shit and no one should read it, if anything people only try to get their hands on the book so they can have a good laugh at his retarded shit

[Anonymous No.16022402]

No idea

[Anonymous No.16022672]

Nigger

[Anonymous No.16023422]

>>16022377
Wow he can string nouns and verbs together. He can't think, he can't write—no discernible talent. And the fucking semicolons man; he is NOT a decent writer. It has more semicolons than Infinite Jest; which is why I think it may be a parody.

[Anonymous No.16023427]

>>16022391
In the minds of others as lolcow fodder... selling no copies b/c someone uploaded the pdf to a libgen mirror... the whole thing was a mistake...

[Anonymous No.16023445]

>>16022396
It should be read. It's a fully baked and dressed, marinated and seasoned disaster

[Anonymous No.16023467]

>>16023427
hey, if people liked it, they might buy your next one

[Anonymous No.16023482]

>>16023467
You can get the gist from all the screencaps... there's nothing to engage...

[Anonymous No.16024009]

>>16022361
He succeeds because he has the janny power to protect his spam from deletion and also mass bans his critics.

[Anonymous No.16024062]

>>16022361
just a janny that baned everyone that criticised him.

[Anonymous No.16024089]

>>16017298
ahhhh selfie/suicide?

[Anonymous No.16024093]

>>16017212
Where can I get hold of a few thousand copies. Im the president of the hale posh boys reading club curriculum and I think this is the finest piece of written word since that guy who done fight club. I think the title sums up perfectly what the modern world needs and thats a collective 'go back to the internet' approach.
Once again, I am writing to inform the reading public that based on what I have read (about 12 words on the front cover) this is already enough for me to consider buyi....

[Anonymous No.16024107]

>>16018890
what a load of bullshit lol