/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.15994517]

why won't she just show me her bookshelf?

[Anonymous No.15994530]

Which mental illness do you think she has?

[Anonymous No.15994549]

>>15994530
npd

[Anonymous No.15994557]

>>15994517
really weird nose

[Anonymous No.15994562]

Twitter screenshots should be banned. Also anyone who further replies to this thread is a fag and actively encouraging the decline of the west.

[Sage No.15994567]

jannies really need to get to work and permaban you twitter faggots

[Anonymous No.15994583]

die faggot zoomers with your fucking twitter screenshots

[Anonymous No.15994596]

>>15994562
My shitposting will expedite the coming Ceaser

[Had sex this morning No.15994674]

Wouldn’t it be beautiful if someone broke into her house with a gun and blew her fucking head open?
Not even trying to be edgy here, it’s just this manner of chaotic aloofness these cookie cutter art hos have. It would just be poetic if one day she attracted with her perpetual orgy of quirky ambiguity, not another sickles sycophant, but a genuinely unpredictable and chaotic outsider who murdered her horrendously. Like a match her life would flare brightly, sizzle out quick and ultimately be insignificant. And I’d lol

[Anonymous No.15994695]

>>15994674
samefagging, shut up and go kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.15994704]

>>15994517
this whole commodification of the smallest female gestures, photographs, little video clips, 'likes' and comments, as a business model, and the associated male behaviors, ideas, and terminology spreading like 'simps' is probably disastrous for sex relations. Not that this is like a very original observation

[Anonymous No.15994708]

>>15994517
>cats eye eyeliner
telltale sign of being fugly

[Anonymous No.15994719]

>>15994704
then why do I want to see the bookshelf more than her

[Anonymous No.15994722]

>>15994695
>samefagging
>one post
unironically how?

[Anonymous No.15994736]

>>15994704
I blame men for falling for this shit desu, it's pathetic

[Anonymous No.15994737]

>>15994704
I was just talking to a jew about this recently, it turns women into meta-stable complexes of "smallest gestures" like you say. As the number of men increases who haven't ever touched a woman, women are increasingly forced to become assemblages of symbols of male lust woven together, little things that titillate men for reasons they can't even express, and the women don't even realize it or have control over it, it just happens naturally as a function of being "fed through" social media, wearing makeup, wearing slutty clothes.

Women are now meatloafs made of male sexual ideas of womanhood.

[Anonymous No.15994746]

disgusting

[Anonymous No.15994749]

>>15994517
>look! you need to know that a male wants my vagina hehe so indiferent and playful

[Anonymous No.15994763]

>>15994719
king

[Anonymous No.15994765]

>>15994549
more like NPC am I right fellas?

[Anonymous No.15994772]

>>15994557
It's the makup

[Anonymous No.15994782]

>>15994530
all of them.

[Anonymous No.15994787]

>>15994737
This "meatloaf" is a male creation, though. You can't say that it is what women "are," it's only in their perception by a certain class of men that they become it

[Anonymous No.15994807]

[Anonymous No.15994809]

>>15994674
>Wouldn’t it be beautiful if someone broke into her house with a gun and blew her fucking head open?
kek. The literary beauty of thousand classical novels could not compare to that.

[Anonymous No.15994814]

everyone who has a twitter account should be shot and dumped in a mass grave

[Anonymous No.15994819]

>>15994787
>women have no agency

[Anonymous No.15994828]

>>15994737
it’s funny to call her a meatloaf because both meatloaves and this e-girl are brown and disappointing

[Anonymous No.15994833]

>>15994517
I want to cum all over her disgusting eyebrows.

[Anonymous No.15994869]

>>15994530
art hoenitis

[Anonymous No.15994874]

>>15994787
Agreed, that's why it's so sad. Whatever womanhood really is or could develop into, it's completely buried under these constructions of male lust now.

I have male lust and it's not good. It's a swirl of overlapping instincts telling you that women are nice soft princess angels who taste like sugar and the color pink. Those instincts should be tamed and integrated into a real appreciation of women, but everything about today's society goes in the opposite direction and panders to the instincts directly. Everywhere I go I'm assaulted by cartoonish images of femininity that confirm my retarded dick's conception of them and invite me to deepen that conception. Now after generations of advertising and media modifying images of women, women even modify themselves to correspond to the images, with surgeries, filters, editing their waistlines and smoothing away imperfections in selfies etc. No surprise there, women are literally subordinate to men's images of women.

That is the real root of the simp/onlyfans phenomenon. It's not just that some men are horny and have no dignity, it's that they have gone so far into worshipping living images like Belle Delphine that they don't even know that's not what a real woman is anymore, they think she is just the ideal woman. Their instincts are telling them that she exists in a permanent state of being made-up, smoothed over and filtered by cameras and editing software, that she's always making a bubbly pink sex face, that being near her would be like snorting pink-flavored cocaine nonstop. Simps aren't trying to fuck the real woman behind the illusion, they are trying to mainline the illusion like pure heroin because they have no idea what a real woman is aside from that.

Women dangerously underestimate how clueless men are about them editing their bodies in photos and such. Most men don't even look clearly at how a woman paints her face. They think that "cat eyes" thing is simply "how some women look." It's operating on their instincts, not on their conscious thoughts.

[Anonymous No.15994880]

guys I just want to see the bookshelf...