How do I recover from U.G Krishnamurti?

File: 17 KB, 460x408, ug054.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

How do I recover from U.G Krishnamurti? Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:14:48 2020 No.15970809 [Reply] [Original]

How does one sanely recover from this guy? This man shattered everything for me, I'm left with a barely functional self/mind. How does one recover so he can function in this world?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:16:26 2020 No.15970825 >>15970809 Have you tried cooming?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:18:26 2020 No.15970842 >>15970825 I have gf

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:20:41 2020 No.15970865 >>15970842 You're going to let that stop you?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:21:50 2020 No.15970875 >>15970865 No, I coom still. Why the emphasis on cooming?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:23:06 2020 No.15970885 >>15970875 Hahahahah you said you have no self cooooooooom till you are completely identified with only your sensory experience and fall into a pit of despair as your higher being rots into oblivion

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:24:59 2020 No.15970896 >>15970885 >No self Well, I fully understand the illusion of "I", and how this thing functions, the self/mind is very powerful there >Coom until you become normie again Fair hahahaha

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:32:46 2020 No.15970933

>>15970875
There exists a clique of people who post on this board 24/7 and who are so mired in degeneracy that the only thing that occupies their mind 24/7 is sexual release. They don't actually read books, spent most of their time masturbating and are hyper-social and hyper-active, which is why they are often the first repliers in threads, see this guy for an example: >>15970825

Not sure what to call these people. But you can especially notice their presence in threads about No-fap, or sexual abstinence. They swarm into these threads accusing everyone who doesn't think about sex every waking hour, of being an "incel", a term which they have invented in order to imply that an individual cannot possibly have control over their sexual impulse, and that abstinence is some form of involuntary condition.

Some of them hang out on Discord were they talk about their depression and share pornographic images most of the day. When they lose an argument they "brigade" threads (they post the link on their discord and implore their so-called "friends" to spam nonsense and off-topic remarks in the threads until it gets so . bad the mod has to delete it). Truely a sorry bunch.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:38:34 2020 No.15970958 >>15970933 Porn, high speed internet, smart phones and it's consequences. Also, discord and it's consequences

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:40:36 2020 No.15970963

>>15970885
You know how the self/mind is always orchestrating an identity to make "you" feel real or whatever. That no longer functions in me, externally I may behave like it, but internally it's so quiet now, and there's not really much of a solid identity structure to start from

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:43:34 2020 No.15970978

>>15970963
I am at a very similar stage you right now. I think once you disidentify with your thinking this tends to happen. A step towards self actualization hopefully.
Also, have you read raja yoga by vivekananda a great book in understanding sensory experience and illusion even if you dont believe in the spiritual stuff.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:44:08 2020 No.15970981 >>15970963 >externally I may behave like it lol

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:49:54 2020 No.15971016 File: 11 KB, 236x253, 26611e364b3c0f44c0e5f792e6ad75a7--internet-meme.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15970809 You don't

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:51:46 2020 No.15971026

>>15970978
>once you disidentify with your thinking this tends to happen
This is true, once the nature of it is understood it truly is a game changer. Right now going full way and doing what U.G did is not in the cards atm, who knows anything maybe one day. I am fully aware of what he did and how
>Also, have you read raja yoga by vivekananda
I have not, last "spiritual" book I read was "I am that" years ago and an assortment of different books from David Godman about Papaji and Ramana Maharishi.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 02:53:35 2020 No.15971036 >>15971016 This is true

>>	jesus Mon Jul 27 03:05:06 2020 No.15971091 >>15970809 take meds

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 03:12:51 2020 No.15971126 >>15971091 Considering it even though I am anti meds

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 04:28:02 2020 No.15971462 >>15970809 what should i read first?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 04:33:05 2020 No.15971483 >>15970809 This man was a pure nihilist

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 04:35:53 2020 No.15971500 >>15971483 Wrong characterization, but a common one. In some of his rhetoric sure, but it was more of accepting life for what it is, and he despised life denying Indians/gurus. He said the only God is money lol

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 04:37:30 2020 No.15971506 >>15971462 Read his wiki, watch some interviews on Youtube of him, have a decent background knowledge of topics he discusses, read Mahesh Bhatts biography of U.G, then read Mystique of Enlightenment and Mind is a myth

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 04:44:23 2020 No.15971524
File: 1.35 MB, 2758x3452, 20200727_204028.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>U.G Krishnamurti (level of consciousness 678/1000) was solidly establish in non-duality, yet he had not yet discovered the joy in unity

Try the other Krishnamurti or Ramana Maharshi.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 05:09:58 2020 No.15971635 >>15971524 No, he was as real as they come

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 05:52:06 2020 No.15971803 >>15971500 >and he despised life denying Indians/gurus. Where? Also how he wasn't a nihilist?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 06:13:12 2020 No.15971865 >>15971524 >Try the other Krishnamurti You're cute

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 06:14:14 2020 No.15971868 >>15971803 >Also how he wasn't a nihilist? I prefer realist. He never advocated dropping out ever, he advocated making a living anyway you could to survive. Pure pragmatism

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 09:32:13 2020 No.15972793 File: 25 KB, 339x330, kush.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Read khushwant singh now

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 10:35:14 2020 No.15973242 >>15970809 You just keep going. He reminds me of Camus

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 10:46:43 2020 No.15973317 >>15970809 u ever wake up and think 'today im not gonna lie on the internet for attention'?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 12:23:56 2020 No.15973995 >>15973317 You wish I were

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 12:24:52 2020 No.15974002 >>15972793 BTFO'd by Guenon

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 13:31:47 2020 No.15974575 >>15974002 BTFOd by azad

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 15:03:12 2020 No.15975448 >>15970809 Recently discovered him and still digging into his stuff. It's a rabbit hole in itself.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 15:08:55 2020 No.15975503 >>15970809 Uncultured swine here, what quotes / key ideas are OP referencing?

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:07:06 2020 No.15975954

>>15975503
I think in this case it's more important to grasp his way of thinking, the perspective from which he speaks, than any particular quote. In any case I think his wikipedia page does a good job when it says "he rejected the very basis of thought and in doing so negated all systems of thought and knowledge."

However his words are not always to be taken exactly literally, as most of his fans do. One have in fact to have some experience and a solid understanding in some mystic or esoteric framework of *spiritual* initiation to really understand or situate his perspective.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:14:22 2020 No.15976013 >>15971524 where's that from?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:16:53 2020 No.15976033 So many philosophers of the last century said basically the same thing

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:31:21 2020 No.15976171 >>15970963 >That no longer functions in me >functions in me >ME are you sure?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:37:26 2020 No.15976224 >>15976033 Like who?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:38:31 2020 No.15976232 >>15974575 Who?

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:38:58 2020 No.15976234

>>15976033
No it's not the same, whoever philosophers you might be alluding to, U.G. doesn't make philosophy, he "negates all systems of thought", etc. But he really does it, he doesn't make a philosophy of it. It's the same difference between talking about a thing from an outside perspective, and speaking from inside that thing, being that thing. That's what makes him a quite peculiar case.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:46:29 2020 No.15976294 >>15976033 Nope kiddo >>15976171 Ofc it does, but it's wobbly

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:47:52 2020 No.15976308 >>15976234 U.G is fair to say the final boss in like a video game what he did if you do it (yeah right) end the video game just like beating a final boss

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:48:04 2020 No.15976310 Give me the rundown on this guy, what’s the best introductory work? I want my mind to be irreparably damaged from seeing the truth like OP

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:49:51 2020 No.15976327 >>15976310 >>15971506

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:50:58 2020 No.15976334 >>15976327 Ty

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 16:52:45 2020 No.15976345 >>15971016 I miss schizoposter

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 17:14:41 2020 No.15976532 He was a fraud.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 17:17:30 2020 No.15976561 >>15976532 He debunked frauds

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 17:22:55 2020 No.15976615

I just saw and interview. Tell me if I got what he is saying. I've been thinking this for a couple years now, so it comes my way of understanding it: thought is there prior to experience and experience is the thought of experience. In a metaphor thought paves the ways you walk.

Another way of putting it would be that let's say one is non-verbal and so he is One. Once you introduce linguistics, there emerges the demand of thought of separation and creating difference, but it's only by thought and in thought that these differences are there.

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 17:23:29 2020 No.15976620

>>15976561
He didn't. He said Freud was a fraud, which is a damn convenient thing to do considering everyone wants to "debunk" him.
He also turned everything against the person who was speaking. There was no way to be "right" around him.
A manipulator.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 17:48:11 2020 No.15976837 >>15976620 He was, because the psyche is an absolute myth/illusion. The problem is physical

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 17:51:02 2020 No.15976861 >>15970809 This guy is a genuine letter asshat. >Everything isn't true >Don't bother thinking >Aren't I DEEP??? *sits back with a smug shit eating grin and gets dubbed a guru

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 17:51:16 2020 No.15976863

>>15976615
Thought and experience is synonymous. In the subject/object experiencer/experience structure we are stuck in we live within this framework. U.Gs calamity experience or no experience washed away that framework, it wasn't Kundalini, it was something that threw that system out. Fascinating man

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 17:52:22 2020 No.15976877 >>15976861 Go deeper

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 17:53:31 2020 No.15976886 >>15970809 What do you mean recover? Krishnamurti has liberated you. You should feel great. You're not still trying to become enlightened, are you?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 17:55:44 2020 No.15976908 >>15976877 Going deeper is just a sign of unenlightenment. It's smart to be stupid!

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 17:56:32 2020 No.15976920 >>15976886 >You're not still trying to become enlightened, are you? Hahahah no. >Youre liberated No, lol no calamity no liberation.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 17:57:48 2020 No.15976935 >>15976908 U.G had nothing to do w that, said it wasn't real go deeper

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:00:41 2020 No.15976968 >>15976935 Turning back to my original post, who gives a fuck what he said? He was clearly jerking himself off the entire time.

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:02:25 2020 No.15976980

>>15976886
>What do you mean recover?
Well you think I did what he did fully? It's complicated issue spans back years. It feels like I'm between 2 world's the world of illusion, understanding that the real is there, but can't access it, I have too many wordly ties now to get go full U.G. Maybe one day who knows anything.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:02:52 2020 No.15976985 >>15970809 Where do I start with this guy?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:03:40 2020 No.15976995 >>15976968 He would say communication between humans is impossible, we're just barking dogs. The man leaves you no where, if you're not careful he can destroy "you" if that's what you want

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:04:42 2020 No.15977007 >>15976985 >>15971506

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:07:27 2020 No.15977033 >>15976995 The man is psychology's worst nightmare

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:08:31 2020 No.15977046 >>15977007 sick. Thank you

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:14:15 2020 No.15977116

>>15976985
"Mind is a myth" and "Mystique of enlightenment", they are available to read online in full. He also has lots of conversations in youtube, with dumb new age titles made by his fans, that usually are as detestable as his detractors, or even more. Similarly happens with his books, that are transcriptions or editions made by others of conversations like those of the videos.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:19:48 2020 No.15977168 >>15976863 >Thought and experience yeah I agree with this. I haven't read Hegel but doesn't he say something similar?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:22:13 2020 No.15977197 File: 62 KB, 940x1024, AB8043F7-138D-42FC-B158-3348A79FE5C8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] what if I like thinking?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:33:03 2020 No.15977323 >>15977197 He says thinking is a tool like a hammer which is needed to sanely act in society. You see you can never get him on something. It's incredible

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:34:04 2020 No.15977335 >>15977323 >>15977197 But of course he's not in denial about rhe destructive nature of thinking I will share a quote of his below this comment

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:35:43 2020 No.15977357
File: 20 KB, 217x320, 1589652870467.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15977335
>>15977323
>>15977197
We are always talking about thought and thinking. What is thought? Have you ever looked at thought, let along controlling thought; let alone manipulating thought; let alone using that thought for achieving something material or otherwise? You cannot look at your thought, because you cannot separate yourself from thought and look at it. There is no thought apart from the knowledge you have about those thoughts -- the definitions you have. So if somebody asks you the question, "what is thought?" any answer you have is the answer that is put in there -- the answers that others have already given.

You have, through combinations and permutations of ideation and mentation about thoughts, created your own thoughts which you call your own. Just as when you mix different colors, you can create thousands of pastel colors, but basically all of them can be reduced to only seven colors that you find in nature. What you think is yours is the combination and permutation of all those thoughts, just the way you have created hundreds and hundreds of pastel colors. You have created your own ideas. That is what you call thinking. When you want to look at thought, what there is is only whatever you know about thought. Otherwise you can't look at thought. There is no thought other than what there is in what you know about thought. That's all that I am saying. So when that is understood the meaninglessness of the whole business of wanting to look at thought comes to an end. What there is is only what you know, the definitions given by others. And out of those definitions, if you are very intelligent and clever enough, you create your own definitions. That's all

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:36:36 2020 No.15977374 >>15971524 is this the guy on quora that made the dbz power levels for spiritual attainment? lol

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:37:05 2020 No.15977380
File: 74 KB, 539x686, 1589652946282.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15977357
When you look at an object the knowledge you have about that object comes into your head. There is an illusion that thought is something different from objects, but it is you who creates the object. The object may be there, but the knowledge you have about that object is all that you know. Apart from that knowledge and independent of that knowledge, free from that knowledge, you have no way of knowing anything about it. You have no way of directly experiencing anything. The word "directly" does not mean that there is any other way of experiencing things other than the way you are experiencing things now. The knowledge you have about it is all that is there and that is what you are experiencing. Really, you do not know what it is.

In exactly the same way, when you want to know something about thought, or experience thought, it is the same process that is in operation there. There is no inside or outside. What there is is only the operation, the flow of the knowledge. So you cannot actually separate yourself from thought and look at it.

So when such a question is thrown at you, what should happen is [the realization] that none of the answers have any meaning, because all that is acquired and taught. So that movement stops. There is no need for you to answer the question. There is no need for you to know anything about it. All that you know comes to a halt. It has no momentum any more. It slows down, and then it dawns upon you that it is meaninglessness to try to answer that question, because it has no answer at all. The answers that others have given are there. So you have nothing to say on that thing called thought, because all you can say is what you have gathered from other sources. You have no answer of your own

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 18:37:56 2020 No.15977391 everybody has a dramatic phase of despair when they read ug, all it means is that you finally understood vedanta in modern terms

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:09:45 2020 No.15977721 >>15977391 >everybody has a dramatic phase of despair when they read ug True

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:13:04 2020 No.15977755 >>15970842 Well, so you're already well functioning in this world, don't you think ?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:16:53 2020 No.15977803 This thread is more astroturfed then a Guenon thread. Now go ahead and hit bump limit because you've been called out.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:19:06 2020 No.15977819 >>15977803 30 posters

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:20:12 2020 No.15977831 >>15977755 No im just good looking

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:28:43 2020 No.15977939 >>15970809 Saw the first 10 minutes, this guy sounds like a massive tool. Am I missing something? https://youtu.be/R2FgamLOHMI

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:30:06 2020 No.15977962 >>15976861 This is my impression of him too

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:36:01 2020 No.15978038 >>15976863 >Thought and experience is synonymous. In the subject/object experiencer/experience structure we are stuck in we live within this framework. Ok, Deleuze.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:39:59 2020 No.15978079 >most followers are women ofc

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:40:01 2020 No.15978081 >>15977939 Yeah just seems like a pissed pajeet

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:44:13 2020 No.15978134 >>15977939 You should watch interviews instead https://youtu.be/KG8ZZxL82Zo https://youtu.be/9olyqhwf2y4 https://youtu.be/58bWr--2_Rw

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:45:14 2020 No.15978145 >>15978134 >>15977939 Ignore last link meant this https://youtu.be/FlzkZu514Ac

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:46:16 2020 No.15978160 >>15978081 Why aren't you pissed? You should be

Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:56:27 2020 No.15978262

>>15977819
Yeah you can easily change your IP and or have an organized raid (former being much more likely here) Not buying that 30 posters are all wacking eachother off to this bland Pajeet. Haven't seen shilling like this since Rick and Morty's first episode aired on /tv/

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:57:36 2020 No.15978275 >>15978262 I wish I had the motivation to do that

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:58:25 2020 No.15978284 >>15978160 Sorry anon I prefer to be calm

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 19:59:30 2020 No.15978297 >>15978284 You can appear pissed but be calm it's possible

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 21:43:35 2020 No.15979165 >>15970963 >externally I may behave like it Then you're not as enlightened as you think you are

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 21:52:25 2020 No.15979231 >>15970933 Imagine being this assblasted about being called an incel.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 21:55:39 2020 No.15979260 >>15979165 Who said that? Anyways the thing is physical, the "mental" simply follows the physical affects of it. Hasn't happened to me rn ATM and neither to you.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 21:57:17 2020 No.15979272 >>15979260 Effects* >>15979165 >Externally Well, the thing is there swimming and going, I have real life obligations, a gf and I have to act nominally "normal" try to my best and not be a perm hermit

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 22:03:46 2020 No.15979325 ITT: Fags who think dissociation is somehow spiritual

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 22:35:04 2020 No.15979598 >>15970809 This fag a was bitter fucking guru monkey of white rich people. A contrarian nihilist edgelord. I would rather read Cioran than listen the ramblings of this hack.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 23:27:08 2020 No.15979961 >>15970958 >it's >it's Please can you just TRY?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 23:46:30 2020 No.15980087 >>15979325 Hi R*ddit. No spiritual stuff here go meditate until you hallucinate then you can become an another clamient >>15979598 >Coping because he's being challenged >>15979961 No

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 27 23:54:17 2020 No.15980132 >>15977380 >>15977357 So basically, reading philosophy is useless and all I should focus on is action?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 00:14:11 2020 No.15980258 >>15980132 You're going no where! Get lost and stay lost! Thinking takes tremendous energy, act!

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 00:28:37 2020 No.15980345 >>15977391 This. Also watching him in youtube ranting about stuff and moving his hands like this is the closest we can get today to what the old Hindu masters of the oral tradition did back then, in many senses.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 00:29:42 2020 No.15980351 >>15980258 Being ironic?

Anonymous Tue Jul 28 00:31:01 2020 No.15980364

>>15980345
That dormant energy that he released (lucky man) is so intelligent so powerful, he said he would sleep every night w his hands on feet curled in a ball because the energy was so much. He also never got tired, he could talk all day and barely even ate food. He was against health foods and doctors

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 00:32:08 2020 No.15980374 >>15980351 Inquiry is important. Read philosophy west to east. I recommend it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 00:33:20 2020 No.15980381 >>15980345 U.G said once the amount of genuinely enlightened people who came out of India you can count on your fingers

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 01:23:51 2020 No.15980737 File: 37 KB, 277x389, azad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15976232 Maulana azad The man with the iron will

Anonymous Tue Jul 28 01:48:45 2020 No.15980907

>>15970809
Whales and elephants probably have more presence by sheer brain volume. Accept the limits of this frame for sentience and language as a vehicle for it. The amount of inane bullshit that arises in human activity is now water off a duck's back for you (at least as expressed in others); now you navigate your own while being more circumspect about it, knowing it has an ineluctable drag, and freedom from it will not arise from self-abnegating asceticism, or becoming neurotic over it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 01:59:27 2020 No.15980974 >>15970825 This

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 02:13:29 2020 No.15981062 >>15980087 >>Coping because he's being challenged I got into ug because of Ligotti who is one of the biggest ugfag. Philosophically I am on the side of ug but fucking hate his faggot asshole personality.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 02:19:57 2020 No.15981108 >>15980737 Damn Where should I start with the work of this based man?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 03:06:03 2020 No.15981330 >>15981062 Has Ligotti expressed sympathy for U.G. somewhere? Had no idea but I could have imagined it. Pseud edgy fags like him always ruin everything.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 04:04:55 2020 No.15981633 >>15971524 >the other Krishnamurti https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqL9c4jYigk yeah?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 04:12:51 2020 No.15981658 >>15981330 >Has Ligotti expressed sympathy for U.G. somewhere? >Had no idea >Pseud edgy fags like him always ruin everything. Lmaoooo okay pseud

Anonymous Tue Jul 28 06:06:10 2020 No.15982188

>>15970933
the never ending arousal is a trait of feminised men. women are always aroused or thinking about sex, men only sometimes. I guarantee that the coomers are low self control pussies with low masculine personality traits/body features.
Only other possibility is that they hate themselves after cooming, then there is still some hope.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 07:29:52 2020 No.15982497 >>15970809 J. Krishnamurti

Anonymous Tue Jul 28 07:32:20 2020 No.15982506

>>15980087
cope1 | kōp |
verb [no object]
(of a person) deal effectively with something difficult: his ability to cope with stress | it all got too much for me and I couldn't cope.
• (of a machine or system) have the capacity to deal successfully with: the roads are barely adequate to cope with the present traffic.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 28 11:49:25 2020 No.15984015 >>15970809 Stop larping, you retarded faggot. You're fine. Besides being a retarded faggot, that is.

Anonymous Tue Jul 28 14:29:36 2020 No.15985255

>>15981108
Start by skimming through his Wikipedia page,
He was more of a action based person rather than one who sits down and thinks all day.

You can start with Tarjuman al Quran, (or atleast read the preface for it written by him)

If you know urdu than almost all of his works will be accessible to you (90% of them aren't translated yet, maybe i will translate some of them myself soon), his speeches were filled with fire to do something and take responsibility, you can listen to them too.
He believed in standing alone when you know you are right no matter what (took at the concept of "fear only god, fear no man" way too far)

Read Tarjuman al Quran or India wins independence (the latter may not be much accessible to someone who doesn't know much about indias colonial struggle and may laugh it off as some lowly goons try, but trust me, the generation after them may be filled with thugs and selfish goons, but these people, Nehru, Azad, Gandhi, etc all were visionaries)

At the end of way, like there was napoleon, there was azad,
They say some men live lives that make them immortal and others write books that make them,
Azad may have been a really learned scholar, but at the end of the day, he was a man of action,

Nobody can give you true enlightenment or purpose my friend, you have to find it yourself :)

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/lit/ - Literature