[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 1.39 MB, 1803x2560, metaphysics.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15908813 No.15908813 [Reply] [Original]

At my current rate it'll take 4 months to finish pic related
is it worth it bros?

>> No.15908833

Read 40 pages a day and you'll finish it in a week.
Also watch this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1oWnS0tSRg&list=PLYFBLkHop2akl5_aPTZLszaIt4DnM8ESx&index=12&t=0s

>> No.15908908

>>15908813
Metaphysics isn't a real domain anymore. Just read Nicomachean Ethics homie

>> No.15908952
File: 643 KB, 1536x2048, goingplaid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15908952

>>15908908
well you aren't wrong

>> No.15909324

>>15908952
>metametaphysics
just read kant

>> No.15909796

>>15909324
>Kant for metametaphysics
read Quine

>> No.15909910

>>15908813
I'm reading this as well, started it three days ago. I'm at book 5, and so far it's going good, but I'm sure the really hard parts will shoe up later.

>> No.15909916

>>15909910
*show

>> No.15909945

>>15908908
Retard.

>> No.15910116

>>15908813

One of the most boring books I've read. Most of it's value lies outside the book. Primarily, I have a clearer conception of metaphysics and what other philosophers mean when they do their metaphysics. But also I can understand the logic Aquinas and others use to prove God and why they still remain unconvincing.

OP just read it to get the gist and his main arguments but there's no need to mentally toil over his ideas and cumbersome writing.

>> No.15911188

>>15908833
I was reading categories and watching this guy's video on it. It's so weird to see this pop up now after never seeing it before.

>> No.15911323
File: 16 KB, 250x278, W. V. Quine.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15911323

>>15908952
Patrician analytic metametaphysics. That being said:
>McDaniel's ontological pluralism
>Schaffer's permissivism
>Hirsch's quantifier variance
>Chalmers' neo-Carnapianism
You don't really believe these right, anon?

>> No.15911330

>>15908813
just read faster lmao