[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 12 KB, 300x250, TheBenShapiroShow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15872939 No.15872939 [Reply] [Original]

Read any good book on winning arguments? Pic unrelated

>> No.15872956

The big book of reddit

>> No.15872969

>>15872939
Talmud

>> No.15872979

Ben Shapiro is great I don't agree with him on politics but if you dislike Ben you're a Gigavirgin

>> No.15872983
File: 44 KB, 500x637, sb5aunsqw7t21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15872983

>>15872939
Stop thinking about winning, it's better think about understanding

>> No.15872995

>>15872979
I'm pro-Israel and I think he's a terrible person

>> No.15873006

>>15872979
It's easy to get fooled into thinking he raises good points. Watch this
https://youtu.be/9bbINLWtMKI

>> No.15873012

>>15873006
The same can be applied to Contra, it's easy to get fooled into thinking he raises good points.

>> No.15873019

>>15873012
She does

>> No.15873029

>>15873019
he's still alive?

>> No.15873050

>>15873006
this must be the dumbest man to have made an account on youtube

>> No.15873810

>>15872939
Why do you wish to argue? Just believe what you want, there is no need to justify it.

>> No.15873822

>>15872939
The truth.

>> No.15875081
File: 97 KB, 600x338, 164aeca9bc1f3ea2-600x338.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15875081

>>15872939
don't win arguments, win fights. take the intellectual leader of the enemy group and beat him into a pulp before his followers. they are your followers now.

>> No.15875494

>>15872939
1. never argue in good faith
2. always be confident when you talk, even if what you say is obviously false.
3. never admit that you were wrong on any points even if you were
4. employ logical fallacies liberally while accusing the opponent using them himself
5. play the victim card when called out and accuse him of ad homing you

>> No.15875522
File: 1001 KB, 1194x895, 1591975151729.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15875522

>>15872979

>> No.15877085

>>15875494
this is me

>> No.15877111

>>15872995
Gross

>> No.15877167

>>15875494
4chan the post

>> No.15877409

>>15873012
Contrapoints presents her points slowly and explains her reasoning. Unlike Shapiro who has admitted when he debates he just wants to look like he's winning, I guess that's why he debates children mostly

>> No.15877437
File: 219 KB, 475x270, 1563906672726.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15877437

>>15872979
I dont like him and I'm not a Virgin.

>> No.15877693

>>15877111
Nice digits

>> No.15877746

>>15875494
Are jews just 4chan incarnate?

>> No.15877807

>>15877409
where did he admit that?

>> No.15877808

>>15877746
Yes, part of why /pol/ hates Israel so much is because the Jews achieved what Europeans couldn't, a militant auth-right ethnostate with a large emphasis on religion/tradition
It's bitter envy and unconscious admiration mired together into unceasing obsession

>> No.15877873

>>15877409
Debates are performative anyways id say he has the right strategy considering the amount of goal post shifting and study quoting that takes place.
The best debate Ive seen in the past few years was Petersom v Zizek because while it started out as a debate it turned into more of a conversation. It was a bit rough off the start with Peterson coming in with a boilerplate anticommie speech but it turned into something decent.
Shapiro does a good job debating, anyone who doesn't admit that is just being a poor sport. Of course because everyone has an opinion and many are ideologically motivated there will always be people who will hate. Theres not many people like Shapiro who have a standing rule that those who disagree with him can come to the front of the line to argue first.
Id love to see Shapiro debate desTiny unironically, the battle of the fasttalking gishgalloping manlets would be great

>> No.15877948

>>15877409
Contrapoints videos are also entirely performative and are mostly just a reason to dress up and entertain an audience that already agrees. Videos like that are just made to comfort the viewer that they are right and not to challenge opposition.

>> No.15877967

>>15877409
contrapoint is definitely leagues better, but they still largely argue for a goal rather than to deconstruct an issue. but at least they have the basic decentcy to address a counterposition with some concessions.

>> No.15878032

>Contrapoints
>when even the best female intellectual on Youtube actually is a guy

>> No.15878039

>>15878032
>is a guy
women aren't guys

>> No.15878072

>>15878039
guys arent women.

>> No.15878129

>>15878072
you find her intellectual yet don't agree with her arguments?

>> No.15878158

>>15872939
Study how the sophists argue in Platon's dialogues.

>> No.15878175

>>15878129
yah, i can acknowledge someones intellegence without necissarily agreeing with them on all things.

>> No.15878512

>>15878158
Best response in the thread, Plato is the best source. Read Sophists, Protagoras, Gorgias. As characters, the Sophists in his work to demonstrate how rhetoric can be used to basically win any argument and to support any point, no matter how bad it is. It's also important to look at Socrates' responses to the Sophists' arguments, and the Socratic method is generally pretty useful. This being said, the thing you should be taking away from reading Plato is that arguing for the sake of winning arguments is dumb as shit. Have informed opinions and back them up in debates, but be prepared to have your points disproved. Don't be a cunt

>> No.15879716

>>15872939
talk really fast, and then say everything is true and logical, like a good salesman

>> No.15879781

>>15872939
Cicero wrote a book called how to win an argument.

>> No.15880432

>>15877409
That's wise to be honest, because most people only care about who seems to be winning, not about the reasoning itself.

>> No.15880440

>>15872939
Hate that sniveling little kike

>> No.15880562

Pointless. People will never be persuaded by your arguments unless they already emotionally agree with you. Facts don't matter, feelings do

>> No.15880897

>>15872939
>Aristotelian rhetoric.
>Schopenhauer's the art of being always right.

>> No.15880925

>It's another 'thinly-veiled political nonsense masquerading as a book suggestion' thread
OP can't read, pass it on

>> No.15881003

>>15877808
>obsession
Obsession implies that one keeps thinking about them when their influence is no longer present.If they kept to themselves, hardly anyone would care about them.

>> No.15881240
File: 28 KB, 380x515, how not to be wrong.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15881240

>>15872939
I liked this book
>pic related
But if you just want to win arguments and not figure out what actually is, you're what's wrong with modern society

>> No.15881263

>>15872939
Plato’s Gorgias. See Carricles’s responses towards the end in particular.