/lit/ - Literature

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15838569]

Dear Professors/staff and based 4channers

My name is Gabriel Vacariu (senior professor, Philosophy, Bucharest University, Romania, East Europe). My webpage: http://filosofie.unibuc.ro/gabriel_vacariu/

My main message of this email: there are many physicists, cognitive neuroscientists and philosophers who have published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas long time after I published and posted many of my works (FREE) on various sites! There is a manuscript at these addresses (and in attachment)! The content is below. You are not the only one who received this email: I have sent this email to thousands…

Many years later, many people (many countries, many domains, many of my ideas – some of them are “great” names from great USA and Germany universities!!) have published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas (see here: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gabriel_Vacariu/publications ) just because discovering the existence of EDWs, I have changed everything!!! https://sites.google.com/view/gabriel-vacariu-philosophy/home


Gabriel Vacariu, (April 2020 to 2014) The UNBELIEVABLE SIMILARITIES between the ideas of some people (2011-2016) and my ideas (2002-2008) in physics (quantum mechanics, cosmology), cognitive neuroscience, philosophy of mind, and philosophy (this manuscript would require a REVOLUTION in international academic environment!) here (the LIST is BELOW)

It is about TWO Nobels prizes (Physics and Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience).

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15838574]

- Discovering the EDWs, I have changed EVERYTHING! Long time ago (2002, 2005, 2007, 2008, etc.), the NEW PHYSICS (a book published at SPRINGER, Germany in 2015!): my theory is the EDWs (Epistemologically Different Worlds) published in 2002-2003-2005: a new interpretation of quantum mechanics: in 2006, 2008, 2010 quantum theory is a pseudo-theory! (see the article 2006 in Attachment!!) The Universe does not exist, but EDWs are! (string theory is a pseudo-theory, see last chapter book 2010)
- In 2005, I have published one article with my theory (EDWs perspective) at Synthese (USA, one of the best journal of philosophy of science) and a book in 2016 at Springer (Germany). My book at SPRINGER (2016, Germany) Illusions of Human Thinking: On Concepts of Mind, Reality, and Universe in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Physics
In this book: quantum theory is a pseudo-theory, the mind-brain (life-organism) problem is a pseudo-problem, cognitive neuroscience is a pseudo-science, the ontology of special and general theory of relativity (without spacetime), definition of ‘life’, mental representation, “levels”, etc.
- The mind and the brain/body are or belong to EDWs; the macro-objects and the micro-objects belong to EDWs; all the approaches of quantum mechanics are wrong, the correct alternative being my EDWs perspective: the wave and the particle belong to the EDWs! Thus, I solved all “mysteries” of quantum mechanics, the relationship between Einstein’s general relativity and quantum mechanics (microparticles versus macroparticles), the mind-brain problem, and many other problems! (“I am now convinced that theoretical physics is actual philosophy.” Max Born)

In 2014, I have sent this email to thousands of people (physicists, philosophers, cognitive scientists) when I discovered the UNBELIEVABLE similarities between my ideas and Markus Gabriel’s ideas (2013). AMAZING, many other people have started to published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas!

[Anonymous No.15838576]

>>15838569
Go on

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15838577]

Obviously, there are other “specialists” that published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas but I have not discovered them yet…

Can you believe in such coincidences??? Anyway, I am the FIRST who published this new FRAMEWORK of THINKING (the EDWs perspective) for physicists, cognitive neuroscientists, and philosophers of the next 200 years!

If you want to change this ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT, share this manuscript! PARTICIPATE TO THE REVOLUTION!!! If you are content with your academic environment, continue to sleep…

Wake up from the DOGMATIC SLEEP of “Universe”/“world”

All great scientific problems are philosophical problems! Long time ago (2002, 2005, 2007, etc.), the NEW PHYSICS (a book published at SPRINGER, Germany in 2015!): my theory is the EDWs (Epistemologically Different Worlds) published in 2002-2003: a new interpretation of quantum mechanics: in 2006, 2008, 2010 quantum theory is a pseudo-theory! The Universe does not exist, but EDWs are! (string theory is a pseudo-theory, see last chapter book 2010)

the mind and the brain/body are or belong to EDWs

the macro-objects and the micro-objects belong to EDWs

all the approaches of quantum mechanics are wrong, the correct alternative being my EDWs perspective: the wave and the particle belong to the EDWs!

Thus, discovering the existence of EDWs, I solved all “mysteries” of quantum mechanics, the relationship between Einstein’s general relativity and quantum mechanics (microparticles versus macroparticles), the mind-brain problem, and many other problems!
I am really sorry I disturb you with this long email. (For a better international academic environment, SHARE this email…)

All the best,

Gabriel Vacariu

[Anonymous No.15838580]

>>15838569
bună

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15838620]

>>15838576
I see that HERE are MANY academicians interested in REAL KNOWLEDGE. See my YouTube channel for many original ideas that have been (UNBELIEVABLY) been plagiarized.

https://youtube.com/user/gvacariu/videos

Proof God cannot even exist:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wEzCNu-JVqs

Proof Markus Gabriel stole my ideas
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WLpzaaSE8L8

[Anonymous No.15838708]

>>15838574
Not gonna lie Mr. Vacariu, I was about to respond saying your thing about the universe not existing sounds like Markus Gabriel, but then you point it out yourself. Have you considered reading more philosophy so you don't repeat what others are saying? Like do you know about Nelson Goodman's irrealism, and his many worlds? Might your 'worlds' be any like David Lewis' concrete possible worlds even? Maybe explain to us what an 'Epistemologically Different World' even is first. I should add that Markus Gabriel himself isn't the first to consider that 'the world does not exist' the way he does. It's an idea that's been around ever since Russell and Cantor, it's the idea that we can't have an universal set (because of certain paradoxes). Those who take that too seriously, argue that there is no 'universe' in the sense Markus Gabriel also does. So I highly doubt Markus Gabriel 'stole' that from you when people were writing about this stuff over 100 years ago. As a senior philosophy professor, you need to READ sir, it's shameful that you're this blind to the philosophical literature and managed to get a position in philosophy.

[Anonymous No.15838733]

bump

[Anonymous No.15838735]

>>15838708
R u like the dean of /lit/?

[Anonymous No.15838737]

I suppose I will ask the question everyone else is thinking to but is too shy to in the presence of Mr. Vacariu. How does all of this relate to “The Synthesis of the Objective and the Subjective”? I am sure you have heard of it and no introduction is required.

[Anonymous No.15838748]

>>15838737
In accordance with the holy words of Belcea, we shall now construct an MBTI chart for Professor Vacariu.

[Anonymous No.15838751]

>>15838735
I meant Mr. Vacariu here claims to be a senior philosophy professor. I'm looking into his dissertation now and he does acknowledge Goodman so I'll take it back that he needs to read Goodman, but I'm still not sure how his 'EDW' claims are 'original' enough to differ from Goodman's irrealism yet. If you look at the comments to his second video you'll find lots of dislikes and people trashing him for thinking he's more original than he really is and for accusing Markus Gabriel and others of plagiarizing him. My guess is this man has paranoia/narcissism which might mean he has schizophrenia.

[Anonymous No.15838758]

Does that mean quantum immortality is true?

[Anonymous No.15838782]

>>15838751
Gordon Wood, Works in Essex County Volume II. Yeah, I read that too.

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15838890]

>>15838758
No quantum is a false, or pseudo, theory. This means that in many worlds the mind-brain problem really references to the SELF. This means that there is no self that can be immortal and that quantum EMERGES from EDW's (Epistemologically Different Worlds).

>>15838708
It is Prof. Vacariu. And the problem is not reading, it is others STEALING my ideas. I have shown this clearly in my email

[Anonymous No.15838925]

Ok Mr. Vacariu. I've glanced over your 2007 dissertation to see just how you and Nelson Goodman differ. Goodman, as you know, began his career by offering an alternative framework to Carnap's in the Aufbau, one which made qualia rather than erlebs the base of the system. You are familiar with this, as you indicate in your dissertation. Carnap already had indicated in his work that he could have started from a different base. Later in his career, Goodman advocated 'irrealism,' which to my understanding argues for a sort of framework relativism, and that any such framework as we pick is as good as any other. But these worlds differ from your so-called 'EDWs' in that your worlds are supposed to be subject-independent. You say this in pp. 190-191 of your dissertation PDF:
>Even with his concept of “worldmaker”, Goodman rests in the end on the “unicorn-world”. The same observation as was made about Carnap is applicable to Goodman: human beings are not worldmakers because these EDWs exist before we observe them. However, in the end, Goodman’s overall approach comes relatively close to the idea of EDWs.
To my knowledge, there are at least two analytic philosophers who believe something analogous to Goodman but make their 'worlds' subject-independent. Mark Balaguer does this with respect to mathematics, and calls his view 'plenitudinous platonism.' Phillip Bricker goes further and does this with respect to everything, and calls his view 'plenitudinous realism.' I highly doubt these people stole from you. The reasoning these people have behind their ideas is tied closely to the analytic tradition, which they are part of. Plus, they were working on these themes before you wrote your dissertation in 2007. Balaguer wrote a book on the subject in 1998, and Bricker wrote an article on the subject in 1992.

[Anonymous No.15838977]

Posting in an epic thread. Gabriel Vacariu has to become a player in the /lit/ team this summer cup.

[Anonymous No.15839232]

bump

[Anonymous No.15839249]

>>15838977
What's the deal with /lit/ memes and Romanians

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15839313]

>>15838925
Even glancing an acamedician like yourself has to see how revolutionary my proposed ideas are. That several breakthroughs in quantum physics and neuroscience happened AFTER I published my ideas are no coincidence. My theory is an revolution as it unifies consciousness, quantum physics and epistemology. Quantum and Einstein's relativity are only pseudo theories, coming from EDW. Wilczek won't admit his ideas are stolen. The dinosaurs you are referring too merely realized an ingredient of my theory. The problem is that modern scholars are dishonest PLAGIARIZERS who won't admit that they only implement my idea. I will show an extensive lists of authors who have plagiarized me here in the near time.

Please refer to my title correctly. It is Prof. NOT Mr.

[Anonymous No.15839328]

>>15838890
>This means that there is no self that can be immortal
retroactively refuted by Shankaracharya

[Anonymous No.15839384]

>>15839313
Mr. Vacariu, I am legitimately worried for your mental health. For a couple of reasons:
1. Your odd insistence that I call you professor, when 'Mr' is perfectly okay.
2. Your treatment of fellow philosophers as 'dinosaurs' who 'merely realized an ingredient of [your] theory' when in fact they are accomplished, smart philosophers who deserve respect in the minimum.
3. Your accusation that people, among them Markus Gabriel, other philosophers, and quantum scientists, all plagiarized your ideas, which is ironic since people could say you plagiarized Balaguer or Bricker by that line of reasoning.
4. Your insistence that your ideas are far more novel, original, or interesting than they actually are.
5. Your dissertation looks quite sloppy and your attitude on this board so far has been rather unprofessional.
I'll repeat what I said before. You show signs of unhealthy narcissism and paranoia. They in turn can be signs of schizophrenia.

[Anonymous No.15839452]

https://philpapers.org/s/Gabriel%20Vacariu

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15839476]

In Chapter III, I present the UNBELIEVABLE similarity between my ideas from 2002-2008 and the ideas of David Ludwig (Philosophy, University Amsterdam, Netherlands) (in “A Pluralist Theory of the Mind”, 2015 Springer – AMAZING; his book was published at SPRINGER in 2015!!!!! I sent my manuscript to Springer in 2014!!! and I made strong pressures on the editor, Reinald Klockenbusch, to publish my manuscript since it was accepted at the beginning of 2015! At my pressure, he finally published my book in November 2015, but he told me he wrote 2016 on the book because of some commercial reasons!!!! What a coincidence: Ludwig’s book was published in 2015!!!) Anyway, my PhD thesis UNSW Sydney, Australia) was posted on 2007 by the university’s staff on university site (!!) and my first book (2008, English) I posted immediately on my webpage and other Internet pages! The main ideas of Springer’s book are in my PhD thesis!

(2016), Gabriel Vacariu and Mihai Vacariu, Dark matter and dark energy, space and time, and other pseudo-notions in cosmology, Datagroup on Amazon at https://www.amazon.com/MATTER.../dp/B01HS025O8/ref=sr_1_2…

About EDWs perspective, my presentation (December 2013): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCTaq3LVxHo&t=599s (“All great truths begin as blasphemies.” George Bernard Shaw)

About EDWs, mind-brain problem and Cognitive Neuroscience: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWxq8og-vss (16m) or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWxq8og-vss&fbclid=IwAR3Nb95fgcvnSXu1JfH2Ojk_6h3XF2AqoSNLiqA9f6zrv2QOEdy-sgR0X4w

(2020) “Rethinking ‘dark matter’ within the epistemologically different worlds (EDWs) perspective”, in "Cosmology 2020 – The Current State", (ed) Michael Smith (CEO, IntechOpen, United Kingdom) https://www.intechopen.com/search?term=cosmology%202020 - our chapter about "dark matter" FREE online (we are the only ones from “Humanities”, others authors of all other chapters are Physicists!)

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15839483]

CONTENT

Some preliminary comments

Introduction: The EDWs perspective in my article from 2005 and my book from 2008
PHYSICS, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY (‘REBORN DINOSAURS’1)

(2016) Did Sean Carroll’s ideas (California Institute of Technology, USA) (within the wrong framework, the “universe”) plagiarize my ideas (2002-2010) (within the EDWs framework) on quantum mechanics, the relationship between Einstein relativity and quantum mechanics, life, the mind-brain problem, etc.?

(2016) The unbelievable similarities between Frank Wilczek’s ideas (Nobel Prize in Physics) and my ideas (2002-2008, etc.) (Philosophy of Mind and Quantum Mechanics)

(2017-2019 - NEW March 2019) Strong similarity between Carlo Rovelli’s ideas (Italy) in three books (2015, 2017) to my ideas (2002-2008) + commentary February 2018!

(2016) Kastner + (2017) R. E. Kastner, Stuart Kauffman, Michael Epperson “Taking Heisenberg’s Potentia Seriously”: Quite similar ideas to my ideas (2008) +

(2017) A trick: Unbelievable similarities between Lee Smolin’s ideas (2017) and my ideas (2002-2008)

(May 2018) ‘Thus spoke Zarathustra!’ - A fairy-tale with Eugen Ionesco and the Idiot about Nothingness.

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15839491]

COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE PHILOSOPHY OF MIND

(2011-2014) Did Georg Northoff (Psychoanalysis, Institute of Mental Health) plagiarize my ideas (2002-2008)?

(2011) The unbelievable similarities between Kalina Diego Cosmelli, Legrand Dorothée and Thompson Evan’s ideas (USA) and my ideas (Cognitive Neuroscience)

(2015) Did David Ludwig (Philosophy, University of Amsterdam) plagiarize many of my ideas? (Philosophy (of Mind)

Did David Bourget (2018) (Director, Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University (or University of Western Ontario) plagiarize my ideas regarding the mind-brain problem? + Chalmers

(2016) Unbelievable similarities between Dan Siegel’s ideas (Mindsight Institute, USA)and my ideas (2002-2008)

Philosophy (of science)

(2010) The unbelievable similarities between Alexey Alyushin (Moscow, Russia) and my ideas (on Ontology)

(2013 + 2017) Did Markus Gabriel (Bonn University) plagiarize my ideas?

(2013) The unbelievable similarities between Andrew Newman’s ideas (University of Nebraska, at Omaha, USA) and my ideas (Ontology)

(2016) Did Tahko E. Tuomas (University of Helsinki, Finland) plagiarize my ideas? + Tahko E. Tuomas (‘The Epistemology of Essence’)

(2017) Did Jani Hakkarainen (University of Tampere, Finland) plagiarize my ideas (2002-2008)? + (2017) Markku Keinänen, Antti Keskinen & Jani Hakkarainen

(2017) The unbelievable similarities between Dean Rickles’s ideas (HPS, Univ. of Sydney) and my ideas (2002-2008)

(2017) Did Dirk K. F. Meijer and Hans J. H. Geesink (University of Groningen, Netherlands) plagiarize my ideas (2002-2008)? (2017)

(2018) Unbelievable similar ideas between Jason Winning’s ideas (2018) and my ideas (2002-2008)

(2018) David Mark Kovacs (Lecturer of philosophy at Tel Aviv University), ‘The Deflationary Theory of Ontological Dependence’, Philosophical Quarterly (forthcoming)

Conclusion [Obviously, there are other “specialists” that published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas but I have not discovered them yet…]

[Anonymous No.15839516]

What if there is an EDW where they steal your ideas and another EDW where they don't?

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15839522]

July 2018

Oreste M. Fiocco

Baptiste Le Bihan (University of Geneva, forthcoming)

Antonella Mallozzi (The Graduate Center – CUNY, forthcoming in Synthese, penultimate draft)

Erik C. Banks (Wright State University, 2014)

Sami Pihlström (2009)

Katherin Koslicki’s ideas (2008) The Structure of Objects, Oxford University Press) and my ideas (2002-2005-2006)
November 2018

Maurizio Ferraris (2014/2012) Manifesto of New Realism

Graham Harman (2017) : Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything (Penguin Books)
January 2019

Philip Ball (2018): “Why everything you thought you knew about quantum physics is different”

Gerhard Grössing “Vacuum landscaping: cause of nonlocal influences without signaling”

Anne Sophie Meincke (November 2018) The Disappearance of Change (IJPS) 28. The Disappearance of Change Towards a Process Account of Persistence Forthcoming in: International Journal of Philosophical Studies DOI: 10.1080/09672559.2018.1548634

Baptiste Le Bihana (University of Geneva) and James Read (Oxford Univ.) “Duality and Ontology” (forthcoming, in Philosophy Compass)

Baptiste Le Bihan (University of Geneva): “Space Emergence in Contemporary Physics: Why We Do Not Need Fundamentality, Layers of Reality and Emergence” in Disputatio, Vol. X, No. 49, November 2018

Alexander Alexandrovich Antonov (2016) (Research Center of Information Technologies “TELAN Electronics”, Kiev, Ukraine): “Hypothesis of the Hidden Multiverse Explains Dark Matter and Dark Energy”, Journal of Modern Physics, 2016, 7, 1228-1246

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15839532]

February 2019

James Barham (2019): “The Reality of Purpose and the Reform of Naturalism”

Giorgio Lando (2017) Mereology - A Philosophical Introduction, Bloomsbury Academic

(2018) Albrecht von M¨uller • Elias Zafiris, Concept and Formalization of Constellatory Self-Unfolding - A Novel Perspective on the Relation between Quantum and Relativistic Physics

(2019) Flaminia Giacomini, Esteban Castro-Ruiz, & Časlav Brukner “Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames”, Nature Communications

(2019) Valia Allori, “Scientific Realism without the Wave-Function: An Example of Naturalized Quantum Metaphysics” (to appear in J. Saatsi, S. French (eds.) “Scientific Realism and the Quantum” OUP (2019) - Department of Philosophy Northern Illinois University)

(2018) Paulo De Jesus “Thinking through enactive agency: sense-making,

bio-semiosis and the ontologies of organismic worlds”, Phenom Cogn Sci

(2016) TIMOTHY MORTON, For a Logic of Future Coexistence, (Columbia University Press)

(2017) Andrew Cooper, Two directions for teleology: naturalism and idealism, Synthese

[Anonymous No.15839537]

>>15838569
Why do you write as if you were and automated ad designed in India and trying to sell me overpriced fake viagra produced in the Philippines, professor Vacariu?
Surely if your ideas are so advanced and fundamental you should be able to write better (not to mention be more explicit).

[Anonymous No.15839541]

>>15839537
ESL.

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15839543]

April 2019

These articles are in this book: Reality and its Structure - Essays in Fundamentality, Ricki Bliss and Graham Priest (2018), Oxford Univ Press
Gabriel Oak Rabin (2018) Grounding Orthodoxy and the Layered Conception

Daniel Nolan (2018) Cosmic Loops

Naomi Thompson (2018) Metaphysical Interdependence, Epistemic Coherentism, and

Tuomas E. Tahko (2018) Holistic Explanation Fundamentality and Ontological Minimality

Matteo Morganti (2018) The Structure of Physical Reality Beyond Foundationalism

Nathan Wildman (2018) On Shaky Ground? Exploring the Contingent Fundamentality Thesis
April 2019

(2015) M. Ringbauer1;2, B. Du_us1;2, C. Branciard1;3, E. G. Cavalcanti4, A. G. White1;2 & A. Fedrizzi: “Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction” at arXiv:1412.6213v2 [quant-ph] 20 Jan 2015
June 2019

Timothy Morton (2013), Realist Magic: Objects, Ontology, Causality (2013) Open Humanities Press,
Ian Bogost, Alien Phenomenology or, What It’s Like to Be a Thing (Minneapolis:

University of Minnesota Press, 2012), 1–34

“Ian Bogost thinks objects as units”: Unit Operations: An Approach to Videogame

Criticism (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008) in Timothy Morton 2013, Realist Magic: Objects, Ontology, Causality (2013) OPEN HUMANITIES PRESS (I have not read Bogost yet, but in Morton’s book, I found UNBELIEVABLE similarity between Bogost’s main ideas and my EDWs ideas!!)

I trust having proven my claim with these proofs of PLAGIARISM. Any honest acamedician will see the truth. SHARE FOR A REVOLUTION

[Anonymous No.15839551]

>>15839541
This doesn't explain the unnecessary caps lock and the grating overuse of exclamation marks.

[Anonymous No.15839555]

>>15839476
>In Chapter III, I present the UNBELIEVABLE similarity between my ideas from 2002-2008 and the ideas of David Ludwig (Philosophy, University Amsterdam, Netherlands) (in “A Pluralist Theory of the Mind”, 2015 Springer – AMAZING; his book was published at SPRINGER in 2015!!!!! I sent my manuscript to Springer in 2014!!! and I made strong pressures on the editor, Reinald Klockenbusch, to publish my manuscript since it was accepted at the beginning of 2015! At my pressure, he finally published my book in November 2015, but he told me he wrote 2016 on the book because of some commercial reasons!!!! What a coincidence: Ludwig’s book was published in 2015!!!) Anyway, my PhD thesis UNSW Sydney, Australia) was posted on 2007 by the university’s staff on university site (!!) and my first book (2008, English) I posted immediately on my webpage and other Internet pages! The main ideas of Springer’s book are in my PhD thesis!
I went to Ludwig's website to check one of his articles from 2012. Here's something he says about his ontological pluralism that you accuse him of stealing from you:
>Recent debates about the nature of philosophical disagreement (e.g. Hirsch 2011; Chalmers 2011) raise the suspicion that metaphysical disagreements are often similar to the pyramid case.
If you're not familiar with things David Chalmers and Eli Hirsch are saying, they are neo-Carnapians, and for this reason they are closely connected to Carnap and Goodman and that sort of framework relativism that I pointed out predates your 2007 work. The fact Ludwig is working off of that is easily explained. He has no need of some obscure Romanian's 2007 dissertation to develop ideas that are actually being discussed presently in analytic metaphysics (since Chalmers and Hirsch are current). Neo-Carnapianism has been a thing for some time here in the United States. I'm sure if I went and looked at everyone else's work, who you accuse of plagiarizing you, I'd find that their ideas trace normally to the work of analytic metaphysicians in the 20th and 21st centuries.

[Anonymous No.15839563]

>>15839384
Based take down of Gypsy Peterson wanna be.

[Anonymous No.15839577]

What the fuck is going on? I just woke up. Literally sippin' the first Monster Energy of the morning right now. Someone give me a quick run down.

[Anonymous No.15839579]

>>15839555
(Cont'd)
Of course the worry Ludwig responds to is: are we reduced to Goodmanian irrealism if we want to accept that metaphysical disagreements are valid? The answer is no, there's another option. As a result, he allows for the Bricker-esque option. Ludwig doesn't cite Bricker but if there's someone to plagiarize it would have been Bricker, not you.

[Anonymous No.15839581]

>>15838569
Yes.
You have discovered Epistemologically Different Worlds. Sure.
I've skimmed over your book on Springer link.. IMO you're full of shit

[Anonymous No.15839593]

>>15839249
What other Romanian /lit/ memes are there? Only Cioran gets posted here; perhaps the occasional larper posting Legionary stuff too.

[Anonymous No.15839606]

>>15839593
That meme guy from the Synthesis of the Objective and Subjective and the author of BAP are both ethnic Romanians

[Anonymous No.15839630]

>>15839543
>>15839532
>>15839522
>>15839491
>>15839483

Regardless of whether or not one of these many academics read your work at some point and forgot to cite you, that all of them have systemically collaborated to exclude you and your work in order to deny you just recognition is palpably absurd. Your work is interesting, sure, as are the many articles by other thinkers you have posted. Have a bit more humility instead of proclaming the existence of a grand conspiracy to gloss over your REVOLUTIONARY ideas.

>>15839606
I know that BAP is a Romanian but who's the Synthesis of the Objective and Subjective guy? I hoped /lit/ discovering Romanian literature would mean Eminescu and Blaga, not mad meme conspirators.

[Anonymous No.15839648]

>>15839630
>I know that BAP is a Romanian but who's the Synthesis of the Objective and Subjective guy?
Some idiot who self-published his diary and posted it on /lit/ a few days ago see >>15829833

[Anonymous No.15839676]

>>15839630
>>15824974

[Anonymous No.15839693]

>>15839648
That's pretty wild, thanks anon

[Anonymous No.15839706]

>>15839606
>>15839630
What's BAP? Sorry if dumb question.

[Anonymous No.15839754]

>>15839706
Bronze Age Pervert, pseudonymous author of a e-published book called Bronze Age Mindset (until he got doxxed, he's a Romanian former academic). If there's a broad, coherent point in the book it's the idea that a certain minority of humans have a predisposition to conquering or occupying 'own space', which provides them with fulfillment absent in the modern world. Hence why BAP celebrates historical conquerors, warriors, pirates and so on. There are intermittent reflections on various philosophers he reveres, mostly the Greeks, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. It's an appeal to a neoclassical cult of the body and individual self-cultivation and freedom, but the author most shitposts on social media and exhorts his readers to post workout selfies. Is it bad? I don't know, it could be a lot worse. It's quite funny at times. It definitely reads like the author has some philosophical education, but it's difficult to make out which points are meant sincerely among the jokes, irony and homoerotic anecdotes. Anyway, it was successful enough that a few right-wing magazines and journals reviewed it, often quite favourably.

[Anonymous No.15839802]

>>15839754
>appeal to a neoclassical cult of the body and individual self-cultivation and freedom
fuck off
health is very important

[Anonymous No.15839847]

>>15838569
ok schizo

[Anonymous No.15839954]

>>15838569
Regardless of whether or not you're right, Christopher Langan's "Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe" has already provided a theory of everything. There is nothing left to solve.

[Anonymous No.15840078]

Oh man, not another item in the long list of things that make me ashamed to be Romanian.

[Anonymous No.15840144]

>>15839954
Does this theory of everything happen to provide trivial solutions to standing philosophical problems by refusing to acknowledge the validity of the conceptual framework which gave rise to those problems?

[Anonymous No.15840160]

>>15840078
Is Ceausescu's cult of personality to blame for all of this? I mean this inability to tell reality apart from insanity?

[Anonymous No.15840165]

>>15839954
Langan's theory is crap. Any time someone gives a 'theory of everything' but is completely unintegrated with the leading academia of the time, it's completely out of touch nonsense. It doesn't have to be that way, but it's always turned out that way.

[Anonymous No.15840239]

>>15839543
Interesting, Vacariu.

Anyway, is there any Romanian literature you recommend?
I think of learning Romanian in the next few years, after I improve my Latin.

[Anonymous No.15840267]

https://www.plebbit.com/r/AcademicPhilosophy/comments/8dxr8y/gabriel_vacariu_and_accusations_of_plagarism/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_content=post_body

[Anonymous No.15840912]

>>15840165
t. seething low iq academic

Follow the herd and you will never innovate

[Anonymous No.15840977]

>>15840912
Yeah that's why we all follow Time Cube, not Einstein or Bohr. Academics are low IQ and everyone outside it must be an innovative genius.

[Anonymous No.15840984]

tl;dr

Is this a schizoposting thread or can someone actually summarise this shit into a few short paragraphs that are comprehensible to a layman?

[Anonymous No.15841010]

Jesus, what a bizarre thread. Are all Romanians as crazy as the OP?

[Anonymous No.15841108]

>>15840984
Basically, OP believes a bunch of philosophers and quantum scientists are plagiarizing him, and that his work is monumentally innovative. The basic way to sum up his EDW theory is that the various 'theories' you can construct about the world are all sort of true, but correspond to different subject-independent 'worlds.' He thinks this has implications for quantum physics and for various problems in philosophy. As it turns out, he is not as original as he thinks. Those he accuses of plagiarism can be shown to have quite normally and naturally derived their ideas from other older sources, and his own EDW idea is not exactly original to him either, as something similar to it was developed by others in the 1990s.

[Anonymous No.15841201]

>>15838569
Are you by any chance related to Horia Belcea?

[Anonymous No.15841275]

>>15841108
Thanks

[Anonymous No.15841679]

>>15839476
>UNBELIEVABLE
>AMAZING
>SPRINGER
>!!!!!
>!!!
>!!!!
>!!!
>(!!)

the reason you are being ignored by academia is none of them want to read your "redneck uncle's chain email"-style writing.

[Anonymous No.15841816]

>>15840977
Cope. Academics are thought leaders in the sense that they are the sheep at the front of the flock. In that realm they excell as midwits among nitwits. Socrates was not some ivory tower academic, and he BTFO'd everyone. The status quo may make advancements, but it will never be the catalyst for a paradigm shift. An outsider dismissed as a quack by out of touch gatekeeper academics, will succeed where Einstein failed, and produce a unified theory. Be prepared.

[Anonymous No.15841965]

Ce pula mea schizopost e asta?

[Anonymous No.15842458]

Sperg-tastic post

[Anonymous No.15843612]

>>15841201
It's probably one of his split personalities

[Anonymous No.15844300]

>>15841816
You're the one that needs to cope. There was no academia in Socrates' time. Every philosopher in the 20th century was an academic. You can even argue that it was true in the 19th century, 18th century, 17th century, even all the way back to the middle ages when universities began. People were either trained at the university, or by professional tutors, or even taught as professionals. Even the ancients belonged to proto-universities ever since Plato. They studied at the Academy, later the Lyceum, the Stoa, and the Epicurean Garden, or were (as I said) taught by tutors and the like (aristocrats). You're the one coping. Rather than presume, wrongly, that change must come from inside, go and get your university training and work from within. There's more people who do that than you think. Some of the craziest philosophers who criticize academia still got trained by it or even get to teach, that's what best prepares them to strike at its heart. Don't be a pseud.

[Anonymous No.15844307]

>>15844300
>from inside
Meant to say 'from outside.'

[Anonymous No.15845525]

>>15844300
Naive. The sophists were the academics of their time. Hyped up circlejerkers who went around charging people for the "privilege" of being "educated" by them, just like the elitist academics of today. All the eccentric Socrates had to do to be a thorn was walk around and ask questions, and it was so effective that even an aristocrat couldn't help but join him. Descartes too recognized the intellectual bankruptcy of his formal education. He also arranged for one of his ground breaking works to be released after his death, because the educational establishment does not want to be exposed and lose all credibility with the public. All these so called crazies only influenced the system at best; the system is still rotten to the core. You cannot change the devil by working with him. Only way is through direct action. Seize the means of education. Otherwise you are doomed to jump their credentialist hoops, only to earn no seat at the table.
Any seats that were available, are taken through nepotism, endlessly perpetuating the circlejerk. Academia is for fools.

[Anonymous No.15845815]

>>15845525
>The sophists were the academics of their time.
You think that because they were hired as tutors, but their method wasn't philosophy. It was all about winning arguments (eristic) without even upholding philosophical virtues like epistemic humility or the principle of charity, much less following the proper rules of reason. Your kind of paint-it-all-the-same attack against academia is inherently sophistic.
>Seize the means of education.
Do it, I wish you luck. I'm not opposed to you fighting the nepotism and everything wrong with academia. The problem is that pseuds on the outside throw out the baby with the bathwater and then pretend they had the baby all along. Freaking Langan doesn't hold the baby dude. I value a genuine autodidact lover-of-wisdom. Langan goes around saying he's figured everything out and you kiss his feet, he's literally behaving like a sophist and you're falling for it. Many people outside academia have a very odd hostility to anything academics say, entirely on the basis of 'it's academia so it must be wrong.' That's sophistry. I'm all for fixing the ills but you should learn the strengths of academia from within in order to take it on to the best of your ability.

[Anonymous No.15845970]

What if it's a student in his class who dislikes him and who is hoping to make him look crazy by impersonating him and acting foolish on 4chan?

[Anonymous No.15845996]

what the fuck is going on in this thread?

[Anonymous No.15846119]

>>15845815
>but their method wasn't philosophy.
i dont know how you dont understand the analogy. when a real shift happens. all the past academics (actual academics) will be seen as sophists.

[Anonymous No.15846134]

>>15838569
Hi Gabe, my name is Deke Weaver and I look like Count Orlok. Also, I am a piss poor teacher.

[Anonymous No.15846806]

>>15838569
>Dear Professors/staff and based 4channers
Kek this man...

[Anonymous No.15846835]

>>15838569
Greetings Gabe, Tito Ortiz here. Have you ever tried fucking your couch cushions?

[Anonymous No.15846880]

Herro professuh. This Shinji, janitor. I reed stuff you say i think you on 2 somefing. Good luck for you

[Anonymous No.15846923]

I agree with several points you've made on the climate and weather of the current event. Nevertheless, the oceans and even the forests have to be accounted for. By this I mean using an intersectional analysis of the premise with tools such as emotion. Logic cannot catch truth in it's entirety but with the use of muscle spasms, one may reach a closer boundary or perhaps overcome the threshold. If by then we recognize the conditions of the outer sphere of cognition, I'd like to refer you to one of my colleagues who is often mischarged with heinous appellations which can harm the reputation thereby ending one's social presence where one announces one's views that are often mistakened with identities that have been traditionally held by the West which as we now today is racist.

[Anonymous No.15847037]

Posting in an epic bread. Considering switching my PhD to Bucharest so I can get tutelage from this madlad.

[Anonymous No.15847044]

>>15838569
What is your relationship to psychedelics?

[Anonymous No.15847054]

>>15847037
>Considering switching my PhD to Bucharest so I can get tutelage from this madlad
Emphasis on the second-to-last syllable.

[Anonymous No.15847064]

>>15845996
We've been enriched by Romanians lately.

[Anonymous No.15847113]

>>15838751
>paranoia/narcissism which might mean he has schizophrenia
How are these 3 related?

[Anonymous No.15847693]

>>15846119
>all the past academics (actual academics) will be seen as sophists.
They won't be. A shift already happened. The present academic system replaced a previous one. Scholasticism was the old academic system. Scientists and philosophers out of the mainstream developed the republic of letters since the 16th and 17th centuries but it took til the late 18th century/early 19th century for them to actually replace the scholastic old guard in the universities. The problem with scholasticism wasn't sophistry but ossification. And that is probably going to be the problem with academia when another such shift happens. The scholastics aren't seen as sophists because they weren't sophists. Stop thinking of people with views that you disagree with as sophists. Sophism is about intentionally abusing rhetoric to win arguments.

[Anonymous No.15847708]

>>15847113
Excessive paranoia and narcissism are delusions, people with both persecution delusions and grandiose delusions might have something going on.

[Anonymous No.15849188]

>>15845815
Not an argument. My history of philosophy college course literally described them as being part of the philosophical conversation of the time. Their position was skepticism, that nothing could be truly known, including morality. So they believed success should be achieved by any means necessary, and behaved accordingly. Now what, is my academic source wrong? Looks like I'm dammed if I do and dammed if I don't. Philosophers should just call themselves creative writers, because everything is open to interpretation, apparently. Scientists aren't wrong when they say philosophers have their heads in the clouds. And if a 4chan weeb could manage to solve a supermuration math problem that stumped worthless academics for 25 years, Christopher Langan is certainly capable of having produced a theory of everything.

[Anonymous No.15849216]

>>15838569
Kek, a pseud

[Anonymous No.15850606]

>>15846806
He knows how to make a first impression

[Anonymous No.15850999]

>>15838569
>Dear Professors/staff and based 4channer
>email
>ironic ALL CAPS WORD
This must be a bait.. there is no way this is real.

[Anonymous No.15851016]

Just a phenomenal thread

[Anonymous No.15851460]

>>15845996
pic related

[Anonymous No.15851546]

>>15838569
fucking hell is it really you? stop spamming me with your emails, you weren't "plagiarized by Sean Carroll"

[Anonymous No.15851573]

>>15849188
I'm just relaying to you what Plato's Socrates saw wrong in them. Yeah if you want to consider Protagoras and Gorgias radical skeptics you have every ground to do so. Plato/Socrates were being polemical. But the sophists as portrayed by them are distinguished from philosophers insofar as, for Plato/Socrates, the philosopher is a bit more modest about what they know and respects the rules of reason. Plato/Socrates felt that the relativism and focus on eristic, not to mention their very title ('sophists') demonstrated that the Sophists were the opposite of philosophers. Langan boasts of his 'high IQ' and then goes on saying he has proven the existence of God and an afterlife from mathematics and other such things. Seriously if you want to do some ok outsider philosophy, you're better off with Max Tegmark or even Pirsig or something. Langan is too narcissistic and his claims are stupid. Stop defending him in particular, go find some other outsider to defend if you want to make a better case.

[Anonymous No.15851579]

>>15850999
it might be real, a guy by this name spams his emails to grad students and faculty at my university. he's one of the more prolific crackpots in terms of how much he spams

[Anonymous No.15851589]

>Langan's support of conspiracy theories, including the 9/11 Truther movement and the white genocide conspiracy theory, and his opposition to interracial relationships, have contributed to his gaining a following among members of the alt-right and others on the far right.[14][15] (Langan has claimed that the George W. Bush administration staged the 9/11 attacks in order to distract the public from learning about the CTMU.)[14] Journalists have described certain of Langan's Internet posts as racist and antisemitic.[14][15]
Wow everything makes sense now, of course fucking 4chan anons would like this man.

[Anonymous No.15851609]

>>15851579
You don't go to his university right? So if he's emailing unrelated university students, that's pretty fucked. How is he still employed? How was he employed in the first place?

[Anonymous No.15851627]

>>15851609
no, I'm in physics at a popular US university. From what I've gathered he sends them out to similar programs, maybe philosophy programs as well.

[Anonymous No.15851629]

Good heavens this thread

[Anonymous No.15851648]

>>15851589
>the president staged the largest attack on american soil in order to stop the public fron hearing about my shitty theory
fucking LMAO

[Anonymous No.15851761]

>>15851589
Holy based

[Anonymous No.15851801]

oh yeah
It's brainlet time.

[Anonymous No.15851808]

>>15851579
Another physicist here, he sounds like that Romanian guy who kept spamming physics departments with similar texts and narratives. Gabor Fekete. He also attached really shitty drawings of his mechanical explanation of relativity.
My bet is on schizophrenia/psychosis.

[Anonymous No.15851837]

>>15839452
Holy schizophrenia this guy is unhinged, and not in a good way.

[Anonymous No.15851877]

>>15851808
I don't have any from Gabor unfortunately. I have a chinese guy who tried to explain light speed in terms of E=mc^2 for the whole universe lmfao

[Anonymous No.15851898]

>>15851837
He's really not okay in the head. I legitimately feel bad.

[Anonymous No.15852361]

>>15851648
My fuk'n sides. God bless Romania and all its based schizos

[Anonymous No.15852370]

>>15852361
That's Langan not Vacariu anon

[Anonymous No.15852380]

>>15839249
Did you miss the debut of the greatest romanian /lit/izen?

[Anonymous No.15852408]

>>15852380
It's really funny that these things happened in succession. Someone should synthesize Vacariu's metaphysics with Belcea's ramblings and see what comes out.

[Anonymous No.15852427]

>>15839384
yes, this man clearly needs treatment

[Anonymous No.15852432]

>>15839551
He's deranged

[Anonymous No.15852442]

>>15852432
Rather likely. It reminds me of Tooker, the resident schizo of /sci/.

[Anonymous No.15852443]

he posted this on /sci/ too

[Anonymous No.15852448]

>>15852443
HOLY FUCK HE DID

[Anonymous No.15852489]

Hold on a second Tony,

so you're telling me that there's a large proportion of Academia that spends its time republishing other people's works under their own name? That's crazy, they're my hard earned taxpayers dollars going to work to stroke the ego of some Nepotists wet dream. Stugats!

[Michael Rapaport No.15852693]

Dear Professor Vacariu

My name is Michael Rapaport. You may remember me from TV shows like Prison Break or Boston Public, or one of the over 60 movies I have starred in. Your plight is not uncommon - the copyright and patent system simply does not protect ideas to the degree it needs to in the modern world. I, along with some other heavy hitters in Hollywood, who are sick of having screenplays, jokes, and characters stolen without recourse, are developing a solution.

The product is called ideaID. We are leveraging neural nets and machine learning against a huge dataset of various concepts, philosophies, pitches, etc. Each is labeled, until we can find distinct signatures in each idea that are unique when weighed against any other. This signature is committed to a registry along with the holder of the ideas name, we call it the ideaIDkey. The neural network ensures ideas that are evolved or iterative are not detected, but once an idea is too similar, it is flagged.

We welcome the academic and philosophy communities with open arms. Please contact me, let's collaborate ASAP. Thanks for bringing this issue out into the open as well.

[Anonymous No.15852827]

>>15852693
What the fuck is this shiiit

[Anonymous No.15852859]

>>15852827
It's hilarious is what it is, lol.

[Anonymous No.15853100]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIBUqYFliCA
I'm watching this Vacariu video and he claims nobody in 2500 years figured out what he figured out til he figured it out (despite Balaguer, Bricker, etc figuring it out before him or the people he says plagiarized him), and what's funniest is pausing at around 5:30 when the slide behind him asks 'Can you imagine Newton's discoveries elaborated by two persons??' Which is funny, because that's exactly what happened between Newton and Hooke, Newton and Leibniz, etc. How didn't Vacariu know that? HOW the University of Bucharest hired this guy as a philosophy professor is seriously beyond me.

[Anonymous No.15854394]

>>15852693
Someone's about to get cancelled

[Anonymous No.15854468]

Dear Gabriel,

You may know me, Bill Gates, from my work as the CEO of Microsoft. During my career, I have repeatedly seen the importance of intellectual copyright. Were it not for this glorious legal institution, a company such as Microsoft could not have flourished. I fully support your fight against these thieving hoodlums, and hope for the immediate and ruthless prosecution of all involved.

Sincerely,
Bill Gates

[Alfred Chocula No.15854650]

>>15838569
Dear Professors/staff and based 4channers

My name is Count Alfred Chocula (senior monster, Breakfast, Bucharest University, Romania, East Europe). My webpage: https://www.generalmills.com/en/Brands/Cereals/Monsters.aspx

My main message of this email: there are many food engineers, dietricians and nutritionists who have published UNBELIEVABLE similar cereals to my ideas long time after I published and posted many of my (FREE) on various sites! There is a recipe at these addresses (and in attachment)! The content is below. You are not the only one who received this sugared delight: I have sent cereals to thousands…

Many years later, many people (many countries, many domains, many of my sweeties – some of them are “great” names from great Kellogs and Nestlé shelves!!) have published UNBELIEVABLE similar treats (see here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cEOKS5-DcQ& ) just because discovering the existence of cocoa's, I have changed everything!!!

Count Chocula, (April 2020 to 2014) The UNBELIEVABLE SIMILARITIES between the cereals of some people (2011-2016) and my treats (2002-2008) in chocolate (crunchiness, milk harmonics), branding, diabetes and prizes.this manuscript would require a CHOCOLUTION in international supermarkets environment!) here (the sweet is BELOW)

It is about TWO Nestlé prizes (Insulin and Breakfast, Crunchiness science).

[Anonymous No.15854691]

>>15854650

sides were sent a considerable distance in the air

[Anonymous No.15854907]

>>15854650
Okay this is based.

[Anonymous No.15854915]

>>15841108
He's basically copemaxxing as the less successful sibling given that his brother is also an academic (?).

t. had a course held by OP in university

[Anonymous No.15854922]

Wowzers, I just made a mess in my trousers

[Anonymous No.15854941]

>>15854915
Tell us more about him and the department of philosophy at the University of Bucharest. What are the other professors like? What do the other professors and students think of Vacariu? The fact Vacariu was hired and hasn't yet been fired reflects really badly on you guys, so I hope it's an isolated incident.

[Anonymous No.15854945]

>>15838576
>>15838708
>>15838751
So fucking based

>HEY YOU GOYS
>I FOUND THE WMD’s SADAM WAS HIDING
>NO DONT COPY ME
>HERE ARE LINKS
>HERES MY FUCKING FACE BRO

[Anonymous No.15854988]

>>15854941
I can only vaguely recall his course given that it was a less relevant one for that particular semester, but he's pretty much a pseud lacking in self-awareness.

I was a sociology student though, so I can't really say anything about his work and status within the philosophy department. I just remember from student gossip that his brother is supposedly a more accomplished academic.

Anyhow, this thread is bizarre, but I wouldn't be surprised if OP is really who he claims to be.

[Anonymous No.15855015]

>>15854988
Thanks for sharing. Hopefully some of his other students drop by to give us more insight.

[Anonymous No.15855044]

>>15838569
Someone please screencap this shit.

[Anonymous No.15855060]

>>15838569
>>15838569
>>15838569
>>15838569
>>15838569


Bamp for screencap.

[Anonymous No.15855077]

Gabriel Vacariu talking about his academic work in English (or rather ingliș in proper istărn iuropiăn feșăn):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIBUqYFliCA

10/10

[Anonymous No.15855093]

Truly a blessed thread

[Anonymous No.15856873]

"Hey Professors,
My name is Gabriel, and I hate every single one of you. All of you are fat, retarded, no-lifes who spend every second of their day looking at stupid ass papers. You are everything bad in academia. Honestly, have any of you ever gotten any ontology or epistemology? I mean, I guess it's fun not citing people because of your own ignorance, but you all take plagiarising Epistemologically Different Worlds (EDW) to a whole new level. This is even worse than not understanding the new philosophical revolution.
Don't be a stranger. Just hit me with your best shot. I'm pretty much perfect. I am a full professor, and published a book on Springer. What articles do you write, other than "gay sex is good when fascists do it"? I also have a high H-index, and have a banging hot girlfriend (She just wrote an article with me; Shit was SO cash). You are all faggots who should just kill yourselves. Thanks for listening.
Pic Related: It's me and my bitch"

[Anonymous No.15856926]

>>15854650
o lawdy

[Anonymous No.15856977]

>>15838890
>It is Prof. Vacariu.
holy based

[Anonymous No.15857144]

>>15856873
Damn nice

[Anonymous No.15857378]

screencapped it btw
http://archive.is/zhBki

[Anonymous No.15857915]

>>15852693
Is this real?

[Anonymous No.15859657]

>>15857915
Might be something from /tv/

[Anonymous No.15861416]

Belcea and Vacariu should collaborate. It will be the unprecedented synthesis of academic and non-academic philosophy.

[Anonymous No.15861429]

>>15857915
holy shit is that the guy from gladiator? no wonder he was squashing rumors of gladiator 2!

[Anonymous No.15861526]

>>15861416
The synthesis of the synthesis if you will.

[Anonymous No.15861643]

Gonna read this nigger's shit because I actually know my Markus Gabriel, let's see if he's right

[Anonymous No.15861680]

>>15861643
Start with his dissertation, it's on his website. Skip like the first 70 pages on Descartes and Kant, it's pointless padding. Around p. 70 is when he starts discussing his 'epistemologically different worlds.'

[Anonymous No.15861686]

>>15861643
Link to his dissertation:
http://filosofie.unibuc.ro/gvacariu/EDWs%20printed%20thesis%202007-posted.pdf

[Anonymous No.15861689]

why does this keep happening

[Anonymous No.15861921]

>>15839384
also, the fact that hes posting this stuff here is a guaranteed red flag.

[Anonymous No.15863185]

I like turtles

[Anonymous No.15863367]

>>15863185
Me too anon.

[Anonymous No.15863558]

>>15839384
You clearly are unhinged, or a PLAGIARIZER yourself trying to cover up your own plagiarism. It is UNDOUBTABLE that the great and very attractive - and sexually available - Prof. Vacariu has created the most significant LEAP forward with EDW theory!! Anyone saying otherwise, like YOU, must be a PSEUDOTHEORETICIAN. Your continued disrespect for the one and only Prof. Gabriel Vacariu (by calling him Mr.) is the only thing I need to dismiss your PSEUDO-thoughts on this subject.

All the best,
Anonymous

[Anonymous No.15863595]

>>15838569
Two Nobel Prize winners plagiarized you, Prof. Vacariu?? Big if true. Also, does your surname mean "laughing cow" in Romanian?

[Gabriel Vacariu No.15863632]

>>15838569
i'm trans btw don't know if that matters

[Anonymous No.15863665]

>>15839384
Faggot stop trolling and show our Professor Vacariu some respect. You cannot deny his position as professor, and also cannot go around blindy accusing people of things like narcissism and paranoia without evidence. Sorry for this faggot giving our board a bad reputation Professor

[Anonymous No.15863784]

>>15838569
>>15838569


Ohhh lawd this can’t be real

[Anonymous No.15863848]

>>15863367
>proceeds to post pic of tortoise.
Anon...

[Anonymous No.15864007]

>>15838569

What's with all the pseuds from Romania?

[Anonymous No.15864062]

>>15863848
They're turtles in the broader colloquial style, don't fret friend.

[Anonymous No.15864206]

>>15838569

I hope that this is a student or colleague taking the piss. Vacariu, if you find this post, please do not post face with timestamp or any personal info because I do not want you to ruin your reputation. You at this point still have a high level of falsifiability in case any wokesters use your posts against you.

[Anonymous No.15864215]

>>15864206

>falsifiability

lol, I meant deniability

[Anonymous No.15864271]

>>15864206
His videos, publications, and email spam already ruin his reputation, and also boost the credibility that OP is really him.

[Anonymous No.15865022]

>>15863632
It does, flying to Romania right now for that boipussy

[Anonymous No.15865281]

>>15863558
>t. Gabriel Vacariu

[Anonymous No.15865617]

>>15838569
Thoughts on Deleuze? He seems to subscribe to some kind of ontological pluralism as well, he plagiarized your ideas even before you were born!

[Anonymous No.15865864]

>>15865617
Damn, Vacariu was retroactively plagiarized by Deleuze???

[Anonymous No.15865895]

>>15838580
Shhhhh, taci, nu-i da atentie

[Anonymous No.15865958]

>>15838569
I did not realise there are so many of my compatriots on this shitposting website

[Anonymous No.15866143]

>>15854650

[Anonymous No.15866595]

>>15861526
Writing the future of modern synthesis.

[Anonymous No.15866605]

>>15864007
Romanians are kinda like russians. Most of them are retarded but the smart ones really shine.

[Anonymous No.15866610]

>>15865895
Credeam că sunt singurul țigan de pe lit.

[Anonymous No.15867734]

>>15866595
If you think about it, Gabriel Vacariu's system is already a synthesis of the objective and the subjective in itself. He considers his work intellectually descended from Kant's transcendental idealism, and his epistemologically different worlds (EDWs) are subject-independent (objective) but delineated by subjective access. By synthesizing his work with Horea Belcea's, we create The Synthesis of the Synthesis of the Objective and the Subjective and the Objective and the Subjective.

[Anonymous No.15867967]

>>15838569
This has to be a fucking LARP. It's impossible for a second Romanian schizo to enter into the /lit/ spotlight back to back.
Muie.

[Anonymous No.15868053]

>>15838751
This post screams narcissism.

[Anonymous No.15868136]

>>15868053
You should be appropriately self-confident if you have reasons to. Once you start alleging quantum scientists and contemporary philosophers must have plagiarized you if they come up with ideas similar to yours independent of you, you've crossed a line into delusional narcissism.

[Anonymous No.15869197]

Remember to start with the Romanians.

[Anonymous No.15869210]

>>15869197
i bet that before thales of miletus there was some romanian guy who already said that everything is water. he simply didn't have an imageboard to complain about the greeks copying him.

[Anonymous No.15869294]

>>15869210
Since Thales was an Ionian there's a chance he had some mixture of Phrygian blood, and the Phrygians were said to have come from Dacia, ancestors of the Romanians, therefore...

[Anonymous No.15869380]

>>15869294
oh fuck, guess we need to rework all our charts so that they are reflective of the huge romanian influence on philosophy. i wouldn't be surprised if every major philosopher was in truth a romanian. in fact, i wouldn't even be surprised if we are all romanians but just somehow forgot about it because Markus Gabriel brainwashed us!

[Anonymous No.15869443]

>>15864062
I'm afraid we can no longer be lovers.

[Anonymous No.15869492]

>>15869380
ALL PHILOSOPHY IS ROMANIAN! Ionians like THALES and HERACLITUS were Daco-Phrygian ROMANIANS that migrated to Anatolia. Daco-Phrygian ROMANIAN Ionians founded the colony of Elea in Italy, home of the Eleatic ROMANIAN philosophers like PARMENIDES. The Athenians claimed to be pure IONIANS therefore ROMANIANS. SOCRATES and PLATO were ROMANIANS from Athens. ARISTOTLE was from Macedon, of Thraco-Dacian ROMANIAN origin. The city of ROME was founded by ROMANIANS from the ANATOLIAN city of TROY. Therefore every ROMAN philosopher was ROMANIAN. When Saxons settled in Transylvania, they INTERMARRIED with ROMANIANS, and other GERMANS intermarried with THEM. GERMAN PHILOSOPHY ONLY BEGAN AFTERWARD. Every GERMAN philosopher is descended from ROMANIANS. GERMANS then intermarried with ALL EUROPEANS through DYNASTIC MARRIAGE, meaning the BRITISH (via Hanover), the FRENCH and SPANISH (via the Habsburgs), etc. ALL ENGLISH PHILOSOPHY IS THEREFORE ROMANIAN. All AMERICAN philosophy is ENGLISH therefore also ROMANIAN.

[Anonymous No.15869543]

>>15869492
RUSSIAN philosophy only began after Russia conquered MOLDAVIA, which is ROMANIAN. ROMANIANS from Moldavia INTERMARRIED with Russians, and RUSSIAN philosophy came out of it. RUSSIAN philosophy is ROMANIAN. Greco-Roman ROMANIANS settled in Harran in Syria when the ARABS found them, they INTERMARRIED with the ARABS, then ARAB philosophy followed. ARAB philosophers are ROMANIAN. Medieval JEWISH philosophy emerged in contact with Greeks, Romans, Arabs, and Europeans of ROMANIAN descent, JEWISH philosophy is ROMANIAN.

[Anonymous No.15870015]

>>15869492
>>15869543
base

[Anonymous No.15870035]

EDW huh? This is incredible. Stealing this.

[Anonymous No.15870117]

>>15870035
>>15870035
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.15870874]

>>15870035
Rare philosophy. Do not steal.

[Anonymous No.15870950]

>>15867967
Who's the first?

[Anonymous No.15871001]

>>15870950
Horia Belcea.

[Anonymous No.15871049]

>>15870950
>>15871001
Welcome to ultimate transcendental enlightenment.

[Anonymous No.15872145]

>>15871049
I wish people read Vacariu as much as they (supposedly) read Belcea. Like, unless he's memeing himself with multiple accounts, people are legitimately diving in. Not so with Mr. Vacariu. They're missing out on the double Romanian deluxe philosophy experience.

[Anonymous No.15872914]

>>15872145
Anons don't pay as much attention to vacariu because there's too much different shit to look through at first glance. Belcea's is all in one package, and it's easier to go through because he wrote it as a layman. Likewise, it's more easily memed.

[Old Man No.15872938]

>>15867967
Bronze Age Pervert didn't start here, but he's close enough innit? I guess I ought to publish something, being a Romanian and all

[Anonymous No.15873145]

>>15838569
>>15838620
Bump interesting stuff.
looking for more on the 'proof god can't exist' point. very revolutionary

[Old Man No.15873221]

>>15838620
I can't comprehend the arguments he's making, but it would be naive to assume God cannot contradict or fudge those ideas you've created, no matter how impervious or logical they might be.

[Anonymous No.15873310]

Vacari U from Uganda ZULOL

[Anonymous No.15873313]

>>15872938
Do it. Join the pantheon.

[Anonymous No.15873727]

>>15872938
Două rușini naționale sînt suficiente.

[Anonymous No.15874849]

>>15867734
Epistemologically synthesized worlds

[Anonymous No.15875012]

I just want to say thank you to Mr. Vacariu for motivating me the last few days, philosophically speaking. His work is still sloppy and not as original as he thinks, but I guess his existence improves my week at least a little bit.

[Anonymous No.15875367]

kek this is still up

[Anonymous No.15875762]

Bump

[Anonymous No.15875843]

>>15838569
How the fuck is this thread still alive?

[Anonymous No.15875867]

>>15875843
Amazing, right? I would have thought the intellectual establishment would have already exercised their insidious power (acquired through wiles and nepotism) to quash all mention of their greatest crime: the plagiarism of EDW. I guess 4chan is somehow safe from their influence. For how long though?

The thread is alive because people (yourself included) have been bumping it.

[Anonymous No.15875905]

We have Londonfrog, we have Romaniaschizo, why is /lit/ the greatest blogging website on earth?

[Anonymous No.15875938]

Still waiting for the Resume with the Romanians chart to be procured, featuring all the schizos from this week alongside others

[Anonymous No.15877104]

>>15838569

Dear Gabriel, it was really a pleasure to read through some of your UNBELIEVABLE ideas and theories, I had never thought about the application of your EDW ideas to certain aspects of physics and neuroscience. I hope you don't mind if I adopt some of these ideas into some of my own work, although I won't be able to credit you directly, of course

[Anonymous No.15877144]

>>15877104
NOOOOOOOOO. NO. NO. NO. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHH. WHY DOES IT KEEP HAPPENING NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.15877794]

>>15854650
thank you.

[Anonymous No.15879356]

bump for basedness

[Anonymous No.15879384]

>>15875843
>>15875867
Professor Vacariu's prolonged lack of response to this thread is concerning. I fear a plot to silence him has been executed by deep state academia.

[Anonymous No.15879409]

>>15838620
>Proof God cannot even exist:
>https://youtube.com/watch?v=wEzCNu-JVqs [Open]
I'm glad somebody finally did it.
The wonderful thing about this is it completely cuts the floor out from under any theistic metaphysics and grounds itself in a rejuvenated and rigorous scientific model in a single stroke. Honestly revolutionary stuff. Epochal implications and perhaps a genuine turning point in the course of metaphysical narratives. Striking at the presuppositional level like this is terrific.
Now as your concept of EDWs becomes less obscure to myself and others i'm sure more concrete explanations and extrapolations will be possible. Amazing how the cutting edge of stuff like this is being posted on 4chan.

[Anonymous No.15880388]

Are QPUs plagiarizing EDWs?

[Anonymous No.15880550]

>>15854650

[Anonymous No.15881174]

>>15854650
Keep up the based work, Count.

[Anonymous No.15882211]

Horia Belcea is temporary, but Gabriel Vacariu is eternal.

[Anonymous No.15882236]

what the sam hill am i reading

[Old Man No.15882327]

>>15873727
Da, dar eu am ambitii. Poate ca o-sa devin un poet, sa un scriitor, dar sa crapa dracu pe toti filosofii

[Anonymous No.15883788]

The fact only one copy of this thread exists but like 50 have been made for Belcea's inferior work prove Horia is the one making all the other threads to force people into paying attention to his book. Mr. Vacariu is a real chad.

[Anonymous No.15884893]

>>15838569
Mr. Vacariu, I cannot express how much I appreciate you posting this well written, coherent, respectful post. It would mean the world to me if you were to meet in person with fellow Romanian Horia Belcea with the intent to beat him unconscious. Please, if you could find it in your heart to do us this tremendous favour I would be very grateful. Have a great day.

[Anonymous No.15885011]

>>15838569
Haha nice

[Anonymous No.15885141]

>>15879384
Oh no.
>>15884893
>>15883788
He is a PROFESSOR. With PhD. A DOCTOR and a PROFESSOR.

[Anonymous No.15885232]

>>15885141
>Honorable Dr. Vacariu PhD PBUH

[Anonymous No.15885277]

>>15885232
Yes. EXCEPT there is NO GOD. He cannot exist. This was proven by Prof. Vacariu years ago. I know

[Anonymous No.15885461]

>>15885277
Nietzsche (1882) BTFO, why would you kill God if, AMAZINGLY, he didn't exist to begin with?

He should have considered Dr. Vacariu's apriori entity which ephemerally implanted episteme-chips into the collective consciousness as to acknowledge the GOD DELUSION (as he is NOT EXISTENT).

As a proud founder of the Cucuteni-Trypillia culture, Honorable Professor Vacariu taught the importance of reevaluation of morals through the Burned House Technique, yet another example of a "fellow" PHILOSOPHER who steals (plagiarizes) ideas.

No dignity.

[Anonymous No.15885640]

http://filosofie.unibuc.ro/gvacariu/edws%20final.pdf

This was enough to convince us, OP

[Anonymous No.15885837]

>>15838569
I'm going to plagiarise you, and I'll get away with it because nobody takes you seriously.

[Anonymous No.15885882]

>>15838569
Thank you for your outstanding work, now i finally can write my thesis using your work as inspiration!

[Anonymous No.15887002]

>>15847693
Good poster. The other guy is obviously a troll or stupid, but if he was genuine, he wouldn't be insulting you but purporting what langan writes about, though he is too stupid to understand debate.

[Anonymous No.15888719]

>>15885141
It's only a mafter of time before he's found having committed suicide with 2 shots to the back of the head.

[Anonymous No.15889759]

>>15839563
gypsy != romanian

[Anonymous No.15889770]

>>15840267
kek

[Anonymous No.15889792]

>>15845970
not impossible

[Anonymous No.15889804]

>>15845996
high IQ

[Anonymous No.15889835]

>>15852443
He didn't. Did he?

[Anonymous No.15889865]

>>15852693
Include me in the screencap

[Anonymous No.15890857]

>>15883788
The academics are conspiring with Horia to distract from EDW.

[Anonymous No.15892015]

>>15889835
He did: >>/sci/thread/S11892452

[Anonymous No.15892023]

>>15838569
now this is the reason for trips. Not some narcissistic no name butterfly.

[Anonymous No.15892039]

Some people here are smart enough to understand OP. Unfortunately as professional toilet cleaner I an not one of them.

[Anonymous No.15893057]

>>15838569
why does this board have so many gypsys as of late?

[Anonymous No.15893413]

>>15838569
Speak English, nigger. Succinctly.

[Anonymous No.15893441]

>>15892023
holy shit