/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.15813214]

What's /lit/s problem with female writers?
This place is so pathetic, I cant believe Tao shouted you idiots out .

[Anonymous No.15813231]

>>15813214
who is this tao?

[Anonymous No.15813232]

>What's /lit/s problem with female writers?
They don't have a penis no homo I promise

[Anonymous No.15813241]

>>15813214
98% of them are trash, the remaining 2% make childrens literature. Also, who's "Tao", sound like a minority, which are produce shit.

[Anonymous No.15813249]

>>15813214
Stop spamming some self-absorbed cumbucket thinking of herself as big brained.

[Anonymous No.15813312]

>>15813241
Untrue, you just don't know and haven't bothered to read any female writers, so of course you're wilfully ignorant. You refuse to advance your intellect because of your own sexism. Does that not sound weak?

[Anonymous No.15813346]

>>15813312
Fake and bait and gay, but perhaps you might be able to suggest a good female author

[Plant a herb in the options fi(...) No.15813376]

>>15813312
I've read numerious, the only ones I liked where literal childrens and YA literature like Burnett, Broente, Christie, Alcott and Trott. And maybe some books on sewing and cooking like Davidis and one biography of Humboldt - which still made a greater point on socio-cultural stuff in his bio than hard facts. On any other subject the female choice is always inferiour when compared with a male counterpart. As is the natural way human interests fall.

Stop trying to shilll internalized sexism, like a retard. True stength means to accept which you can't change and concentrate on those which can be altert. Human nature isn't part of the later and trying to make women into mans equals only devalues their inert qualities as would be vice versa, trying to meme mens as experts on child birth and rearing, outside on pure rational fact sheets.

Now be gone, with your silly cuntposting.

[Anonymous No.15813382]

> What's /lit/s problem with female writers?
This place is so pathetic,

I don’t have a problem with female authors, truth to be told I bought different cookbooks last month.

[Anonymous No.15813383]

>>15813346
You're so stupid.

I'll recc Chris Kraus for you

[Plant a herb in the options fi(...) No.15813414]

>>15813383
>wrote books like "I Love Dick, Aliens & Anorexia"
She's a heeb, isn't she? I bet she is.
Nevermind. Of course, she is.

[Anonymous No.15813435]

>>15813414
>Woman write book called I Love Dick

Don’t worry. She was just referring to Moby Dick.

[Anonymous No.15813439]

>>15813214
My main problem with female writers is that they are not sitting on my face right now as I'm typing this.

[Anonymous No.15813441]

>>15813376
>On any other subject the female choice is always inferiour when compared with a male counterpart. As is the natural way human interests fall.

>Stop trying to shilll internalized sexism, like a retard. True stength means to accept which you can't change and concentrate on those which can be altert.

>cuntposting


How can you not see how sexist your statement is. You're basing your idea on unfound knowledge and self-righteousness .

>trying to meme mens as experts on child birth and rearing, outside on pure rational fact sheets.

This has nothing to do with the biological ability of women but on male and female intellect . A woman can be just as good a scientist as a man.

>>15813414
Are you schizophrenic?
You know nothing about the work, clearly, but because she is a woman you see her as something inferior. Do women intimidate you?

[Anonymous No.15813445]

I don't know why I even come here anymore. I'm going back to /sci/

[Anonymous No.15813451]

>>15813214
Vast majority of them are average.

[Anonymous No.15813465]

>>15813214
penis envy

[Anonymous No.15813474]

>>15813465
Can women disprove this without resorting to ad hominems? I mean, I don't believe it to be true, but I definitely would not ever trade my dick for a pussy so I intuitively feel there's something to it

[Anonymous No.15813478]

>>15813441
better to be honest and explicit with your bias than vague and under the pretense of impartiality. the bluntness of lit is refreshing

[Anonymous No.15813482]

>>15813441
Facts aren't sexist nor racist, they are reality, just like any prejudge represents your brain working properly in terms of pattern recognition.

>A woman can be just as good a scientist as a man.
Can, but more likely than not will never be. Do I need to post the gender bell curve? Let me. Plus reproduction prevents female from truly engaging a subject and no sane woman at 40 years of age will be glad to have picked a job instea of a family (see suicide statistics).

>Do women intimidate you?
Nah, I consider most modern women to be a shame to my sex, tho mostly due to indoctrination. Lemmy guess, you're the hedonist from yeterday? Just a heads up, women distrust and dislike submissive feminist men and will go for a sexist chad when gven the chance. Instead of dwelling in sex in the city literature, maybe visit /fit/ instead?

[Anonymous No.15813488]

The male ones clearly outshine them, and with the absolute state of literature atm seems it will stay that way for the rest of human history

[Anonymous No.15813530]

>>15813474
The crux of most feminist theory revolves of such ad hominems toward men as "inferior" without bases. They're core claim on this is that they can exclusively produce children, but that statement gets equalized by the fact that they require the male's seed for that gift.

From a practical perspective, look at how feminization has lead to the masculinization of women: in their behavior, job selection, identity, rights etc. The whole history of feminism has been a move to not expand and embrace the femininity of females, but to brute force their masculinity on par with males.

Rather than embracing the value of being a good mother (something exclusive to women), they have tarnished it as a derogation relative to being a successful career business woman.

[Anonymous No.15813536]

>>15813214
Name one female writer who's Dostoevsky's equivalent.

[Anonymous No.15813540]

>>15813249

She was undoubtedly smarter than you, as were most women writers and thinkers of history.

[Anonymous No.15813541]

>>15813214
I like this author, happy now?

[Anonymous No.15813574]

>>15813541
Ouch, my bad. Honorary man.

[Anonymous No.15813579]

>>15813376

Is there name for this type of LARPer? You’re one of those positivist, Nietzschean, “Might is Right” incels yeah? Lol no it’s genuinely embarrassing, not because I think you’re totally brain dead, but I really can’t help laughing at sniveling men who get on this board and carve out the most “manly” philosophies to compensate for God knows what.

Wait let me try, “ah, the biological structures of society indicate that men and women are particular roles that must not be deviated from in any way less we deny the order of nature” right? And the holes in the argument are always glossed over. Do you think you can find em this time anon?

[Anonymous No.15813596]

>>15813530

The point of feminism is having freedom to choose one’s relationship with femininity for themselves rather than be forced into it. Men have been allowed a spectrum of masculine expression for centuries and women have not, it’s literally that simple.

[Anonymous No.15813618]

>>15813579
I have no idea what your problem is, but if you felt the need write me your diary entry, because I don't share your delusions, consider getting help.

[Anonymous No.15813622]

>>15813441
>you’re schizophrenic
>proceed projecting

I always wonder this: why are there so many b8 posters on /lit/? I think it’s just because word got out that people here are autistic as fuck, but you shitheads are so obvious, you always argue along the same lines, I just want to know why? I’m not insane; I know no one would be paying you for this; is it literally just for the benefit of laughing to yourself? This is so tiresome

[Anonymous No.15813638]

>>15813596
>Men have been allowed a spectrum of masculine expression for centuries

lol no

If anything men are much more constrained in self-expression than women ever were. Women who don't do their role are shunned, men who don't play theirs are killed.

[Anonymous No.15813639]

>>15813596
Mens spectrum has been as much restricted as that of females. Try becoming a male midwife or even kindergarden teacher and wait for the acusations of pedophilia or pervertism. Both sexes had their role and were more succefull and happy than they are today. Feminism also never meant the freedom of choice, otherwise feminists wouldn't degrade the role of motherhood as much as they do. Feminism was a marketing scheme to get more people in the workforce to squeeze wages down and give the state a bigger indoctrination spectrum (see the child rearing system in the sobjet union or eastern germany).

[Anonymous No.15813651]

>>15813639
>Try becoming a male midwife or even kindergarden teacher and wait for the acusations of pedophilia or pervertism

You don't even need to pursue a particularly unmasculine role, just failing at a typically masculine role is already enough to make men miserable. Men kill themselves way more and it's often because they're undesirable to women, can't provide for their families or some other general failure at living up to the male role.

[Anonymous No.15813667]

>>15813596
>The point of feminism is having freedom to choose one’s relationship with femininity for themselves rather than be forced into it.
So you've proven my point that feminism is about the masculinization of women (penis envy).
If you have X & Y, and you tell the X people that they don't have to be X, then their only de facto alternative is Y.

[Anonymous No.15813669]

I can't believe the Tao shouted us out

[Anonymous No.15813671]

>>15813651
>just failing at a typically masculine role is already enough to make men miserable
Indeed. Corono meme killed hundreds of good men after they found themself unable to provid, which still and always will mean social shunning, where suicide is the more honorable exit. But women generally can't fathom this, as our world is so much easier in that regard. But it's not like any of thoe feminists want to talk about male suicides.

[Anonymous No.15813696]

>>15813651
Oh and you reminded me of the "white feather" movement during the war. Can't think of a female equivallent tho. Funny, isn't it.

[Anonymous No.15813726]

>>15813214
Imagine giving a flying fuck what Terence thinks

[Anonymous No.15813805]

>>15813667

That’s not even close to what I said.

>>15813639

You’re very blatantly using a narrow scope of “feminism” and probably attributing it to what you see of whit women on twitter. Read Audre Lorde.

>>15813638

Hardly, look at the history of poetry for example. You can be as soft an effeminate as Wordsworth or as masculine as Tennyson. You can be William Carlos Williams or Wallace Stevens, Edmund Spenser or John Milton, etc. etc. Meanwhile women were criticized for their first steps outside of “traditional femininity”. You don’t have to be a feminist to just trace the history of women’s expression juxtaposed with men.

[Anonymous No.15813810]

>>15813214
women should be making babies not writing

[Anonymous No.15813812]

>>15813618

What the hell are you talking about, incel? Deflecting because you know I’m right?

[Anonymous No.15813833]

>>15813805
>I swear, real feminism has never been tried before
I think I've seen that episode.

>Audre Lorde
I didn't mind looking up who you mean and read some great female works, but seriously, from all available literature you had to pick some gay farm equipment which was to blame to terming the Unwort "afro-german"? What a disgrace.

[Anonymous No.15813886]

>>15813810
Who would want to make babies with current generation males?

[Anonymous No.15813905]

>>15813214
Because most of fags here are contrarians and nothing is sacred on /lit/. Be it a man or a woman these alienated nihilistic fucks hate normalfagism.

>I have not yet spoken my last word about women. I believe that if a woman succeeds in withdrawing from the mass, or rather raising herself from above the mass, she grows ceaselessly and more than a man.
Arthur Schopenhauer

[Anonymous No.15813946]

>>15813812
i share most of his opinion and am not an incel so debate me if you have this ad hominem problem.
>believing people on 4chan
i have no real reason to lie online im just chillin here and thinking about good female writers. I can give you a springboard: Hannah Arendt was nice, I liked her take on Eichmann and I like Harper Lee but I heard most of what she wrote was actually her simp. Anyways, these two can't really compare to what contemporary men wrote and today's female writers are mostly generic trash.

[Anonymous No.15813972]

>>15813946
that being said, women in general write better than men. aaaand were beck to the bell curve

[Anonymous No.15814004]

>>15813833

What? Lorde is brilliant man, one of those things you kinda have to step out of your comfort zone to enjoy if you’re generally masculine. She’s wildly insightful but she’s entirely feminine and without pretension so it seems less digestible if you’re used to most western philosophers and canonical authors. I read the whole range and can tell you she is worthy of consideration, a lot more than someone like Judith Butler.

[Anonymous No.15814014]

they were mk-ultrad

[Anonymous No.15814015]

>>15813214
the only female i respect is buttercunt.

[Anonymous No.15814026]

>>15814004
Jesus, taking Judith Butler for comparison? Another gay and critical theorist? No, thanks anon. Those women are the worst my sex can produce, for which I don't even need to read their works, as their fields of interest are insightfull enought. Completely indoctrinated trash.

[Anonymous No.15814079]

>>15813669
How could this happen to us lads

[Anonymous No.15814083]

>>15814026

Alright man, your loss.

[Anonymous No.15814106]

>>15813214
beauvoir's only merit is having had the guts to let her thight ass get destroyed by that little mongrel.

[Anonymous No.15814114]

>>15813214

There's only 2 kinds of writers, those who are worthy remembering and those who aren't.

Since you write with your hands and brains, having or not having a vagina/penis is pretty inconsequential.

[Anonymous No.15814141]

>>15813214
I want a female writer to cuck me

[Anonymous No.15814177]

Any charts for women authors? I'm interested in reading them but i'm not really interested in wasting my time with mediocre media.

[Anonymous No.15814278]

>>15814177
google 4chan lit charts i can’t remember where it is exactly but there’s a pretty good list of canon women writers there

[Anonymous No.15814287]

>>15814106
Sartre was a well-known ladies man despite his looks. She desired him because other women did.

[Anonymous No.15814290]

>>15814177
also you should read rachel cusk who is contemporary and kind of popular in the nyc middlebrow literary scene but surprisingly not sjw/preachy or obnoxious, she wrote a trilogy and it’s good

[Anonymous No.15814328]

>>15813214
There are far fewer of quality, not just because they were prevented from engaging intellectually for centuries (Which is a factor), it’s also because any kind of exceptionalism whether it by physical, financial, intellectual or influential sources conveys an advantage to attract mates, men compete for women not the other way around (this is also why a lot of successful female writers were lesbians or bi) and so men are more likely to show exceptionalism because they might need to in order to reproduce. /lit/‘s attitude is a response to the modern opinion that women are just as likely to be exceptional in writing as men, they aren’t, the most famous female philosopher ever may be Ayn Rand, imagine if the most famous male philosopher was Lacan, it would be embarrassing to say it represented lots of exceptionalism.
>>15813249
She was big somethinged alright. Also she helped Sartre rape kids.

[Anonymous No.15814333]

>>15814287
LMAO
that dumb dwarf's smegmatic penis RAVAGING her throat was her only way to have her commonplaces published by an editor.

[Anonymous No.15814364]

>>15813214
/lit/ doesn't have any problem with good female writers. Show me the hate thread about O'Connor, or Woolf or Munro or Austen. I'll wait while you search the archives to no avail.

[Anonymous No.15814366]

>>15814287
>ladies man
More of a little girls man really.

[Anonymous No.15814380]

>>15813214
Tao probably shouted out /lit/ because he owes virtually all his success to the anons here.

[Anonymous No.15814385]

>>15814364
> O'Connor,
trash
> or Woolf
good
> or Munro
trash
> or Austen
trash

truth is there were just 2 great female writers in history: sappho and woolf.

[Anonymous No.15814392]

>>15813214
Women produce few geniuses. Most female authors and philosophers are midwits.

[Anonymous No.15814409]

>>15814287
>excusez-moi mademoiselle, would you like to grab some coffee and have a talk over poetry?

[Anonymous No.15814708]

>>15813214
One of my favorite gay vampire books was written by a female author in the mid-70s and I also greatly enjoyed Edith Hamilton's retelling of Greek Mythology in the ubiquitous primer text.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.15814719]

>>15813231
Noobs get out.

[Anonymous No.15814761]

The only women writers I like are shrill lesbians with aristocratic sentiments and those might as well be honorary men as far as contemporary feminism is concerned.

[Anonymous No.15814866]

>>15813596
>when women act like men its just an extended form of femininity
You're wrong by definition

[Anonymous No.15814953]

>>15814708
>One of my favorite gay vampire books was written by a female author in the mid-70s
Which book?

[Anonymous No.15815446]

>>15814719
>Noobs get out.
You know what?
That was pretty funny.
Maybe you aren't a total piece of shit ;_;

[Anonymous No.15815496]

>>15814953
One would assume he means Anne Rice, famed for her gay vampire books, also she wrote bdsm erotica based on the story of sleeping beauty

[Anonymous No.15816210]

>>15814014

These have way too many words now and the sentences are ham-handed. Sad. This is the magnum opus:

>To truly appreciate how Tao Lin changed Megan Boyle's vagina, one must appreciate the incredible endurance and stamina Lin brings to the bedroom. Where average males deliver a hundred to two hundred thrusts per copulation, Tao Lin exceeds 10,000 in around a half hour period. Megan Boyle's beef never had a chance. Her dainty veal slices were transformed by the hot crucible of Lin's locomotive hips pummeling and drubbing and smashing her beef until it grew as swollen and gnarled as a wrestler's ear. Lin must have marveled over time as he watched her beef blossom with each subsequent sexcapade until Megan was bashful about shorts and skirts and came to prefer yoga pants, which allowed her to tape and tuck her vajayjay jerky. Like an Earth boring machine grinding bedrock, Lin bored into Boyle to free her from herself, to give her the aesthetic charms of a wounded war veteran. Megan would grow to love her beef, to be proud of it. She liked that Tao had made the beef, that it was his muscular jackhammering that turned her bushy peach into a frizzy-headed split pomegranate

[Anonymous No.15816244]

>>15813214
Their feet.

[Anonymous No.15816302]

>>15816244
Frankly, this. They never miss a chance to free their belletristic tootsies during a reading or junket.
>you don't mind, do you?
Heard Mary Karr could match drum solos with how she strummed her dangled heels.

[Anonymous No.15816377]

>>15813231
Lurk More

[Anonymous No.15816410]

>>15813241
>98% of them are trash, the remaining 2% make childrens literature. Also, who's "Tao", sound like a minority, which are produce shit.
1. Untrue, see pic related
2. Imagine being ignorant of the one actual author this board has produced
3. Learn to speak english

[Anonymous No.15816530]

>>15813231
Tao isn't Tao that can be named

[Anonymous No.15816585]

>>15813383
>women are so shit at writing they have to trick readers by giving a male pen-name
kek

[Anonymous No.15816636]

>>15814177
Read Jane Eyre and Beloved and stop while you're a head

[Anonymous No.15816644]

>>15813214
Chicks live life on ez mode what do they have to write about

[Anonymous No.15816751]

>>15816530
Only based post of this thread.

[Anonymous No.15816784]

>>15813812
>incel
Insecure women always out themselves with their predictable terminology.

[Anonymous No.15816846]

>>15815446

Nail Polish 0/10

On the subject of this thread, there's plenty of great female writers, the absolute best writers of all time are all males though (if simply due to greater male variability).

[Anonymous No.15816960]

>>15813214
lol at picture related

[Anonymous No.15817978]

>>15816410
>Imagine being ignorant of the one actual author this board has produced
Who's that?

[Anonymous No.15818064]

>>15813214
Because the most popular female writers are Rand, Rowling, Lee, and the Brontes. All of which bored us to tears in high school. I'm sure there are good female writers, I just haven't been able to read one just yet.

[Anonymous No.15818082]

>>15813214
I have no problem with female writers but female writers never write anything interesting nor seem to have interesting thoughts.

[Anonymous No.15818114]

>>15813231
lit went through a period where it was intensely fascinated with the Tao Te Ching. i cant find the post anymore, but one anon meticulously went through it, analyzing its passages, and found a section that quite clearly gave lit a shoutout

[Q No.15818252]

>>15813579
>denies biology with a seething passion
Tranny hands made this post

[Anonymous No.15819548]

>>15816960
Beauvoir is objectively a good writer.

[Anonymous No.15819648]

>>15813231
>>15813241
>>15817978

[Anonymous No.15819819]

>>15813231

[Anonymous No.15819839]