/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.15807194]

What am I in for?

[Anonymous No.15807274]

>>15807194
some pretty entry-level opinions on the American caste system

[Anonymous No.15807691]

>>15807274
>one of the most important philsopher alive
>ashkeanzi jew so very intelligent
>entry-level

[Anonymous No.15808080]

>>15807691
He's not a philosopher; he's a fucking linguist dude.

[Anonymous No.15808087]

>>15807691
>philosopher

[Anonymous No.15808089]

>>15808080
Epic post dude! Nice numbers though 808080

[Anonymous No.15808091]

>>15808080
Philosophers regard him as among the most important philosophers of language of the 20th century.

[Anonymous No.15808098]

>>15808091
No I don't

[Anonymous No.15808110]

>>15807194
The wrong answer

[Anonymous No.15808112]

>>15808098
Cringe

[Anonymous No.15808118]

>>15807691
don't call him a philosopher, anyone can email him and see for themselves that all his opinions are completely status-quo left. The only reason he is popular is because people like having a so-called intellectual saying the same things as them. He is the type of guy that you will know all his opinions on a topic before you even ask him. I would say his most important contribution to philosophy was his debate with Foucault.

[Anonymous No.15808135]

>>15807194
didnt even know he was an antisemite, how quaint

[Anonymous No.15808141]

>>15807194
For a detailed directory of the ruling class, check out pic related (endorsed by Chomsky).

[Anonymous No.15808150]

>>15808118
Because he invented status-quo

[Anonymous No.15808152]

>>15808118
>don't call him a philosopher, anyone can email him and see for themselves that all his opinions are completely status-quo left
Cringe. You don't even know what Philosophy is, do you?

[Anonymous No.15808183]

>>15808118
>I would say his most important contribution to philosophy was his debate with Foucault.
Holy FUCK you're a retard. Here are Chomsky's most important philosophical writings:

>Chomsky's Philosophy:
Language and Mind (1968)
Reflections On Language (1976)
Rules and Representations (1980)
Knowledge of Language (1986)
Language and Problems of Knowledge (1988)
New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind (2000)

Having political opinions is not philosophy, dumbfuck. It's just part of being a citizen.

[Anonymous No.15808495]

>>15808183
No one cares about your boyfriend dude

[Anonymous No.15808537]

>>15808495
This is the Chomsky thread, son. You'll find your Milo thread here: >>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.15808563]

>>15808537
Chomsky is a /pol/ author https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/chomsky/

[Anonymous No.15808891]

So, uh, what's his philosophy?

[Anonymous No.15809057]

>>15807194
>What am I in for?
Apparently a book on how Noam Chomsky rules the world

[Anonymous No.15809083]

>>15807194
Howard Zin-tier bluepilling.

[Anonymous No.15809119]

>>15808091
Fuck Chomsky. Linguists do not take him seriously. He built a cult following of sycophants which gave him prestige; thats it. Generative Syntax was shown to be bullshit early on. If his Linguistic contributions are reyarded then his sophomoric political hot takes in book form are even more retarded.

[Anonymous No.15809149]

>>15809119
>Linguists do not take him seriously.
He invented modern linguistics, shit-for-brains.

[Anonymous No.15809163]

>>15808891
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/innateness-cognition/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/innateness-language/

[Anonymous No.15809167]

>>15809149
>t. Non-linguist
Yeah. In the same way Heinrich Schliemann invented modern archeology.
Popularizing something =/= inventing it.

[Anonymous No.15809176]

>>15809167
No, he didn't "popularize" anything. He literally invented the techniques of modern syntax, phonology, etc. You have never studied linguistics.

[Anonymous No.15809220]

>>15809176
Are you a MIT lingfag cause you sound like a pseud. He became famous for challenging Skinner which gave him intellectual clout. Formal syntax is useless and his in particular is only marginally functional for indo-european languages only. His own wife's research in L1 language acquisition discredits universal grammar.

[Anonymous No.15809270]

>>15808080
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpk2AUypdVg

[Anonymous No.15809271]

>>15809220
Cringe. You've never studied linguistics.

[Anonymous No.15809287]

>>15809220
ITT literal brainlets who think they know more than one of the most important figures in linguistics. Chomsky is the equivalent in linguistics of an Einstein. You cannot do the subject as it stands today without his work.

[Anonymous No.15809309]

>>15809287
>>15809271

Cringe. Imagine thinking that modern linguistics is only syntax and phonology. remind me of his views on corpuslinguistics

[Anonymous No.15809321]

>>15809220
And what crackpot theory of syntax do you subscribe to?

[Anonymous No.15809335]

>>15809287
>Chomsky is the equivalent in linguistics of an Einstein.
So somebody only successful because of nepotism, repeating things discovered and published 20 years prior, and making assertions based on religious faith that were later proven to be obviously wrong?

[Anonymous No.15809339]

>>15809309
>Imagine thinking that modern linguistics is only syntax and phonology
No, modern linguistics is Phonetics, Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics. What alternative to mainstream linguistics did you have in mind?

[Anonymous No.15809344]

>>15809335
>>>/x/

[Anonymous No.15809852]

>>15809057
lmao

[Anonymous No.15809867]

>>15809287
>>15809271
>the type of arguments made by Chomskyfags
Lmfao

[Anonymous No.15810586]

>>15807194
Ok /lit/ i'll give you the big enchilada on who rules the world. are you ready?

[Anonymous No.15810595]

>>15810586
>*Deep breath in*

[Anonymous No.15810599]

>>15810586
>>15810595
The elite are all about transcendence and living forever and the secrets of the universe, and they want to know all this. Some are good, some are bad, some are a mix. But the good ones don’t ever want to organize; the bad ones tend to organize because they lust after power. Powerful consciousnesses don’t want to dominate other people, they want to empower them, so they don’t tend to get together, until things are really late in the game. Then they come together and evil’s always defeated, because good is so much stronger. We’re on this planet and Einstein’s physics show and Max Planck’s physics’ show that there are at least 12 dimensions. And now that’s what all the top scientists and billionaires are coming out saying, ‘it’s a false hologram—it is artificial.’ The computers are scanning it and finding tension points where it’s artificially projected, and gravity’s bleeding-in to this universe. That’s what they call ‘dark matter’. There’s this sub-transmission zone below the 3rd dimension that just turned over the most horrible things—it’s what it resonates to. And it’s trying to get up into the 3rd dimension—that’s just a basic level consciousness—to launch into the next levels. And our species is already way up at the 5th/6th dimension, consciousining (sic) our best people. But there’s this big war trying to basically destroy humanity, because humanity has free will. And there’s a decision to which level we want to go to. We have free will, so evil’s allowed to come and contend, and not just good. Which is kinda like a false transmission, because what they’re thinking is that they are is ugly and bad, projecting it onto themselves, instead of believing ‘no, it’s a human test about building us up.’

[Anonymous No.15810604]

>>15810586
>>15810595
>>15810599
And so, Google was set up, 18/19 years ago (I knew about this before it was declassified—I’m just saying I have good sources) that they wanted to build a giant artificial system, and Google believes that the 1st artificial intelligence will be a supercomputer based on the neuron activities of the hive mind of humanity, with billions of people wired into it, with the internet of things. So all of our thoughts go into it. And we’re actually building a computer that has real neurons in real-time that’s also psychically connected to us, that are organic creatures, so that they will have current prediction powers, future prediction powers, a true crystal ball, but the big secret is: Once you have a crystal ball and know the future, you can add stimuli before-hand that make decisions that control the future, and so then it’s the end of consciousness and free will for individuals as we know, and a true 2.0 (and a very bad way) hive-mind consciousness with an AI jacked-into everyone, knowing our hopes and dreams, delivering it to us, not in some PKD wire-head system where we plug in and give up on consciousness because of unlimited pleasure, but because we were already wired-in and absorbed before we knew it by giving over our consciousness to the system, our daily decisions—that it was able to manipulate and control into a larger system. There’s now a human counter-strike taking place, to shut this off before it gets fully into place, and to block these systems and to try to have an actual debate about where humanity goes, and cut-off the pedophiles and psychic vampires that are in control of this AI system before humanity’s destroyed.

[Anonymous No.15810628]

>>15810599
>>15810604
a good book for you is the DSM-5

[Anonymous No.15810636]

>>15810599
>>15810604

[Anonymous No.15810685]

>>15807194
A discourse on America and the World being run for the benefit of the Power Elite at everyone elses expense

[Anonymous No.15810710]

>>15808089
ow wow. i guess if its on wikipedia its definitly true. and not just true, probably also makes him in the top 10 philosophers ever. Of course not a philosopher on the same level of anon.

[Anonymous No.15811174]

>>15809287
>Chomsky is the equivalent in linguistics of an Einstein
oh so he is only well known due to ethnic nepotism?

[Anonymous No.15811196]

>>15810599
>>15810604
now this is schizoposting

[Anonymous No.15811459]

>>15807194
America bad >=[

[Anonymous No.15811489]

>>15807194

[Anonymous No.15811751]

>>15811489
Time is short and a good life should be preserved by avoiding bad books

[Anonymous No.15811758]

>>15811751
>concerned about time
>asks /lit/ for its opinion on a book that you are implying that you are about to read anyway

There are a lot of things here that just don’t add up, OP.

[Anonymous No.15811797]

>>15811489
Kekd and saved

[Anonymous No.15812358]

>>15810710
Cope harder dumbass

[Anonymous No.15812367]

>>15809335
>>15811174
What are you talking about? Einstein was working in a patent office when he had his annus mirabilis

[Anonymous No.15812378]

>>15811758
>if you're about to read it, it means there's no way you can possibly amend that action if new evidence surfaces

[Anonymous No.15812399]

>>15807691
>>ashkeanzi jew so very intelligent
That's pretty banal way of thinking.
Even if they had the average IQ of 115, which they don't - at least in Israel, the intellectuals of Europeans and Asians would still outnumber them.

Besides, 115-130 IQ is not enough to be an intellectual, and for every 160 IQ person you'd have to have an equivalent weight beneath the average line to balance it out. But you knew that, right?

[Anonymous No.15812410]

>>15812399
Yes, it was a joke, pseud

[Anonymous No.15812431]

>>15809119
>Linguists do not take him seriously.
>"called the father of modern linguistics" 2nd line of his Wikipedia article.
what an absolutely retarded post. completely separated from reality.

[Anonymous No.15812472]

>>15812431
>wikipedia is written by linguists

[Anonymous No.15812512]

>>15809176
>>15809271
>>15809287
>>15809321
>coping syntax cultists who wasted their lives studying some useless bullshit that doesn't exist let alone accurately model language (in other words your entire field is pseudoscience)
YES, there are no such things as 'words' generally (not even phonologically).
YES, there is no difference between morphology and syntax.
YES, morphology and syntax are just autistic elaborations of traditional Greek/Latin grammar and utterly useless for explaining languages with due generality.
YES, semantics/pragmatics/etc. -- meaning -- are all that language is at a 'generative' level and the only way to understand nonindoeuropean languages correctly (discarding the presuppositions of Latin/Greek).

Your shit doesn't even model European languages accurately LMAO. Dishonest, autistic cretins.

[Anonymous No.15812529]

>>15808183
>Language and Mind (1968)
>Reflections On Language (1976)
>Rules and Representations (1980)
>Knowledge of Language (1986)
>Language and Problems of Knowledge (1988)
>New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind (2000)
literally all refuted by learning a language that isn't indoeuropean and being critical about your tools. even an amateur can do it.

[Anonymous No.15812543]

>his ethnic group's IQ is only a measly 115
*laughs in ancient athenian citizen*

[Anonymous No.15812707]

>>15812543
That's not an ethnicity brainlet

[Anonymous No.15812736]

>>15807194
Stop reading Chomsky. He's a CIA funded fraud who plagiarized his better ideas from Micheal Parenti

[Anonymous No.15812808]

>>15810599
>>15810604
You... you almost had something to say

[Anonymous No.15812859]

>>15807194
>triggers conservatives
>triggers Holocaust deniers
>triggers Holocaust believers
>triggers commies
>triggers tankies
>triggers sjws
>triggers trannies
>triggers liberals
>triggers continental philosophers
>triggers Cormac McCarthy
>triggers linguists
>triggers computer scientists
>triggers /pol/
>triggers /lit/
>triggers rebbit
>triggers twitter
Based beyond belief.

[Anonymous No.15812898]

>>15812859
>no one even read it
>lol triggered