[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 106 KB, 1280x720, 569C400B-77A3-490B-BF81-F5F1446CEE40.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15801806 No.15801806 [Reply] [Original]

Is there a word or term for something that’s conclusion negates its own premise? For example, if they ever found bigfoot on the show Finding Bigfoot, the show could no longer exist.

>> No.15801828
File: 65 KB, 440x454, ouroboros.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15801828

>>15801806
the ouroboros is an ancient version of this phenomenon

>> No.15801846
File: 133 KB, 1024x1024, 1562031510366.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15801846

Would that be a "paradox"? I don't know, I'm kind of curious about this too, now that I think of it.

>> No.15801881

self-defeating
counterproductive
incongruous
untenable
OP

>> No.15801890

>>15801806
In logic it's implication or disjunction with premise negated. It could also be vacuous

>> No.15801958
File: 424 KB, 1600x2134, 0B1761E0-CED9-409E-8266-88DB72CBE6BD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15801958

Thanks guys, close but not quite.

It would be a paradox, I’m just not sure what you would call it.

There are a lot of examples, and it’s a phenomenon/argument you see a lot. I just used a stupid example. The USSR and revolutionary governments generally are examples of entities where their stated end negates their own reason for being.

Conservatives use this argument a lot. Thomas Sowell used to critique the Obama administration and the Democratic party writ large on the grounds that their stated goal of resolving racial tensions and inequities would remove the reason many people vote for them, and thus they were not to be trusted to solve do so.

>> No.15801983

>>15801958
The Bigfoot example was better.

>> No.15802044

>>15801983
Yeah the bigfoot one is the simplest and most clear, but all these critiques are couched in the same logical principle I’m trying to identify.

>> No.15802047

>>15801806
They wouldn't find big foot if they could and filthy liberals would not want a solution to the numerous grievances they purport to want to redress because of a LIVELIHOOD CONSCIENTIOUSNESS.

>> No.15802060

>>15802047
Lol I’m not saying the argument is correct, but I’m trying to understand if it’s a defined logical principle.

>> No.15802137

>>15801806
What is the ultimate bigfoot novel?

>> No.15802143
File: 40 KB, 636x413, sgambbfnxjoprt8wi8m6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15802143

>>15802060
>defined logical principle
Like what, contradiction?

>> No.15802198

>>15801806
oxymoron

>> No.15802209

>>15802198
That's a rhetorical device.

>> No.15802217 [DELETED] 

>>15802143
maybe? i’m not educated in logic, hence the questiony by. another example:

socrates is striving towards wisdom

if one achieves wisdom, he is no longer striving towards wisdom

because socrates is defined by the condition of striving towards wisdom, if he achieves wisdom, he will no longer be socrates

bigfoot:

finding bigfoot is defined by the condition of finding bigfoot

if bigfoot is found, one can no longer be finding bigfoot

thus it will no longer be finding bigfoot

>> No.15802233

>>15802217
wait, no it isn’t a contradiction:

finding bigfoot exists to find bigfoot
if bigfoot is found, one cannot be finding bigfoot
therefore finding bigfoot shall cease to exist

>> No.15802262

>>15802233
>if bigfoot is found, one cannot be finding bigfoot
You must be joking. Think about that one second.

>> No.15802270

>>15801958
debasing

>> No.15802279

>>15802262
I think by found he means discover

>> No.15802281

>>15801881
Self-defeating would be the one imo

>> No.15802289

>>15802270
It doesn't work in English

>> No.15802298

>>15802262
bigfoot being found is the act which concludes the process of finding bigfoot idiot

>> No.15802332

>>15802298
who's bigfoot idiot?

>> No.15802369

none of your examples are arguments or have premises or conclusions so there is no such logical principle.

they are examples of means-end reversal.

>> No.15802520

>>15802332
sasquatch, yeti. BLM Big foot lives matter. Theyre tired of being misrepresented in the media. Theyve been discriminated against by privileged white people who exploit the sightings for economic gains; they cornered the market on bigfoot swag and refuse to support after school programs for bigfoot kids. Many complaints against forest rangers who they say pull them over without cause only to measure they're feet and force them to participate in plaster casting their own feet. Terrible times in the woods.

>> No.15802533

>>15801828
Can someone explain the history of the symbol of the ouroboros to me. I'm a dimwit. Pls guys.

>> No.15802555

>>15801806
How would finding bigfoot on a show called "Finding Bigfoot" be negating? It would be, actually, fulfilment. Is it "self-negating" for a character on the show to make or maintain friendships?

But the word you're likely looking for is something along the lines of a self-fulfilling prophecy, or determinate self-destruction. A paradox like having a contest with someone to see who can kill himself first: the punishment for losing is death.

>> No.15802564

>>15802533

No. The symbol is older than writing and thus older than 'history'. So no one can give you the full story.
Other than that Wikipedia is your friend. I ain't typing all that shit nigga.

>> No.15802587

>>15801806
Adjacent to this would be racketeering - if the initial problem at the heart of the enterprise were to be solved the enterprise, inherently self perpetuating, would no longer need exist

Rare instance where Finding Bigfoot, war and media coverage of muh raycism all converge

>> No.15802611

>>15802369
based, thank you!!

>> No.15802801

>>15801806
This is what Lacan’s about, or at least what most philosophers seem to get out of lacans work

>> No.15803961

>>15802533
Orphic theogony, Egyptian theogony.
>So then, [Zeus] by engulfing Erikepaios (Ericepaeus) the Firstborn [Phanes], he had the body of all things in his belly, and he mixed into his own limbs the god's power and strength. Because of this, together with him, everything came to be again inside Zeus, the broad air and the lofty splendour of heaven, the undraining sea and earth's glorious seat, great Okeanos (Oceanus) and the lowest Tartara of the earth, rivers and boundless sea and everything else, and all the immortal blessed gods and goddesses, all that had existed and all that was to exist afterwards became one and grew together in the belly of Zeus. After he had hidden them all away, again into the glad light from his holy heart he brought them up, performing mighty acts."