/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.15801634]

A threesome of two girls and one man, though a common fantasy of many men, is in fact decadent and unreasonable. This is because a man only has one penetrative organ, and cannot possibly show equal attention to both women at the same time leading to non-optimal pleasure for everyone involved. On the other hand, a threesome of two men and one woman is a beautiful thing. A woman has a total of three holes, more than capable of accommodating up to three men at once, as long as they are willing to share.

[Anonymous No.15801645]

>>15801634
phone posters should get the rope.

[Anonymous No.15801653]

>>15801634
This is reactionary and cringe. Retards like OP should read W. Reich

[Anonymous No.15801660]

>>15801634
Sodomy is bad no matter who is receiving it and men can eat pussy, giving two pleasurable organs for both men and women

[Anonymous No.15801669]

>>15801634
Are two females one male actually that common or a fantasy? Personall, I've never fantasized about that. But then again I'm just a sample size of one.

[Anonymous No.15801676]

>>15801645
learn to use the report button or this shit is never going to stop.

[Anonymous No.15801682]

>learn to use the report button or this shit is never going to stop.

[Anonymous No.15801690]

>>15801645
get with the times

[Anonymous No.15801749]

based

[Anonymous No.15801765]

All threads about women and sex should be deleted and their posters banned.

[Anonymous No.15801772]

>>15801765
ok incel ;)

[Anonymous No.15801780]

>>15801634
you got a mouth don't you

[Anonymous No.15801789]

>>15801634
Sex is a bit broader a category of acts than just penetration.

[Anonymous No.15801800]

>>15801765
this

[Anonymous No.15801817]

>>15801634
And this is precisely what makes two females and one male superior. The fact that it is not endowed by nature, but by the will of the human spirit - two women wrangled by a single man - this is what makes it a joyous play of life - not to mention the ability some men have to ejaculate twice in one sitting.. that means two pregnant women, perfect! Two men and a female on the other hand, is the truer perversion - for she will have to take two loads even though she only has, using your terms, one 'hole' capable of effectively utilizing a load. Two men is two too many for pleasuring a woman, ironically making the female the master, instead of the equal, potential mastery of both the female and male in the two female and one male sexual encounter.

[Anonymous No.15801833]

>>15801682

Based. Report non /lit/ threads.

Also, obviously you can get two women pregnant in a threesome but a woman can't get pregnant twice in a threesome with two guys, therefore the latter is nonsense.

[Anonymous No.15801838]

>>15801634
>>15801660
>>15801817
Get help https://pmohackbook.org/easypeasy.pdf

[Anonymous No.15801859]

>>15801653
>The immediate stimulus for the idea of analyzing the feminine character was a passage in Leo’s [Löwenthal: “Das Individuum in der individualistischen Gesellschaft.” In Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung vol. 5 (1936), 321-363] essay on Ibsen, in which he attributes a lesser degree of reification and mutilated sexuality and a lesser degree of repression to woman than to man. Immediately, Leo’s remark appeared to me to be somewhat romantic, and the more I thought about it, and the more consciously I observed things, the more it seemed to me that woman today is to a certain extent dominated more by the commodity character than man and that she is—now I am varying an old and nice formula of yours—functioning as the agency of the commodity in society. Very closely related to this, it appears to me that women and their specific consumer consciousness must be regarded as the social glue to a far greater extent than, say, family authority with its ascetic sexual morality, which is already crumbling without having any significant effect on the character of the middle-class.
>(As you see, I strongly oppose Reich, as I do in other pieces, who regressed to the pre-Marxist, Feuerbachian point-of-view of “wholesome sensuousness” in, what is for a talented psychologist, unbelievable naiveté and who via his detour through anarchism will undoubtedly end up with reformism. Any observation could teach him that even sexually uninhibited, or at least in the primitive sense, completely uninhibited women bear the worst features of the bourgeois character.)
http://www.logosjournal.com/adorno_letter.htm

[Anonymous No.15801997]

>>15801789
Sex is all about penetration, or the anticipation of penetration.

[Anonymous No.15802117]

>>15801859
Thank you for reminding me of another cringy reactionary

[Anonymous No.15802407]

>>15801997
In a materialistic sense, since all our neo-cultural, atheistic ideas about death being eternal black nothingness stem from our experiences half-consciously liquid breathing in the amniotic, naturally sensory deprived darkness of our mothers wombs, and sex aims to procreate beings into this darkness thus introducing them to the new 'eternal black death', then sex is all about death, not avoiding death, but embracing death.