[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 9 KB, 172x293, being.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15798996 No.15798996 [Reply] [Original]

I'll start:

>> No.15799008

das kapital

>> No.15799019

>>15798996
I second with Existencialism is a Humanism

>> No.15799579

>>15799019
The transcript is literally 50 pages long

>> No.15799618

>>15798996
OP why shouldn't people read that book?

>> No.15799621

>>15799618
Peedo-tier

>> No.15799625

Any Abrahamic holy text

>> No.15799635

>>15798996
Read Husserl. This frog plagiarized him.

>> No.15799645

>>15799621
o

>> No.15799646
File: 743 KB, 419x255, robert loggia.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15799646

>>15798996
what a useless fucken thread

>> No.15799693

>>15799008
This
It's dry, boring, and focuses far too much on 19th century economics. Holy shit i dont care about pieces of linen you fucking autist.

>> No.15799802

>>15799008
>>15799693
Yeah his ideas have been synthesized more clearly since. He has lots of good insights there but there's no reason to read it now unless you have severe autism.

>>15799579
>>15799635
This. Also, after reading Heidegger I realized that Sartre literally just translated him and wasn't a Nazi which is an improvement but probably not enough to make his works worth it.

>> No.15799890
File: 33 KB, 508x507, 1588936249259.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15799890

>>15799802
>which is an improvement

>> No.15799918
File: 2.80 MB, 1995x2882, Atlas_Shrugged_(1957_1st_ed)_-_Ayn_Rand.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15799918

This

>> No.15799956

>>15799802
Where can I read his synthesized ideas?

>> No.15799959

>>15799956
There are some pretty good YT lecture series on Marx' thoughs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_FRPoJIrlI

>> No.15799968

>>15799635
Husserl is overrated and his French successors tend to be more clear and decisive. Sartre is a hack however.

>> No.15799990

>>15799968
>French successors tend to be more clear and decisive.
True, his novel Nausea made the ideas accessible to the general public.

>> No.15800139
File: 49 KB, 480x640, s-l640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15800139

vacuous verbiage

>> No.15800209

>>15800139
But aesthetics

>> No.15800302

>>15799918
This is literally the most important book worth reading regarding American politics and economics in current year. Must read before election

>> No.15800520

>>15799802
>Also, after reading Heidegger I realized that Sartre literally just translated him
he took a few ideas from him but it's mostly pretty original. And it's way more fun to read than anything Heidegger produced.