[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 13 KB, 444x275, 1298397017680[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1576464 No.1576464 [Reply] [Original]

Ok /lit/,

Go to http://www.iqout.com/tulos.php

See if you can beat /sci/. The best they got was 149 so far. I got 130.

>>>/sci/2584546

>> No.1576467

iq tests are not literature

>> No.1576468

they're not science either btw

>> No.1576508

>>1576468
And that's supposed to justify this OT thread?
Let me teach you a lesson in elementary morals.
Just because others do it, doesn't mean you should too.

>> No.1576524

>>1576508
>>1576467

It is a general intelligence comparison between scholars and a scientists.

It may not be related to literature Per se, but it is related to those who associate themselves with literature.

>> No.1576528

Gah, 123.

I missed about five for time. The first ten or so were easy, but I didn't really get what was going on from then until the low twenties. The last five were challenging as a mug.

>> No.1576530
File: 24 KB, 550x370, omg wallstreet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1576530

>online IQ tests

>> No.1576552

I never get these tests.
I mean, its just 3 fucking random shits and Im supposed to place 4th random shit to complete something. Clearly you can find over 9000 to find any system between them, it doesnt make any damn sense. Is that how you amerikans measure your intelligence?

>> No.1576560

111

fuck

well i'm happy about it

and it's not like i haven't scored well in actual iq tests!

please just tell i'm smart /lit/

>> No.1576568

inb4 JamesBond has 150+ iq

>> No.1576577
File: 13 KB, 444x275, iq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1576577

everyone above this post is small time..check out my score

>> No.1576582 [DELETED] 
File: 45 KB, 500x739, SMILING_MAN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1576582

145.

>> No.1576587

>implying intelligence can be measured through a broad test

>> No.1576592

118. Meh. That was rough, but I'm not entirely disappointed with my score.

>> No.1576615
File: 26 KB, 378x275, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1576615

I win.

>> No.1576617

126, missed a bunch because of load times. Pro tip, don't take a timed test on a laptop in a crowded school library.

>> No.1576621

I can't stand doing 35 questions like that. I was doing well, but fuck is that boring.

>> No.1576643
File: 27 KB, 444x275, 1298409150429.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1576643

>> No.1576647

>>1576615
wtf. thaat looks shooped as fuck i know because i'm good at spotting shoops faggot

>> No.1576649
File: 47 KB, 288x499, 1298391939481.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1576649

108 ;_;

>> No.1576658

>>1576649
don't feel bad. i got a mid 90 something. but i clicked through the last 4-5 questions without looking because i'm at work and my boss told me to get off the computer.

>> No.1576659
File: 13 KB, 444x275, 1298409150429.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1576659

>> No.1576661
File: 74 KB, 500x640, 1295571815563.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1576661

>2011
>still believing in online IQ test
>still believing in IQ at all

>> No.1576662

>>1576661
Low IQ detected.

>> No.1576668

inb4 D&E's IQ is his post number

>> No.1576664 [DELETED] 
File: 30 KB, 300x473, 1298082194726.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1576664

Has anyone read this? Thoughts? Where to Get?

>> No.1576671

>>1576664
Or you could just join a Systema class.

>> No.1578161

>>1576560
Hey, same here. We're "somewhat above the average". Also,

>implying we're taking this seriously and not just doing it for fun
I can't believe people don't get this.

>> No.1579385

130 here

>> No.1579398

>>1576668
I rangahahaha'd

>> No.1579403
File: 74 KB, 240x240, asian face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1579403

if you take an online IQ test you automatically fail

saged and reported for not literature