[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 17 KB, 220x304, evola.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15755359 No.15755359[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Why are all right wing philosophers just massive memes?

>> No.15755365

Why are all leftists niggerloving, white-hating, cocksucking trannies who get off on pedophilia?

It's a strange world we live in.

>> No.15755378

>>15755365
chillax

>> No.15755440

>>15755365
grow the fuck up man

>> No.15755449

>>15755359
Because people from /pol/ utilise the aesthetic qualities of their work without being able to substantially articulate the inner form.
Then leftists latch onto the derivation of the aesthetic and mock it in an attempt to devalue work itself, all the while having played themselves.

>> No.15755455

>>15755365
Even the leftist eugenicists?

>> No.15755473

>>15755359
>>15755365
PLEASE FUCKING KILL YOURSELVES YOU FUCKING MONGRELS OF THIS WORLD. THERE IS NO THING THAT WASN`T CONTAMINATED BY YOUR FUCKING SENILE INFANTILE GLIBBERISH DISCOURSE, YOU FUCKING BURP OF THE UNIVERSE. PLEASE KILL YOURSELVES AND MAKE EARTH MUCH MORE HAPPY PLACE, YOU, FUCKING RIGHT-LEFT SCAM.

>> No.15755486

>>15755359
Right-wing ideology is inherently limiting in thought

>> No.15755487

>>15755359
Carl Schmitt was cool though
Orthodox commies appreciate his work.

>> No.15755506

>>15755486
Then so must left-wing ideology.

>> No.15755509

>>15755506
If that’s what the right-wingers tell you, so be it

>> No.15755521

>>15755449
wow this is actually very true. Right wing people do tend to be quite aesthetically focused. Why is that?

>> No.15755523

>>15755509
Explain in detail what you think 'right wing ideology is'. Explain the points of divergence between Rene Guenon, Julius Evola, Mussolini, Giovanni Gentile, Alfred Rosenberg, Hitler, Ernst Junger, Heidegger, Carl Schmitt, William Buckley, Jordan Peterson, etc.

If you cannot, you do not understand it.

>> No.15755525

>>15755521
Because an aesthetic contains all of the essence of the form in 'feeling' and articulates the core meaning well.

>> No.15755526

>>15755365
Never seen someone prolapse this hard from their favorite philosopher being called a "meme"

>> No.15755531

>>15755523
Contempt for human life that isn’t their own, essentially egoism to its destructive conclusions

>> No.15755533

>>15755359
>all right wing philosophers just massive memes
You can only get away with saying this because at the current point in time Leftism is the dominant ideology. If the roles were reversed you could just say the opposite and feel just as smug and self righteous.

>> No.15755538

>>15755531
Absolutely retarded. Imagine thinking of the term 'egoism' when thinkers such as Guenon and Gentile are put in front of you.

>> No.15755549

>>15755523
You completely failed to address the question and didn't point out a single point of divergence between any of those thinkers.

Anti-right reading comprehension. I have probably read more left-wing theory than you, too.

>> No.15755558

>>15755549
Meant for >>15755531

>> No.15755559

>>15755365
Because they subscribe to slave morality

>> No.15755567

>>15755521
Because Aesthetics>>>>>Ethics

>> No.15755573

>>15755359
What makes Evola a meme

>> No.15755574

>>15755365
Because they embrace their weak selves

>> No.15755580
File: 561 KB, 887x846, selfhate.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15755580

Most philosophers before the 20th century would be considered right wing by today's standards.

>> No.15755581

>>15755549
Not him but you put Buckley and Peterson on the same list as Gentile, that's fucking funny in its own right

>> No.15755589

>>15755581
Yes, you dolt, because I was seeking for the other poster to accurately explain the difference between all of those people. Throwing in normie cons with fascist Hegelians should reveal what is desired.

>> No.15755607

>>15755589
>Throwing in normie cons with fascist Hegelians should reveal what is desired.
That they’re all the same?

>> No.15755608

>>15755589
If that's what you were going for, fair enough.
Who's your favorite one on that list? Hard mode: they can't be gay

>> No.15755621

>>15755608
Evola.

>> No.15755644

>>15755621
So you namedropped this whole spread of right-wing philosophers to show off your expertise,
but your favorite one is the only guy on the list who thought he could do magic and believed he was descended from ice giants?

Regardless of his beliefs, you've failed. Evola never married, approved of light homosexuality, and fantasized about spartan warrior brotherhood culture. The man was gay.

>> No.15755653

>>15755644
His ideas are the most exhilarating and his writing style is dark and unique. I've read everyone else on the list, but the point was that they couldn't really be compared.

>> No.15755665

>>15755359
Any philosopher who falls neatly into right or left wing will naturally be a meme

>> No.15755668

>>15755653
Yeah, but who's your favorite one that didn't like cock?

>> No.15755671

>>15755668
Schmitt or Guenon.