/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.15696053]

>there are virgins on /lit/ right now who actually think that reading Marx and larping as a leftist will get them laid
Why are so many dudes today oblivious to the shallow nature of women?

[Anonymous No.15696063]

>>15696053
Nothing wrong with being a leftist, anon.

[Anonymous No.15696078]

how will we ever recover bros?

[Anonymous No.15696083]

>>15696053
Do people really think that? I think you're projecting.

Also that pic is retarded. You could have the same guy with a hammer & sickle and get the same responses.

[Anonymous No.15696100]

>>15696053
TINDER IS NOT A REFLECTION OF REALITY
I REPEAT, TINDER IS NOT A REFLECTION OF REALITY
IN THE UNITED STATES, ONLY 10% OF WOMEN AND 15% OF MEN HAVE EVER USED TINDER. YES, THERE ARE MORE MEN THAN WOMEN ON TINDER. YES, THIS IS PARTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SKEWED NUMBERS YOU SEE POSTED ALL OVER THE INTERNET.
NORMAL WOMEN DO NOT USE TINDER. NORMAL MEN DO NOT USE TINDER. NORMAL PEOPLE DO NOT USE TINDER. STOP TALKING ABOUT TINDER. STOP POSTING ABOUT TINDER. STOP.

[Anonymous No.15696110]

Men are like this too honestly. if you forced enough good looking chad with swastikas into pop culture you could create a generation of natsoc zoomers in a few years

people accept what they are given if the giver is competent

[Anonymous No.15696130]

>>15696100
>NORMAL PEOPLE DO NOT USE TINDER.
Bayste

[Anonymous No.15696136]

>>15696100
adults aged 19-34 only make up 21% of the American population.

[Anonymous No.15696147]

>>15696136
Usage numbers are about even across all age groups.

[Anonymous No.15696150]

>>15696053
I am a virgin but I aint delusional. Nothing less attractive than vanity. Especially if it is vanity about your own "education" or "morality". If you want to get laid you should act like a man. Vanity is for girls

[Anonymous No.15696162]

>>15696100
cope stinky toasty toasty

[Anonymous No.15696188]

>>15696063
desu he has a point because the average german male leftie is usually a pathetic soi cuck

i always Point and laugh with my akhis when I see one
>>15696100
Lmao cope

[Anonymous No.15696207]

>>15696100
Fake tinder certainly isn't.

[Anonymous No.15696265]

>>15696053
>wanting to get laid
lmao /pol/tards are pathetic, sex is digusting.

[Anonymous No.15696274]

Imagine using tinder instead of insta to get laid.

[Anonymous No.15696283]

>>15696100
Online dating (inc Tinder) is the reality of dating
Ergo, Tinder is reality

[Anonymous No.15696285]

Your place or mine?! Jesus...

[Anonymous No.15696292]

>>15696100
>ONLY 10% OF WOMEN AND 15% OF MEN HAVE EVER USED TINDER
that's more than enough for statistical purposes

[Anonymous No.15696297]

>>15696274
how do you do that?

[Anonymous No.15696303]

this one is more brutal to be honest

[Anonymous No.15696311]

>>15696053
Men who read just to get laid are equally shallow and dumb. Also not literature.

[Anonymous No.15696317]

>>15696303
Men would do the same, we're all degenerates for a 10/10

[Anonymous No.15696318]

>people want to fuck attractive people

omg such a redpill guys

[Anonymous No.15696327]

>>15696317
No.

[Anonymous No.15696329]

>>15696317
>>15696318
>missing the point this hard

if you ask a thousand women "how do I get a gf?", you will get 999 responses consisting of inanities like "work on your personality", "be more outgoing", "personal hygiene?", "smile"...

the point is it's all about looks whether you're a woman on man. men were never hypocrites about this, women are the ones selling us a lie

[Anonymous No.15696331]

>>15696265
So all this time leftards are just projecting when they unironically say incel to based /pol/chad?

[Anonymous No.15696335]

>>15696329
>the point is it's all about looks
This

[Anonymous No.15696357]

>>15696303
>>15696053
Is there other pics like these? I feel some kind of societal masochism reading them and I like it.

[Anonymous No.15696361]

>>15696329
Anon how shallow can you be to think a successful relationship is about looks
>b-b-but my tindies

[Anonymous No.15696369]

>>15696329
>it's all about looks
No, not all. But sure, looks count and women don't deny that.
Stop being so cringe and stop visiting your pathetic echo chambers full of losers.

[Anonymous No.15696370]

>>15696329
Cope

[Anonymous No.15696374]

>>15696053
Sorry, what does the convo in the pic have to do with one's political or economic views? Getting one's dick wet with a random thot is about as far from solving the transformation problem as I can imagine. What's the connection?

[Anonymous No.15696380]

>>15696361
Looks open the door for you. If she finds you ugly, you'll never get a shot

>>15696369
Cope. Just like with everything else, women feel the need to be deceptive and hide their motives when it comes to attraction. I guess you're not ready to accept this. It's okay.

>>15696370
No u

[Anonymous No.15696381]

>>15696329
>if you ask a thousand women

why would you? half the time women have no fucking idea what they're talking about, the other half they're just repeating something they heard or read somewhere but it's not their original idea so they can't really explain the fundamentals

tl;dr women = for reproduction

[Anonymous No.15696383]

ITT: anons seemingly shocked by the fact that people who downloaded an app to try and fuck attractive people are trying to fuck attractive people.

[Anonymous No.15696402]

>>15696383
Sure, but shouldn't they be trying to prove Goldbach's Conjecture first? They can't just heckin' fuckerino, that wouldn't be fair!

[Anonymous No.15696407]

>>15696381
I wouldn't. You're correct.

>>15696383
ITP: a dense motherfucker. Read >>15696329

[Anonymous No.15696411]

>>15696100
I wish this were true.

[Anonymous No.15696417]

>>15696407
Autist detected.

[Anonymous No.15696423]

The autism+virginity of this website never ceases to amaze me.

>b-but women said they want this and then they fuck that other guy
>look at this tinder whore, women are all whores

Go lift some weights you degenerate freaks. Go chop some wood with an axe or something.

[Anonymous No.15696424]

>>15696381
men do this too, you know? I have a friend who sometimes just repeats things I told him the last time we met. He also constantly argues against free will. Go figure.

[Anonymous No.15696428]

>>15696417
>>15696423
Keep crying for me, you permavirgins. I'll shove this redpill down your throat whether you like it or not

[Anonymous No.15696441]

>>15696053
>>15696303
do something like this with a female account, one hunderd percent you'll get thirsty betas all over her

[Anonymous No.15696449]

>>15696441
THAT'S NOT THE POINT
STOP BEING A LITTLE PUSSYWHIPPED BITCH

[Anonymous No.15696454]

>>15696441
>>15696449
Have sex.

[Anonymous No.15696461]

>>15696428
Okay anon, here's thhe two big logical faults in your argument:

1. You think that a select group of women (those using dating apps) are representative of the whole demographic
2. You think the women on dating apps are looking for the same thing you are

[Anonymous No.15696483]

>>15696449
whats the point then? beautiful people fuck more? wow

[Anonymous No.15696492]

>>15696274
Tinder worked like shit for me. Badoo on the other hand got me 2 gfs and an 3 milfs

[Anonymous No.15696499]

>>15696461
All women are literally the same. They're all whores and once they see they are not appealing enough anymore they try to settle with kids. It's natural and there's nothing wrong with it but you can't deny it.

[Anonymous No.15696502]

>>15696461
>1. You think that a select group of women (those using dating apps) are representative of the whole demographic
Most new couples met online. This 2020, gramps. Of course Tinder is representative of populations at large.

>2. You think the women on dating apps are looking for the same thing you are
Whether they want casual dating or long-term relationship, it doesn't matter, looks are key.


>>15696483
Lookism is real and women want attractive men. Your personality is secondary to this. I won't stop until this becomes a mainstream notion.

[Anonymous No.15696504]

>>15696502
>Lookism is real and women want attractive men. Your personality is secondary to this. I won't stop until this becomes a mainstream notion.
Very based.

[Anonymous No.15696519]

>>15696499
sad, sad brainlet. It's a shame, if someone had showed you a bit of love earlier you probs wouldn't have ended up like this
>>15696502
attractiveness isn't the same as looks. For a hookup and a quick fuck looks are the main priority, but for a relationship it's attractiveness. Attractiveness has way less to do with looks than people think

[Anonymous No.15696524]

>>15696502
Have sex.

[Anonymous No.15696526]

>>15696502
My ex cheated on me with the physically ugliest mfer I know lol believe me looks aren't the final word

[Anonymous No.15696527]

>>15696502
>Lookism is real and women want attractive men

no shit you fucking spastic, did mommy tell you all women are nice ladies waiting for a prince and then you got on the internet and got le redpilled? get the fuck out of here you fucking mongoloid, of course women want fucking chads. but no, thats not why you spreading this message, you just want to justify your miserable piece of shit life that you have

[Anonymous No.15696535]

>>15696502
This is /lit/. Stop posting random charts without sources. We may be retarded here, but not /b/ or /pol/-tier retarded.

[Anonymous No.15696545]

>>15696535
Not him, but it's real:
https://www.pnas.org/content/116/36/17753/tab-figures-data

[Anonymous No.15696551]

>>15696424
So one man is equivalent to the entire female subspecies

[Anonymous No.15696562]

OP you're not being savage or redpilled or alpha, you're actually just being SAD. It's making me SAD reading this thread. I feel like a mouldy piece of bread on the side of a bowl soaking up the pathetic soup of your life. I don't know who the fuck hurt you but you need to escape this trap NOW before it swallows you

[Anonymous No.15696574]

>>15696053
>becoming an emotional pussy will help you get emotional pussy
Can't blame them for thinking this. The logic checks out.

[Anonymous No.15696590]

>>15696562
Nice ad hominem. You know that you in fact support OPs ideas if you have to resort to this.

[Anonymous No.15696591]

>>15696083
>you could get the same reaction with a hammer and sickle.
I think that's the point anon.

[Anonymous No.15696592]

>>15696519
Looks is the key. Money and status might work as proxies to pussy and relationships, however true love only comes with visceral physical attraction.

>>15696524
You have no power over me.

>>15696526
Why did she cheat on you?

>>15696527
>did mommy tell you all women are nice ladies waiting for a prince and then you got on the internet and got le redpilled?
Yes! Men worldwide must escape this trap. I want even Reddit retards to acknowledge the true nature of f*males

>>15696535
Check >>15696545

>>15696562
>who hurt you? xD
Predictable. Clueless. Reddit.

[Anonymous No.15696628]

>>15696592
Coz I was a virgin scared of physical intimacy because I was sexually assaulted when I was like 10 and I hadn't really processed it whilst he was a sexually active self confident guy with a killer sense of humour. And she was really emotionally immature. Long story lol.

[Anonymous No.15696743]

>>15696592
Based OP being a one man army to prove a point on an Alpine cattle-grazing forum

[Anonymous No.15697027]

>>15696147
cope

[Anonymous No.15697416]

All the roasties seething in this thread must hang

[Anonymous No.15697458]

I have to ask, is puss puss really what makes a person leftist?

I actually don't understand how someone becomes a lefty

[Anonymous No.15697523]

>>15697458
empathy, care for the environment, intelligence. those are the main factors. i'm selfish and i want my tax dollars to improve my society rather than buy mr shekelstein a 3rd yacht

[Anonymous No.15697563]

>>15697523
>empathy, care for the environment, intelligence

But none of these things reflect the average leftist.
They are not emphatic to people who are against their cause, they have no cares for the environment considering they blatenly support industrial complexes for their goods, and their intelligence is a thing of the past considering the stagnation of art and science for the last 15 years.

Simply because one says they are any of these things does not make them the thing.
I too can say I'm emphatic while stomping down on the heads of dissident.

It's contradictory and mind boggling

[Anonymous No.15697581]

>>15697523
hope she sees this, man

[Anonymous No.15697676]

Based OP dabbing on the simps

[Anonymous No.15697695]

>>15696188
Dunno, I personally prefer reading what most people would call leftists in here. But I read everything and I also enjoy reading a decent book that shakes or changes my world view.

[Anonymous No.15697726]

[Anonymous No.15697750]

>>15696100
It's at least 30%, and that's not factoring in that people lie out of embarrassment, and that the older population and certain minority populations don't use it.

If you take mostly secular, normie white people between 20-35 as your demographic, it's probably closer to 70%+ and that rate is rising. Now the people who don't use dating apps are increasingly "weird" and isolated for not doing so.

Thankfully dating apps were so degenerate and horrible that the culture of casual hypergamy they created collapsed into the "Onlyfans economy" which is just women openly admitting their primary function in life is to be a disgusting prostitute, which causes schizophrenia in women and reactionary patriarchy in men so it won't last either.

[Anonymous No.15697816]

>>15697563

lefitists are slightly more intelligent as a whole than right wingers. that's irrefutable.
they care more for the environment than right wingers considering leftist political parties actually put measures in place to protect wildlife and reduce emissions(within the framework of neoliberal capitalisim). arguing that right wingers care more for the environment is simply fucking retarded.

>stagnation of arts and science
all the classic literature and art you appreciate is the very best that civilization has to offer. it stood the test of time. if i transported you back to 50 years ago you would conclude art and science are stagnating because you're exposed to all the garbage pop art being created. garbage art has always existed and will always exist, it's not a sign that new and worthwhile art isn't being created. most artists are liberal and most great artists were liberal for their times.

>stagnation of science
this is untrue and wildly fucking retarded progress is more hyperspecialized but new discoveries are being made all the time.
liberals aren't the bogeyman out to ruin society, nor are right wingers.

the pussy didn't turn me leftist and turning leftist doesn't get you hoes in any way. however supporting conservative policies that are bad for women will obviously make you less attractive to them

source for the infographic
https://www.asanet.org/research-and-publications/journals/social-psychology-quarterly/why-liberals-and-atheists-are-more-intelligent
(im not sure i belive in the reasoning behind why but the data speaks for itself)

[Anonymous No.15697833]

>>15697816
I'm curious whether you accept that IQ data shows some races are much dumber than others, if you accept it for conservative/progressive

[Anonymous No.15697852]

>>15696053
I doubt said person would post on an anonymous board, or at least they wouldn't go out of their way to defend Marx there

[Anonymous No.15697853]

I have a theory OPs pic was the inspiration for the mythical boogaloo boys. He's a fascist stud in a Hawaiian shirt. Maybe they can get some dumb chuds to cargo cult him by being fascist and putting on tacky shirts.

[Anonymous No.15697862]

>>15697853
>He's a fascist stud in a Hawaiian shirt
when did boomer tourists get culturally appropriated by fascists?

[Anonymous No.15697874]

>>15697862
>27 years old
>boomer

kys my chud

[Anonymous No.15697909]

>>15697874
I was talking about how the Hawaiian shirt got moved from the boomer tourist aesthetic to the "bungaloo boys" or w/e
Relax there buddy

[Anonymous No.15697916]

>>15697816
>this is untrue and wildly fucking retarded progress is more hyperspecialized but new discoveries are being made all the time.
It's not caused by lefties(although they fuel the fire) but number of macroinnovations per billion of people per year(kind of awkward measure but it makes sense) is dropping since I think 1880's at the very least, nowadays its' at the level of 17th century, which is only compensated by the fact there's much more of us right now. This has more to do with fertility vs. IQ pattern than anything particularly political though, the political leftist especially the modern version of it is probably caused by socially epistatic mutations.

[Anonymous No.15697934]

>>15697909
Dude, that reminds me, there are these white dudes who own a brownstone downtown that must cost at least 2 mil, and every time I go by it, they are out front on the steps grilling meat and they always have at least one tiki-torch...do you think.. they're..based? This is a very lib area where most buildings in that area have BLM shit in the windows right now.

[Anonymous No.15697950]

>>15697916
I wonder if the innovation explosion in the late 19th century was related to the massive expansion of engineering education in Prussia which then lead other countries like the US to pump their STEM education in order to close the "engineer" gap, something we have completely failed to do this time around with China.

[Anonymous No.15697971]

>>15697816
Roosevelt was literally the only United States president to actually put in place policies that help the environment

I'm curious in what ways have Leftys actually helped the environment?

[Anonymous No.15697978]

>>15697833
i believe that some races are dumber than others, it's also irrefutable. i don't think it makes them inherently worse or worthy of hatred though.
i don't hate conservatives, religious people, blacks or think every single one is irredeemable.
empathetic, intelligent people trend leftist but that doesn't mean right wingers are all slobbering morons.

[Anonymous No.15698008]

>>15697950
19th century innovations were predominately British. The innovation occurred by concurrence of two factors - one was long period of very harsh conditions during little ice age, the other was that education was indeed improving by the end of it(in the sense that it wasn't Latin and Bible anymore). What ended this period of megainnovations though was the period itself, by drastically decreasing the infant mortality(and children up to 12 mortality as well) destroyed the harsh darwinian regime which made poor people, who were less intelligent to have lower effective fertility(as in have kids that survived long enough that at that point they'll live to 50+ years old) than the rich.

[Anonymous No.15698039]

>>15696100

Only 10% of women and 15% of men are actively looking for a mate, retard.
What you thought your grandmother was on Tinder? How about the 18-year old special needs kid that lives next door?

[Anonymous No.15698042]

>>15698039
>How about the 18-year old special needs kid that lives next door?

I hope so, he's fucking sexy.

[Anonymous No.15698051]

>>15697978
If you accept some races are dumber than others does it not give you pause that Leftists, who have higher IQs, almost universally disagree with that? Does that not indicate that the average IQ of a group is a very flawed metric for determining the truth of their majority opinion?

[Anonymous No.15698061]

>>15697816
>>15697978
>conservative, liberal, religious, ...
Those labels don't have a clear meaning. There is no reliable way to categorize someone like that.
Western society is such a fucking joke.

[Anonymous No.15698067]

>>15698051

Being low IQ doesn't mean your opinion is false.
Being high IQ doesn't mean your opinion is true.

[Anonymous No.15698310]

>>15696083
That's exactly the point he's making you dumbfuck

[Anonymous No.15698361]

>>15696502
>Lookism is real and women want attractive men. Your personality is secondary to this. I won't stop until this becomes a mainstream notion.
what a fucking king

[Anonymous No.15698379]

>>15696100
This
Under no circumstances should OP’s picture be taken seriously.

[Anonymous No.15698403]

>>15696100
I met a chick who said she lost her virginity on tinder to some nerdy guy from an ivy league college who talked her into believing polyamory, which was basically just a way for him to stay in a relationship with someone from his own ethnicity, while smashing any random horny chick on the internet.

[Anonymous No.15698443]

>>15697458
>I have to ask, is puss puss really what makes a person leftist?
For men, I'd say 4 out of 5 are only in it because they expect to be socially rewarded somehow.

Women get into it to feel rebellious and, paradoxically, to experience authority for the first time, and the guys get into it to simp them and agree with whatever they do. And if you're the 1 out of 5 guys who actually took it seriously and read theory and quotes Marx, you end up bitter and isolated posting on r/stupidpol

[Anonymous No.15698619]

>>15697971
the carbon tax in canada has been effective and the average citizen gets a couple hundred bucks back on their taxes. unless they own multiple vehicles or pollute in some way then they pay for it, which i feel is fair.

[Anonymous No.15698682]

>>15697916
yeah that's why i said hyper specialized. i'm not sure where you got that data, google was inconclusive. if you have a source i'd like to read it

[Anonymous No.15698683]

>>15698619
How does that help the environment though? It's not as if the average person running around farting all day is the cause of the ice caps melting, it's major corporate entities and fractal resource extraction that is the main cause of most environmental decadence

If every person in Canada stopped driving and farting it would be such a negligible impact that it might as well not even factor into the global whole

All of these conservative social feel good movements do less than nothing, in fact often times the money that would have been spent on wildlife preservation that at least saves some kangaroo's or some shit has been taken into the pockets of wealthy democratic elites under the guise of the environment

[Anonymous No.15698703]

>>15698061
do you believe in or participate in a religion? yes? you're religious
do you vote for liberal politicians, etc etc.
all categories are meaningless if you get pedantic about it but there are generally understood and rational meanings of those words.

[Anonymous No.15698723]

How do I get gf as a 5'5" dude, I can't imagine tinder working for me DESU

[Anonymous No.15698754]

>>15698703
>all categories are meaningless if you get pedantic about it
Sure, but some categories are better than others. Those categories are shit and should be discarded.

Is worshiping George Floyd a 'religion'? Is censoring different opinions a 'liberal' thing?

[Anonymous No.15698760]

>>15698683
the carbon tax im canada mainly effects corporations though. each business has a limit on how much they can pollute (just like each person). if you go over you get large fines and if you're a particularly green and sustainable company you can sell your spare allowed amount of pollution back to the govt
it's honestly a very capitalist way of going about it. it encourages sustainability while not inherently fucking small business.
some people get mad that gas is more expensive now but if you factor in the phat tax return almost every middle to lower class person gets they actually make money from the carbon tax

[Anonymous No.15698785]

>>15696502
>Lookism is real and women want attractive men.

[Anonymous No.15698967]

>>15698723
be so good they can't say no

[Anonymous No.15699004]

im gay so i no longer worry about this

before I started sucking cock, I plowed pootang. honestly looks matter a lot

that said, i punched above my weight cause i had a prestigious job and that got me a lot of matches so not all about looks. (I also have a solid personality desu)

[Anonymous No.15699027]

I just want to end poverty and scarcity for God's sake

[Anonymous No.15699029]

>>15697726
>>15696303
>>15696053
stuff like this is pretty funny to read as long as you avoid the redpill data cringe

[Anonymous No.15699665]

>>15696063
All wrong.