[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 101 KB, 1920x1080, 17 - tr4uBQk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15619684 No.15619684 [Reply] [Original]

Is "The Face of Seung Hui Cho" the best ever writing about incels?

https://www.jstor.org/stable/44363543

> So: Seung-Hui Cho's face. A perfectly unremarkable Korean face - beady-eyed, brown-toned, a small plump-lipped mouth, eyebrows high off his eyelids, with crooked glasses perched on his nose. It's not an ugly face, exactly; it's not a badly made face. It's just a face that has nothing to do with the desires of women in this country. It's a face belonging to a person who, if he were e-mailing you, or sending you instant messages, and you were a normal, happy, healthy American girl at an upper second-tier American university - and that's what Cho was doing in the fall of 2005, e-mailing and writing instant messages to girls - you would consider reporting to campus security. Which is what they did, the girls who were contacted by Cho. [...] Seung-Hui Cho's is the kind of face for which the appropriate response to an expression of longing or need involves armed guards.

>> No.15619794

>>15619684
>Asian beats Caucasians at FPS
No surprises here

>> No.15620412

>>15619684
What's the point of posting a thread if you're not going to link the paper you'd like to talk about?

>> No.15620535

>>15619684
Come on OP, this has the potential to be a good thread. Why don't you come back and post a link to the article?

>> No.15620604

>>15620412
>https://www.jstor.org/stable/44363543
It was linked. Oh, you don't have a JSTOR account? That's your own fault.

>> No.15620649
File: 1.13 MB, 1440x3040, Screenshot_20200616-015126_YouTube.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620649

lol

>> No.15620674
File: 1.08 MB, 1440x3040, Screenshot_20200616-015853_Samsung Internet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620674

>>15620649

>> No.15620699

>>15620604
>https://www.jstor.org/stable/44363543

Personally I do, but if you want people to actually respond to your thread just reupload it somwhere else and link it here.

>> No.15620771
File: 1.03 MB, 1440x3040, Screenshot_20200616-021800_Samsung Internet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620771

>> No.15620775
File: 750 KB, 1440x3040, Screenshot_20200616-021901_Samsung Internet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620775

>> No.15620785
File: 953 KB, 1440x3040, Screenshot_20200616-022005_Samsung Internet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620785

>> No.15620788

>>15620649
>>15620674
>>15620771
>15620771
>>15620775
>>15620785
OP this is fucking gay. Upload the PDF to catbox.moe.

>> No.15620791
File: 894 KB, 1440x3040, Screenshot_20200616-022053_Samsung Internet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15620791

>> No.15620793

>>15620788
im not OP, im just posting the good bits. that was the last one for me

>> No.15620834

>>15620793
Alright.
I read the entire thing, and some of it resonated with me. I don't like how the author panders to the views of the people who have excluded him. It's kind of sad and pathetic, not to mention divorced from reality, but I suspect that he would not have been able to publish this piece if he had done otherwise. There is only so much truth that one can tell without incurring penalties. That being said, I wish someone would come out and say that the measure of a man is not what women think of him, but what he contributes to this world.
Also, he wrote that "losers" will never band together and fight to escape their condition. I wonder about that. It seems that "incels" are starting to do just that, albeit where no one can see them.

>> No.15620837

>>15620788
>>15620604
go onto scihub

>> No.15620852

>>15620837
I have access to it through my institution. I'm interested in expanding the discussion to include people who don't have such means.

>> No.15620961

>>15619684
I feel like shit after reading this, great.

>> No.15621012

>>15620791
You skipped page 108. Can you post it pretty please, Mr. Opie S. Notafaggot?

>> No.15621033

>>15620837
>>15620604
I don't have a jstor account yet I was able to download it. Wtf?

>> No.15621037

This sounds very interesting. I will read it and say what I think later.

>> No.15621045

>>15621033
You don't know what scihub is? You can download papers for free there, it doesn't work with all of them but it works with a good amount of them.

>> No.15621060

>>15621045
I know what it is. I used the jstor link by OP and was able to download it there, without going through scihub. I am surprised that others can't do it.

>> No.15621069
File: 356 KB, 820x550, 1560951304209.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15621069

First thing I thought reading this was "the author of this essay relates because he too has that face". Here is the face of the author for anyone wondering.

>> No.15621077

>>15621069
The author says so himself.

>> No.15621079

>>15621045
>>15621060
can someone just fucking upload it

>>15621069
the hair makes it work

>> No.15621084

>>15621077
Just got the e-book.
>You see a face that looks like yours. You know that there’s an existential knowledge you have in common with that face. Both of you know what it’s like to have a cultural code superimposed atop your face, and if it’s a code that abashes, nullifies, and unmans you, then you confront every visible reflection of that code with a feeling of mingled curiosity and wariness.

>> No.15621099

>>15621079
>can someone just fucking upload it
My downloaded copy has my IP in the first page lmao. So no, I won't dox myself.

>> No.15621108
File: 162 KB, 680x717, 1589630880052.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15621108

>>15621079
Bro just go to scihub and literally paste in the website to get the full thing.

https://sci-hub.tw

>> No.15621118

>>15621108
wow it worked thx m8