[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 74 KB, 525x700, 1386520001758.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15609336 No.15609336[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

The Cold Winters Theory proposed by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen states that races living in cold dry climates have higher intelligence, while races living in warm humid climates have lower intelligence.

According to Allen-Bergmann's Rule, larger and rounder body shapes reduce surface area exposure and heat loss while increasing heat retention. So nonwhites such as Finns and Koreans have larger brains and higher encephalization, whiles whites have smaller brains and lower intelligence. Koreans have an average IQ of 107, while Finns have an average IQ of 104. On the other hand, whites have an average IQ of 100. Whiteness is just simply adaptations to survive in warm humid climes.

According to Templer (2006), IQ correlates at -0.76 for mean high winter temperature, − 0.66 for mean low winter temperature, clearly demonstrating that the whiter you are, the less intelligent you are.

According to Pesta (2014), temperature predicts IQ (and other well-being variables) within the 50 U.S. states. Colder U.S. states have higher income, higher IQ, less crime because they have more mongoloid traits.

>> No.15609362

Dunno, maybe because there are less people living in colder climates. So couples tend to have less children which leads to then nurturing children better. The number of children probably has some relation to it, but even that sounds stupid, because when you reach a certain number, what happens is that the older siblings help to raise the younger ones. Which might be even better than having simply 2 parents.

This temperature correlation sounds like something from the 19th century. KEK

>> No.15609366

>>15609336
Only a mongoloid would believe that.

>> No.15609371

OP I'm a quappa, so probably close to fin genetically. Anyways growing up I always felt energized by the cold, especially early in the morning when it was cold and windy on my way to school, and whenever it started to get hot I'd turn into a slow lazy sack of shit. It's been a while since I've truly experienced a dark winter because of where I've been living, but I know that when it's cold I become more animated and my thoughts come quicker.

>> No.15609396

>>15609366
only a whitoid would deny that

>> No.15609467

>>15609366
>>15609396
Chinese people are on average higher IQ than Europeans, yet most of them live in warmer climates.

>> No.15609475

>>15609336
It's about more than just temperature. It's about the overall ruggedness and rigor of the terrain. The higher the death rate due to harshness of the physical environment, the more spatial intelligence and logistical planning skills ends up being selected for. In contrast, in the more hospitable and 'civilized' environments, verbal intelligence and social cunning are selected for.

>> No.15609494

>>15609475
If you consider that type of thing, then there are other places with way more intelligent people. Then Inuit would be fucking geniuses.

>> No.15609516

What kinda bait is this? Most of the parts of Europe where light skinned whites live is colder than most of the places east Asians live the hell are you actually on about zipperhead

>> No.15609519

race realism is pseudoscience. at least make objective arguments you fucking cunt

>> No.15609521

And this is related to literature in what way?
>>>/pol/

>> No.15609525

>>15609336
Wow who's the cool chick? I don't care about OP's drivel but can someone tell me who she is

>> No.15609524

>>15609494
He didn't say that's all there was to it

>> No.15609527

>>15609467
See this is what I dont get. IQ has to be limited of bs (not entirely). Have you seen the Chinese? They live like subhumans, there is no way they are more intelligent than Europeans

>> No.15609530

>>15609336
>Whiteness is just simply adaptations to survive in warm humid climes

Then why do the people who live in the hottest and most humid areas of the planet all have dark skin?

>> No.15609533

>>15609494
You need to try actually thinking dude. They never could be super intelligent because their environment wouldn't be able to support a large enough population. How tf are you thinking tribes of a 100 people would become super intelligent

>> No.15609538

>>15609530
I think he confused himself and meant cold and dry.

>> No.15609539

>>15609530
finland and korea are extremely cold and dry and they are the mongolest races on earth, and they both have light skin

>> No.15609544

>another race baiting thread.

Isn’t she a Sami though?

>> No.15609546

>>15609530
Ya this is a really weird thread

>> No.15609557

>>15609530
pretty sure op is a foreigner, drunk, or a bot

>>15609544
GTFO useless butterdyke

>> No.15609561

>>15609494
You have to look at things over a 300,000 year time scale. The (proto-)Inuits only moved to their present location fairly recently.

>> No.15609562

>>15609533
This is legit 19th century pseudo-scientific quackery. I know that it "makes sense" but people are more complicated than that. It is not as simple as putting someone inside a freezer that will make them smarter. It is not that easy.

>> No.15609573

>>15609539
The Finns only arrived in Finland recently, genetically speaking.

>> No.15609581

>>15609562
>It is not as simple as putting someone inside a freezer that will make them smarter.
Don't knock it until you've tried it.

>> No.15609603

>>15609581
Bro, if you show me a study with lab rats, throughout 4 or 5 generations with significant difference. Ok, it might be the case, otherwise this is just quackery.

>> No.15609685
File: 1.29 MB, 1078x1385, 1592185622748.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15609685

>>15609336
>IQ
https://medium.com/incerto/iq-is-largely-a-pseudoscientific-swindle-f131c101ba39

>> No.15609798

>>15609336
IQ is not a good measure of real world success, social behavior and confidence in combination with super-high IQ predicts income according to Miriam Gensowski,. not IQ alone. Encephealization does not correlate to IQ, Dunbar's Number which measures frontal cortex volume seems to correlate with social group size -- the frontal cortex is what we would associate with 'intelligence'. It's the top level of the 'triune brain' for those of you who like the reptilian-brain metaphor.
>According to Templer (2006), IQ correlates at -0.76 for mean high winter temperature, − 0.66 for mean low winter temperature, clearly demonstrating that the whiter you are, the less intelligent you are.
It doesn't refer to pigmentation. That's wrong.
>According to Pesta (2014), temperature predicts IQ (and other well-being variables) within the 50 U.S. states.
Chicken or the Egg? Is it that warmer climates allow more productivity which allows better resources to nurture children? are high IQ people attracted to and better able to find work in more desirable warmer climates? Is it the remnants of early colonial patterns which would have favoured more temperate climates and thus where there is more infrastructure?
Or is there a metabolic thing that happens when you live in a warmer climate that frees up more of the body's ATP for thought?
But again that's presuming that IQ actually means anything.
If IQ really was a good measure, why would all the philosophy reading wankers on /lit/ still be anything less than the ruling socio-economic elite - wouldn't they rule the world? Able to outwit, our smart, and thrive in accordance with their own morals but still earn big money instead of being marginalized by normies?

>> No.15609857

>>15609685
Is this Bee-Keeper Taleb, or is this how far he’ll go with covid19 protection?

>> No.15609872

>>15609798
>If IQ really was a good measure, why would all the philosophy reading wankers on /lit/ still be anything less than the ruling socio-economic elite - wouldn't they rule the world? Able to outwit, our smart, and thrive in accordance with their own morals but still earn big money instead of being marginalized by normies?
Because phil reading pseuds on lit are 120 IQ midwits who go to no name colleges and stand out, and not Ivy league normies where 120 is average.

>> No.15609876

>>15609872
ivy leagues have average iq in 130s not 120s

>> No.15609925

>>15609336

Finland is just a scandi / baltic nation who has yet to be hit by American dysgenic and maldevelopmental social norms. Educated people not reproducing while sub 90 IQ people have the most abundant families and are supported by the welfare state (and tacitly incentivized to produce more and more children)

Also I'm pretty sure that long term exposure to rap and hip hop music damages the developing brain. Adolescents consume this stuff incessantly and ostracize anyone who does not (cultural selection against intelligent and noble qualities). Also I listened to some Riff Raff and Andy Milonakis and felt like my IQ was 15 points lower for a few hours afterwards and I was more instinctive and nigger-like. There might be a direct contribution as well, because music is the expression of the soul and the soul imitates music via a kind of enthusiasm.

>> No.15609939

>>15609876
You're thinking of earlier data for Ivy league, and Euro elite unis. It's 120 nowadays.

>> No.15609942

>>15609925
i created this thread on /pol/ which is related to what you are saying

>>>/pol/262843292

>> No.15609975

>>15609925
Rap is mostly shit. Who are some fierce and mentally sharp rappers? I haven't heard of that many.

>> No.15609983

>>15609925
Why are low IQ people incentivized to breed rapidly?

>> No.15609998

>>15609983

The government benefits they receive are higher the more children they have, as the state sees the support of children especially important as they had no choice to be brought into a dysfunctional family with incompetent parents

>> No.15610000

>>15609983
welfare

IQ and fertility correlates at -.1

>> No.15610006

>>15610000

Surprised it isn't higher, since the differential at the extremes (+125 IQ vs. sub 90 IQ) is so large

>> No.15610041

>>15609983
Poor people have more children as insurance that they’ll be taken care of in old age by multiple incomes.
Ignorant faithful too believe it’s some sort of imperative from god, but is in fact just horny husbands and tribes wishing for greater numbers.

Why do insecure incels believe in IQ tests but hate the public school system tests? Tests aren’t a proper measure of intellect.

>> No.15610050

>>15609798
>Chicken or the Egg? Is it that warmer climates allow more productivity which allows better resources to nurture children? are high IQ people attracted to and better able to find work in more desirable warmer climates? Is it the remnants of early colonial patterns which would have favoured more temperate climates and thus where there is more infrastructure? Or is there a metabolic thing that happens when you live in a warmer climate that frees up more of the body's ATP for thought?
Are you retarded? OP said colder climates predict higher IQ.

>> No.15610054

>>15609925
Ive noticed rap is a lot more depressing than it was 15-25 years ago. Lot of depressive drug addicts now it seems

>> No.15610074

>>15609983
>>15609998
Why does the government want poor people to breed more?

>> No.15610082

>>15610074
The government is run by lunatics who don't even believe in IQ or think it's hereditary

>> No.15610083

>>15610041
Shut the fuck up, no one asked you tripfag

>> No.15610089

>>15610074
LBJ wanted a group of voters who will always vote democrat. so he did the Great Society Project

Whitoid women raising children without fathers have an average IQ of 92

White women married with children have an average IQ of 105

>> No.15610095

>>15609336

too fucking stupid to move south or migrate....

>> No.15610122

>>15610082
>>15610089
So basically the government set the rules so that more poor people breed, and not intelligent people, so that they're easier to confuse and control?

>> No.15610146

>>15610122
it's about the political power

poor people get about $400/month for each child they have.

>> No.15610181

>>15610083
But that’s the right answer.

>> No.15610248

>>15610181
Tell me why the government wants and incentivizes poor people to breed more than smart people or fuck off.

>> No.15610272
File: 89 KB, 720x720, AFAE5373-5445-4BD5-A0AB-B7D52293BA7E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15610272

>>15610248
They’re ...we’re livestock.
But honestly, they don’t care to keep too many of us now with automation. We’re a burden now so they’re quite careless with our health needs and don’t mind us dying.

>> No.15610294

>>15610272
But why. Enough of the pseud generalizations which tellingly display a lack of deep knowledge.

>> No.15610340

>>15610294
Why what? Your question? They don’t give much of a fuck how many kids they have anymore. They have to maintain some kind of freedoms to fool people. In the end all they want is for those meager wages they pay out to go back into their industries. Insurance and drug companies don’t care if you live or die. Money is all that matters here.
The tax credit for having kids is like the tax credit for getting married. Small incentives from before the 1970s (this is when the labor surplus happened, never to reverse)

>> No.15610940

>>15609527
Have you seen the Europeans? They live like subhumans

>> No.15611268

>>15610050
I'm pretty retarded, like a solid 4. but not as retarded as people who think intelligence is measurable by a standardized written test and is monocausal to boot.