/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.15562804]

Are there any good redpilled books that summarize the assasination of Kennedy and circumstances surrounding it, Oswald being a patsy and not even one of the killers, witnesses seeing shooter on the grassy knoll, Warren Commission false report, Gerald Ford's involvement in it etc.?

[Anonymous No.15563495]

>>15562804
Roger Stone

[Anonymous No.15563538]

the devils chessboard and jfk and the unspeakable are both good. the fictional takes in libra and american tabloid are worth reading as well.

[Anonymous No.15563539]

>>15562804
>books that will validate the theory I’ve already decided on instead of actually informing me?
Also, pretty much everybody who goes down this rabbit hole (like Norman Mailer) subscribes to the lone gunman theory sooner or later

[Anonymous No.15563553]

>>15562804
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUtMMi5NXqw
This guy has a whole bookshelf on JFK.

[Anonymous No.15564607]

>>15563539
Fuck off and go back to wanking to your magic bullet theory, shill.

[Anonymous No.15564722]

>>15563539
idk about mailer specifically but there is way too much suspicious stuff around jfk to read anything and not come away perplexed. i am pretty agnostic on the specifics of the situation - oswald could very well have been the only shooter - but it seems incontrovertible that the CIA was at the very least monitoring him and more likely had some degree of influence in or foreknowledge of his plans.

read up on RFK and sirhan sirhan too, the official narrative is even thinner there.

[Anonymous No.15564753]

>>15563539
>>15564722
LBJ had the motive and the means to get rid of JFK, especially in Texas which he basically controlled. The two men hated each other, and enough groups had an interest in getting rid of JFK that the plan became feasible.

[Anonymous No.15564764]

>>15564722
Idk about the CIA, but the FBI was. Thing is, when you read about it you find out they destroyed a very thin file on him because of how bad it looked that they already had the guy under observation and still let him shoot the president.
Than theres stuff like the audio recording cited by HSCA which turned out to be undeniably fake (and this is the whole basis of the multiple shooter theory).
Just seems like most people come to the conclusion that Oswald wanted to be famous.
Mailer is good on the subject, although his book is kind of old. It’s good because he specifically set out to research and vindicate Oswald. But as he kept digging and digging he eventually realized that the guy totally did it and it was all because he was a nobody who wanted to be a somebody.

[Anonymous No.15564770]

>>15564753
Of all the theories, the LBJ one is definitely the stupidest. Cuba, CIA and even the mob are much more plausible

[Anonymous No.15564776]

>>15562804
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/books.htm
Here you go, these will completely demolish pretty much every conspiracy theory you've heard.

[Anonymous No.15564779]

>>15562804
Libra by Don DeLillo, and JFK and the Unspeakable by James Douglass. Any other answers are CIA shills

[Anonymous No.15564780]

>>15562804
all about money

[Anonymous No.15564836]

>>15564770
>Of all the theories, the LBJ one is definitely the stupidest.
It's actually the most plausible, but keep seething.

[Anonymous No.15565972]

it was done by CIA/Mossad so Israel could continue their nuclear program, also Ruby was under investigation by the FBI for selling plane parts to Israel, and pic related

[Anonymous No.15566001]

>>15562804
Right from the start. He proved it wasn’t Oswald, it was top brass at the Pentagon.
Later evidence shows LBJ was in the know if not orchestrated it.

[Anonymous No.15566016]

>>15564779
>Libra by Don DeLillo
seconded, the best book on the subject