/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.15473883]

Why are these antinatalist types ALWAYS ugly as fuck?

Cant take these incels seriously at all

[Anonymous No.15473897]

>>15473883
because why would a normal, attractive, socially well adjusted person be crying about "WAHHHHHH LIFE IS HARD SO HAVING KIDS IS EVIL"? They wouldn't. Only an ugly subhuman would believe such a thing.

[Anonymous No.15473910]

>>15473897
Well. They're not wrong. Life is hard if you're unattractive.

[Anonymous No.15473916]

>>15473883
>Why are these antinatalist types ALWAYS ugly as fuck?
Take a guess lmao

[Anonymous No.15473918]

>>15473883
>believes in physiognomy
>call other people incels

[Anonymous No.15473930]

>>15473883
You’d have to be an absolute genetic abomination, a spiritual black hole, to be that life denying.

[Anonymous No.15473932]

>>15473910
That is undoubtedly true, but that doesn't mean that procreation is morally wrong.

[Anonymous No.15473937]

>>15473883
What are you talking about

[Anonymous No.15473944]

>>15473937

[Anonymous No.15473950]

>>15473944

[Anonymous No.15473957]

>>15473950

[Anonymous No.15473963]

>>15473883
I would ask why a lifecuck has no empathy but it would answer itself. Like asking the ocean why it's wet

[Anonymous No.15473972]

>>15473957

[Anonymous No.15473975]

>>15473957
I must read mainlander, but how?

[Anonymous No.15473978]

>>15473918
Post chin

[Anonymous No.15473997]

I'm sure you're outwitted them this time, they probably have never thought about their appearance and why their less than stellar looks would give them a bleak outlook on life

[Anonymous No.15473998]

>>15473937
>>15473944
>>15473950
>>15473957
>>15473972
All of these guys are completely average 4-5/10, are these honestly the best example you have? That’s pretty sad.

[Anonymous No.15474011]

>>15473883
Were you tired of losing debates about this?

[Anonymous No.15474026]

>>15473998
They literally prove the point that not all antinatalists are "ugly as fuck"

So fuck off nigger

[Anonymous No.15474033]

>>15473883
After reflecting on this matter more, I cannot in good conscience support antinatalism to European peoples. I think there should be natalist incentives or policies for native Europeans and antinatalist ones for foreigners such as Muslims and Jews.

[Anonymous No.15474035]

>>15473883
Im a model and an antinatalist suck my asshole

[Anonymous No.15474036]

>>15473972
Younger Thomas Ligotti looks like he's the son of Lovecraft, such a qt desu.

[Anonymous No.15474037]

>>15473998
Shut your mouth about Schoppy right this instant.

[Anonymous No.15474060]

I sincerely doubt Schopenhauer would be supporting antinatalism during this present demographic displacement.

[Anonymous No.15474067]

>>15473998
cope harder faggot

[Anonymous No.15474073]

The antinatalist is immunized against all dangers:
one may call him a pussy, life-denier, mentally ill, a faggot, it all runs of him like water off a raincoat. But call him a genetic dead-end and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: 'I've been found out.'

[Anonymous No.15474078]

>>15474026
Are you a retard in general? Statistically if the 99th percentile of antinatalists in attractiveness looks like this >>15473950 a low test androgynous 5/10, then the average anti stalker is absolutely disgusting.

If anything it proves antinatslism is a cope for disgusting human abominations.

[Anonymous No.15474085]

>>15474067
Do you unironically think that’s attractive? I’m not Mekong, maybe it’s cause I went to college and hang out with normal young people but he unitonically loks pretty ugly to me.

[Anonymous No.15474093]

>>15474078
*antinatalist

[Anonymous No.15474098]

>>15473937
Error 404- Chin not found

[Anonymous No.15474102]

>>15474085
*meming

[Anonymous No.15474112]

>>15474078
being androgynous is peak /fa/ you fucking pleb. have you ever looked at the runway models of high end designers?

[Anonymous No.15474123]

Lotta coping subhumans on /lit/

[Anonymous No.15474134]

>>15474112
Have you ever tried not being a fag?

[Anonymous No.15474137]

>>15474123
you probably look like this

[Anonymous No.15474143]

>>15474112
Those are specifically chosen by the faggot designers because they look like lanky teenage boys.

Pic is peak female form.

[Anonymous No.15474145]

>>15474143
this girl looks like my girflriend. my heart actually skipped a beat for a second when i saw this picture

[Anonymous No.15474146]

>>15474112
This is the gayest shit I've read all day, just transition if you want to look feminine dude

[Anonymous No.15474153]

>>15474143
Is this a man?

[Anonymous No.15474157]

>>15474146
How fucking retarded do you have to be to think taking hormones and cutting your dick off is more reasonable than simply looking somewhat androgynous. Literally what retarded mindset could possibly rationalize this

[Anonymous No.15474170]

>>15474143
>female

[Anonymous No.15474173]

>>15474145
Ahaha thats a tranny my dude. ur girlfriend is a dude

[Anonymous No.15474185]

>>15474173
>>15474170
>>15474153
You need to take a break from 4chan if you have begun to visualize every female you see as having male genitalia. Do you ever wonder if your mom is a tranny when you look at her face?

[Anonymous No.15474204]

>>15474185
My mom is a bitch. She is also a bit inbred, and I learned of this through genetic testing. I am too afraid to confront her about this... My dad, however, comes from a royal line. All of my relatives on my dad's side are engineers, doctors, and architects. I hate my mom.

[Anonymous No.15474211]

>>15474123
good bait thread lad, thanks for the laffs doe
now i am out

>>15474134
>>15474143
>>15474146
if there is a peak human body aesthetic then it is androgyny. now cope harder for your shitty sense of aesthetics.

also pic related is peak female form.

[Anonymous No.15474217]

>>15474157
Androgyny is gross and ugly. It is a display either of a weak man or unfertile woman.The human species is a sexually dimorphic one, it is aesthetically the most beautiful when it becomes its fullest potential.

[Anonymous No.15474237]

>>15474211
>>15474217

[Anonymous No.15474249]

>>15474145
Does she have a sister anon?

[Anonymous No.15474260]

>>15474211
Anon, bad news. You're gay.

[Anonymous No.15474271]

>>15474217
mega based

[Anonymous No.15474279]

>>15474217
>>15474237
gymcel cope

[Anonymous No.15474313]

So let me get this straight, antinatalists are products of their condition and can't be trusted to speak objectively about life, but the enjoyers of life can? Like asking a wine taster if the destruction of all those grapes was worth it.

[Anonymous No.15474324]

>>15474279
Anon that boy looks malnourished. It makes me feel sad.

[Anonymous No.15474343]

>>15473998
Where as lovers of smug anime girls are famed for being atractive.

[Anonymous No.15474349]

>>15474204
You sound mentally ill.

[Anonymous No.15474351]

>natalists outing themselves as disgusting void parasites that crave the perfect flesh

kek like pottery

[Anonymous No.15474360]

>>15474343
Yes

[Anonymous No.15474372]

>>15474324
this guy is one of the most aesthetic man i have ever seen.

[Anonymous No.15474471]

From a Christian perspective, antinatalism is the most just thing you can do. In fact, if Christianity is true, every person should be forcibly sterilized in order to ensure nobody is born again, and that humanity goes willingly extinct. As heaven is the ultimate award and hell is the ultimate punishment, is it immoral to bring a life into the world, as this life may do things that damn it to hell (the ultimate punishment). Continuing natalistic society risks sending billions of future people to hell, while willing extinction prevents minimizes the amount of people who risk eternal suffering.
This is of course assuming that "unbaptized infants get damned" idea is true. If it's wrong, and aborted babies are saved, then the most just thing is to restructure society into an abortion factory, where babies are conceived and immediately terminated so that they are sent to heaven without a chance of sinning and being damned, maximizing the amount of eternal bliss while the amount of eternal suffering is, in comparison, so minimal that it is ultimately a non-factor.

[Anonymous No.15474472]

antinatalists:
>just having a bit of a laff. deconstructing copes with reason so they can watch normies seethe, probably the only thing that brings joy to their awful lives
natalists:
>immediately start talking about appearance and working out, posting about the perfect body when confronted with the MALIGNANT USELESSNESS of everything

[Anonymous No.15474526]

>>15473883
bro i know tom IRL and he has mad kids. i don't know why he published that book. he has like 20-30 kids

[Anonymous No.15474540]

>>15474526
yeah i have also heard this too
he even donated few of his kids to local charities

[Anonymous No.15475919]

>>15474036
That's not Ligotti, it's an often misattributed picture of Jean Cocteau

[Anonymous No.15475936]

>>15474540
>local charities
funded by Hilary and renowned for its pizza parties on Friday! Lots of happy clowns masquerading around and for once life isn't so icy bleak!

[Anonymous No.15475953]

>>15473883
Ugly faces correlate with brain damage, so likely their hormones are considerably fucked up hence leading to a stance that "all life is suffering".

[Anonymous No.15475987]

>>15475919
>it's an often misattributed picture of Jean Cocteau
How could that possibly be when there's hundreds of pictures of Jean Cocteau, he is standing in front of props from "Blood of a Poet" and the image even has his signature on it? Are anti-natalists really this intellectually handicapped?

[Anonymous No.15476008]

>>15473883
You sure it not the stomach problems and the mental illness making him a real downer?

[Anonymous No.15476305]

>>15473883
Sarah Perry is cute and super interesting:
https://youtu.be/GK-EzsD3-U0

[Anonymous No.15476589]

>>15473883
those who are left-wing, anti-life, spiteful, self-loathing are always ugly

https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/caveman-politics/201803/science-weighs-in-conservatives-look-better
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29355104/
https://www.susqu.edu/about-su/newsroom/research-finds-attractive-people-more-likely-to-be-conservative
https://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2018/01/beautiful_people_more_likely_t.html
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008733
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2807452/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322194494_Are_political_views_and_religiosity_related_to_facial_morphology_Evidence_from_a_Turkish_sample

>>15473918
>thinking physiognomy doesnt exist
>>15474035
sure bro
>>15474073
based
>>15474360
>attractive
>nigger

>>15473937
>>15473944
>>15473950
>>15473957
>>15474067
they may not be ugly but the thing is, with high intelligence also comes the potential for mental instability like schizophrenia and neuroticism, take kierkegaard as the prime example
or they are simply so autistic that they rationalise themselves into this, like a libertarian, and may not actually hate living or life

[Anonymous No.15476659]

>>15474036
>Younger Thomas Ligotti looks like he's the son of Lovecraft, such a qt desu.
To me he looks like Michael Corleone.

[Anonymous No.15476725]

>>15473932

Perhaps just in the lives of the ugly.