[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 1.36 MB, 193x135, 1296173961809.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1546074 No.1546074 [Reply] [Original]

You have ten seconds to be as 'post-modern' as possible.

GO!

>> No.1546076

whats a postmodern

>> No.1546082

>>1546076
"

>> No.1546090

phonies

>> No.1546100

EVERYTHING MEANS NOTHING CUZ LANGUAGE MEANS NOTHING DURR

>> No.1546103

It's all relative, really.

>> No.1546105
File: 49 KB, 315x394, baudrillard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1546105

Now we have passed from the commodity law, of value to the structural law of value, and this coincides with the obliteration of the social form known as production. Given this, are we still within a capitalist mode? It may be that we are in a hyper-capitalist mode, or in a very different order. Is the form of capital bound to the law of value in general, or to some specific form of the law of value (perhaps we are really already within a socialist mode? Perhaps this metamorphosis of capital under the sign of the structural law of value is merely its socialist outcome? Oh dear ...)? If the life and death of capital are staked on the commodity law of value, if the revolution is staked on the mode of production, then we are within neither capital nor revolution. If this latter consists in a liberation of the social and generic production of man, then there is no longer any prospect of a revolution since there is no more production.

>> No.1546107

Auspe Lawrence was my captcha