[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 151 KB, 852x900, ramanujacharya.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15221622 No.15221622 [Reply] [Original]

>Ramauja agreed with Shankara they just emphasise different aspects it's all orthodox bro
t. Rene Gaynon

Here is what Ramanuja actually says about the avdaita vedanta doctrine (Brahma Sutra Bhashya 1.1.1):
>This entire theory rests on a fictitious foundation of altogether hollow and vicious arguments, incapable of being stated in definite logical alternatives, and devised by men who are destitute of those particular qualities which cause individuals to be chosen by the Supreme Person revealed in the Upanishads; whose intellects are darkened by the impression of beginningless evil; and who thus have no insight into the nature of words and sentences, into the real purport conveyed by them, and into the procedure of sound argumentation, with all its methods depending on perception and the other instruments of right knowledge. The theory therefore must needs be rejected by all those who, through texts, perception and the other means of knowledge — assisted by sound reasoning — have an insight into the true nature of things.

>> No.15223346

>>15221622
based

>> No.15223424
File: 236 KB, 812x792, soynon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15223424

>>15221622
Here he was merely speaking exoterically, not esoterically. One who is aware of the fundamental unity of all Traditions knows this.

>> No.15223434

>>15221622
Ramanuja and Madhvacharya continue to blast shit in Shankara's smug little face

>> No.15223654

>>15223424
>even monkeys have their own onions bugmen
Kek. So is this the sacral being Guenon (pizza be upon him) reincarnated from?